Exotic R4

From HandWiki
Short description: Smooth 4-manifold homeomorphic yet not diffeomorphic to Euclidean space


In mathematics, an exotic ℝ4 is a differentiable manifold that is homeomorphic (i.e. shape preserving) but not diffeomorphic (i.e. non smooth) to the Euclidean space ℝ4. The first examples were found in 1982 by Michael Freedman and others, by using the contrast between Freedman's theorems about topological 4-manifolds, and Simon Donaldson's theorems about smooth 4-manifolds.[1][2] There is a continuum of non-diffeomorphic differentiable structures ℝ4, as was shown first by Clifford Taubes.[3]

Prior to this construction, non-diffeomorphic smooth structures on spheres – exotic spheres – were already known to exist, although the question of the existence of such structures for the particular case of the 4-sphere remains open as of 2026. For any positive integer n other than 4, there are no exotic smooth structures ℝn; in other words, if n ≠ 4 then any smooth manifold homeomorphic to ℝn is diffeomorphic to ℝn.[4]

Construction

Construction from the failure of smooth surgery theory

Exotic ℝ4 arise from the failure of smooth surgery theory, in particular glueing a disc D4 to its boundary sphere S3 not resulting in a smooth 4-manifold. Exotic 7-spheres called Milnor spheres arise from a fully analogous failure of glueing a disc D8 to its boundary sphere S7 not resulting in a smooth 8-manifold. But the conclusions are different: In the latter case, D8≅ℝ8 has no exotic smooth structure, so S7 has to in order to explain the failure. In the former case, S3 has no exotic smooth structure due to Moise's theorem,[5] so D4≅ℝ4 has to in order to explain the failure.

Construction from the K3 surface

A concrete construction is the K3 surface K3, described by the homogenous equation x4+y4+z4+w4=0 in twistor space ℂP3.[6][7] According to Freedman's classification,[8][9] it is homeomorphic to the connected sum 2ME8‾#3(S2×S2) of twice the orientation-reversed E8 manifold ME8 and thrice the complex surface S2×S2≅ℂP1×ℂP1 gained from the product of the Riemann sphere with itself. Although K3 is a smooth 4-manifold, 2ME8‾#k(S2×S2) isn't for k=0,1,2. For k=0, this follows from Donaldson's theorem,[8][10] and for k=1,2, it was also shown by Simon Donaldson,[11] although Donaldson's theorem itself no longer applies. (A simpler argument was later obtained with Seiberg–Witten invariants.) Hence a smooth surgery along the connecting sphere S3 to remove one, two or three S2×S2 from the smooth K3 surface K3 must fail.[12] (It is an open question whether this also holds for any connected sum of the K3 surface K3, which is known as 11/8 conjecture.) In the simplest surgery of removing three S2×S2, the failure spawns an exotic ℝ4 in #3(S2×S2).

Construction from a nine-fold blow-up

The intersection form of the smooth complex surface ℂP2#9ℂP9‾, the simplest example of an elliptic surface known as Dolgachev surface, is [+1]⊕9[−1]≅−E8⊕[+1]⊕[−1][13] with the isomorphism coming from the Hesse–Minkowski theorem. It is therefore the same as for the topological 4-manifold ME8‾#ℂP2#*ℂP2‾ using the fake second complex projective space, so Freedman's classification[8][9] claims both to be homeomorphic. In particular, that makes ME8‾#ℂP2#*ℂP2‾ smoothable. But a smooth surgery to remove ℂP2 results in the non-smoothable manifold ME8‾#*ℂP2‾,[9] which follows from its intersection form −E8⊕[−1] being negative definite and not diagonalizable, which Donaldson's theorem forbids if it was smoothable. The failure of this smooth surgery spawns an exotic ℝ4 in ℂP2.

Construction from a ten-fold blow-up

The previous construction can be expanded: The intersection form of the smooth complex surface ℂP2#10ℂP9‾ is [+1]⊕10[−1]≅−E8⊕H⊕[−1],[13] the same as for the topological 4-manifold ME8‾#(S2×S2)#*ℂP2‾, so Freedman's classification[8][9] claims both to be homeomorphic and in particular the latter to be smoothable. But a smooth surgery to remove S2×S2 again results in the non-smoothable manifold ME8‾#*ℂP2‾. The failure of this smooth surgery spawns an exotic ℝ4 in S2×S2.

Construction from the failure of the smooth h-cobordism theorem

According to Michael Freedman, the four-dimensional topological h-cobordism theorem holds, while according to Simon Donaldson, the four-dimensional smooth h-cobordism theorem doesn't hold. Let W be a smooth h-cobordism between smooth 4-manifolds M and N, for which there is no diffeomorphism W≅M×[0,1], although there must be a homeomorphism W≅M×[0,1]. In this case there exists an open sub-cobordism U⊂W with a homeomorphism U≅D4×[0,1]≅ℝ4×[0,1] and a compact contractible sub-cobordism K⊂U, so that W and U are indeed smoothly trivial cobordisms outside of K, hence there are diffeomorphisms:

W∖K≅(M∖K)×[0,1];
U∖K≅(U∩M∖K)×[0,1].

Now U connects the two open subsets U∩M∖K and U∩N∖K, which are homeomorphic to ℝ4, but cannot diffeomorphic to ℝ4 as this would cause a diffeomorphism W≅M×[0,1].[13]

Small exotic R4s

An exotic ℝ4 is called small if it can be smoothly embedded as an open subset of the standard ℝ4.

Small exotic ℝ4 can be constructed by starting with a non-trivial smooth 5-dimensional h-cobordism (which exists by Donaldson's proof that the h-cobordism theorem fails in this dimension) and using Freedman's theorem that the topological h-cobordism theorem holds in this dimension.

Large exotic R4s

An exotic ℝ4 is called large if it cannot be smoothly embedded as an open subset of the standard ℝ4.

Examples of large exotic ℝ4 can be constructed using the fact that compact 4-manifolds can often be split as a topological sum (by Freedman's work), but cannot be split as a smooth sum (by Donaldson's work).

Michael Hartley Freedman and Laurence R. Taylor (1986) showed that there is a maximal exotic ℝ4, into which all other ℝ4 can be smoothly embedded as open subsets.

Casson handles are homeomorphic to 𝔻2×ℝ2 by Freedman's theorem (where 𝔻2 is the closed unit disc) but it follows from Donaldson's theorem that they are not all diffeomorphic to 𝔻2×ℝ2. In other words, some Casson handles are exotic 𝔻2×ℝ2.

It is not known (as of 2024) whether or not there are any exotic 4-spheres; such an exotic 4-sphere would be a counterexample to the smooth generalized Poincaré conjecture in dimension 4. Some plausible candidates are given by Gluck twists.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Kirby (1989), p. 95
  2. ↑ Freedman and Quinn (1990), p. 122
  3. ↑ Taubes (1987), Theorem 1.1
  4. ↑ Stallings (1962), in particular Corollary 5.2
  5. ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 101
  6. ↑ Freed & Uhlenbeck 84, p. 21
  7. ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 130
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Freed & Uhlenbeck 84, p. 22-24
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Scorpan 05, p. 240-243
  10. ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 243
  11. ↑ Scorpan 05, p. 248
  12. ↑ Freed & Uhlenbeck 84, p. 24-30
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 Scorpan 05, p. 250-259
  14. ↑ Asselmeyer-Maluga, Torsten; Król, Jerzy (2014-08-28). "Abelian gerbes, generalized geometries and foliations of small exotic R^4". arXiv:0904.1276 [hep-th].

References