Binary erasure channel

From HandWiki
The channel model for the binary erasure channel showing a mapping from channel input X to channel output Y (with known erasure symbol ?). The probability of erasure is pe

In coding theory and information theory, a binary erasure channel (BEC) is a communications channel model. A transmitter sends a bit (a zero or a one), and the receiver either receives the bit correctly, or with some probability Pe receives a message that the bit was not received ("erased") .

Definition

A binary erasure channel with erasure probability Pe is a channel with binary input, ternary output, and probability of erasure Pe. That is, let X be the transmitted random variable with alphabet {0,1}. Let Y be the received variable with alphabet {0,1,e}, where e is the erasure symbol. Then, the channel is characterized by the conditional probabilities:[1]

Pr[Y=0|X=0]=1PePr[Y=0|X=1]=0Pr[Y=1|X=0]=0Pr[Y=1|X=1]=1PePr[Y=e|X=0]=PePr[Y=e|X=1]=Pe

Capacity

The channel capacity of a BEC is 1Pe, attained with a uniform distribution for X (i.e. half of the inputs should be 0 and half should be 1).[2]

If the sender is notified when a bit is erased, they can repeatedly transmit each bit until it is correctly received, attaining the capacity 1Pe. However, by the noisy-channel coding theorem, the capacity of 1Pe can be obtained even without such feedback.[3]

If bits are flipped rather than erased, the channel is a binary symmetric channel (BSC), which has capacity 1Hb(Pe) (for the binary entropy function Hb), which is less than the capacity of the BEC for 0<Pe<1/2.[4][5] If bits are erased but the receiver is not notified (i.e. does not receive the output e) then the channel is a deletion channel, and its capacity is an open problem.[6]

History

The BEC was introduced by Peter Elias of MIT in 1955 as a toy example.[citation needed]

See also

Notes

  1. MacKay (2003), p. 148.
  2. 2.0 2.1 MacKay (2003), p. 158.
  3. Cover & Thomas (1991), p. 189.
  4. Cover & Thomas (1991), p. 187.
  5. MacKay (2003), p. 15.
  6. Mitzenmacher (2009), p. 2.

References