Biology:Sewage fungus

From HandWiki
Revision as of 01:02, 10 February 2024 by AstroAI (talk | contribs) (url)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
A photo of sewage fungus (brown/white 'cotton wool' like blanket over a riverbed)
A photo of sewage fungus found in the River Crane (London, England) suspected as a consequence of airport de-icers.

Sewage fungus is a polymicrobial biofilm that proliferates in saprobic rivers[1] and has been frequently used as a bioindicator[2][3] of organic river pollution for the past century.[4] Its presence has been strongly associated with discharges of untreated or inadequately treated sewage,[5][6][7][8] yet its presence extends beyond these areas, with contributors including airport de-icers,[9][10][11] papermill effluents,[12] and agricultural runoff.[13][14]

The name "sewage fungus" is somewhat of a misnomer,[4] as these growths are not primarily fungal in nature. Instead, they are complex polymicrobial biofilms bound within a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances. Taxa most frequently associated with sewage fungus include Sphaerotilus natans, Zoogloea spp., Beggiatoa alba, and Rhodoferax spp.[10][15][16]

Environmental Impacts

In addition to being a bioindicator of organic pollution in rivers and playing a vital role utilizing excess organic carbon in fluvial systems, sewage fungus causes significant ecological impacts through direct and indirect ecological pathways.

Sewage fungus thrives in the low dissolved oxygen (DO) environment of an organically polluted river.[3][16][17][18] Whilst DO is required for sewage fungus growth, it readily outcompetes other benthic organisms at low DO,[19][20][21] quickly smothering riverbeds, greatly altering the benthic habitat for invertebrates[22][23] and fish spawning.[1][24][25] The dominating growth of sewage fungus also reduces hyporheic exchange flows, an important part of a rivers self-cleaning system.[26][27] Similar river biofilms are also reported to accumulate heavy metals[28][29] and other toxic substances.[30] within their matrix causing ecological impacts throughout the food web.[31][32] As a heterotroph, sewage fungus uses considerably higher DO than an aquatic macrophyte of the same mass,[33] it can maintain DO concentrations below thresholds required for other organisms. Once sewage fungus becomes established, it is difficult to remove,[34] unless all sources of organic nutrients (pollution) are addressed, causing a further loss in biodiversity[35] and other flora and fauna[36][37] in the river. These ecological impacts and the striking visible presence of sewage fungus growth on a riverbed further affects people's perceptions and use of rivers.[6][38]

Microbial composition

Sewage fungus is a polymicrobial biofilm and the specific composition of which is affected by the available nutrients (especially organic carbon sources) and the environmental drivers of each unique occurrence. However, several key taxa are reported as highly frequent and dominant within sewage fungus.

Sphaerotilus, and especially S. natans, has been strongly associated with sewage fungus since its inception[4] and continues to be regarded as a key sewage fungus taxon.[10][11] Consequently, Sphaerotilus has been used seemingly synonymously with sewage fungus and a series of laboratory studies use S. natans as sewage fungus.[24][39][40]

Other key taxa include the bacteria Zoogloea spp., Beggiatoa spp., Thiothrix II, Flavobacterium spp., and Flexibacter spp..[15][16] However, fungi (e.g., Leptomitus lacteus, Geotrichium candidum, and Fusarium aquaeductuum), algae (e.g., Cladophora glomerata) along with archaea and protozoa (e.g., Carchesium polypinum) also form integral and important pasts of the biofilm.

Recent genomic studies of sewage fungus composition have identified some of these taxa within airport de-icer implicated occurrences but have also identified new taxa not previously associated with sewage fungus. Exton et al (2023) identified Rhodoferax as a dominant component of sewage fungus,[10] whereas Nott et al (2020) noted the presence of Thiothrix.[11]

Drivers of sewage fungus

Alongside the complex nutrient utilisation requirements of sewage fungus, there are several key environmental drivers including substrate type, flow velocity, temperature, shading/sunlight, and water chemistry (e.g. pH).

Flowing water is a requirement for sewage fungus growth, to provide a constant replenishment of nutrients.[1][3][41] However, if the velocity of the river is too fast, then growths are scoured away, especially on more readily mobilised substrates. In turn, the specific flow of the river shapes the morphotype and structure of the biofilm.[42] Intrinsically the substrate affects the upper limit of flow as more stable riverbeds are less readily mobilised in periods of higher flows. Surfaces such as large cobbles, anthropogenic litter (e.g., bricks), and concrete channels facilitate excellent sewage fungus growth, whereas fine sediments and gravel provide a less stable substrate.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Curtis, E.J.C. (May 1969). "Sewage fungus: Its nature and effects" (in en). Water Research 3 (5): 289–311. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(69)90084-0. Bibcode1969WatRe...3..289C. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135469900840. 
  2. "Freshwater Biology and Ecology Handbook". https://fwrinformationcentre.co.uk/biology-and-ecology-handbook/. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Quinn, McFarlane (1985). "Sewage fungus as a monitor of water quality". Biological Monitoring in Freshwaters: Proceedings of a Seminar. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261028452. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Butcher, R.W. (August 1932). "Contribution to our knowledge of the ecology of sewage fungus" (in en). Transactions of the British Mycological Society 17 (1–2): 112–IN4. doi:10.1016/S0007-1536(32)80029-X. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000715363280029X. 
  5. Chonova, Teofana; Labanowski, Jérôme; Cournoyer, Benoit; Chardon, Cécile; Keck, François; Laurent, Élodie; Mondamert, Leslie; Vasselon, Valentin et al. (April 2018). "River biofilm community changes related to pharmaceutical loads emitted by a wastewater treatment plant" (in en). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (10): 9254–9264. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0024-0. ISSN 0944-1344. PMID 28884270. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-017-0024-0. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Curtis, E.J.C.; Harrington, D.W. (June 1971). "The occurrence of sewage fungus in rivers in the United Kingdom" (in en). Water Research 5 (6): 281–290. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(71)90173-4. Bibcode1971WatRe...5..281C. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135471901734. 
  7. Harrison, Heukelekian (1958). "Slime Infestation: Literature Review". Sewage and Industrial Wastes 30 (10): 1278–1302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25033719. 
  8. Hammond, Peter; Suttie, Michael; Lewis, Vaughan T.; Smith, Ashley P.; Singer, Andrew C. (2021-03-11). "Detection of untreated sewage discharges to watercourses using machine learning" (in en). npj Clean Water 4 (1). doi:10.1038/s41545-021-00108-3. ISSN 2059-7037. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41545-021-00108-3. 
  9. Mericas, Dean; Sturman, Paul; Lutz, Michelle; Corsi, Steve; Cieciek, Chris; Boltz, Josh; Morgenroth, Eberhard; Airport Cooperative Research Program et al. (2014-11-03). Understanding Microbial Biofilms in Receiving Waters Impacted by Airport Deicing Activities. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board. doi:10.17226/22262. ISBN 978-0-309-30809-0. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/22262. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Exton, Benjamin; Hassard, Francis; Medina Vaya, Angel; Grabowski, Robert C. (2023-03-01). "Polybacterial shift in benthic river biofilms attributed to organic pollution – a prospect of a new biosentinel?" (in en). Hydrology Research 54 (3): 348–359. doi:10.2166/nh.2023.114. ISSN 0029-1277. https://iwaponline.com/hr/article/54/3/348/93893/Polybacterial-shift-in-benthic-river-biofilms. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Nott, Michelle A.; Driscoll, Heather E.; Takeda, Minoru; Vangala, Mahesh; Corsi, Steven R.; Tighe, Scott W. (2020-01-22). Loiselle, Steven Arthur. ed. "Advanced biofilm analysis in streams receiving organic deicer runoff" (in en). PLOS ONE 15 (1): e0227567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227567. ISSN 1932-6203. PMID 31968006. Bibcode2020PLoSO..1527567N. 
  12. Roberts, J.C. (1978). "Sewage fungus growth in rivers below papermill discharges". New Processes for Wastewater Treatment and Recovery: 140–158. 
  13. Rutt, G.P.; Pickering, T.D.; Reynolds, N.R.M. (1993). "The impact of livestock-farming on welsh streams: The development and testing of a rapid biological method for use in the assessment and control of organic pollution from farms" (in en). Environmental Pollution 81 (3): 217–228. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(93)90205-3. PMID 15091808. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0269749193902053. 
  14. Seager, J.; Jones, F.; Rutt, G. (February 1992). "Assessment and Control of Farm Pollution" (in en). Water and Environment Journal 6 (1): 48–53. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.1992.tb00737.x. ISSN 1747-6585. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-6593.1992.tb00737.x. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Geatches, Gething, Rutt (2014). 'Sewage fungus': A field and microscopic guide. Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Curtis, E.J.C.; Curds, C.R. (December 1971). "Sewage fungus in rivers in the United Kingdom: The slime community and its constituent organisms" (in en). Water Research 5 (12): 1147–1159. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(71)90080-7. Bibcode1971WatRe...5.1147C. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135471900807. 
  17. Gray, N.F.; Hunter, Christine A. (January 1985). "Heterotrophic slimes in Irish rivers" (in en). Water Research 19 (6): 685–691. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(85)90113-7. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135485901137. 
  18. Hickey, Christopher W. (November 1988). "River oxygen uptake and respiratory decay of sewage fungus biofilms" (in en). Water Research 22 (11): 1375–1380. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(88)90093-0. Bibcode1988WatRe..22.1375H. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135488900930. 
  19. Adeola, Samuel; Revitt, Michael; Shutes, Brian; Garelick, Hemda; Jones, Huw; Jones, Clive (2009-01-12). "Constructed Wetland Control of BOD Levels in Airport Runoff" (in en). International Journal of Phytoremediation 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/15226510802363220. ISSN 1522-6514. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15226510802363220. 
  20. Turnbull, D.A.; Bevan, J.R. (1995). "The impact of airport de-icing on a river: The case of the Ouseburn, Newcastle upon Tyne" (in en). Environmental Pollution 88 (3): 321–332. doi:10.1016/0269-7491(95)93446-7. PMID 15091545. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0269749195934467. 
  21. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2000). "Preliminary Data Summary - Airport Deicing Operations (Revised)". https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/airport-deicing-pds-2000.pdf. 
  22. Hirsch (1958). "Biological evaluation of organic pollution of New Zealand streams". New Zealand Journal of Science 1 (4): 500–553. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19580800264. 
  23. Hynes (1960). The biology of polluted waters. Liverpool University Press. https://archive.org/details/biologyofpollute0000hbnh/page/n5/mode/2up. 
  24. 24.0 24.1 Curtis, E.J.C.; Delves-Broughton, J.; Harrington, D.W. (June 1971). "Sewage fungus: studies of Sphaerotilus slimes using laboratory recirculating channels" (in en). Water Research 5 (6): 267–279. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(71)90172-2. Bibcode1971WatRe...5..267C. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135471901722. 
  25. Smith, Lloyd L.; Kramer, Robert H. (July 1963). [220:SOWEIR2.0.CO;2 "Survival of Walleye Eggs in Relation to Wood Fibers and Sphaerotilus natans in the Rainy River, Minnesota"] (in en). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 92 (3): 220–234. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1963)92[220:SOWEIR2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0002-8487. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1577/1548-8659(1963)92[220:SOWEIR]2.0.CO;2. 
  26. Magliozzi, Chiara; Grabowski, Robert C.; Packman, Aaron I.; Krause, Stefan (2018-11-30). "Toward a conceptual framework of hyporheic exchange across spatial scales" (in en). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 22 (12): 6163–6185. doi:10.5194/hess-22-6163-2018. ISSN 1607-7938. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/6163/2018/. 
  27. Lewandowski, Jörg; Arnon, Shai; Banks, Eddie; Batelaan, Okke; Betterle, Andrea; Broecker, Tabea; Coll, Claudia; Drummond, Jennifer et al. (2019-10-25). "Is the Hyporheic Zone Relevant beyond the Scientific Community?" (in en). Water 11 (11): 2230. doi:10.3390/w11112230. ISSN 2073-4441. 
  28. Decho, Alan W.; Visscher, Pieter T.; Reid, R. Pamela (2005), "Production and cycling of natural microbial exopolymers (EPS) within a marine stromatolite" (in en), Geobiology: Objectives, Concepts, Perspectives (Elsevier): pp. 71–86, doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52019-7.50008-5, ISBN 978-0-444-52019-7, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780444520197500085, retrieved 2023-10-10 
  29. Flemming, Hans-Curt; Wingender, Jost (September 2010). "The biofilm matrix" (in en). Nature Reviews Microbiology 8 (9): 623–633. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415. ISSN 1740-1526. PMID 20676145. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro2415. 
  30. Flemming, Hans-Curt; Wingender, Jost; Szewzyk, Ulrich; Steinberg, Peter; Rice, Scott A.; Kjelleberg, Staffan (September 2016). "Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life" (in en). Nature Reviews Microbiology 14 (9): 563–575. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94. ISSN 1740-1526. PMID 27510863. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro.2016.94. 
  31. Friedman, Barry A.; Dugan, Patrick R. (May 1968). "Identification of Zoogloea species and the Relationship to Zoogloeal Matrix and Floc Formation" (in en). Journal of Bacteriology 95 (5): 1903–1909. doi:10.1128/jb.95.5.1903-1909.1968. ISSN 0021-9193. PMID 5650090. 
  32. Patrick, F; Loutit, M (1976). "Passage of metals in effluents, through bacteria to higher organisms" (in en). Water Research 10 (4): 333–335. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(76)90176-7. Bibcode1976WatRe..10..333P. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135476901767. 
  33. Gray, N (1987). Sewage Fungus in Irish Rivers: A Guide to Identification, Evaluation and Control. Trinity College, University of Dublin. 
  34. McKinney, Ross E. (2004-03-11) (in en). Environmental Pollution Control Microbiology (0 ed.). CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780203025697. ISBN 978-1-135-52187-5. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135521875. 
  35. Hartwell, S. Ian; Jordahl, David M.; Evans, Joyce E.; May, Eric B. (August 1995). "Toxicity of aircraft de-icer and anti-icer solutions to aquatic organisms" (in en). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14 (8): 1375–1386. doi:10.1002/etc.5620140813. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5620140813. 
  36. Pillard, David A (February 1995). "Comparative toxicity of formulated glycol deicers and pure ethylene and propylene glycol to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas" (in en). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14 (2): 311–315. doi:10.1002/etc.5620140217. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5620140217. 
  37. Pillard, D. A.; DuFresne, D. L. (1999-07-01). "Toxicity of Formulated Glycol Deicers and Ethylene and Propylene Glycol to Lactuca sativa, Lolium perenne, Selenastrum capricornutum, and Lemna minor". Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 37 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1007/s002449900486. ISSN 0090-4341. PMID 10341039. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s002449900486. 
  38. Gray, N. F. (November 1985). "Heterotrophic Slimes in Flowing Waters" (in en). Biological Reviews 60 (4): 499–548. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00621.x. ISSN 1464-7931. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00621.x. 
  39. Dias, F. F.; Dondero, Norman C.; Finstein, M. S. (August 1968). "Attached Growth of Sphaerotilus and Mixed Populations in a Continuous-flow Apparatus" (in en). Applied Microbiology 16 (8): 1191–1199. doi:10.1128/am.16.8.1191-1199.1968. ISSN 0003-6919. PMID 4877499. 
  40. Dias, F. F.; Heukelekian, H. (September 1967). "Utilization of Inorganic Nitrogen Compounds by Sphaerotilus natans Growing in a Continuous-Flow Apparatus" (in en). Applied Microbiology 15 (5): 1083–1086. doi:10.1128/am.15.5.1083-1086.1967. ISSN 0003-6919. PMID 16349722. 
  41. Phaup, John D. (October 1968). "The biology of Sphaerotilus species" (in en). Water Research 2 (9): 597–614. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(68)90065-1. Bibcode1968WatRe...2..597P. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0043135468900651. 
  42. Besemer, Katharina; Singer, Gabriel; Limberger, Romana; Chlup, Ann-Kathrin; Hochedlinger, Gerald; Hödl, Iris; Baranyi, Christian; Battin, Tom J. (August 2007). "Biophysical Controls on Community Succession in Stream Biofilms" (in en). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73 (15): 4966–4974. doi:10.1128/AEM.00588-07. ISSN 0099-2240. PMID 17557861. Bibcode2007ApEnM..73.4966B.