Correspondence (mathematics)
From HandWiki
In mathematics and mathematical economics, correspondence is a term with several related but distinct meanings.
- In general mathematics, a correspondence is an ordered triple (X,Y,R), where R is a relation from X to Y, i.e. any subset of the Cartesian product X×Y.[1]
- One-to-one correspondence is an alternate name for a bijection. For instance, in projective geometry the mappings are correspondences[2] between projective ranges.
- In algebraic geometry, a correspondence between algebraic varieties V and W is in the same fashion a subset R of V×W, which is in addition required to be closed in the Zariski topology. It therefore means any relation that is defined by algebraic equations. There are some important examples, even when V and W are algebraic curves: for example the Hecke operators of modular form theory may be considered as correspondences of modular curves.
- However, the definition of a correspondence in algebraic geometry is not completely standard. For instance, Fulton, in his book on Intersection theory,[3] uses the definition above. In literature, however, a correspondence from a variety X to a variety Y is often taken to be a subset Z of X×Y such that Z is finite and surjective over each component of X. Note the asymmetry in this latter definition; which talks about a correspondence from X to Y rather than a correspondence between X and Y. The typical example of the latter kind of correspondence is the graph of a function f:X→Y. Correspondences also play an important role in the construction of motives (cf. presheaf with transfers).[4]
- In category theory, a correspondence from [math]\displaystyle{ C }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ D }[/math] is a functor [math]\displaystyle{ C^{op}\times D\to\mathbf{Set} }[/math]. It is the "opposite" of a profunctor.
- In von Neumann algebra theory, a correspondence is a synonym for a von Neumann algebra bimodule.
- In economics, a correspondence between two sets [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ B }[/math] is a map [math]\displaystyle{ f: A \mapsto P(B) }[/math] from the elements of the set [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] to the power set of [math]\displaystyle{ B }[/math].[5] This is similar to a correspondence as defined in general mathematics (i.e., a relation,) except that the range is over sets instead of elements. However, there is usually the additional property that for all a in A, f(a) is not empty. In other words, each element in A maps to a non-empty subset of B; or in terms of a relation R as subset of A×B, R projects to A surjectively. A correspondence with this additional property is thought of as the generalization of a function, rather than as a special case of a relation, and is referred to in other contexts as a multivalued function.
- An example of a correspondence in this sense is the best response correspondence in game theory, which gives the optimal action for a player as a function of the strategies of all other players. If there is always a unique best action given what the other players are doing, then this is a function. If for some opponent's strategy, there is a set of best responses that are equally good, then this is a correspondence.
See also
References
- ↑ Encyclopedic dictionary of Mathematics. MIT. 2000. pp. 1330–1331. ISBN 0-262-59020-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=azS2ktxrz3EC&pg=PA1331#v=onepage&f=false.
- ↑ H. S. M. Coxeter (1959) The Real Projective Plane, page 18
- ↑ Fulton, William (1998), Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], 2, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-98549-7
- ↑ Mazza, Carlo; Voevodsky, Vladimir; Weibel, Charles (2006), Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, 2, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-3847-1
- ↑ Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael D.; Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 949–951. ISBN 0-19-507340-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=KGtegVXqD8wC&pg=PA949.