Biology:Haplogroup O-M122

From HandWiki
Short description: Y-chromosome DNA Haplogroup O2 (formerly O3)
Haplogroup O-M122
Possible time of origin33,943 (95% CI 25,124 <-> 37,631) ybp [1]

35,000 (with slower average mutation rate) or 30,000 (with faster average mutation rate) years ago[2]
Coalescence age30,365 (95% CI 22,492 <-> 33,956) ybp[1]
Possible place of originSouth Asia [citation needed] or Southeast Asia [3]
AncestorO-M175
Defining mutationsM122 [4]
Highest frequenciesNyishi 94%, [5] Adi 89%,[5] Tamang 87%, [6] Kachari (Boro) 85%,[7] Apatani 82%,[5] Rabha 76.5%,[7] Naga 76%,[5] Bhutanese 74%[citation needed], Naiman Kazakhs 68%,[8] Han Chinese 56%, Tibetan 48%, She People 48% (78.6% Northern,[9] 62.7%[10]), Manchus 47%, Hmong/Miao 46% (69.0% China ,[10] 64.3% Thailand,[11] 44.0% Hunan,[9] 41.2% Laos,[9] 36.7% Yunnan,[9] 30.6% Guizhou,[9] 14.6% Điện Biên Phủ[12]), Vietnamese 44%, Korean 43%, Karen 37%,[13] Filipinos 33%, Southwestern Tai approx. 30.4%[14] (Shan 40%,[15] Siamese 39.5%,[14] Northern Thai 37.2%,[15] Yong 37%,[13] Tai Lue 29%,[15] Saek 29%,[14] Phuan 29%,[14] Thái in Vietnam 29%,[12] Lao 27.5%,[14] Kaleun 24%,[14] Nyaw 22%,[14] Isan 21%,[14] Tai Khün 21%,[15] Phutai 17%,[14] Tai Dam 14%[14])

Haplogroup O-M122 (also known as Haplogroup O2 (formerly Haplogroup O3)) is an Eastern Eurasian Y-chromosome haplogroup. The lineage ranges across Southeast Asia and East Asia, where it dominates the paternal lineages with extremely high frequencies. It is also significantly present in Central Asia, especially among the Naiman tribe of Kazakhs.[8]

This lineage is a descendant haplogroup of haplogroup O-M175.

Origins

Researchers believe that O-M122 first appeared in Southeast Asia approximately 25,000-30,000 years ago [3] or roughly between 30,000 and 35,000 years ago according to more recent studies (Karmin et al. 2015, Poznik et al. 2016, YFull January 4, 2018). In a systematic sampling and genetic screening of an East Asian–specific Y-chromosome haplogroup (O-M122) in 2,332 individuals from diverse East Asian populations, results indicate that the O-M122 lineage is dominant in East Asian populations, with an average frequency of 44.3%. Microsatellite data show that the O-M122 haplotypes are more diverse in Southeast Asia than those in northern East Asia.[3] This suggests a southern origin of the O-M122 mutation to be likely.

It was part of the settlement of East Asia. However, the prehistoric peopling of East Asia by modern humans remains controversial with respect to early population migrations and the place of the O-M122 lineage in these migrations is ambivalent.[citation needed]

Distribution

Although Haplogroup O-M122 appears to be primarily associated with ethnic Tibeto-Burman speaking groups inhabiting the Seven Sister States of north eastern India, it also forms a significant component of the Y-chromosome diversity of most modern populations of the East Asian region.

East Asia

Haplogroup O-M122 is found in approximately 53.29% of all modern Chinese males[16] (with frequency ranging from 30/101=29.7% among Pinghua-speaking Hans in Guangxi [17] to 110/148=74.3% among Hans in Changting, Fujian [18]), about 40% of Manchu, Chinese Mongolian, Korean, and Vietnamese males, about 33.3% [19] to 62% (Jin 2009 and [20]) of Filipino males, about 10.5% [21] to 55.6% [21] of Malaysian males, about 10% (4/39 Guide County, Qinghai) [22] to 45% (22/49 Zhongdian County, Yunnan) [23] of Tibetan males, about 20% (10/50 Shuangbai, northern Yunnan) [23] to 44% (8/18 Xishuangbanna, southern Yunnan) [23] and [24] of Yi males, about 25% of Zhuang [25] and Indonesian [26] males, and about 16%[27][28] to 20% [19] of Japanese males. The distribution of Haplogroup O-M122 stretches far into Asia (approx. 40% of Dungans,[29] 30% of Salars,[30] 28% of Bonan,[30] 24% of Dongxiang,[30] 18% to 22.8% of Mongolian citizens in Ulaanbaatar,[19] 11%-15.4% of Khalkha Mongolians (Yamamoto et al. 2013[31]) but also as high as 31.1% (Kim et al. 2011), 12% of Uyghurs,[29] 9% of Kazakhs [29] but in the Naiman of Kazakhs 65.81%,[8] 6.8% of Kalmyks[32] (17.1% of Khoshuud, 6.1% of Dörwöd, 3.3% of Torguud, 0% of Buzawa), 6.2% of Altaians,[33] 5.3% of Kyrgyz,[34] 4.1% of Uzbeks,[29] and 4.0% of Buryats.[35]

Modern northern Han Chinese Y haplogroups and mtdna match those of ancient northern Han Chinese ancestors 3,000 years ago from the Hengbei archeological site. 89 ancient samples were taken. Y haplogroups O3a, O3a3, M, O2a, Q1a1, and O* were all found in Hengbei samples.[36] Three men who lived in the Neolithic era are the ancestors of 40% of Han Chinese, with their Y haplogroups being subclades of O3a-M324 and they are estimated to have lived 6,800 years ago, 6,500 years ago and 5,400 years ago.[37]

The East Asian O3-M122 Y chromosome Haplogroup is found in large quantities in other Muslims close to the Hui people like Dongxiang, Bo'an and Salar. The majority of Tibeto-Burmans, Han Chinese, and Ningxia and Liaoning Hui share paternal Y chromosomes of East Asian origin which are unrelated to Middle Easterners and Europeans. In contrast to distant Middle Eastern and Europeans whom the Muslims of China are not related to, East Asians, Han Chinese, and most of the Hui and Dongxiang of Linxia share more genes with each other. This indicates that native East Asian populations converted to Islam and were culturally assimilated to these ethnicities and that Chinese Muslim populations are mostly not descendants of foreigners as claimed by some accounts while only a small minority of them are.[38]

South Asia

Haplogroup O-M122 is restricted among tribal groups of Northeast India where it is found at very high frequencies. In Arunachal Pradesh, it is found at 89% among Adi, 82% among Apatani, and 94% among Nishi, while the Naga people show it at 100% (Cordaux 2004). In Meghalaya, 59.2% (42/71) of a sample of Garos and 31.7% (112/353) of a sample of Khasis have been found to belong to O-M122.[39] In Nepal, Tamang people present a very high frequency of O-M122 (39/45 = 86.7%), while much lower percentages of Newar (14/66 = 21.2%) and the general population of Kathmandu (16/77 = 20.8%) belong to this haplogroup.[40] A study published in 2009 found O-M122 in 52.6% (30/57, including 28 members of O-M117 and two members of O-M134(xM117)) of a sample of Tharus from a village in Chitwan District of south-central Nepal, 28.6% (22/77, all O-M117) of a sample of Tharus from another village in Chitwan District, and 18.9% (7/37, all O-M117) of a sample of Tharus from a village in Morang District of southeastern Nepal.[41] In contrast, the same study found O-M122 in only one individual in a sample of non-Tharu Hindus collected in Chitwan District (1/26 = 3.8% O-M134(xM117)), one tribal individual from Andhra Pradesh, India (1/29 = 3.4% O-M117), and one individual in a sample of Hindus from New Delhi, India (1/49 = 2.0% O-M122(xM134)).[41]

Southeast Asia

Among all the populations of East and Southeast Asia, Haplogroup O-M122 is most closely associated with those that speak a Sinitic, Tibeto-Burman, or Hmong–Mien language. Haplogroup O-M122 comprises about 50% or more of the total Y-chromosome variation among the populations of each of these language families. The Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman language families are generally believed to be derived from a common Sino-Tibetan protolanguage, and most linguists place the homeland of the Sino-Tibetan language family somewhere in northern China. The Hmong–Mien languages and cultures, for various archaeological and ethnohistorical reasons, are also generally believed to have derived from a source somewhere north of their current distribution, perhaps in northern or central China. The Tibetans, however, despite the fact that they speak a language of the Tibeto-Burman language family, have high percentages of the otherwise rare haplogroups D-M15 and D3, which are also found at much lower frequencies among the members of some other ethnic groups in East Asia and Central Asia.

Haplogroup O-M122 has been implicated as a diagnostic genetic marker[42] of the Austronesian expansion when it is found in populations of insular Southeast Asia and Oceania. It appears at moderately high frequencies in the Philippines , Malaysia, and Indonesia. Its distribution in Oceania is mostly limited to the traditionally Austronesian culture zones, chiefly Polynesia (approx. 25% [19] to 32.5% [21]). O-M122 is found at generally lower frequencies in coastal and island Melanesia, Micronesia, and Taiwanese aboriginal tribes (18% [19] to 27.4% [21] of Micronesians, and 5% of Melanesians,[43] albeit with reduced frequencies of most subclades.

Haplogroup O-M122* Y-chromosomes, which are not defined by any identified downstream markers, are actually more common among certain non-Han Chinese populations than among Han Chinese ones, and the presence of these O-M122* Y-chromosomes among various populations of Central Asia, East Asia, and Oceania is more likely to reflect a very ancient shared ancestry of these populations rather than the result of any historical events. It remains to be seen whether Haplogroup O-M122* Y-chromosomes can be parsed into distinct subclades that display significant geographical or ethnic correlations.

Subclade Distribution

Paragroup O-M122*

Paragroup O2*-M122(xO2a-P197) Y-DNA is quite rare, having been detected only in 2/165 = 1.2% of a sample of Han Chinese in a pool of samples from mainland China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia (n=581), 8/641 = 1.2% of a sample of Balinese in a pool of samples from western Indonesia (n=960), and 7/350 = 2.0% of a sample of males from Sumba in a pool of samples from eastern Indonesia (n=957). In the same study, O2*-M122(xO2a-P197) Y-DNA was not observed in a pool of samples from Oceania (n=182).[44]

A paper published by a group of mainly Chinese geneticists in the American Journal of Human Genetics in 2005 reported the detection of O2*-M122(xO2a-M324) Y-DNA in 1.6% (8/488) of a pool of seven samples of Han Chinese (3/64 = 4.7% Sichuan, 2/98 = 2.0% Zibo, Shandong, 1/60 = 1.7% Inner Mongolia, 1/81 = 1.2% Yunnan, 1/86 = 1.2% Laizhou, Shandong, 0/39 Guangxi, 0/60 Gansu). O2*-M122(xO2a-M324) Y-DNA also was detected in the following samples of ethnic minorities in China: 5.9% (1/17) Jingpo from Yunnan, 4.3% (2/47) Zhuang from Yunnan, 4.1% (2/49) Lisu from Yunnan, 3.2% (1/31) Wa from Yunnan, 2.6% (1/39) Zhuang from Guangxi, 2.5% (2/80) Bai from Yunnan, 2.4% (1/41) Hani from Yunnan, 2.3% (2/88) Lahu from Yunnan, 2.1% (1/47) Yi from Yunnan, 2.1% (1/48) Miao from Yunnan, 1.5% (2/132) Dai from Yunnan, 1.0% (1/105) Miao from Hunan, and 0.9% (2/225) Yao from Guangxi.[45]

O2*-M122(xO2a-M324) Y-DNA has been found as a singleton (1/156 = 0.6%) in a sample from Tibet.[40] It also has been found as a singleton in a sample of nineteen members of the Chin people in Chin State, Myanmar.[46]

In a paper published in 2011, Korean researchers have reported finding O2*-M122(xO2a-M324) Y-DNA in the following samples: 5.9% (3/51) Beijing Han, 3.1% (2/64) Filipino, 2.1% (1/48) Vietnamese, 1.7% (1/60) Yunnan Han, 0.4% (2/506) Korean, including 1/87 from Jeju and 1/110 from Seoul-Gyeonggi.[47] In another study published in 2012, Korean researchers have found O-M122(xM324) Y-DNA in 0.35% (2/573) of a sample from Seoul; however, no individual belonging to O-M122(xM324) was observed in a sample of 133 individuals from Daejeon.[48]

In 2011, Chinese researchers published a paper reporting their finding of O2*-M122(xO2a-M324) Y-DNA in 3.0% (5/167) of a sample of Han Chinese with origins in East China (defined as consisting of Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shanghai, and Anhui) and in 1.5% (1/65) of a sample of Han Chinese with origins in Southern China. O2* Y-DNA was not detected in their sample of Han Chinese with origins in Northern China (n=129).

In a paper published in 2012, O2*-M122(xO2a-P200) Y-DNA was found in 12% (3/25) of a sample of Lao males from Luang Prabang, Laos. O2* Y-DNA was not detected in this study's samples of Cham from Binh Thuan, Vietnam (n=59), Kinh from Hanoi, Vietnam (n=76), or Thai from northern Thailand (n=17).[49]

Trejaut et al. (2014) found O2-M122(xO2a-M324) in 6/40 (15.0%) Siraya in Kaohsiung, 1/17 (5.9%) Sulawesi, 1/25 (4.0%) Paiwan, 2/55 (3.6%) Fujian Han, 1/30 (3.3%) Ketagalan, 2/60 (3.3%) Taiwan Minnan, 1/34 (2.9%) Taiwan Hakka, 1/38 (2.6%) Siraya in Hwalien, 5/258 (1.9%) miscellaneous Han volunteers in Taiwan, and 1/75 (1.3%) in a sample of the general population of Thailand.[50]

Brunelli et al. (2017) found O2-M122(xO2a-M324) in 5/66 (7.6%) Tai Yuan, 1/91 (1.1%) Tai Lue, and 1/205 (0.5%) Khon Mueang in samples of the people of Northern Thailand.[15]

O-M324

O-M121

O2a1a1a1a1-M121 is a subclade of O2a1-L127.1, parallel to O2a1b-M164 and O2a1c-JST002611.

In an early survey of Y-DNA variation in present-day human populations of the world, O-M121 was detected only in 5.6% (1/18) of a sample from Cambodia and Laos and in 5.0% (1/20) of a sample from China.[51]

In a large study of 2,332 unrelated male samples collected from 40 populations in East Asia (and especially Southwest China), O-M121/DYS257 Y-DNA was detected only in 7.1% (1/14) of a sample of Cambodians and in 1.0% (1/98) of a sample of Han Chinese from Zibo, Shandong.[45]

In a study published in 2011, O-M121 Y-DNA was found in 1.2% (2/167) of a sample of Han Chinese with origins in East China, defined as consisting of Jiangsu, Anhui, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, and in 0.8% (1/129) of a sample of Han Chinese with origins in Northern China. O-M121 was not detected in this study's sample of Han Chinese with origins in Southern China (n=65).[52]

O-L599 (considered to be phylogenetically equivalent to O-M121[53]) also has been found in one individual in the 1000 Genomes Project sample of Han Chinese from Hunan, China (n=37), one individual in the 1000 Genomes Project sample of Kinh from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, one individual in the Human Genome Diversity Project sample of Tujia, an individual from Singapore, and an individual from the Jakarta metropolitan area.[54] According to 23mofang, O-L599 currently accounts for about 0.79% of the male population in China and is concentrated in Fujian, Taiwan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Hubei, Zhejiang and other provinces and cities; it appears to have undergone explosive population growth between about 2600 and 2300 years ago.[55]

O-M164

O2a1b-M164 is a subclade of O2a1-L127.1, parallel to O2a1a1a1a1-M121 and O2a1c-JST002611.

In an early survey of Y-DNA variation in present-day human populations of the world, O-M164 was detected only in 5.6% (1/18) of a sample from Cambodia and Laos.[51]

In a large study of 2,332 unrelated male samples collected from 40 populations in East Asia (and especially Southwest China), O2a1b-M164 Y-DNA was detected only in 7.1% (1/14) of a sample of Cambodians.[45]

According to 23mofang, O-M164 is a recent branch (TMRCA 2120 years) downstream of O2a1c-JST002611 rather than parallel to it. Out of fourteen members total, six are from Guangdong, five are from Fujian, one is from Nantong, one is from Wenzhou, and one is from Taiwan.[55]

O-JST002611

Haplogroup O2a1c-JST002611 is derived from O2-M122 via O2a-M324/P93/P197/P199/P200 and O2a1-L127.1/L465/L467. O2a1c-JST002611 is the most commonly observed type of O2a1 Y-DNA, and, more generally, represents the majority of extant O2-M122 Y-DNA that does not belong to the expansive subclade O2a2-P201.

Haplogroup O2a1c-JST002611 was first identified in 3.8% (10/263) of a sample of Japanese (Nonaka et al. 2007). It also has been found in 3.5% (2/57) of the JPT (Japanese in Tokyo, Japan) sample of the 1000 Genomes Project, including one member of the rare and deeply divergent paragroup O2a1c1-F18*(xO2a1c1a1-F117, O2a1c1a2-F449).[54][2] Subsequently, this haplogroup has been found with higher frequency in some samples taken in and around China , including 12/58 = 20.7% Miao (China), 10/70 = 14.3% Vietnam, 18/165 = 10.9% Han (China & Taiwan), 4/49 = 8.2% Tujia (China).[44] O-002611 also has been found in a singleton from the Philippines (1/48 = 2.1%), but it has not been detected in samples from Malaysia (0/32), Taiwanese Aboriginals (0/48), She from China (0/51), Yao from China (0/60), Oceania (0/182), eastern Indonesia (0/957), or western Indonesia (0/960).[44] Haplogroup O2a1c‐JST002611 is prevalent in different ethnic groups in China and Southeast Asia, including Vietnam (14.29%), Sichuan of southwestern China (Han, 14.60%; Tibetan in Xinlong County, 15.22%),[56] Jilin of northeastern China (Korean, 9.36%), Inner Mongolia (Mongolian, 6.58%), and Gansu of northwestern China (Baima, 7.35%; Han, 11.30%).[57] Y-DNA belonging to haplogroup O-JST002611 has been observed in 10.6% (61/573) of a sample collected in Seoul and 8.3% (11/133) of a sample collected in Daejeon, South Korea.[48][58]

According to 23mofang, haplogroup O-IMS-JST002611 currently accounts for approximately 14.72% of the entire male population of China , and its TMRCA is estimated to be 13,590 years.[59] Yan et al. (2011) have found O-IMS-JST002611 in 16.9% (61/361) of a pool of samples of Han Chinese from East China (n=167), North China (n=129), and South China (n=65).[60] According to Table S4 of He Guanglin et al. 2023, haplogroup O2a1b-IMS-JST002611 has been found in 17.50% (366/2091) of a pool of samples of Han Chinese from various provinces and cities of China.[61] Haplogroup O2a1b-IMS-JST002611 is the second most common Y-DNA haplogroup among Han Chinese (and among Chinese in general) after haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117.

O-P201

O2a2-JST021354/P201 has been divided into primary subclades O2a2a-M188 (TMRCA 18,830 ybp, accounts for approximately 4.74% of all males in present-day China[62]) and O2a2b-P164 (TMRCA 20,410 ybp, accounts for approximately 30.4% of all males in present-day China[63][64]). Among the various branches of O2a2a-M188, O-M7 (TMRCA 14,510 ybp, accounts for approximately 2.15% of all males in present-day China[65]) is notable for its relatively high frequency over a wide swath of Southeast Asia and southern China, especially among certain populations that currently speak Hmong-Mien, Austroasiatic, or Austronesian languages. Other branches of O2a2a-M188, such as O-CTS201 (TMRCA 16,070 ybp, accounts for approximately 1.76% of all males in present-day China[66]), O-MF39662 i.e. O-F2588(xCTS445), and O-MF109044 i.e. O-M188(xF2588) (TMRCA 9,690 ybp, accounts for approximately 0.4% of all males in present-day China[67]) have been found with generally low frequency in China; however, the O-CTS201 > O-FGC50590 > O-MF114497 subclade is fairly common among males in Korea and Japan. O2a2b-P164 has been divided cleanly into O2a2b1-M134 (TMRCA 17,450 ybp, accounts for approximately 27.58% of all males in present-day China[68]), which has been found with high frequency throughout East Asia and especially among speakers of Sino-Tibetan languages, and O2a2b2-AM01822 (TMRCA 16,000 ybp, accounts for approximately 2.80% of all males in present-day China[69]), which has been found with relatively low frequency but high diversity throughout East Asia and with high frequency in Austronesia.

O2a2-P201(xO2a2a1a2-M7, O2a2b1-M134) Y-DNA has been detected with high frequency in many samples of Austronesian-speaking populations, in particular some samples of Batak Toba from Sumatra (21/38 = 55.3%), Tongans (5/12 = 41.7%), and Filipinos (12/48 = 25.0%). [44] Outside of Austronesia, O2a2-P201(xO2a2a1a2-M7, O2a2b1-M134) Y-DNA has been observed in samples of Tujia (7/49 = 14.3%), Han Chinese (14/165 = 8.5%), Japanese (11/263 = 4.2%), Miao (1/58 = 1.7%), and Vietnam (1/70 = 1.4%) (Karafet 2010 and Nonaka 2007).

O-M159

O2a2a1a1a-M159 is a subclade of O2a2-P201 and O2a2a1a1-CTS201. In an early survey of Y-DNA variation in present-day human populations of the world, O-M159 was detected only in 5.0% (1/20) of a sample from China.[51]

Unlike its phylogenetic siblings, O-M7 and O-M134, O-M159 is very rare, having been found only in 2.9% (1/35) of a sample of Han males from Meixian, Guangdong in a study of 988 males from East Asia.[70]

In a study published in 2011, O-M159 was detected in 1.5% (1/65) of a sample of Han Chinese with origins in Southern China. O-M159 was not detected in the same study's samples of Han Chinese with origins in East China (n=167) or Northern China (n=129).[52]

Trejaut et al. (2014) found O-M159 in 5.0% (3/60) Minnan in Taiwan, 4.2% (1/24) Hanoi, Vietnam, 3.88% (10/258) miscellaneous Han volunteers in Taiwan, 3.6% (2/55) Han in Fujian, 3.24% (12/370) Plains Aborigines in Taiwan (mostly assimilated to Han Chinese), 1.04% (2/192) Western Indonesia (1/25 Kalimantan, 1/26 Sumatra), and 0.68% (1/146) Philippines (1/55 South Luzon).[50]

Kutanan et al. (2019) found O-M159 in 1.6% (2/129) of their samples of Thai people from Central Thailand.[14]

According to 23mofang, the TMRCA of haplogroup O-M159 is estimated to be 8,900 years. It is currently distributed mainly in southern China, accounting for about 0.80% of the total male population of China.[71]

O-M7

Projected spatial frequency distribution for haplogroup O3-M7.[72]

Haplogroup O2a2a1a2-M7 Y-DNA has been detected with high frequency in some samples of populations who speak Hmong-Mien languages, Katuic languages, or Bahnaric languages, scattered through some mostly mountainous areas of southern China , Laos, and Vietnam.[73]

O-M7 has been noted for having a widespread but uneven distribution among populations that speak Hmong-Mien languages, such as She (29/51 = 56.9% She, 10/34 = 29.4% She, 14/56 = 25.0% Northern She from Zhejiang), Miao (21/58 = 36.2% Miao from China, 17/51 = 33.3% Hmong Daw from northern Laos, 6/49 = 12.2% Yunnan Miao, 2/49 = 4.1% Guizhou Miao, 4/100 = 4.0% Hunan Miao), and Yao (18/35 = 51.4% Yao from Liannan, Guangdong, 29/60 = 48.3% Yao from Guangxi, 12/35 = 34.3% Yao from Bama, Guangxi, 12/37 = 32.4% Zaomin from Guangdong, 5/36 = 13.9% Bunu from Guangxi, 1/11 = 9.1% Top-Board Mien, 3/41 = 7.3% Native Mien, 2/31 = 6.5% Southern Mien from Guangxi, 1/19 = 5.3% Flowery-Headed Mien from Guangxi, 1/20 = 5.0% Mountain Straggler Mien from Hunan, 1/28 = 3.6% Blue Kimmun from Guangxi, 1/31 = 3.2% Pahng from Guangxi, 1/47 = 2.1% Western Mien from Yunnan, 0/11 Thin Board Mien, 0/31 Lowland Yao from Guangxi, 0/32 Mountain Kimmun from Yunnan, 0/33 Northern Mien, and 0/41 Lowland Kimmun from Guangxi). [73][44][70]

Cai et al. 2010 have reported finding high frequencies of O-M7 in their samples of Katuic (17/35 = 48.6% Ngeq, 10/45 = 22.2% Katu, 6/37 = 16.2% Kataang, 3/34 = 8.8% Inh (Ir), 4/50 = 8.0% So, 1/39 = 2.6% Suy) and Bahnaric (15/32 = 46.9% Jeh, 17/50 = 34.0% Oy, 8/32 = 25.0% Brau, 8/35 = 22.9% Talieng, 4/30 = 13.3% Alak, 6/50 = 12.0% Laven) peoples from southern Laos. However, O-M7 has been found only with low frequency in samples of linguistically related Khmuic populations from northern Laos (1/50 = 2.0% Mal,[9] 1/51 = 2.0% Khmu,[9] 0/28 Bit,[9] 0/29 Xinhmul[9]), Vietic peoples from Vietnam and central Laos (8/76 = 10.5% Kinh from Hanoi, Vietnam,[74] 4/50 = 8.0% Kinh from northern Vietnam,[12] 2/28 = 7.1% Bo,[9] 4/70 = 5.7% Vietnamese,[10] 0/12 Muong,[9] 0/15 Kinh,[9] 0/38 Aheu[9]), Palaungic peoples from northwestern Laos and southwestern Yunnan (2/35 = 5.7% Lamet,[9] 0/29 Ava,[9] 0/52 Blang[9]), and Pakanic peoples from southeastern Yunnan and northwestern Guangxi (0/30 Palyu,[9] 0/32 Bugan[9]).[73][44][49]

Haplogroup O-M7 has been found with notable frequency in some samples of Austronesian populations from the central part of the Malay Archipelago (17/86 = 19.8% Indonesians from Borneo,[10] 4/32 = 12.5% Malaysia,[10] 7/61 = 11.5% Java (mostly sampled in Dieng),[10] 6/56 = 10.7% Sumatra,[75] 4/53 = 7.5% Java,[75] 1/17 = 5.9% Malaysia[75]), but the frequency of this haplogroup appears to drop off very quickly toward the east (1/48 = 2.1% Philippines,[10] 5/641 = 0.8% Balinese,[10] 0/9 Timor,[10] 0/28 Alor,[10] 0/30 Moluccas,[10] 0/31 Nusa Tenggaras,[75] 0/33 Moluccas,[75] 0/37 Philippines,[75] 0/40 Borneo,[75] 0/48 Taiwanese Aboriginals,[10] 0/54 Mandar from Sulawesi,[10] 0/92 Lembata,[10] 0/350 Sumba,[10] 0/394 Flores[10]) and toward the west (0/38 Batak Toba from Sumatra,[10] 0/60 Nias,[10] 0/74 Mentawai[10]). O-M7 has been found in 14.8% (4/27) of a sample of Giarai from southern Vietnam,[12] 8.3% (2/24) of a sample of Ede from southern Vietnam,[12] and 5.1% (3/59) of a sample of Cham from Binh Thuan, Vietnam.[74] These Chamic-speaking peoples inhabit southern Vietnam and eastern Cambodia, but their languages are related to those of the Acehnese and Malays. O-M7 also has been found in 21.1% (8/38) of a small set of samples of highlanders of northern Luzon (including 1/1 Ifugao, 1/2 Ibaloi, 4/12 Kalangoya, and 2/6 Kankanaey).[76]

In the northern fringes of its distribution, O-M7 has been found in samples of Oroqen (2/31 = 6.5%), Tujia from Hunan (3/49 = 6.1%), Qiang (2/33 = 6.1%), Han Chinese (2/32 = 6.3% Han from Yili, Xinjiang, 4/66 = 6.1% Han from Huize, Yunnan, 2/35 = 5.7% Han from Meixian, Guangdong, 1/18 = 5.6% Han from Wuhan, Hubei, 6/148 = 4.1% Han from Changting, Fujian, 20/530 = 3.8% Han Chinese from Chongming Island,[77] 2/63 = 3.2% Han from Weicheng, Sichuan, 18/689 = 2.6% Han Chinese from Pudong,[77] 2/100 = 2.0% Han from Nanjing, Jiangsu, 3/165 = 1.8% Han Chinese,[44] 1/55 = 1.8% Han from Shanghai),[23][70] Manchus (1/50 = 2.0% Manchu from Liaoning[78]), and Koreans (2/133 = 1.5% Daejeon,[48] 1/300 = 0.3% unrelated Korean males obtained from the National Biobank of Korea,[79] 1/573 = 0.2% Seoul[48]).

According to 23mofang, O-M7 has a TMRCA of approximately 14,510 years and is currently relatively common among many ethnic groups in Sichuan and Yunnan, as well as among the Zhuang, Austroasiatic, and Austronesian groups. O-M7 now accounts for about 2.15% of the total male population in China.[55] The O-N5 subclade (TMRCA 4,230 ybp) by itself accounts for about 0.40% of the total male population in China at present, with its proportion among Hmong-Mien-speaking populations in Southwest China being rather high; in regard to geography, it is found mainly in Guizhou (3.52% of the total provincial population), Hunan (1.63%), Chongqing (1.05%), Sichuan (0.83%), Guangxi (0.76%), Fujian (0.44%), Yunnan (0.35%), Guangdong (0.28%), Jiangxi (0.26%), Hubei (0.26%), Shaanxi (0.20%), and Ningxia (0.18%).[80]

O-M134

O-M134*

Paragroup O-M134(xM117) has been found with very high frequency in some samples of Kim Mun people, a subgroup of the Yao people of southern China (16/32 = 50.0% Mountain Kimmun from southern Yunnan, 11/28 = 39.3% Blue Kimmun from western Guangxi). However, this paragroup has been detected in only 3/41 = 7.3% of a sample of Lowland Kimmun from eastern Guangxi.[73] This paragroup also has been found with high frequency in some Kazakh samples, especially the Naiman tribe (102/155 = 65.81%)(Dulik 2011) Dulik hypothesizes that O-M134 in Kazakhs was due to a later expansion due to its much more recent TMRCA time.

The general outline of the distribution of O-M134(xM117) among modern populations is different as that of the related clade O-M117. In particular, O-M134(xM117) occurs with only low frequency or is nonexistent among most Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations of Southwest China, Northeast India, and Nepal, who exhibit extremely high frequencies of O-M117.[citation needed] This paragroup also occurs with very low frequency or is non-existent among most Mon-Khmer population of Laos, who exhibit much higher frequencies of O-M117.[73] In Han Chinese, the paragroup is found in approximately the same percentage as O-M117, but has a higher distribution in northern Han Chinese than Southern Han Chinese.[citation needed]

According to 23mofang, the TMRCA of O-M134 is estimated to be 17,450 years, and O-M134(xM117) can be divided into two subsets: O-F122 (TMRCA 17,420 years), which is subsumed alongside O-M117 in an O-F450 clade (TMRCA 17,430 years), and O-MF59333 (TMRCA 13,900 years, currently distributed mainly in southern China and accounting for the Y-DNA of approximately 0.03% of the total male population of China), which is derived from O-M134 but basal to O-F450. O-F122 in turn is divided into O-MF38 (TMRCA 4,680 years, currently distributed mainly in northern China and accounting for the Y-DNA of approximately 0.02% of the total male population of China) and O-F114 (TMRCA 15,320 years, accounts for the Y-DNA of approximately 11.29% of the total male population of China).[55] The O-F46 (TMRCA 10,050 years) subclade of O-F114 by itself accounts for the Y-DNA of approximately 10.07% of the total male population of present-day China.[55]

In a study of Koreans from Seoul (n=573) and Daejeon (n=133), haplogroup O-M134(xM117), all members of which have been found to belong to O-F444[58] (phylogenetically equivalent to O-F114[55]), has been found in 9.42% of the sample from Seoul and 10.53% of the sample from Daejeon.[48]

In a study of Japanese (n=263), haplogroup O-M134(xM117) has been observed in nine individuals, or 3.4% of the entire sample set.[81] The Japanese members of O-M134(xM117) in this study have originated from Shizuoka (3/12 = 25%), Tokyo (2/52 = 3.8%), Toyama (1/3), Ishikawa (1/4), Tochigi (1/5), and Ibaraki (1/5), respectively.[82]

O-M117

Haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117 (also defined by the phylogenetically equivalent mutation Page23) is a subclade of O2a2b1-M134 that occurs frequently in China and in neighboring countries, especially among Tibeto-Burman-speaking peoples. Haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117 is the most common Y-DNA haplogroup among present-day Chinese (16.27% China,[83] 59/361 = 16.3% Han Chinese,[60] 397/2091 = 18.99% Han Chinese[61]), followed closely by haplogroup O2a1b-IMS-JST002611.

O-M117 has been detected in samples of Tamang (38/45 = 84.4%)，Tibetans (45/156 = 28.8% or 13/35 = 37.1%), Tharus (57/171 = 33.3%), Han Taiwanese (40/183 = 21.9%), Newars (14/66 = 21.2%), the general population of Kathmandu, Nepal (13/77 = 16.9%), Han Chinese (5/34 = 14.7% Chengdu, 5/35 = 14.3% Harbin, 4/35 = 11.4% Meixian, 3/30 = 10.0% Lanzhou, 2/32 = 6.3% Yili), Tungusic peoples from the PRC (7/45 = 15.6% Hezhe, 4/26 = 15.4% Ewenki, 5/35 = 14.3% Manchu, 2/41 = 4.9% Xibe, 1/31 = 3.2% Oroqen), Koreans (4/25 = 16.0% Koreans from the PRC, 5/43 = 11.6% Koreans from South Korea), Mongols (5/45 = 11.1% Inner Mongolian, 3/39 = 7.7% Daur, 3/65 = 4.6% Outer Mongolian), and Uyghurs (2/39 = 5.1% Yili, 1/31 = 3.2% Urumqi) (Xue 2006, Gayden 2007, and Fornarino 2009).

Like O-M7, O-M117 has been found with greatly varying frequency in many samples of Hmong-Mien-speaking peoples, such as Mienic peoples (7/20 = 35.0% Mountain Straggler Mien, 9/28 = 32.1% Blue Kimmun, 6/19 = 31.6% Flower Head Mien, 3/11 = 27.3% Top Board Mien, 3/11 = 27.3% Thin Board Mien, 11/47 = 23.4% Western Mien, 6/33 = 18.2% Northern Mien, 5/31 = 16.1% Lowland Yao, 5/35 = 14.3% Yao from Liannan, Guangdong, 5/37 = 13.5% Zaomin, 5/41 = 12.2% Lowland Kimmun, 3/41 = 7.3% Native Mien, 2/31 = 6.5% Southern Mien, 2/32 = 6.3% Mountain Kimmun, but 0/35 Yao from Bama, Guangxi), She (6/34 = 17.6% She, 4/56 = 7.1% Northern She), and Hmongic peoples (9/100 = 9.0% Miao from Hunan, 4/51 = 7.8% Hmong Daw from northern Laos, 3/49 = 6.1% Miao from Yunnan, 1/49 = 2.0% Miao from Guizhou, but 0/36 Bunu from Guangxi) (Cai 2011 and Xue 2006).

In a study published by Chinese researchers in the year 2006, O-M117 has been found with high frequency (8/47 = 17.0%) in a sample of Japanese that should be from Kagawa Prefecture according to the geographical coordinates (134.0°E, 34.2°N) that have been provided.[70] However, in a study published by Japanese researchers in the year 2007, the same haplogroup has been found with much lower frequency (11/263 = 4.2%) in a larger sample of Japanese from various regions of Japan.[28] More precisely, the Japanese members of O-M117 in this study's sample set have originated from Tokyo (4/52), Chiba (2/44), Gifu (1/2), Yamanashi (1/2), Hiroshima (1/3), Aichi (1/6), and Shizuoka (1/12).[82]

In Meghalaya, a predominantly tribal state of Northeast India, O-M133 has been found in 19.7% (14/71) of a sample of the Tibeto-Burman-speaking Garos, but in only 6.2% (22/353, ranging from 0/32 Bhoi to 6/44 = 13.6% Pnar) of a pool of eight samples of the neighboring Khasian-speaking tribes.[39]

O-M300

O-M333

Population Frequency n Source SNPs
Derung 1 Shi 2009  
Naga
(Sagaing, Myanmar)		 1.000 15 [citation needed] Page23=15
Nishi 0.94 Cordaux 2004  
Adi 0.89 Cordaux 2004  
Tamang 0.867 45 Gayden 2007 M134
Nu 0.86 Wen 2004  
Yao (Liannan) 0.829 35 Xue 2006 M7=18
M117=5
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=4
M134(xM117)=2
Achang 0.825 Shi 2009  
Apatani 0.82 Cordaux 2004  
Bai 0.82 Shi 2009  
CHS
(Han in Hunan & Fujian)		 0.788 52 Poznik 2016 M122=41
Naga (NE India) 0.765 34 Cordaux 2004 M134=26
Ava (Yunnan) 0.759 29 Cai 2011 M122
Han Chinese 0.74 Wen 2004  
She 0.735 34 Xue 2006 M7=10
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=7
M117=6
M134(xM117)=2
Nu 0.7 Shi 2009  
Miao 0.7 Karafet 2001  
Shui 0.7 Shi 2009  
Han (Harbin) 0.657 35 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=10
M134(xM117)=8
M117=5
Lisu 0.65 Wen 2004  
Zaomin (Guangdong) 0.649 37 Cai 2011 M122
She 0.63 Karafet 2001  
Filipinos 0.62 Jin 2009  
Taiwan Han 0.619 21 Tajima 2004 M122
Philippines 0.607 28 Hurles 2005 M122
Han (East China) 0.593 167 Yan 2011 M122
Garo 0.59 Reddy 2007  
Kinh (Hanoi, Vietnam) 0.58 48 [citation needed] M122=28
Chin
(Chin State, Myanmar)		 0.579 19 [citation needed] Page23=10
M122(xM324)=1
Han (North China) 0.566 129 Yan 2011 M122
Toba (Sumatra) 0.553 38 Karafet 2010 P201(xM7, M134)
Northern Han 0.551 49 Tajima 2004 M122
Garo 0.55 Kumar 2007  
Tujia 0.54 Shi 2009  
Tujia 0.53 Karafet 2001  
Han (Chengdu) 0.529 34 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=8
M134(xM117)=5
M117=5
Han (NE China) 0.524 42 Katoh 2005 M122=22
Han (Meixian) 0.514 35 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=10
M117=4
M7=2
M159=1
M134(xM117)=1
CHB
(Han Chinese in Beijing)		 0.500 46 Poznik 2016 F444=8
M117=7
JST002611=5
KL2(xJST002611)=2
M188(xM7)=1
Han (South China) 0.492 65 Yan 2011 M122
Va 0.48 Shi 2009  
Bai 0.48 Shi 2009
Wen 2004		  
KHV
(Kinh in Ho Chi Minh City)		 0.478 46 Poznik 2016 M7=6
M133=4
F444=4
JST002611=4
KL2(xJST002611)=2
N6>F4124=1
CTS1754=1
Koreans 0.472 216 Kim 2007  
Lisu 0.47 Shi 2009  
Hani 0.47 Wen 2004  
Han (Yili) 0.469 32 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=10
M7=2
M117=2
M134(xM117)=1
Bai (Dali, Yunnan) 0.46 50 Wen 2004 M122
Mongols (Baotou) 0.455 33 [citation needed] F273=2
F4249=2
FGC23868=1
Z26109=1
F133=1
F12=1
Y26383=1
CTS201=1
F8=1
Y20928=1
F748=1
SK1783=1
SK1775=1
Hezhe (China) 0.444 45 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=11
M134(xM117)=2
M117=7
Koreans 0.443 506 Kim 2011 P201=146
M324(xP201)=76
M122(xM324)=2
Tibetans
(Zhongdian, Yunnan)		 0.440 50 Wen 2004 M122
Miao 0.44 Shi 2009  
Yi 0.44 Wen 2004  
Lahu 0.43 Shi 2009  
Bit (Laos) 0.429 28 Cai 2011 M122
Manchu (NE China) 0.426 101 Katoh 2005 M122=43
Koreans (Seoul) 0.422 573 Park 2012 M122
Koreans (Daejeon) 0.414 133 Park 2012 M122
Hmong Daw (Laos) 0.412 51 Cai 2011 M122
Vietnamese 0.41 Karafet 2001  
Dai 0.4 Yang 2005  
Dungan (Kyrgyzstan) 0.40 40 Wells 2001 M122
Tibetans 0.400 35 Xue 2006 M117=13
M134(xM117)=1
Koreans (China) 0.400 25 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=6
M117=4
Shan
(Northern Thailand)		 0.400 20 Brunelli 2017 M117=7
M7=1
Thai (Central Thailand) 0.395 129 Kutanan 2019 F8/F42*=17
M7=11
JST002611=10
F474/F317=4
F323/F46=4
M159=2
F2055/CTS445=1
F2137=1
F837=1
Koreans (South Korea) 0.395 43 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=7
M134(xM117)=5
M117=5
Vietnamese 0.39 Jin 2009  
Khon Mueang
(Northern Thailand)		 0.390 205 Brunelli 2017 O-M117=46
O-M7=17
O-M324(xM7, M134)=16
O-M122(xM324)=1
Mon
(Northern Thailand)		 0.389 18 Brunelli 2017 M117=4
M324(xM7, M134)=3
Blang (Yunnan) 0.385 52 Cai 2011 M122
Northern Thai people
(Khon Mueang & Tai Yuan)		 0.384 86 Kutanan 2019 F8/F42=24
M7=7
JST002611=1
F999/F717=1
Manchu 0.38 Karafet 2001  
Philippine
(Tagalog language group)		 0.380 50 Tajima 2004 M122
Hanoi, Vietnam 0.375 24 Trejaut 2014 M7=3
M134(xM133)=3
M133=1
JST002611=1
M159=1
Manchu 0.371 35 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=6
M117=5
M134(xM117)=2
Han (Lanzhou) 0.367 30 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=6
M117=3
M134(xM117)=2
Lahu 0.36 Wen 2004  
Qiang 0.364 33 Xue 2006 M134(xM117)=4
M117=3
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=3
M7=2
Bamar (Myanmar) 0.361 72 [citation needed] Page23=26
Borneo, Indonesia 0.360 86 Karafet 2010 M122
Korean 0.356 45 Wells 2001 M122
Pahng (Guangxi) 0.355 31 Cai 2011 M122
Philippines 0.354 48 Karafet 2010 M122
Western Yugur 0.35 Zhou 2008  
Thai
(Chiang Mai & Khon Kaen)		 0.353 34 Shi 2009
Tajima 2004		 M122
Tai Yong
(Northern Thailand)		 0.346 26 Brunelli 2017 M324(xM7, M134)=4
M117=3
M7=2
Tharu 0.345 171 Fornarino 2009 M134
Kinh (Hanoi, Vietnam) 0.342 76 He 2012 M122
Koreans (Seoul) 0.341 85 Katoh 2005 M122=29
Tibet 0.340 156 Gayden 2007 M122
Yao (Bama) 0.343 35 Xue 2006 M7=12
Kazakhs (SE Altai) 0.337 89 Dulik 2011 M134(xM117, P101)
Tai Yuan
(Thailand)		 0.329 85 Brunelli 2017 M117=15
M7=5
M122(xM324)=5
M134(xM117)=3
Dai
(Xishuangbanna, Yunnan)		 0.327 52 Poznik 2016 O-M133=13
O-M7=2
O-F444=1
O-JST002611=1
Polynesians 0.325 Su 2000  
Tibetans 0.32 Wen 2004  
Khasi 0.32 Reddy 2007  
Lao
(Luang Prabang, Laos)		 0.32 25 He 2012 M122
Eastern Yugur 0.31 Zhou 2008  
Malays 0.31 Karafet 2001  
Buyei 0.314 35 Xue 2006 M7=6
M134(xM117)=3
M117=1
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=1
Mongolian (Khalkh) 0.311 Kim 2011  
Filipinos 0.308 146 Trejaut 2014 P164(xM134)=26
JST002611=7
M7=3
M133=3
M134(xM133)=2
P201(xM159, M7, P164)=2
M159=1
M324(xKL1, P201)=1
Han (Pinghua speakers) 0.3 Gan 2008  
Salar 0.302 43 Wang 2003 M122
Dong 0.300 20 Xie 2004 M134=3
M122(xM7, M134)=3
Thailand 0.293 75 Trejaut 2014 M133(xM162)=10
M7=5
M134(xM133)=3
JST002611=2
P164(xM134)=1
M122(xM324)=1
Koreans (NE China) 0.291 79 Katoh 2005 M122=23
Khasi 0.29 Kumar 2007  
Zhuang 0.29 Su 2000  
Inner Mongolian 0.289 45 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=5
M117=5
M134(xM117)=3
Tai Lue
(Northern Thailand)		 0.286 91 Brunelli 2017 O-M117=16
O-M7=6
O-M324(xM7, M134)=3
O-M122(xM324)=1
Zhuang 0.286 28 Xie 2004 M134=7
M122(xM7, M134)=1
Laotian
(Vientiane & Luang Prabang)		 0.275 40 Kutanan 2019 F8/F42=6
M7=2
M188(xM7)=2
P164(xF8,F46,F4110,F706,F717)=1
Bonan 0.273 44 Wang 2003 M122
Sibe 0.268 41 Xue 2006 M134(xM117)=5
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=4
M117=2
Micronesia 0.27 Su 2000  
Mon (Thailand) 0.267 105 Kutanan 2019 F8/F42=15
M7=4
F323/F46=4
JST002611=3
F2859=1
M122(x002611,M188,P164,F837)=1
Daur 0.256 39 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=7
M117=3
Polynesians 0.25 Hammer 2005
Kayser 2006		  
Bunu (Guangxi) 0.25 36 Cai 2011 M122
Malay
(near Kuala Lumpur)		 0.25 12 Tajima 2004 M122
Zhuang (Guangxi) 0.247 166 Chen 2006 M122(xM121, M134)=23
M117=9
M134(xM117)=7
M121=2
Japanese (Kyūshū) 0.240 104 Tajima 2004 M122
Dongxiang 0.24 Wang 2003  
Manchurian Evenks 0.24 Karafet 2001  
Thai (Northern Thailand) 0.235 17 He 2012 M122
Japanese (Kagawa) 0.234 47 Xue 2006 M117=8
M134(xM117)=2
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=1
Mosuo (Ninglang, Yunnan) 0.234 47 Wen 2004 M122
Evenks (China) 0.231 26 Xue 2006 M117=4
M134(xM117)=1
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=1
Mongolia
(mainly Khalkhs[84])		 0.228 149 Hammer 2005 M134=24
M122(xM134)=10
Zhuang
(Napo County, Guangxi)		 0.222 63 [citation needed] M117=5
M122(xM188, M134)=4
M188=3
M134(xM117)=2
Lawa
(Northern Thailand)		 0.220 50 Brunelli 2017 M324(xM7, M134)=6
M117=5
Mal (Laos) 0.220 50 Cai 2011 M122
Cambodian (Siem Reap) 0.216 125 Black 2006 M122
Japanese (Tokushima) 0.214 70 Hammer 2005 M134=11
M122(xM134, LINE)=2
LINE=2
Newar 0.212 66 Gayden 2007 M117
Lao Isan 0.210 62 Kutanan 2019 M7=6
F8=4
JST002611=3
Blang 0.21 Shi 2009  
Okinawans 0.21 Nonaka 2007  
Tai Khün
(Northern Thailand)		 0.208 24 Brunelli 2017 M117=4
M134(xM117)=1
Kathmandu, Nepal 0.208 77 Gayden 2007 M324
Sui 0.200 50 Xie 2004 M134=10
Yi (Shuangbai, Yunnan) 0.20 50 Wen 2004 M122(xM7)
Japanese (Shizuoka) 0.197 61 Hammer 2005 M122(xM134, LINE)=7
M134=5
Khmu (Laos) 0.196 51 Cai 2011 M122
Dongxiang 0.196 46 Wang 2003 M122
Oroqen 0.194 31 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=2
M7=2
M134(xM117)=1
M117=1
Khalkh (Mongolia) 0.188 85 Katoh 2005 M122=16
Japanese (Miyazaki) 0.183 1285 Nohara 2021 M134=118
M122(xM134)=117
Japanese (Tokyo) 0.179 56 Poznik 2016 M117=5
M134(xM117)=3
JST002611=2
Hani 0.176 34 Xue 2006 M134(xM117)=3
M117=2
M122(xM159, M7, M134)=1
Micronesia 0.176 17 Hammer 2005 M122(xM134, LINE)=3
Hui 0.171 35 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=4
M134(xM117)=1
M117=1
Kalmyk (Khoshuud) 0.171 82 Malyarchuk 2013 M122=14
Japanese 0.167 263 Nonaka 2007 M122
Mandar (Sulawesi) 0.167 54 Karafet 2010 M122
Mulam (Luocheng) 0.167 42 Wang 2003 JST002611=3
M134(xM117)=3
M117=1
Japanese (Kantō) 0.162 117 Katoh 2005 M122=19
Thai 0.16 Jin 2009  
Zhuang 0.16 Karafet 2001  
Aheu (Laos) 0.158 38 Cai 2011 M122
Bugan (Yunnan) 0.156 32 Cai 2011 M122
Okinawans 0.156 45 Hammer 2005 M122(xM134, LINE)=3
LINE=3
M134=1
Uygur (Yili) 0.154 39 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=2
M134(xM117)=2
M117=2
Japanese (Aomori) 0.154 26 Hammer 2005 M134=3
M122(xM134, LINE)=1
Cambodia 0.14 Shi 2009  
Cham
(Binh Thuan, Vietnam)		 0.136 59 He 2012 M122
Java
(mainly sampled in Dieng)		 0.131 61 Karafet 2010 M122
Aboriginal Taiwanese 0.126 223 Tajima 2004 M122
Uighur (Kazakhstan) 0.122 41 Wells 2001 M122
Uzbek (Bukhara) 0.121 58 Wells 2001 M122
Ulchi 0.115 52 [citation needed] O-M122(xP201)=6
Karakalpak (Uzbekistan) 0.114 44 Wells 2001 M122
Utsat (Sanya, Hainan) 0.111 72 Li 2013 M117=3
M122(xM159, M117)=3
M159=2
Outer Mongolian 0.108 65 Xue 2006 M122(xM159, M7, M134)=3
M117=3
M134(xM117)=1
Bo (Laos) 0.107 28 Cai 2011 M122
Tibetans 0.1 Zhou 2008  
Maluku Islands 0.1 30 Karafet 2010 M122
Kazakh (Kazakhstan) 0.093 54 Wells 2001 M122
Bouyei 0.089 45 Xie 2004 M122(xM7, M134)=2
M7=1
M134=1
Pumi (Ninglang, Yunnan) 0.085 47 Wen 2004 M122(xM7)
Zakhchin (Mongolia) 0.083 60 Katoh 2005 M122=5
Mongols 0.083 24 Wells 2001 M122
Balinese (Bali) 0.073 641 Karafet 2010 M122
Japanese 0.068 59 Ochiai 2016 P198
Uriankhai (Mongolia) 0.067 60 Katoh 2005 M122=4
Sinte (Uzbekistan) 0.067 15 Wells 2001 M122
Uygur (Urumqi) 0.065 31 Xue 2006 M134(xM117)=1
M117=1
Iranian (Esfahan) 0.063 16 Wells 2001 M122
Kalmyk (Dörwöd) 0.061 165 Malyarchuk 2013 M122=10
Flores 0.046 394 Karafet 2010 M122
Buryat 0.040 298 Kharkov 2014 M324(xM134)=5
M134(xM117)=4
M117=3
Buyei 0.04 Yang 2005  
Kalmyk (Torguud) 0.033 150 Malyarchuk 2013 M122=5
Kazakhs (SW Altai) 0.033 30 Dulik 2011 M134(xM117, P101)
Munda
(Jharkhand)		 0.032 94 [citation needed] M134=3
Burusho 0.031 97 Firasat 2007 M122
Li 0.029 34 Xue 2006 M134(xM117)=1
Sumba 0.029 350 Karafet 2010 M122
Khoton (Mongolia) 0.025 40 Katoh 2005 M122=1
Naxi (Lijiang, Yunnan) 0.025 40 Wen 2004 M134
Rajbanshi
(West Bengal)		 0.022 45 [citation needed] M134=1
Pathan 0.010 96 Firasat 2007 M122
Pakistan 0.005 638 Firasat 2007 M122

Phylogenetics

Phylogenetic History

Main page: Biology:Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups

Prior to 2002, there were in academic literature at least seven naming systems for the Y-Chromosome Phylogenetic tree. This led to considerable confusion. In 2002, the major research groups came together and formed the Y-Chromosome Consortium (YCC). They published a joint paper that created a single new tree that all agreed to use. Later, a group of citizen scientists with an interest in population genetics and genetic genealogy formed a working group to create an amateur tree aiming at being above all timely. The table below brings together all of these works at the point of the landmark 2002 YCC Tree. This allows a researcher reviewing older published literature to quickly move between nomenclatures.

YCC 2002/2008 (Shorthand) (α) (β) (γ) (δ) (ε) (ζ) (η) YCC 2002 (Longhand) YCC 2005 (Longhand) YCC 2008 (Longhand) YCC 2010r (Longhand) ISOGG 2006 ISOGG 2007 ISOGG 2008 ISOGG 2009 ISOGG 2010 ISOGG 2011 ISOGG 2012
O-M175 26 VII 1U 28 Eu16 H9 I O* O O O O O O O O O O
O-M119 26 VII 1U 32 Eu16 H9 H O1* O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a O1a
O-M101 26 VII 1U 32 Eu16 H9 H O1a O1a1 O1a1a O1a1a O1a1 O1a1 O1a1a O1a1a O1a1a O1a1a O1a1a
O-M50 26 VII 1U 32 Eu16 H10 H O1b O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2 O1a2
O-P31 26 VII 1U 33 Eu16 H5 I O2* O2 O2 O2 O2 O2 O2 O2 O2 O2 O2
O-M95 26 VII 1U 34 Eu16 H11 G O2a* O2a O2a O2a O2a O2a O2a O2a O2a O2a1 O2a1
O-M88 26 VII 1U 34 Eu16 H12 G O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1 O2a1a O2a1a
O-SRY465 20 VII 1U 35 Eu16 H5 I O2b* O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b O2b
O-47z 5 VII 1U 26 Eu16 H5 I O2b1 O2b1a O2b1 O2b1 O2b1a O2b1a O2b1 O2b1 O2b1 O2b1 O2b1
O-M122 26 VII 1U 29 Eu16 H6 L O3* O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 O3 O3
O-M121 26 VII 1U 29 Eu16 H6 L O3a O3a O3a1 O3a1 O3a1 O3a1 O3a1 O3a1 O3a1 O3a1a O3a1a
O-M164 26 VII 1U 29 Eu16 H6 L O3b O3b O3a2 O3a2 O3a2 O3a2 O3a2 O3a2 O3a2 O3a1b O3a1b
O-M159 13 VII 1U 31 Eu16 H6 L O3c O3c O3a3a O3a3a O3a3 O3a3 O3a3a O3a3a O3a3a O3a3a O3a3a
O-M7 26 VII 1U 29 Eu16 H7 L O3d* O3c O3a3b O3a3b O3a4 O3a4 O3a3b O3a3b O3a3b O3a2b O3a2b
O-M113 26 VII 1U 29 Eu16 H7 L O3d1 O3c1 O3a3b1 O3a3b1 - O3a4a O3a3b1 O3a3b1 O3a3b1 O3a2b1 O3a2b1
O-M134 26 VII 1U 30 Eu16 H8 L O3e* O3d O3a3c O3a3c O3a5 O3a5 O3a3c O3a3c O3a3c O3a2c1 O3a2c1
O-M117 26 VII 1U 30 Eu16 H8 L O3e1* O3d1 O3a3c1 O3a3c1 O3a5a O3a5a O3a3c1 O3a3c1 O3a3c1 O3a2c1a O3a2c1a
O-M162 26 VII 1U 30 Eu16 H8 L O3e1a O3d1a O3a3c1a O3a3c1a O3a5a1 O3a5a1 O3a3c1a O3a3c1a O3a3c1a O3a2c1a1 O3a2c1a1

Original Research Publications

The following research teams per their publications were represented in the creation of the YCC Tree.


Phylogenetic Trees

This phylogenetic tree of haplogroup O subclades is based on the YCC 2008 tree [85] and subsequent published research.

  • O-M122 (M122, P198)
    • O-P93 (M324, P93, P197, P198, P199, P200)
      • O-M121 (M121, P27.2)
      • O-M164 (M164)
      • O-P201 (P201/021354)
      • O-002611 (002611)
      • O-M300 (M300)
      • O-M333 (M333)

See also

Genetics

Y-DNA O Subclades

Y-DNA Backbone Tree

References

Citations

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Karmin, MonikaExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (28 February 2022). "Episodes of Diversification and Isolation in Island Southeast Asian and Near Oceanian Male Lineages". Molecular Biology and Evolution 39 (3). doi:10.1093/molbev/msac045. ISSN 0737-4038. PMID 35294555. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Poznik, G. DavidExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (June 2016). "Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences". Nature Genetics 48 (6): 593–599. doi:10.1038/ng.3559. PMID 27111036. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Shi 2009.
  4. ↑ Krahn and FTDNA 2013.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Cordaux, R. (12 February 2004). "The Northeast Indian Passageway: A Barrier or Corridor for Human Migrations?". Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (8): 1525–1533. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh151. ISSN 0737-4038. PMID 15128876. 
  6. ↑ Gayden, TenzinExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (May 2007). "The Himalayas as a Directional Barrier to Gene Flow". The American Journal of Human Genetics 80 (5): 884–894. doi:10.1086/516757. ISSN 0002-9297. PMID 17436243. 
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Bing Su, Chunjie Xiao, Ranjan Deka, Mark T. Seielstad, Daoroong Kangwanpong, Junhua Xiao, Daru Lu, Peter Underhill, Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Ranajit Chakraborty, Li Jin, "Y chromosome haplotypes reveal prehistorical migrations to the Himalayas." Hum. Genet. (2000) 107:582-590. DOI 10.1007/s004390000406 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225570045_Y_chromosome_haplotypes_reveal_prehistorical_migrations_to_the_Himalayas
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Ashirbekov, E. E.; Botbaev, D. M.; Belkozhaev, A. M.; Abayldaev, A. O.; Neupokoeva, A. S.; Mukhataev, J. E.; Alzhanuly, B.; Sharafutdinova, D. A. et al.. "Distribution of Y-Chromosome Haplogroups of the Kazakh from the South Kazakhstan, Zhambyl, and Almaty Regions". Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan 6 (316): 85–95. ISSN 2224-5227. 
  9. ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 9.12 9.13 9.14 9.15 9.16 9.17 Cai X, Qin Z, Wen B, Xu S, Wang Y, et al. (2011), "Human Migration through Bottlenecks from Southeast Asia into East Asia during Last Glacial Maximum Revealed by Y Chromosomes." PLoS ONE 6(8): e24282. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024282
  10. ↑ 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 Tatiana M. Karafet, Brian Hallmark, Murray P. Cox, et al. (2010), "Major East–West Division Underlies Y Chromosome Stratification across Indonesia." Mol. Biol. Evol. 27(8):1833–1844. doi:10.1093/molbev/msq063
  11. ↑ Wibhu Kutanan, Rasmi Shoocongdej, Metawee Srikummool, et al. (2020), "Cultural variation impacts paternal and maternal genetic lineages of the Hmong-Mien and Sino-Tibetan groups from Thailand." European Journal of Human Genetics https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0693-x
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Enrico Macholdt, Leonardo Arias, Nguyen Thuy Duong, et al., "The paternal and maternal genetic history of Vietnamese populations." European Journal of Human Genetics (2020) 28:636–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0557-4
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Jatupol Kampuansai, Wibhu Kutanan, Eszter Dudás, Andrea Vágó-Zalán, Anikó Galambos, and Horolma Pamjav (2020), "Paternal genetic history of the Yong population in northern Thailand revealed by Y-chromosomal haplotypes and haplogroups." Molecular Genetics and Genomics volume 295, pages 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-019-01644-x
  14. ↑ 14.00 14.01 14.02 14.03 14.04 14.05 14.06 14.07 14.08 14.09 14.10 Kutanan, Wibhu; Kampuansai, Jatupol; Srikummool, Metawee; Brunelli, Andrea; Ghirotto, Silvia; Arias, Leonardo; Macholdt, Enrico; Hübner, Alexander et al. (2019). "Contrasting Paternal and Maternal Genetic Histories of Thai and Lao Populations". Mol. Biol. Evol. 36 (7): 1490–1506. doi:10.1093/molbev/msz083. PMID 30980085. 
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 Brunelli, AExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2017). "Y chromosomal evidence on the origin of northern Thai people". PLOS ONE 12 (7): e0181935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181935. PMID 28742125. Bibcode: 2017PLoSO..1281935B. 
  16. ↑ "O-M122单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M122/detail. 
  17. ↑ Gan 2008.
  18. ↑ Wen 2004c.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 Hammer 2005.
  20. ↑ Hurles 2005.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 Su 2000.
  22. ↑ Zhou 2008.
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 Wen 2004.
  24. ↑ Karafet 2001.
  25. ↑ Jing 2006.
  26. ↑ Li 2008.
  27. ↑ Katoh 2005.
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Nonaka 2007.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 Wells 2001.
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Wang 2003.
  31. ↑ Yamamoto (2013). "Y-chromosome lineage in five regional Mongolian populations". Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series 4: e260–e261. doi:10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.133. 
  32. ↑ Malyarchuk, Boris; Derenko, Miroslava; Denisova, Galina; Khoyt, Sanj; Woźniak, Marcin; Grzybowski, Tomasz; Zakharov, Ilya (2013). "Y-chromosome diversity in the Kalmyks at the ethnical and tribal levels". Journal of Human Genetics 58 (12): 804–811. doi:10.1038/jhg.2013.108. PMID 24132124. 
  33. ↑ Kharkov 2007.
  34. ↑ Di Cristofaro, JExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2013). "Afghan Hindu Kush: Where Eurasian Sub-Continent Gene Flows Converge". PLOS ONE 8 (10): e76748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076748. PMID 24204668. Bibcode: 2013PLoSO...876748D. 
  35. ↑ Kharkov, V. N.; Khamina, K. V.; Medvedeva, O. F.; Simonova, K. V.; Eremina, E. R.; Stepanov, V. A. (2014). "Gene pool of Buryats: Clinal variability and territorial subdivision based on data of Y-chromosome markers". Russian Journal of Genetics 50 (2): 180–190. doi:10.1134/S1022795413110082. 
  36. ↑ Zhao, Yong-Bin; Zhang, Ye; Zhang, Quan-Chao; Li, Hong-Jie; Cui, Ying-Qiu; Xu, Zhi; Jin, Li; Zhou, Hui et al. (May 4, 2015). "Ancient DNA Reveals That the Genetic Structure of the Northern Han Chinese Was Shaped Prior to 3,000 Years Ago". PLOS ONE 10 (5): e0125676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125676. PMID 25938511. Bibcode: 2015PLoSO..1025676Z. 
  37. ↑ Yan, Shi; Wang, Chuan-Chao; Zheng, Hong-Xiang; Wang, Wei; Qin, Zhen-Dong; Wei, Lan-Hai; Wang, Yi; Pan, Xue-Dong et al. (August 29, 2014). "Y Chromosomes of 40% Chinese Descend from Three Neolithic Super-Grandfathers". PLOS ONE 9 (8): e105691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105691. PMID 25170956. Bibcode: 2014PLoSO...9j5691Y. 
  38. ↑ Yao, Hong-Bing; Wang, Chuan-Chao; Tao, Xiaolan; Shang, Lei; Wen, Shao-Qing; Zhu, Bofeng; Kang, Longli; Jin, Li et al. (2016). "Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of Chinese Muslim populations Dongxiang and Hui". Scientific Reports 6: 38656. doi:10.1038/srep38656. PMID 27924949. Bibcode: 2016NatSR...638656Y. 
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 Reddy 2007.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Gayden 2007.
  41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 Fornarino, SimonaExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2009). "Mitochondrial and Y-chromosome diversity of the Tharus (Nepal): a reservoir of genetic variation". BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 (9): 154. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-154. PMID 19573232. Bibcode: 2009BMCEE...9..154F. 
  42. ↑ Murray P. Cox (June 2003). Genetic Patterning at Austronesian Contact Zones (PDF) (PhD). University of Otago. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2006. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
  43. ↑ Karafet 2005.
  44. ↑ 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 44.6 Karafet 2010.
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 Shi, Hong; Dong, Yong-li; Wen, Bo; Xiao, Chun-Jie; Underhill, Peter A.; Shen, Pei-dong; Chakraborty, Ranajit; Jin, Li et al. (Sep 2005). "Y-Chromosome Evidence of Southern Origin of the East Asian–Specific Haplogroup O2-M122". American Journal of Human Genetics 77 (408–419): 408–19. doi:10.1086/444436. PMID 16080116. 
  46. ↑ Peng, Min-ShengExpression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (2013). "Retrieving Y chromosomal haplogroup trees using GWAS data". European Journal of Human Genetics 2013 (8): 1–5. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.272. PMID 24281365. 
  47. ↑ Kim, Soon-Hee; Kim, Ki-Cheol; Shin, Dong-Jik; Jin, Han-Jun; Kwak, Kyoung-Don; Han, Myun-Soo; Song, Joon-Myong; Kim, Won et al. (2011). "High frequencies of Y-chromosome haplogroup O2b-SRY465 lineages in Korea: a genetic perspective on the peopling of Korea". Investigative Genetics 2 (1): 10–121. doi:10.1186/2041-2223-2-10. PMID 21463511. 
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 48.3 48.4 Jin Park, Myung; Young Lee, Hwan; Ick Yang, Woo; Shin, Kyoung-Jin (2012). "Understanding the Y chromosome variation in Korea—relevance of combined haplogroup and haplotype analyses". International Journal of Legal Medicine 126 (4): 589–599. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0703-9. PMID 22569803. 
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 He 2012.
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 Trejaut, Jean A; Poloni, Estella S; Yen, Ju-Chen; Lai, Ying-Hui; Loo, Jun-Hun; Lee, Chien-Liang; He, Chun-Lin; Lin, Marie (2014). "Taiwan Y-chromosomal DNA variation and its relationship with Island Southeast Asia". BMC Genetics 2014 (15): 77. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-15-77. PMID 24965575. 
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 51.2 Underhill, Peter A.Expression error: Unrecognized word "etal". (November 2000). "Y chromosome sequence variation and the history of human populations". Nature Genetics 26 (3): 358–61. doi:10.1038/81685. PMID 11062480. 
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 Yan 2011.
  53. ↑ ISOGG Y-DNA Haplogroup O and its Subclades - 2017
  54. ↑ 54.0 54.1 YFull Haplogroup YTree v6.01 at 4 January 2018
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.5 Phylogenetic tree of human Y-DNA at 23mofang
  56. ↑ Wang, Chuan-Chao; Wang, Ling-Xiang; Shrestha, Rukesh; Zhang, Manfei; Huang, Xiu-Yuan; Hu, Kang; Jin, Li; Li, Hui (2014). "Genetic Structure of Qiangic Populations Residing in the Western Sichuan Corridor". PLOS ONE 9 (8): e103772. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103772. PMID 25090432. Bibcode: 2014PLoSO...9j3772W. 
  57. ↑ Wang; Yan, Shi; Dong, QIN; Lu, Yan; Qi; Liang, DING; Hai, WEI; Shi et al. (2013). "Late Neolithic expansion of ancient Chinese revealed by Y chromosome haplogroup O2a1c-JST002611". Journal of Systematics and Evolution 51 (3): 280–286. doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2012.00244.x. 
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 Yeun Kwon, So; Young Lee, Hwan; Young Lee, Eun; Ick Yang, Woo; Shin, Kyoung-Jin (2015). "Confirmation of Y haplogroup tree topologies with newly suggested Y-SNPs for the C2, O2b and O3a subhaplogroups". Forensic Science International: Genetics 19: 42–46. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.06.003. PMID 26103100. 
  59. ↑ "O-Ims-Jst002611单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-IMS-JST002611/detail. 
  60. ↑ 60.0 60.1 Shi Yan, Chuan-Chao Wang, Hui Li, Shi-Lin Li, Li Jin, and The Genographic Consortium, "An updated tree of Y-chromosome Haplogroup O and revised phylogenetic positions of mutations P164 and PK4." European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 1013–1015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.64; published online 20 April 2011.
  61. ↑ 61.0 61.1 He, G., Wang, M., Miao, L. et al. "Multiple founding paternal lineages inferred from the newly-developed 639-plex Y-SNP panel suggested the complex admixture and migration history of Chinese people." Hum Genomics 17, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-023-00476-6
  62. ↑ "O-M188单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M188/detail. 
  63. ↑ "O-Am01822单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-AM01822/detail. 
  64. ↑ "O-M134单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M134/detail. 
  65. ↑ "O-M7单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M7/detail. 
  66. ↑ "O-Cts201单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-CTS201/detail. 
  67. ↑ "O-Mf109044单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-MF109044/detail. 
  68. ↑ "O-M134单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M134/detail. 
  69. ↑ "O-Am01822单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-AM01822/detail. 
  70. ↑ 70.0 70.1 70.2 70.3 Xue 2006.
  71. ↑ "O-M159单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M159/detail. 
  72. ↑ O'Rourke, Dennis; Cai, Xiaoyun; Qin, Zhendong; Wen, Bo; Xu, Shuhua; Wang, Yi; Lu, Yan; Wei, Lanhai et al. (2011). "Human Migration through Bottlenecks from Southeast Asia into East Asia during Last Glacial Maximum Revealed by Y Chromosomes". PLOS ONE 6 (8): e24282. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024282. ISSN 1932-6203. PMID 21904623. Bibcode: 2011PLoSO...624282C. 
  73. ↑ 73.0 73.1 73.2 73.3 73.4 Cai 2011.
  74. ↑ 74.0 74.1 He J-D, Peng M-S, Quang HH, Dang KP, Trieu AV, et al. (2012), "Patrilineal Perspective on the Austronesian Diffusion in Mainland Southeast Asia." PLoS ONE 7(5): e36437. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036437
  75. ↑ 75.0 75.1 75.2 75.3 75.4 75.5 75.6 Manfred Kayser, Ying Choi, Mannis van Oven, et al. (2008), "The Impact of the Austronesian Expansion: Evidence from mtDNA and Y Chromosome Diversity in the Admiralty Islands of Melanesia." Mol. Biol. Evol. 25(7):1362–1374. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn078
  76. ↑ Frederick Delfin, Jazelyn M Salvador, Gayvelline C Calacal, et al., "The Y-chromosome landscape of the Philippines: extensive heterogeneity and varying genetic affinities of Negrito and non-Negrito groups." European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 224–230; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.162; published online 29 September 2010.
  77. ↑ 77.0 77.1 Zhang, X.; Tang, Z.; Wang, B.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, G.; Tian, J.; Zhao, Y.; Yao, Z.; Tian, L.; et al. "Forensic Analysis and Genetic Structure Construction of Chinese Chongming Island Han Based on Y Chromosome STRs and SNPs." Genes 2022, 13, 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081363
  78. ↑ Karafet TM, Osipova LP, Savina OV, Hallmark B, Hammer MF. "Siberian genetic diversity reveals complex origins of the Samoyedic-speaking populations." Am J Hum Biol. 2018;e23194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23194
  79. ↑ Myung Jin Park, Hwan Young Lee, Na Young Kim, et al. (2013), "Y-SNP miniplexes for East Asian Y-chromosomal haplogroup determination in degraded DNA." Forensic Science International: Genetics 7, 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.014
  80. ↑ "夏商西南大族祖源分析-23魔方祖源基因检测". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/family/636ded4222a04b160d827738. 
  81. ↑ Nonaka, I.; Minaguchi, K.; Takezaki, N. (2007). "Y-chromosomal Binary Haplogroups in the Japanese Population and their Relationship to 16 Y-STR Polymorphisms". Annals of Human Genetics 71 (4): 480–495. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00343.x. PMID 17274803. 
  82. ↑ 82.0 82.1 Sae Naitoh, Iku Kasahara-Nonaka, Kiyoshi Minaguchi, and Phrabhakaran Nambiar, "Assignment of Y-chromosomal SNPs found in Japanese population to Y-chromosomal haplogroup tree." Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 58, 195–201; doi:10.1038/jhg.2012.159; published online 7 February 2013.
  83. ↑ "O-M117单倍群详情". https://www.23mofang.com/ancestry/ytree/O-M117/detail. 
  84. ↑ Karafet, T. M.; Zegura, S. L.; Posukh, O.; Osipova, L.; Bergen, A.; Long, J.; Goldman, D.; Klitz, W. et al. (1999). "Ancestral Asian Source(s) of New World Y-Chromosome Founder Haplotypes". American Journal of Human Genetics 64 (3): 817–831. doi:10.1086/302282. PMID 10053017. 
  85. ↑ Karafet 2008.

Sources

Journal articles
Websites

Sources for conversion tables

÷

Further reading

External links



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Haplogroup_O-M122&oldid=3493221"