Standardized mean of a contrast variable

From HandWiki

In statistics, the standardized mean of a contrast variable (SMCV or SMC), is a parameter assessing effect size. The SMCV is defined as mean divided by the standard deviation of a contrast variable.[1][2] The SMCV was first proposed for one-way ANOVA cases [2] and was then extended to multi-factor ANOVA cases.[3]

Background

Consistent interpretations for the strength of group comparison, as represented by a contrast, are important.[4][5]

When there are only two groups involved in a comparison, SMCV is the same as the strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD). SSMD belongs to a popular type of effect-size measure called "standardized mean differences"[6] which includes Cohen's d[7] and Glass's δ.[8]

In ANOVA, a similar parameter for measuring the strength of group comparison is standardized effect size (SES).[9] One issue with SES is that its values are incomparable for contrasts with different coefficients. SMCV does not have such an issue.

Concept

Suppose the random values in t groups represented by random variables G1,G2,…,Gt have means μ1,μ2,…,μt and variances σ12,σ22,…,σt2, respectively. A contrast variable V is defined by

V=∑i=1tciGi,

where the ci's are a set of coefficients representing a comparison of interest and satisfy ∑i=1tci=0. The SMCV of contrast variable V, denoted by λ, is defined as[1]

λ=E⁡(V)stdev⁡(V)=∑i=1tciμiVar(∑i=1tciGi)=∑i=1tciμi∑i=1tci2σi2+2∑i=1t∑j=icicjσij

where σij is the covariance of Gi and Gj. When G1,G2,…,Gt are independent,

λ=∑i=1tciμi∑i=1tci2σi2.

Classifying rule for the strength of group comparisons

The population value (denoted by λ ) of SMCV can be used to classify the strength of a comparison represented by a contrast variable, as shown in the following table.[1][2] This classifying rule has a probabilistic basis due to the link between SMCV and c+-probability.[1]

Effect type Effect subtype Thresholds for negative SMCV Thresholds for positive SMCV
Extra large Extremely strong λ≤−5 λ≥5
Very strong −5<λ≤−3 5>λ≥3
Strong −3<λ≤−2 3>λ≥2
Fairly strong −2<λ≤−1.645 2>λ≥1.645
Large Moderate −1.645<λ≤−1.28 1.645>λ≥1.28
Fairly moderate −1.28<λ≤−1 1.28>λ≥1
Medium Fairly weak −1<λ≤−0.75 1>λ≥0.75
Weak −0.75<λ<−0.5 0.75>λ>0.5
Very weak −0.5≤λ<−0.25 0.5≥λ>0.25
Small Extremely weak −0.25≤λ<0 0.25≥λ>0
No effect λ=0

Statistical estimation and inference

The estimation and inference of SMCV presented below is for one-factor experiments.[1][2] Estimation and inference of SMCV for multi-factor experiments has also been discussed.[1][3]

The estimation of SMCV relies on how samples are obtained in a study. When the groups are correlated, it is usually difficult to estimate the covariance among groups. In such a case, a good strategy is to obtain matched or paired samples (or subjects) and to conduct contrast analysis based on the matched samples. A simple example of matched contrast analysis is the analysis of paired difference of drug effects after and before taking a drug in the same patients. By contrast, another strategy is to not match or pair the samples and to conduct contrast analysis based on the unmatched or unpaired samples. A simple example of unmatched contrast analysis is the comparison of efficacy between a new drug taken by some patients and a standard drug taken by other patients. Methods of estimation for SMCV and c+-probability in matched contrast analysis may differ from those used in unmatched contrast analysis.

Unmatched samples

Consider an independent sample of size ni,

Yi=(Yi1,Yi2,…,Yini)

from the ith(i=1,2,…,t) group Gi. Yi's are independent. Let Y¯i=1ni∑j=1niYij,

si2=1ni−1∑j=1ni(Yij−Y¯i)2,
N=∑i=1tni

and

MSE =1N−t∑i=1t(ni−1)si2.

When the t groups have unequal variance, the maximal likelihood estimate (MLE) and method-of-moment estimate (MM) of SMCV (λ) are, respectively[1][2]

λ^MLE =∑i=1tciY¯i∑i=1tni−1nici2si2

and

λ^MM=∑i=1tciY¯i∑i=1tci2si2.

When the t groups have equal variance, under normality assumption, the uniformly minimal variance unbiased estimate (UMVUE) of SMCV (λ) is[1][2]

λ^UMVUE=KN−t∑i=1tciY¯i∑i=1tMSE ci2

where K=2(Γ(N−t2))2(Γ(N−t−12))2.

The confidence interval of SMCV can be made using the following non-central t-distribution:[1][2]

T=∑i=1tciY¯i∑i=1tMSE ci2/ni∼noncentral t(N−t,bλ)

where b=∑i=1tci2∑i=1tci2/ni.

Matched samples

In matched contrast analysis, assume that there are n independent samples (Y1j,Y2j,⋯,Ytj) from t groups (Gi's), where i=1,2,⋯,t;j=1,2,⋯,n. Then the jth observed value of a contrast V=∑i=1tciGi is vj=∑i=1tciYi.

Let V¯ and sV2 be the sample mean and sample variance of the contrast variable V, respectively. Under normality assumptions, the UMVUE estimate of SMCV is[1]

λ^UMVUE=Kn−1V¯sV

where K=2(Γ(n−12))2(Γ(n−22))2.

A confidence interval for SMCV can be made using the following non-central t-distribution:[1]

T=V¯sV/n∼noncentral t(n−1,nλ).

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 Zhang XHD (2011). Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Practical Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Genome-scale RNAi Research. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-73444-8. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Zhang XHD (2009). "A method for effectively comparing gene effects in multiple conditions in RNAi and expression-profiling research". Pharmacogenomics 10 (3): 345–58. doi:10.2217/14622416.10.3.345. PMID 20397965. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Zhang XHD (2010). "Assessing the size of gene or RNAi effects in multifactor high-throughput experiments". Pharmacogenomics 11 (2): 199–213. doi:10.2217/PGS.09.136. PMID 20136359. 
  4. ↑ Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press. 2000. ISBN 0-521-65980-9. 
  5. ↑ Huberty CJ (2002). "A history of effect size indices". Educational and Psychological Measurement 62 (2): 227–40. doi:10.1177/0013164402062002002. 
  6. ↑ Kirk RE (1996). "Practical significance: A concept whose time has come". Educational and Psychological Measurement 56 (5): 746–59. doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002. 
  7. ↑ Cohen J (1962). "The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65: 145–53. doi:10.1037/h0045186. PMID 13880271. 
  8. ↑ Glass GV (1976). "Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research". Educational Researcher 5 (10): 3–8. doi:10.3102/0013189X005010003. 
  9. ↑ Steiger JH (2004). "Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis". Psychological Methods 9 (2): 164–82. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.2.164. PMID 15137887.