Synergistic system

From HandWiki
Short description: System of nonlinear differential equations

A Synergistic system (or S-system)[1] is a collection of ordinary nonlinear differential equations

dxidt=αij=1n+mxigijβjj=1n+mxihij(i=1,...,n)

where the xi are positive real, αi and βi are non-negative real, called the rate constant(or, kinetic rates) and gij and hij are real exponential, called kinetic orders. These terms are based on the chemical equilibrium[2]

One variable S-system[3]

In the case of n=1(i=1) and m=0, the given S-system equation can be written as

 dxdt=αxgβxh 

Under the non-zero steady condition, dx0dt=0, the following non-linear equation can be transformed into an ordinary differential equation(ODE).

Transformation one variable S-system into a first-order ODE

Let x=elogx=ey(with x0=ey0) Then, given a one-variable S-system is

dydt=αe(g1)yβe(h1)y

Apply a non-zero steady condition to the given equation

0=dy0dt=αe(g1)y0βe(h1)y0, or equivalently αe(g1)y0=βe(h1)y0

Thus, y0=logβlogαgh(or, x0=(βα)1gh)

If dydt can be approximated around y=y0, remaining the first two terms,

dydtαe(g1)y0+αe(g1)y0(g1)(yy0)βe(g1)y0βe(h1)y0(h1)(yy0)

By non-zero steady condition, αe(g1)y0=βe(h1)y0, a nonlinear one-variable S-system can be transformed into a first-order ODE:

dudt(αe(g1)y0(gh))u=(Fa)u

where F=αe(g1)y0, a=gh, and u=yy0xx0x0, called a percentage variation.

Two variables S-system[3]

In the case of n=2(i=1,2) and m=0 , the S-system equation can be written as system of (non-linear) differential equations.

{dx1dt=α1x1g11x2g21β1x1h11x2h21 dx2dt=α2x2g21x2g22β2x1h21x2h22

Assume non-zero steady condition, dxi0dt=0.

Transformation two variables S-system into a second-order ODE

By putting xi=elogxi=eyi . The given system of equations can be written as

{du1dt=c11u1+c12u2 du2dt=c21u1+c22u2

(where ui=yiyi0, ui=yiyi0 and cij(i,j=1,2) are constant.

Since d2u1dt2=c11du1dt+c12du2dt, the given system of equation can be approximated as a second-order ODE:

d2u1dt2(c11+c22)du1dt+(c11c22c12c21)u1=0,

Applications

Mass-action Law[2]

Consider the following chemical pathway:

A+2BkA1CkA23D+E

where k1 and k2 are rate constants.

Then the mass-action law applied to species C gives the equation

d[C]dt=k1[A][B]2k2[D]3[E]

(where [A] is a concentration of A etc.)

Komarova Model (Bone Remodeling)[4][5]

Komarova Model is an example of a two-variable system of non-linear differential equations that describes bone remodeling. This equation is regulated by biochemical factors called paracrine and autocrine, which quantify the bone mass in each step.

{dx1dt=α1x1g11x2g21β1x1dx2dt=α2x1g12x2g22β2x2dzdt=k1y1+k2y2

Where

  • x1, x2: The number of osteoclast/osteoblasts
  • α1, α2: Osteoclast/Osteoblast production rate
  • β1, β2: Osteoclast/Osteoblast removal rate
  • gij: Paracrine factor on the j-cell due to the presence of i-cell
  • z: The bone mass percentage
  • yi: Let xi¯ be the difference between the number of osteoclasts/osteoblasts and its steady state. Then yi:=12[(xixi¯)+(xixi¯))]

Modified Komarova Model (Bone Remodeling with Tumor affecting, Bone metastasis)[6]

The modified Komarova Model describes the tumor effect on the osteoclasts and osteoblasts rate. The following equation can be described as

{dx1dt=α1(ω)^x1g11x2g21β1(ω)^x1dx2dt=α2(ω)^x2g22β2(ω)^x2dωdt=μωlog(σLωω)

(with initial condition x1(0)=x10, x2(0)=x20, and ω(0)=ω0)

Where

  • x1, x2: The number of osteoclast/osteoblasts.
  • ω=ω(t) : The tumor representation depending on time t
  • α1(ω)^,α2(ω)^: The representation of the activity of cell production
  • β1(ω)^,β2(ω)^: The representation of the activity of cell removal
  • gij: The net effectiveness of osteoclast/osteoblast derived autocrine and paracrine factors
  • μ : The tumor cell proliferation rate
  • Lω: The upper limit value for tumor cells
  • σ : Scaling constant of tumor growth


References

  1. Savageau, Michael A. (1988-01-01). "Introduction to S-systems and the underlying power-law formalism". Mathematical and Computer Modelling 11: 546–551. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(88)90553-5. ISSN 0895-7177. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tournier, Laurent (2005-07-24). "Approximation of dynamical systems using s-systems theory: Application to biological systems". Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation. ISSAC '05. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 317–324. doi:10.1145/1073884.1073928. ISBN 978-1-59593-095-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1073884.1073928. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Savageau, Michael A.; Rosen, Robert (1976). Biochemical systems analysis: a study of function and design in molecular biology. Advanced book program (40th Anniversary ed.). London: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-06738-5. 
  4. Komarova, Svetlana V.; Smith, Robert J.; Dixon, S. Jeffrey; Sims, Stephen M.; Wahl, Lindi M. (August 2003). "Mathematical model predicts a critical role for osteoclast autocrine regulation in the control of bone remodeling". Bone 33 (2): 206–215. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00157-1. ISSN 8756-3282. PMID 14499354. 
  5. Ramtani, Salah; Sánchez, Juan Felipe; Boucetta, Abdelkader; Kraft, Reuben; Vaca-González, Juan Jairo; Garzón-Alvarado, Diego A. (June 2023). "A coupled mathematical model between bone remodeling and tumors: a study of different scenarios using Komarova's model". Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 22 (3): 925–945. doi:10.1007/s10237-023-01689-3. ISSN 1617-7940. PMID 36922421. 
  6. Ayati, Bruce P.; Edwards, Claire M.; Webb, Glenn F.; Wikswo, John P. (2010-04-20). "A mathematical model of bone remodeling dynamics for normal bone cell populations and myeloma bone disease". Biology Direct 5: 28. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-28. ISSN 1745-6150. PMID 20406449.