Biology:Otodus chubutensis

From HandWiki
Short description: Species of fossil sharks

Otodus chubutensis
Temporal range: Early Miocene–Middle Miocene
Carcharocles subauriculatus big.jpg
Partially preserved O. chubutensis broken tooth with a slant height of 129 mm (5.1 in)
Scientific classification edit
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Elasmobranchii
Subdivision: Selachimorpha
Order: Lamniformes
Family: Otodontidae
Genus: Otodus
Species:
O. chubutensis
Binomial name
Otodus chubutensis
Ameghino, 1901
Synonyms
  • Carcharodon mexicanus
  • Carcharocles chubutensis
  • Carcharodon productus
  • Megaselachus chubutensis Glikman, 1964
  • Carcharodon subauriculatus Agassiz, 1843

Otodus chubutensis,[1] meaning "ear-shaped tooth of Chubut", from Ancient Greek ὠτ (ōt, meaning "ear") and ὀδούς (odoús, meaning "tooth") – thus, "ear-shaped tooth", is an extinct species of prehistoric megatoothed sharks in the genus Otodus, that lived during Early Miocene to Middle Miocene.[2] The largest individuals were about 13.5 metres (44 ft) long. This shark is considered a close relative of the famous prehistoric megatoothed shark O. megalodon.[3] However, as is the case with O. megalodon, the classification of this species is disputed.

Taxonomy

As is the case with other known megatoothed sharks, the genus of O. chubutensis remains in dispute.[4] The Swiss naturalist Louis Agassiz first identified this shark as a species of Carcharodon in 1843.[5] In 1906, Ameghino renamed this shark as C. chubutensis.[6] In 1964, shark researcher, L. S. Glikman recognized the transition of Otodus obliquus to C. auriculatus. In 1987, shark researcher, H. Cappetta reorganized the C. auriculatus - O. megalodon lineage and placed all related megatoothed sharks along with this species in the genus Carcharocles. Finally, the complete Otodus obliquus to O. megalodon progression became clear and has since gained the acceptance of many shark researchers.[7]

Within the Otodus lineage; O. chubutensis is the succeeding species of O. angustidens and is followed by O. megalodon.[3] In short, O. chubutensis is considered a possible ancestor of O. megalodon.[3][7][8] However, due to its co-existence with O. megalodon during the Miocene and Pliocene epochs, it is regarded as a morpho-species.[3]

Size

Otodus chubutensis was a large lamniform shark, with the largest individuals reaching a body length of 13.5 metres (44 ft).[9] Relatively large individuals reached body lengths of 9–11 metres (30–36 ft).[10] Smaller individuals were still about the size of the modern great white shark, reaching body lengths of 4.6–6.3 metres (15–21 ft).[11]

Paleoecology

Paleontological research suggests that this species may have changed habitat preferences through time, or it may have had enough behavioral flexibility to occupy different environments at different times.[12]

Diet

Otodus chubutensis was likely an apex predator and commonly preyed upon fish, sea turtles, cetaceans (e.g. whales), and sirenids.[12]

There is also potential evidence that Otodus hunted raptorial sperm whales; a tooth belonging to an undetermined 4 m (13 ft) physeteroid closely resembling those of Acrophyseter discovered in the Nutrien Aurora Phosphate Mine in North Carolina suggests that a megalodon or O. chubutensis may have aimed for the head of the sperm whale in order to inflict a fatal bite, the resulting attack leaving distinctive bite marks on the tooth. While scavenging behavior cannot be ruled out as a possibility, the placement of the bite marks is more consistent with predatory attacks than feeding by scavenging, as the jaw is not a particularly nutritious area to for a shark feed or focus on. The fact that the bite marks were found on the tooth's roots further suggest that the shark broke the whale's jaw during the bite, suggesting the bite was extremely powerful. The fossil is also notable as it stands as the first known instance of an antagonistic interaction between a sperm whale and an otodontid shark recorded in the fossil record.[13]

Fossil record

This species is also known from fossil teeth and some fossilized vertebral centra. Shark skeletons are composed of cartilage and not bone, and cartilage rarely gets fossilized. Hence, fossils of O. chubutensis are generally poorly preserved. Although the teeth of O. chubutensis are morphologically similar to teeth of O. megalodon,[14] they are comparatively slender with curved crown, and with presence of lateral heels feebly serrated.[12] Fossils of this species have been found in North America,[12] South America,[12] Africa,[15] and Europe.[16] Its fossils have also been discovered in Asia and Australia .[17]

Locations

South America[18]
North America
  • Culebra Formation, Panama
  • Arcadia Formation, Florida
  • Pungo River Formation, North Carolina
  • Calvert Formation, Delaware
Europe
  • Bolognano Formation, Italy

See also

  • List of prehistoric fish
  • Largest prehistoric organisms

References

  1. Shimada, K.; Chandler, R. E.; Lam, O. L. T.; Tanaka, T.; Ward, D. J. (2016). "A new elusive otodontid shark (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) from the lower Miocene, and comments on the taxonomy of otodontid genera, including the 'megatoothed' clade". Historical Biology 29 (5): 1–11. doi:10.1080/08912963.2016.1236795. 
  2. Maisch IV, Harry M.; Becker, Martin A.; Chamberlain Jr., John A. (2020). "Macroborings in Otodus megalodon and Otodus chubutensis shark teeth from the submerged shelf of Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA: implications for processes of lag deposit formation". Ichnos 27 (2): 122–141. doi:10.1080/10420940.2019.1697257. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Renz, Mark (2002). Megalodon: Hunting the Hunter. PaleoPress. pp. 26–30. ISBN 0-9719477-0-8. 
  4. Gottfried M.D.; Fordyce R.E (2001). "An Associated Specimen of CARCHARODON ANGUSTIDENS (CHONDRICHTHYES, LAMNIDAE) From the LATE OLIGOCENE of NEW ZEALAND, with comments on CARCHARODON Interrelationships". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21 (4): 730–739. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0730:AASOCA2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0272-4634. 
  5. Klimley, Peter; Ainley, David (1996). Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-415031-4. 
  6. Andres, Lutz. "Megatooth Fossils Found at the Calvert Cliffs of Maryland". http://www.fossilguy.com/sites/calvert/calv_meg.htm. Retrieved 10 September 2022. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Andres, Lutz (2002). "C. megalodon — Megatooth Shark, Carcharodon versus Carcharocles". http://www.fossilguy.com/topics/megshark/megshark.htm. Retrieved 2010-05-10. 
  8. Bruner, John (1997). "The "Megatooth" shark, Carcharodon megalodon". Mundo Marino Revista Internacional de Vida Marina. 
  9. Kast, Emma R.; Griffiths, Michael L.; Kim, Sora. L.; Rao, Zixuan C.; Shimada, Kensu; Becker, Martin A.; Maisch, Harry M.; Eagle, Robert A. et al. (22 June 2022). "Cenozoic megatooth sharks occupied extremely high trophic positions". Science Advances 8 (25): eabl6529. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl6529. PMID 35731884. Bibcode2022SciA....8L6529K. 
  10. Perez, Victor; Leder, Ronny; Badaut, Teddy (2021). "Body length estimation of Neogene macrophagous lamniform sharks (Carcharodon and Otodus) derived from associated fossil dentitions". Palaeontologia Electronica 24 (1): 1–28. doi:10.26879/1140. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2021/3284-estimating-lamniform-body-size. 
  11. McCormack, Jeremy; Griffiths, Michael L.; Kim, Sora L.; Shimada, Kenshu; Karnes, Molly; Maisch, Harry; Pederzani, Sarah; Bourgon, Nicolas et al. (31 May 2022). "Trophic position of Otodus megalodon and great white sharks through time revealed by zinc isotopes" (in en). Nature Communications 13 (1): 2980. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30528-9. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 35641494. Bibcode2022NatCo..13.2980M. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Aguilera O.; Augilera E. R. D. (2004). "Giant-toothed White Sharks and Wide-toothed Mako (Lamnidae) from the Venezuela Neogene: Their Role in the Caribbean, Shallow-water Fish Assemblage". Caribbean Journal of Science 40 (3): 362–368. 
  13. STEPHEN J. GODFREY; JOHN R. NANCE; NORMAN L. RIKER (2021). "Otodus-bitten sperm whale tooth from the Neogene of the Coastal Eastern United States". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 66 (3): 599–603. http://app.pan.pl/archive/published/app66/app008202020.pdf. 
  14. Nyberg K.G; Ciampaglio C.N; Wray G.A (2006). "Tracing the ancestry of the GREAT WHITE SHARK". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26 (4): 806–814. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[806:TTAOTG2.0.CO;2]. ISSN 0272-4634. 
  15. Cook, Todd D.; Alison M. Murray; Elwyn L. Simons; Yousry S. Attia; Prithijit Chatrath (18 February 2010). "A Miocene selachian fauna from Moghra, Egypt". Historical Biology (Egypt) 22 (1–3): 78–87. doi:10.1080/08912960903249329. 
  16. Marsili, Stefano; Giorgio Carnevale; Ermanno Danesea; Giovanni Bianuccia; Walter Landinia (March 2007). "Early Miocene vertebrates from Montagna della Maiella, Italy". Annales de Paléontologie (Italy: Elsevier) 93 (1): 27–66. doi:10.1016/j.annpal.2007.01.001. Bibcode2007AnPal..93...27M. 
  17. Harry M. Maisch, IV; Martin A. Becker; John A. Chamberlain, Jr. (2018). "Lamniform and Carcharhiniform Sharks from the Pungo River and Yorktown Formations (Miocene–Pliocene) of the Submerged Continental Shelf, Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA". Copeia 106 (2): 353–374. doi:10.1643/OT-18-016. 
  18. Otodus chubutensis at Fossilworks.org

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q5038155 entry