Ziv–Zakai bound

From HandWiki
Short description: Theoretical bound used in estimation theory

The Ziv–Zakai bound (named after Jacob Ziv and Moshe Zakai[1]) is used in theory of estimations to provide a lower bound on possible-probable error involving some random parameter X from a noisy observation Y. The bound work by connecting probability of the excess error to the hypothesis testing. The bound is considered to be tighter than Cramér–Rao bound albeit more involved. Several modern version of the bound have been introduced [2] subsequent of the first version which was published 1969.[1]

Simple Form of the Bound

Suppose we want to estimate a random variable X with the probability density fX from a noisy observation Y, then for any estimator g a simple form of Ziv-Zakai bound is given by[1]

𝔼[|Xg(Y)|2]120t(fX(x)+fX(x+t))Pe(x,x+t)dxdt,

where Pe(x,x+t) is the minimum (Bayes) error probability for the binary hypothesis testing problem between

0:YX=x1:YX=x+t

with prior probabilities Pr(0)=fX(x)fX(x)+fX(x+t) and Pr(1)=1Pr(0).

Generalization

The original lower bound can be tightened by introducing a notion of the valley-filling function, which for a function f

𝒱t(f)=supu:utf(u)

with the bound given by

𝔼[|Xg(Y)|2]120t𝒱{(fX(x)+fX(x+t))Pe(x,x+t)dx}dt,

The most general version of the bound, which holds for both continuous and discrete random vectors, is also available.[3]

Tightness

Ziv-Zakai bound has some general tightness guarantees, such as[3]

  • For continuous random variables:
    • The bound is tight in the high signal-to-noise ratio regime for continuous random vectors.
    • In the low signal-to-noise ratio regime, the bound is tight if unimodal and symmetric with respect to its mode.
  • For discrete random variables:
    • The bound requires a valley-filling function; otherwise, the bound is equal to zero.
    • The bound is typically not tight for discrete random variables.
    • A version of the bound known as the single point Ziv-Zakai bound is generally tighter than other versions of Ziv-Zakai.


Applications

The Ziv-Zakai bound has several appealing advantages. Unlike the other bounds, in fact, the Ziv-Zakai bound only requires one regularity condition, that is, the parameter under estimation needs to have a probability density function; this is one of the key advantages of the Ziv-Zakai bound . Hence, the Ziv-Zakai bound has a broader applicability than, for instance, the Cramér-Rao bound, which requires several smoothness assumptions on the probability density function of the estimand.

  • quantum parameter estimation [4]
  • time delay estimation [5]
  • time of arrival estimation [6]
  • direction of arrival estimation [7]
  • MIMO radar [8]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ziv, J.; Zakai, M. (1969). "Some lower bounds on signal parameter estimation". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 15 (3): 386–391. doi:10.1109/TIT.1969.1054301. 
  2. Bell, K.; Steinberg, Y.; Ephraim, Y.; Van Trees, H. (1997). "Extended Ziv–Zakai lower bound for vector parameter estimation". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 43 (2): 624–637. doi:10.1109/18.556118. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Jeong, M.; Dytso, A.; Cardone, M. (2025). "A Comprehensive Study on Ziv-Zakai Lower Bounds on the MMSE". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (IEEE) 71 (4): 3214–3236. doi:10.1109/TIT.2025.3541987. 
  4. Tsang, M. (June 2012). "Ziv–Zakai error bounds for quantum parameter estimation". Physical Review Letters 108 (23). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.230401. PMID 23003924. Bibcode2012PhRvL.108w0401T. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.230401. Retrieved 2025-02-16. 
  5. Mishra, K. V.; Eldar, Y. C. (2017). "Performance of time delay estimation in a cognitive radar". IEEE. pp. 3141–3145. 
  6. Driusso, M.; Comisso, M.; Babich, F.; Marshall, C. (2015). "Performance analysis of time of arrival estimation on OFDM signals". IEEE Signal Processing Letters 22 (7): 983–987. doi:10.1109/LSP.2014.2378994. Bibcode2015ISPL...22..983D. 
  7. Wen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, C.; Shi, Z. (2024). "Ziv–Zakai bound for DOA estimation with gain–phase error". IEEE. pp. 8681–8685. 
  8. Chiriac, V. M.; Haimovich, A. M. (2010). "Ziv–Zakai lower bound on target localization estimation in MIMO radar systems". IEEE. pp. 678–683.