Biology:Daohugouthallus
| Daohugouthallus | |
|---|---|
| |
| Simplified sketch diagram of the D. ciliiferus fossil holotype. | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Fungi |
| Division: | Ascomycota |
| Class: | Lecanoromycetes |
| Family: | †Daohugouthallaceae X.L.Wei, D.Ren & J.C.Wei (2022) |
| Genus: | †Daohugouthallus Wang, Krings & Taylor (2010) |
| Species: | †D. ciliiferus
|
| Binomial name | |
| †Daohugouthallus ciliiferus Wang, Krings & Taylor (2010)
| |
Daohugouthallus is an extinct genus of lichen which was found in the Jurassic Haifanggou Formation near Daohugou village, Ningcheng County, China.[1] It contains a single species, D. ciliiferus, and while it is considered to be most closely related to Parmeliaceae, a monogeneric family Daohugouthallaceae has been proposed.[2] This macrolichen has been dated at approximately 165 Ma. It is thought that D. ciliiferus was a gymnosperm epiphyte and thus the earliest fossil example of an epiphytic macrolichen.[2]
Discovery
Five specimens of Daohugouthallus ciliiferus have been found so far. These were collected from the fossiliferous beds of the Jurassic Haifanggou Formation in China (Callovian–Oxfordian boundary interval, Middle Jurassic),[1][2] a formation which has been dated at between 168 and 152 Ma based on isotopic analyses.[3] More specifically, the site of discovery can be found about 80 km to the south of Chifeng City, within the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (lat.119°14.318′E, long. 41°18.979′N).[2]
On first discovery, it was thought that the D. ciliiferus was a “lichen-like” organism. It was considered to be affiliated with either thallose liverworts, alga, or lichens. Due to a lack of diagnostic features which would ally the species with liverworts or alga, D. ciliiferus was determined to be most closely affiliated with lichens. This is based primarily on the fossil thalli and ruptured branch tips, making this species the earliest known example of a macrolichen with morphology comparable to that of extant lichen species.[2] The species has been listed under the 2022 in paleontology events overview and as a floristic component of the Daohugou flora.[4]
D. ciliiferus fossil specimens are currently kept in Beijing, at the Key Lab of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes within the College of Life Sciences and Academy for Multidisciplinary Studies at Capital Normal University.[2]
Preservation
Daohugouthallus ciliiferus specimens are preserved as lichen adpression fossils left on a yellowish tuffaceous mudstone matrix.[2] In total, five specimens containing D. ciliiferus lichen have been recorded, with some fossils also containing remains of an unidentified gymnosperm with associated seed cones.[2][5]
Etymology
Daohugouthallus ciliiferus fossil specimens were found near Daohugou village in Ningcheng County. The village lends its name to the first part of the genus “Daohugou” while the second part “thallus” is a Latin term which refers to a plant-like body without typical differentiation into parts such as roots, stems and leaves. “Ciliiferus” comes from the Latin for bearing cilia, referring to the presence of cilia present in this macrolichen.[2]
Description
The thalli of Daohugouthallus ciliiferus are approximately 5 cm high and 3 cm wide and foliose to subfruticose. The slender lobes have tapering tips and are approximately 5 mm long and between 0.5 and 1.5 mm wide. Their branching pattern is irregular, and in some places lateral cilia and lobules are present. Aggregated, punctiform black spots are regularly visible on the surface of the lichen remnants, and the upper cortex is approximately 1 µm thick and described as conglutinate, i.e. stuck together.[2]
The photobiont component of the D. ciliiferus specimens is comparable to extant green algae species. These cells are globose with a diameter of between 1.5 and 2.5 µm. The mycobiont-photobiont attachment is via wall-to-wall interface, allowing nutrient exchange between the fungal and algal components.[6] The fungal hyphae of the mycobiont component are filamentous and septate with a diameter of less than 1.25 µm. Both the photobiont cells and fungal hyphae are narrower than those of extant macrolichen species which could be due to drying during the fossilisation process which caused shrinkage. Alternatively, the photobiont algae species could have been naturally smaller in size in this lichen species.[2] No alternative explanation has been proposed as to why the fungal hyphae are smaller than those in comparable extant macrolichens.
With an estimated age of around 165 Ma, Daohugouthallaceae could be the oldest known macrolichen family aside from Icmadophilaceae. It has been confirmed that D. ciliiferus was an gymnosperm epiphyte due to the more recent specimens being found attached to an unidentified gymnosperm branch. However, the key identification features for determining the way in which the macrolichen attached itself to the branch or bark, such as rhizines, tomentum, or an umbilicus, are missing.[2]
Classification
When compared to extant lichen genera, it has been found that the thallus morphology is most similar to foliose Parmeliaceae. However, the resemblance is not morphologically close enough to include D. ciliiferus in the Parmeliaceae family. For this reason, a monogeneric family has been proposed for this fossil – Daohugouthallaceae –with the unique genus Daohugouthallus.[2] The consensus is that D. ciliiferus could be described within the class Lecanoromycetes but the Phylum is currently Fungi incertae sedis, i.e. uncertain placement.[7] The external morphology could be closely correlated to the extant lichen species Everniastrum cirrhatum.[5] However, several key diagnostic features which would allow for a more accurate classification are missing including hamathecia, asci, and ascospore structures.[2]
Phylogeny
A simplified cladogram for D. ciliiferus, following the phylogeny of Wang, Krings & Taylor (2010); Yang et al. (2023).
| Lecanoromycetes |
| ||||||||||||
Palaeoenvironment
The Middle Jurassic palaeoenvironment of the Daohuguo area can be visualised as temperate, humid and seasonal, with variations in precipitation.[4] The landscape was composed of gymnosperm-dominated forests interspersed with lakes and freshwater streams. This environment may have been affected by large volcanic eruptions which spread thick layers of ash across the landscape.[2]
Palaeoecology
The climate and conditions prior to the discovery of D. ciliiferus may support its epiphytic habit. Lecanoromycetes are estimated to have diverged between 300 and 250 Mya following the end-Permian mass extinction.[8] This period is partially characterised by diverse gymnosperm forests which may have provided the ideal environment for the adaptation of epiphytic macrolichens. Forest ecosystems similar to these recovered again following the end-Triassic mass extinction (200 Mya).[9] This makes it possible for the existence of gymnosperm epiphytic lichens during the middle-Jurassic from which D. ciliiferus is dated.[2] However, there is no empiric fossil evidence to support this evolutionary path nor the potential transition of epiphytic lichens from gymnosperm to angiosperm substrates.[8]
Insect-lichen mimesis
A moth lacewing genera – Lichenipolystoechotes – may have been associated with D. ciliiferus via a mimetic relationship. Two new species of moth lacewing were described from fossils found at Daohugou 1 (near Daohugou Village, China) at the Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation, close to the site in which D. ciliiferus fossils were found. They were given the genus Lichenipolystoechotes (family Ithonidae) to indicate their possible association with D. ciliiferus lichen.[5]
Structural similarities between the branching patterns on the wings of the insect fossil specimens of Lichenipolystoechotes and thalli of D. ciliiferus could indicate the earliest known example of insect-lichen mimesis. Additionally, black spots present on the wings of one fossil species, Lichenipolystoechotes ramimaculatus, resemble the black spots found on D. ciliiferus specimens. It has been hypothesised that these moth lacewings could have camouflaged themselves effectively against a backdrop of D. ciliiferus lichen, providing them with a survival advantage.[5] However, evidence of the evolution of insect-lichen mimesis is largely missing in the fossil record and this potential lichen-insect mimesis requires further investigation.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Wang, Xin; Krings, Michael; Taylor, Thomas N. (2010-11-01). "A thalloid organism with possible lichen affinity from the Jurassic of northeastern China" (in en). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 162 (4): 591–598. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.07.005. ISSN 0034-6667. Bibcode: 2010RPaPa.162..591W. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666710001545.
- ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 Yang, Qiuxia; Wang, Yanyan; Lücking, Robert; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten; Du, Zhenyong; Chen, Yunkang; Bai, Ming; Ren, Dong et al. (2023-01-20). "The Jurassic epiphytic macrolichen Daohugouthallus reveals the oldest lichen-plant interaction in a Mesozoic forest ecosystem" (in en). iScience 26 (1): 105770. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105770. ISSN 2589-0042. PMID 36590161. Bibcode: 2023iSci...26j5770Y.
- ↑ He, H. Y. (2004). "40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating of ignimbrite from Inner Mongolia, northeastern China, indicates a post-Middle Jurassic age for the overlying Daohugou Bed" (in en). Geophysical Research Letters 31 (20): L20609. doi:10.1029/2004GL020792. ISSN 0094-8276. Bibcode: 2004GeoRL..3120609H. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2004GL020792.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Na, Yuling; Sun, Chunlin; Wang, Hongshan; Dilcher, David L.; Li, Yunfeng; Li, Tao (2017-12-01). "A brief introduction to the Middle Jurassic Daohugou Flora from Inner Mongolia, China" (in en). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 247: 53–67. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.08.003. ISSN 0034-6667. Bibcode: 2017RPaPa.247...53N. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666717300684.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Fang, Hui; Labandeira, Conrad C; Ma, Yiming; Zheng, Bingyu; Ren, Dong; Wei, Xinli; Liu, Jiaxi; Wang, Yongjie (2020-07-29). Perry, George H; Lücking, Robert; Peñalver, Enrique. eds. "Lichen mimesis in mid-Mesozoic lacewings". eLife 9: e59007. doi:10.7554/eLife.59007. ISSN 2050-084X. PMID 32723477.
- ↑ Watkinson, Sarah C. (2016-01-01), Watkinson, Sarah C.; Boddy, Lynne; Money, Nicholas P., eds., "Chapter 7 - Mutualistic Symbiosis Between Fungi and Autotrophs" (in en), The Fungi (Third Edition) (Boston: Academic Press): pp. 205–243, ISBN 978-0-12-382034-1, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123820341000074, retrieved 2023-02-08
- ↑ Rees, Tony (2013-04-04). "IRMNG - Daohugouthallus X.". https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1465803.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Huang, Jen-Pan; Kraichak, Ekaphan; Leavitt, Steven D.; Nelsen, Matthew P.; Lumbsch, H. Thorsten (2019-06-28). "Accelerated diversifications in three diverse families of morphologically complex lichen-forming fungi link to major historical events" (in en). Scientific Reports 9 (1): 8518. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44881-1. ISSN 2045-2322. PMID 31253825. Bibcode: 2019NatSR...9.8518H.
- ↑ Bonis, Nina R.; Kürschner, Wolfram M. (2012). "Vegetation history, diversity patterns, and climate change across the Triassic/Jurassic boundary" (in en). Paleobiology 38 (2): 240–264. doi:10.1666/09071.1. ISSN 0094-8373. Bibcode: 2012Pbio...38..240B. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/vegetation-history-diversity-patterns-and-climate-change-across-the-triassicjurassic-boundary/A12AF62EF39ECFCC72CFA3E797F15FC3.
External links
- Geological information for the Jiulongshan Formation at Daohugou Village
- Earliest fossil evidence of an insect lichen mimic
Wikidata ☰ Q116846935 entry
 |  |
