Biology:Lissamphibia

From HandWiki
Short description: Subclass of amphibians

Lissamphibians
Temporal range: Early Triassic – Present (Possible Cisuralian record)
Centrolene buckleyi01.jpeg
Emerald glass frog (Centrolene prosoblepon)
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Subclass: Lissamphibia
Haeckel, 1866
Subgroups

The Lissamphibia (from Greek λισσός (lissós, "smooth") + ἀμφίβια (amphíbia), meaning "smooth amphibians") is a group of tetrapods that includes all modern amphibians. Lissamphibians consist of three living groups: the Salientia (frogs, toads, and their extinct relatives), the Caudata (salamanders, newts, and their extinct relatives), and the Gymnophiona (the limbless caecilians and their extinct relatives).

Salientians and caudatans are likely more closely related to each other than to caecilians. The name Batrachia is commonly used for the clade combining salientians and caudatans. A fourth group, the Allocaudata (also known as Albanerpetontidae) is also known, spanning 160 million years from the Middle Jurassic to the Early Pleistocene, but became extinct two million years ago.

For several decades, this name has been used for a group that includes all living amphibians, but excludes all the main groups of Paleozoic tetrapods, such as Temnospondyli, Lepospondyli, Embolomeri, and Seymouriamorpha.[1] Most scientists have concluded that all of the primary groups of modern amphibians—frogs, salamanders and caecilians—are closely related.

Some writers have argued that the early Permian dissorophoid Gerobatrachus hottoni is a lissamphibian.[2] If it is not,[3] the earliest known lissamphibians are Triadobatrachus and Czatkobatrachus from the Early Triassic.[4][5]

Characteristics

Reconstruction of Gerobatrachus, possible ancestor of salamanders and frogs

Some, if not all, lissamphibians share the following characteristics. Some of these apply to the soft body parts, hence do not appear in fossils. However, the skeletal characteristics also appear in several types of Palaeozoic amphibians:[6]

  • Double or paired occipital condyles
  • Two types of skin glands (mucous and granular)
  • Fat bodies associated with gonads
  • Double-channeled sensory papillae in the inner ear
  • Green rods (a special type of visual cell, unknown in caecilians)
  • Ribs do not encircle body. In anurans the ribs are fused to their vertebrae, except in the suborder Archaeobatrachia which still has free ribs.[7]
  • Ability to elevate the eyes (with the levator bulbi muscle)
  • Forced-pump respiratory mechanism, the primitive breathing system also found in labyrinthodont amphibians[8]
  • Cylindrical centra (the main body of the vertebrae; cylindrical centra are also found in several groups of early tetrapods)
  • Pedicellate teeth (the crowns of the teeth are separated from the roots by a zone of fibrous tissue; also found in some Dissorophoidea; the teeth of some fossil salamanders are not pedicellate)
  • Bicuspid teeth (two cusps per tooth, also found in juvenile dissorophoids)
  • Operculum (small bone in the skull, linked to shoulder girdle by the opercularis muscle; perhaps involved in hearing and balance; absent in caecilians and some salamanders, fused to the columella (ear bone) in most anurans)
  • Loss of posterior skull bones (also in Microsauria and Dissorophoidea)
  • Small, widely separated pterygoid bones (also found in Temnospondyli and Nectridea)
  • Wide cultriform process of the parasphenoid (also found in some Microsauria (Rhynchonkos) and Lysorophia)
  • Presence of ampullae of Lorenzini in some salamanders and caecilians, but never in frogs[9][10]

Relationships and definition

The features uniting the Lissamphibia were first noted by Ernst Haeckel, even though in Haeckel's work, Lissamphibia excluded the caecilians.[6][11] Nevertheless, Haeckel considered the caecilians to be closely related to what he called Lissamphibia (gr. λισσός, smooth), which is now called Batrachia and includes frogs and salamanders. In the early to mid 20th century, a biphyletic origin of amphibians (and thus of tetrapods in general) was favoured.[12][13] In the late 20th century, a flood of new fossil evidence mapped out in some detail the nature of the transition between the elpistostegalid fish and the early amphibians.[14] Most herpetologists and paleontologists, therefore, no longer accept the view that amphibians have arisen twice, from two related but separate groups of fish. The question then arises whether Lissamphibia is monophyletic as well. The origin and relationships of the various lissamphibian groups both with each other and among other early tetrapods remain controversial. Not all paleontologists today are convinced that Lissamphibia is indeed a natural group, as there are important characteristics shared with some non-lissamphibian Palaeozoic amphibians.

Currently, the two prevailing theories of lissamphibian origin are:

One of the hypotheses regarding their ancestors is that they evolved by paedomorphosis and miniaturization from early tetrapods.[16][17]

Molecular studies of extant amphibians based on multiple-locus data favor one or the other of the monophyletic alternatives and indicate a Late Carboniferous date for the divergence of the lineage leading to caecilians from the one leading to frogs and salamanders, and an early Permian date for the separation of the frog and salamander groups.[4][18][19]

The stem-caecilian Funcusvermis, described in 2023, retained many dissorophoid temnospondyl features, supporting a monophyletic Lissamphibia within clade Temnospondyli.[20]

References

  1. ↑ Laurin, M. (2010). How Vertebrates Left the Water. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-26647-6. 
  2. ↑ Anderson, J.S.; Reisz, R.R.; Scott, D.; Fröbisch, N.B.; Sumida, S.S. (2008). "A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders". Nature 453 (7194): 515–518. doi:10.1038/nature06865. PMID 18497824. Bibcode: 2008Natur.453..515A. http://www.naherpetology.org/pdf_files/988.pdf. Retrieved 2012-12-10. 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Marjanović, D.; Laurin, M. (2009). "The origin(s) of modern amphibians: a commentary". Evolutionary Biology 36 (3): 336–338. doi:10.1007/s11692-009-9065-8. Bibcode: 2009EvBio..36..336M. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00549002/file/MARJANOVIC_David.pdf. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Marjanović, D.; Laurin, M. (2007). "Fossils, molecules, divergence times, and the origin of lissamphibians". Systematic Biology 56 (3): 369–388. doi:10.1080/10635150701397635. PMID 17520502. 
  5. ↑ Evans, S. E.; Borsuk-Białynicka, M. (2009). "The Early Triassic stem−frog Czatkobatrachus from Poland". Palaeontologica Polonica 65: 79–195. http://palaeontologia.pan.pl/PP65/PP65_079-106.pdf. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Duellman, W. E.; Trueb, L. (1994). Biology of amphibians. illustrated by L. Trueb. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-4780-X. 
  7. ↑ Biology of Amphibia
  8. ↑ Janis, C.M.; Keller, J.C. (2001). "Modes of ventilation in early tetrapods: Costal aspiration as a key feature of amniotes". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46 (2): 137–170. http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app46/app46-137.pdf. Retrieved 11 May 2012. 
  9. ↑ Chapter 41 - Electroreceptors and Magnetoreceptors
  10. ↑ The Evolution of Amphibian Photoreception
  11. ↑ Haeckel, E. (1866), Generelle Morphologie der Organismen : allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin
  12. ↑ Säve-Söderbergh, G. (1934). "Some points of view concerning the evolution of the vertebrates and the classification of this group". Arkiv för Zoologi 26: 1–20. 
  13. ↑ von Huene, F. (1956) Paläontologie und Phylogenie der niederen Tetrapoden, G. Fischer, Jena
  14. ↑ Gordon, M.S.; Long, J.A. (2004). "The Greatest Step In Vertebrate History: A Paleobiological Review of the Fish-Tetrapod Transition". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77 (5): 700–719. doi:10.1086/425183. PMID 15547790. http://usf.usfca.edu/fac_staff/dever/tetrapod_review.pdf. 
  15. ↑ Ruta, M.; Coates, M. I. (2007). "Dates, nodes and character conflict: addressing the lissamphibian origin problem". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5 (1): 69–122. doi:10.1017/S1477201906002008. Bibcode: 2007JSPal...5...69R. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=715136. 
  16. ↑ "First Land Creatures Had Wild Appearances". LiveScience.com. 6 July 2009. http://www.livescience.com/5529-land-creatures-wild-appearances.html. 
  17. ↑ Schoch, R. R. (2019). "The putative lissamphibian stem-group: phylogeny and evolution of the dissorophoid temnospondyls". Journal of Paleontology 93 (1): 37–156. doi:10.1017/jpa.2018.67. Bibcode: 2019JPal...93..137S. 
  18. ↑ Sigurdsen, T.; Green, D.M. (2011). "The origin of modern amphibians: a re-evaluation". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 162 (2): 457–469. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00683.x. 
  19. ↑ San Mauro, D. (2010). "A multilocus timescale for the origin of extant amphibians". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56 (2): 554–561. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.019. PMID 20399871. 
  20. ↑ Kligman, Ben T.; Gee, Bryan M.; Marsh, Adam D.; Nesbitt, Sterling J.; Smith, Matthew E.; Parker, William G.; Stocker, Michelle R. (2023). "Triassic stem caecilian supports dissorophoid origin of living amphibians" (in en). Nature 614 (7946): 102–107. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05646-5. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 36697827. Bibcode: 2023Natur.614..102K. 

Bibliography

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q134861 entry



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Lissamphibia&oldid=3541190"