Equilateral dimension
In mathematics, the equilateral dimension of a metric space is the maximum size of any subset of the space whose points are all at equal distances to each other.[1] Equilateral dimension has also been called "metric dimension", but the term "metric dimension" also has many other inequivalent usages.[1] The equilateral dimension of [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional Euclidean space is [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math], achieved by a regular simplex, and the equilateral dimension of a [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional vector space with the Chebyshev distance ([math]\displaystyle{ L^\infty }[/math] norm) is [math]\displaystyle{ 2^d }[/math], achieved by a hypercube. However, the equilateral dimension of a space with the Manhattan distance ([math]\displaystyle{ L^1 }[/math] norm) is not known. Kusner's conjecture, named after Robert B. Kusner, states that it is exactly [math]\displaystyle{ 2d }[/math], achieved by a cross polytope.[2]
Lebesgue spaces
The equilateral dimension has been particularly studied for Lebesgue spaces, finite-dimensional normed vector spaces with the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm [math]\displaystyle{ \ \|x\|_p=\bigl(|x_1|^p+|x_2|^p+\cdots+|x_d|^p\bigr)^{1/p}. }[/math]
The equilateral dimension of [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] spaces of dimension [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math] behaves differently depending on the value of [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math]:
Unsolved problem in mathematics: How many equidistant points exist in spaces with Manhattan distance? (more unsolved problems in mathematics)
|
- For [math]\displaystyle{ p=1 }[/math], the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm gives rise to Manhattan distance. In this case, it is possible to find [math]\displaystyle{ 2d }[/math] equidistant points, the vertices of an axis-aligned cross polytope. The equilateral dimension is known to be exactly [math]\displaystyle{ 2d }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ d\le 4 }[/math],[3] and to be upper bounded by [math]\displaystyle{ O(d\log d) }[/math] for all [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math].[4] Robert B. Kusner suggested in 1983 that the equilateral dimension for this case should be exactly [math]\displaystyle{ 2d }[/math];[5] this suggestion (together with a related suggestion for the equilateral dimension when [math]\displaystyle{ p\gt 2 }[/math]) has come to be known as Kusner's conjecture.
- For [math]\displaystyle{ 1\lt p\lt 2 }[/math], the equilateral dimension is at least [math]\displaystyle{ (1+\varepsilon)d }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ \varepsilon }[/math] is a constant that depends on [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math].[6]
- For [math]\displaystyle{ p=2 }[/math], the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm is the familiar Euclidean distance. The equilateral dimension of [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional Euclidean space is [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math]: the [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math] vertices of an equilateral triangle, regular tetrahedron, or higher-dimensional regular simplex form an equilateral set, and every equilateral set must have this form.[5]
- For [math]\displaystyle{ 2\lt p\lt \infty }[/math], the equilateral dimension is at least [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math]: for instance the [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math] basis vectors of the vector space together with another vector of the form [math]\displaystyle{ (-x,-x,\dots) }[/math] for a suitable choice of [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] form an equilateral set. Kusner's conjecture states that in these cases the equilateral dimension is exactly [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math]. Kusner's conjecture has been proven for the special case that [math]\displaystyle{ p=4 }[/math].[6] When [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] is an odd integer the equilateral dimension is upper bounded by [math]\displaystyle{ O(d\log d) }[/math].[4]
- For [math]\displaystyle{ p=\infty }[/math] (the limiting case of the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm for finite values of [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math], in the limit as [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] grows to infinity) the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm becomes the Chebyshev distance, the maximum absolute value of the differences of the coordinates. For a [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional vector space with the Chebyshev distance, the equilateral dimension is [math]\displaystyle{ 2^d }[/math]: the [math]\displaystyle{ 2^d }[/math] vertices of an axis-aligned hypercube are at equal distances from each other, and no larger equilateral set is possible.[5]
Normed vector spaces
Equilateral dimension has also been considered for normed vector spaces with norms other than the [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norms. The problem of determining the equilateral dimension for a given norm is closely related to the kissing number problem: the kissing number in a normed space is the maximum number of disjoint translates of a unit ball that can all touch a single central ball, whereas the equilateral dimension is the maximum number of disjoint translates that can all touch each other.
For a normed vector space of dimension [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math], the equilateral dimension is at most [math]\displaystyle{ 2^d }[/math]; that is, the [math]\displaystyle{ L^\infty }[/math] norm has the highest equilateral dimension among all normed spaces.[7] (Petty 1971) asked whether every normed vector space of dimension [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math] has equilateral dimension at least [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math], but this remains unknown. There exist normed spaces in any dimension for which certain sets of four equilateral points cannot be extended to any larger equilateral set[7] but these spaces may have larger equilateral sets that do not include these four points. For norms that are sufficiently close in Banach–Mazur distance to an [math]\displaystyle{ L^p }[/math] norm, Petty's question has a positive answer: the equilateral dimension is at least [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math].[8]
It is not possible for high-dimensional spaces to have bounded equilateral dimension: for any integer [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math], all normed vector spaces of sufficiently high dimension have equilateral dimension at least [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math].[9] more specifically, according to a variation of Dvoretzky's theorem by (Alon Milman), every [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional normed space has a [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math]-dimensional subspace that is close either to a Euclidean space or to a Chebyshev space, where [math]\displaystyle{ k\ge\exp(c\sqrt{\log d}) }[/math] for some constant [math]\displaystyle{ c }[/math]. Because it is close to a Lebesgue space, this subspace and therefore also the whole space contains an equilateral set of at least [math]\displaystyle{ k+1 }[/math] points. Therefore, the same superlogarithmic dependence on [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math] holds for the lower bound on the equilateral dimension of [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional space.[8]
Riemannian manifolds
For any [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional Riemannian manifold the equilateral dimension is at least [math]\displaystyle{ d+1 }[/math].[5] For a [math]\displaystyle{ d }[/math]-dimensional sphere, the equilateral dimension is [math]\displaystyle{ d+2 }[/math], the same as for a Euclidean space of one higher dimension into which the sphere can be embedded.[5] At the same time as he posed Kusner's conjecture, Kusner asked whether there exist Riemannian metrics with bounded dimension as a manifold but arbitrarily high equilateral dimension.[5]
Notes
References
- "Embedding of [math]\displaystyle{ l^{k}_{\infty} }[/math] in finite-dimensional Banach spaces", Israel Journal of Mathematics 45 (4): 265–280, 1983, doi:10.1007/BF02804012.
- "Equilateral sets in [math]\displaystyle{ l_p^n }[/math]", Geometric and Functional Analysis 13 (3): 467–482, 2003, doi:10.1007/s00039-003-0418-7.
- Bandelt, Hans-Jürgen; Chepoi, Victor (1998), "Embedding into rectilinear spaces", Discrete & Computational Geometry 19 (4): 595–604, doi:10.1007/PL00009370, http://www.lif-sud.univ-mrs.fr/~chepoi/rectilinear.pdf.
- Braß, Peter (1999), "On equilateral simplices in normed spaces", Contributions to Algebra and Geometry 40 (2): 303–307, http://www.emis.de/journals/BAG/vol.40/no.2/3.html.
- Encyclopedia of Distances, Springer-Verlag, 2009, p. 20.
- "An olla-podrida of open problems, often oddly posed", American Mathematical Monthly 90 (3): 196–200, 1983, doi:10.2307/2975549.
- Koolen, Jack (2000), "Equilateral dimension of the rectilinear space", Designs, Codes and Cryptography 21 (1): 149–164, doi:10.1023/A:1008391712305.
- Petty, Clinton M. (1971), "Equilateral sets in Minkowski spaces", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 29 (2): 369–374, doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1971-0275294-8.
- Swanepoel, Konrad J. (2004), "A problem of Kusner on equilateral sets", Archiv der Mathematik 83 (2): 164–170, doi:10.1007/s00013-003-4840-8.
- Swanepoel, Konrad J.; Villa, Rafael (2008), "A lower bound for the equilateral number of normed spaces", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 136 (1): 127–131, doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08916-2.
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equilateral dimension.
Read more |