GEDCOM

From HandWiki
Short description: Specification for genealogical data
GEDCOM
Filename extension.ged, .gdz
Internet media typeapplication/vnd.familysearch.gedcom [1] application/vnd.familysearch.gedcom+zip [1]
Developed byLDS FHD
Initial release1984; 40 years ago (1984)
Latest release
7.0.13
(4 August 2023; 11 months ago (2023-08-04))
Type of formatGenealogy data exchange
StandardDe facto[2]
Open format?no
Websitegedcom.io
github.com/familysearch/GEDCOM

GEDCOM (/ˈdʒɛdkɒm/ JED-kom), complete name FamilySearch GEDCOM, is a de facto open file format specification to store genealogical data, and import or export it between compatible genealogy software.[2] GEDCOM is an acronym standing for Genealogical Data Communication. GEDCOM was developed by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) as an aid to genealogical research.[3] Most genealogy software supports importing from and exporting to GEDCOM format.[4]

As of version 7.0, a GEDCOM file is defined as UTF-8 encoded plain text. This file contains genealogical information about individuals such as names, events, and relationships; metadata links these records together. GEDCOM 7.0 is the first version to use semantic versioning, and is the most recent minor version of the specification.

The predecessor to 7.0, GEDCOM 5.5.1, was released as a draft in 1999. It has received only minor updates in the subsequent 20 years. The lack of updates to the standard and deficiencies in its capabilities began to see some genealogy programs add proprietary extensions to the format, which are not always recognized by other genealogy programs, such as the GEDCOM 5.5 EL (Extended Locations) specification.[5][6][7] Other standards, such as GEDCOM X, have been suggested as complete replacements for GEDCOM.

GEDCOM 5.5.1 final, released in 2019, remains the industry's format standard for the exchange of genealogical data. With the release of GEDCOM 7.0 in 2021, however, a push is underway to see 7.0 adopted. FamilySearch intends to be GEDCOM 7.0 compatible in Quarter 3 of 2022, and Ancestry.com has 7.0 compatibility on its roadmap but has not yet specified an implementation date. FamilySearch GEDCOM has a GitHub repository.[8]

Model

GEDCOM uses a lineage-linked data model, with link emphasis on the nuclear family, and the individuals (children) produced by that family.[9] These historical goals are described in the 7.0 specification document, "The FAM record was originally structured to represent families where a male HUSB (husband or father) and female WIFE (wife or mother) produce CHIL (children)."[10]

The document goes on to say that these record types may be used more flexibly to reflect different family concepts. "The FAM record may also be used for cultural parallels to this, including nuclear families, marriage, cohabitation, fostering, adoption, and so on, regardless of the gender of the partners...The individuals pointed to by the HUSB and WIFE are collectively referred to as 'partners', 'parents' or 'spouses'."[10]

File structure

A GEDCOM file consists of a header section, records, and a trailer section. Within these sections, records represent people (INDI record), families (FAM records), sources of information (SOUR records), and other miscellaneous records, including notes. Every line of a GEDCOM file begins with a level number where all top-level records (HEAD, TRLR, SUBN, and each INDI, FAM, OBJE, NOTE, REPO, SOUR, and SUBM) begin with a line with level 0, while other level numbers are positive integers.

Although it is possible to write a GEDCOM file by hand, the format was designed to be used with software and thus is not especially human-friendly. A GEDCOM validator[11] that can be used to validate the structure of a GEDCOM file is included as part of PhpGedView project, though it is not meant to be a standalone validator. For standalone validation "The Windows GEDCOM Validator" can be used.[12] or the older unmaintained Gedcheck[13] from the LDS Church.

During 2001, The GEDCOM TestBook Project evaluated how well four popular genealogy programs conformed to the GEDCOM 5.5 standard using the Gedcheck program.[14] Findings showed that a number of problems existed and that "The most commonly found fault leading to data loss was the failure to read the NOTE tag at all the possible levels at which it may appear."[15] In 2005, the Genealogical Software Report Card was evaluated (by Bill Mumford who participated in the original GEDCOM Testbook Project)[16] and included testing the GEDCOM 5.5 standard using the Gedcheck program.[17]

To assist with adoption of GEDCOM 7.0, validation tools now exist for that standard as well.[18]

Example

The following is a sample GEDCOM file.

sample.ged 
0 HEAD
1 SOUR PAF
2 NAME Personal Ancestral File
2 VERS 5.0
1 DATE 30 NOV 2000
1 GEDC
2 VERS 5.5
2 FORM LINEAGE-LINKED
1 CHAR ANSEL
1 SUBM @U1@
0 @I1@ INDI
1 NAME John /Smith/
1 SEX M
1 FAMS @F1@
0 @I2@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Stansfield/
1 SEX F
1 FAMS @F1@
0 @I3@ INDI
1 NAME James /Smith/
1 SEX M
1 FAMC @F1@
0 @F1@ FAM
1 HUSB @I1@
1 WIFE @I2@
1 MARR
1 CHIL @I3@
0 @U1@ SUBM
1 NAME Submitter
0 TRLR

The header (HEAD) includes the source program and version (Personal Ancestral File, 5.0), the GEDCOM version (5.5), the character encoding (ANSEL), and a link to information about the submitter of the file.

The individual records (INDI) define John Smith (ID I1), Elizabeth Stansfield (ID I2), and James Smith (ID I3).

The family record (FAM) links the husband (HUSB), wife (WIFE), and child (CHIL) by their ID numbers.

Versions

The current version of the specification in wide use is GEDCOM 5.5.1 final, which was released on 15 November 2019. Its predecessor, GEDCOM 5.5.1 draft[19] was issued in 1999, introducing nine new attribute, tags and adding UTF-8 as an approved character encoding. The draft was not formally approved, but its provisions were adopted in some part by a number of genealogy programs[20][21][22] including FamilySearch.org.[19]

Lineage-linked GEDCOM is the deliberate de facto common denominator.[2] Despite version 5.5 of the GEDCOM standard first being published in 1996, many genealogical software suppliers have never fully supported the feature of multilingual Unicode text (instead of the ANSEL character set) introduced with that version of the specification. Uniform use of Unicode would allow for the usage of international character sets. An example is the storage of East Asian names in their original Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK) characters, without which they could be ambiguous and of little use for genealogical or historical research.[23] PAF 5.2 is an example of software that uses UTF-8 as its internal character set, and can output a UTF-8 GEDCOM.[23][24]

GEDCOM 7.0 requires UTF-8 encoding throughout,[25] and resolves other long-standing issues with GEDCOM 5.5.1. Multimedia support in the form of an associated .zip file, called a GEDZip, is another inclusion. Efforts are underway to see 7.0 embraced as the new exchange standard.[26] GEDCOM 7.0 allows explicitly identifying what standards other than GEDCOM may apply to a particular file. GEDCOM has always been extensible, but prior to 7.0 there was no standard way to identify such extensions. Also, GEDCOM 7.0 allows explicitly marking an event as nonexistent. This allows, for example, documenting that a particular individual never married.[27]

Release history

GEDCOM version Release date Notes
1.0[28] 1984[29] –
2.0[28] Dec 1985[30] PAF 2.0
2.1 Feb 1987[30] GEDCOM for PAF 2.1
2.3 Draft 7 August 1985[31] with PAF2.0 GEDCOM implementation conventions
2.4 Draft 13 December 1985[31] with PAF2.0 GEDCOM implementation conventions
3.0 Standard[28] 9 October 1987[32] PAF 2.0 and 2.1 implementation of 3.0
4.0 Standard August 1989 PAF 2.1 – 2.31
4.1 Draft[33] – –
4.2 Draft[34] 25 January 1990[35] –
5.0 Draft[28] 31 December 1991[31] lineage-linked structures were introduced.[36]
5.1 Draft 18 September 1992[30] –
5.2 Draft 22 January 1992[37] –
5.3 Draft 4 November 1993[38] Unicode standard (ISO/IEC 10646) was introduced as an additional character set.
5.4 Draft 21 August 1995[39] –
5.5 Standard 11 December 1995[40] PAF 3, 4 and 5
5.5 Standard January 2, 1996[41][42] PAF 3, 4 and 5 / 5.5 Standard[43]
GEDCOM (Future Direction) Draft[36][44] May 1, 1998[45][46] "it used an entirely new data model"[47]
5.5.1 Draft[48][49] October 2, 1999[19] Used by FamilySearch.org[19] UTF-8 added as an approved character encoding.
5.5.1 Release[50] November 15, 2019 current standard, minor text modifications to 5.5.1 Draft.
5.6 Private Draft -[51] "Jed Allen sent those two files to a few people only for sort of "private comments"[52]
6.0 XML Draft December 28, 2001[53] Was not a complete specification, and not recommended to begin to software implementations.
7.0.0-rc1 Draft February 2021[54] Release candidate revealed for RootsTech 2021, but then all talks, specifications and the web site were removed on 25 February 2021[55]
7.0[56] 27 May 2021 Modernize character encoding, clarify ambiguities in 5.5.1 specification, introduce semantic versioning, improve multimedia handling
7.0.13[57] 4 August 2023
{{{2}}}

Limitations

Support for multi-person events and sources

A GEDCOM file can contain information on events such as births, deaths, census records, ship's records, marriages, etc.; a rule of thumb is that an event is something that took place at a specific time, at a specific place (even if time and place are not known). GEDCOM files can also contain attributes such as physical description, occupation, and total number of children; unlike events, attributes generally cannot be associated with a specific time or place.

The GEDCOM specification requires that each event or attribute is associated with exactly one individual or family.[58] This causes redundancy for events such as census records where the actual census entry often contains information on multiple individuals. In the GEDCOM file, for census records a separate census "CENS" event must be added for each individual referenced. Some genealogy programs, such as Gramps and The Master Genealogist, have elaborate database structures for sources that are used, among other things, to represent multi-person events. When databases are exported from one of these programs to GEDCOM, these database structures cannot be represented in GEDCOM due to this limitation, with the result that the event or source information including all of the relevant citation reference information must be duplicated each place that it is used. This duplication makes it difficult for the user to maintain the information related to sources.

In the GEDCOM specification, events that are associated with a family such as marriage information is only stored in a GEDCOM once, as part of the family (FAM) record, and then both spouses are linked to that single family record.[58]

Ambiguity in the specification

The GEDCOM specification was made purposefully flexible to support many ways of encoding data, particularly in the area of sources. This flexibility has led to a great deal of ambiguity, and has produced the side effect that some genealogy programs which import GEDCOM do not import all of the data from a file.[59]

Support for varying definitions of families and relationships

GEDCOM does not explicitly support data representation of many types of close interpersonal relationships, such as same-sex marriages, domestic partnerships, cohabitation, polyamory or polygamy. Such relationships can only be represented using the generic ASSO tag used for any type of relationship.

Ordering of events that do not have dates

The GEDCOM specification does not offer explicit support for keeping a known order of events. In particular, the order of relationships (FAMS) for a person and the order of the children within a relationship (FAM) can be lost. In many cases the sequence of events can be derived from the associated dates. But dates are not always known, in particular when dealing with data from centuries ago. For example, in the case that a person has had two relationships, both with unknown dates, but from descriptions it is known that the second one is indeed the second one. The order in which these FAMS are recorded in GEDCOM's INDI record will depend on the exporting program. In Aldfaer[60] for instance, the sequence depends on the ordering of the data by the user (alphabetical, chronological, reference, etc.). The proposed XML GEDCOM standard[53] does not address this issue either.

Lesser-known features

GEDCOM has many features that are not commonly used. Some software packages do not support all the features that the GEDCOM standard allows.

Multimedia

The GEDCOM standard supports the inclusion of multimedia objects (for example, photos of individuals).[61] Such multimedia objects can be either included in the GEDCOM file itself (called the "embedded form") or in an external file where the name of the external file is specified in the GEDCOM file (called the "linked form"). Embedding multimedia directly in the GEDCOM file makes transmission of data easier, in that all of the information (including the multimedia data) is in one file, but the resulting file can be enormous. Linking multimedia keeps the size of the GEDCOM file under control, but then when transmitting the file, the multimedia objects must either be transmitted separately or archived together with the GEDCOM into one larger file. Support for embedding media directly was dropped in the draft 5.5.1 standard.[62]

Conflicting information

The GEDCOM standard allows for the specification of multiple opinions or conflicting data, simply by specifying multiple records of the same type. For example, if an individual's birth date was recorded as 10 January 1800 on the birth certificate, but 11 January 1800 on the death certificate, two BIRT records for that individual would be included, the first with the 10 January 1800 date and giving the birth certificate as the source, and the second with the 11 January 1800 date and giving the death certificate as the source. The preferred record is usually listed first.

This example encoded in GEDCOM might look like this: 

0 @I1@ INDI
1 NAME John /Doe/
1 BIRT
2 DATE 10 JAN 1800
2 SOUR @S1@
3 DATA
4 TEXT Transcription from birth certificate would go here
3 NOTE This birth record is preferred because it comes from the birth certificate
3 QUAY 2
1 BIRT
2 DATE 11 JAN 1800
2 SOUR @S2@
3 DATA
4 TEXT Transcription from death certificate would go here
3 QUAY 2

Conflicting data may also be the result of user errors. The standard does not specify in any way that the contents must be consistent. A birth date like "10 APR 1819" might mistakenly have been recorded as "10 APR 1918" long after the person's death. The only way to reveal such inconsistencies is by rigorous validation of the content data.

Internationalization

The GEDCOM standard supports internationalization in several ways. First, newer versions of the standard allow data to be stored in Unicode (or, more recently, UTF-8), so text in any language can be stored.[63] Secondly, in the same way that you can have multiple events on a person, GEDCOM allows you to have multiple names for a person,[64] so names can be stored in multiple languages (although there is no standardized way to indicate which instance is in which language). Finally, in the latest version (5.5.1, not yet in widespread use), the NAME field also supports a phonetic variation (FONE) and a romanized variation (ROMN) of the name.[65]

GEDCOM X

In February 2012 at the RootsTech 2012 conference, FamilySearch outlined a major new project around genealogical standards called GEDCOM X, and invited collaboration.[66] It includes software developed under the Apache open source license. It includes data formats that facilitate basing family trees on sources and records (both physical artifacts and digital artifacts), support for sharing and linking data online, and an API.[66][67][68]

In August 2012 FamilySearch employee and GEDCOM X project leader Ryan Heaton dropped the claim that GEDCOM X is the new industry standard, and repositioned GEDCOM X as another FamilySearch open source project.[69]

After the release of GEDCOM 7, FamilySearch positioned GEDCOM X as useful for interoperation with its FamilySearch Family Tree software.[70]

Alternatives

Commsoft, the authors of the Roots[71] series of genealogy software and Ultimate Family Tree, defined a version called Event-Oriented GEDCOM (also known as "Event GEDCOM" and originally called InterGED[72]),[73] which included events as first class (zero-level) items. Although it is event based, it is still a model built on assumed reality rather than evidence. Event GEDCOM was more flexible, as it allowed some separation between believed events and the participants. However, Event GEDCOM was not widely adopted by other developers due to its semantic differences.[citation needed] With Roots and Ultimate Family Tree no longer available, very few people today are using Event GEDCOM.[74]

Gramps XML is an XML-based open format created by the open source genealogy project Gramps and used also by PhpGedView.

The Family History Information Standards Organisation was established in 2012 with the aim of developing international standards for family history and genealogical information.[75] One of the standards the organization proposed was Extended Legacy Format (ELF), compatible with GEDCOM 5.5(.1) but including an extensibility mechanism. The organization requested public comment on the proposed standard in 2017.[76] It withdrew the proposal because release 7.0 of GEDCOM addressed many of the organization's concerns.[27]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Clarke, Gordon (2021-12-07). "Media subtype name: vnd.familysearch.gedcom+zip". https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/vnd.familysearch.gedcom+zip. Retrieved 2022-10-01. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Subject: GEDCOM and Formal Standards Organizations Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 11:53:52 -0700 From: Bill Harten – Organization: Brigham Young University "why wasn't GEDCOM developed through a formal standards organization?..."Thus GEDCOM was born as a deliberate, de facto standard, to be followed only by those who felt it was in their best interest to do so.
  3. ↑ Subject: rep: T Jenkins – open letter to GEDCOM-L – "The goal was to try and provide a standard to allow developers to provide a vehicle for their users to share genealogical conclusions and supporting evidence with others." From: "Jed R. Allen" Brigham Young University – Date: 29 Sep 1995 17:40:04 -0600 – GEDCOM-L Archives – September 1995, week 5 (#7)
  4. ↑ "Genealogical Software Report Card". March 2005. http://www.mumford.ca/reportcard/index.htm. 
  5. ↑ GEDCOM 5.5 EL (Extended Locations) specification
  6. ↑ Ability to save information against places – "Support for parts of the GEDCOM 5.5EL proposal" – FHUG Wish List
  7. ↑ 0000688: Support for Gedcom 5.5EL – Gramps Bugtracker
  8. ↑ https://github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM
  9. ↑ "The GEDCOM Standard Release 5.5: Data Model Chart". https://homepages.rootsweb.com/~pmcbride/gedcom/55gcmod.htm. 
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 "The FamilySearch GEDCOM Specification" (in en). 2022-06-07. https://gedcom.io/specifications/FamilySearchGEDCOMv7.html#records. 
  11. ↑ "View of phpgedview's GEDCOM validator source code". http://phpgedview.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/phpgedview/trunk/phpGedView/gedcheck.php. 
  12. ↑ "VGed 3.02". https://rumblefische.com/vged/vged.html. 
  13. ↑ Gedcheck – "uses a grammar file for the specific version of GEDCOM to be checked against." The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
  14. ↑ "GEDCOM TestBook Project". 2001. https://www.ngsgenealogy.org/ngsgentech/projects/TestBook2001/index.cfm. 
  15. ↑ [GEDCOM and the GenTech Testbook Project] Genealogical Computing 7/1/2001 – Archive Summer 2001 Vol. 21.1 – Ancestry.com
  16. ↑ The Genealogical Software Report Card 2000 S W Mumford Last updated March 2005[unreliable source?]
  17. ↑ Reviews from the NGS Newsmagazine and its Predecessors. – Test Result are in the PDF's
  18. ↑ "Tools for FamilySearch GEDCOM" (in en). https://gedcom.io/tools/. 
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 Family History Department GEDCOM Coordinator (2 October 1999). "The GEDCOM Standard: Draft Release 5.5.1". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. http://www.phpgedview.net/ged551-5.pdf. Retrieved 2022-10-01. 
  20. ↑ GED-GEN is based on GEDCOM version 5.5.1 (draft) , dated 2 October 1999. The following record types are parsed: header, individual, family, notes, source, and repository. However not all elements within these records are processed. – Specifications – GED-GEN Introduction
  21. ↑ 0000688: Support for Gedcom 5.5EL (0008068) romjerome (developer) 2009-01-25 06:13 – "Note : GRAMPS 3.0.x supports a part of GEDCOM 5.5.1 on export, which is not supported by most programs" – Gramps Bugtracker
  22. ↑ "MyBlood supports the GEDCOM 5.5 and 5.5.1 file format." – MyBlood Support – Forum, FAQ, Know Problems
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Personal Ancestral File 5.2 and PAF Companion 5.4 – Software Version Changes Release 5.0.1.4, 22 December 2000 – "10.GEDCOM improvements: Table:Destination:PAF 5 GEDCOM Version:5.5 Character Set:UTF-8
  24. ↑ Personal Ancestral File 5.1 – "Also noted in a second test was the use of four tags from a later draft version of the Gedcom specification, FONE (phonetic name), ROMN (romanized name), EMAIL (e-mail), and _UID" Jan/Feb 2002 NGS Newsmagazine
  25. ↑ "The FamilySearch GEDCOM Specification" (in en). 2022-06-07. https://gedcom.io/specifications/FamilySearchGEDCOMv7.html#characters. 
  26. ↑ "Implementation Progress • Genealogy" (in en). http://familysearch.org/en/GEDCOM/implementation-progress. 
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Smith, Richard (2021-07-21). "FamilySearch GEDCOM 7" (in en-US). https://fhiso.org/2021/07/familysearch-gedcom-7/. 
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 28.2 28.3 pafuser : Beitrag: Re: [pafuser] PAF 5.01 und GEDCOM By Eckhard Henkel – Beitrag #103 von 1494 – Yahoo Groups
  29. ↑ Subject:description of InterGED theory From:Gary Steiner – "The first GEDCOM standard, version 1.0, was released to the genealogical software development community in 1984." – GEDCOM-L Archives – July 1994, week 4 (#14)
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 Subject:Timeline of GEDCOM versions and PAF By George Archer – GEDCOM-L Archives – November 2000, week 3 (#12)
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 Subject:Re: GEDCOM standards help please From:Graham Starkey – "DRAFT VERSION 2.3–7 August 1985 with PAF2.0 GEDCOM implementation conventions" – GEDCOM-L Archives – June 2000, week 4 (#1)
  32. ↑ RootsWeb: ROOTS-L Re: Large Charts (fairly long):Date:Tue, 11 Jul 89 15:14:31 CDT From: Marty Hoag <NU021172@N...> Subject:Re: Printing trees with PAF? From soc.roots ... * GEDCOM release 3.0, 9 Oct 1987, 131 pages (!)
  33. ↑ "LISTSERV - GEDCOM-L Archives - LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU". https://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind9410A&L=GEDCOM-L&P=R880&I=-3&T=0. 
  34. ↑ File Structures for PAF and GEDCOM – Date: 1996/01/04 – soc.genealogy.computing | Google Groups:
  35. ↑ Subject:4.x specs From:Rafal Prinke -"while this document has the date January 25, 1990. So maybe it is GEDCOM 4.2 ?" – GEDCOM-L Archives – May 1994, week 1 (#19)
  36. ↑ 36.0 36.1 Subject: GEDCOM (Future Direction) Announced by Family History From: "Jed R. Allen" Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 18:08:24 -0600
  37. ↑ Subject:Re: GEDCOM standards help please From:Graham Starkey – "DRAFT Release 5.2–22 January 1992 120kb" – GEDCOM-L Archives – June 2000, week 4 (#1)
  38. ↑ GEDCOM 5.3 draft – 4 November 1993
  39. ↑ THE GEDCOM STANDARD – DRAFT Release 5.4–21 August 1995
  40. ↑ Subject:Timeline of GEDCOM versions and PAF By George Archer – "5.5 11 Dec 1995 (Title Page for 5.5)"- GEDCOM-L Archives – November 2000, week 3 (#12)
  41. ↑ GEDCOM 5.5 Standard (Executable file in Envoy format)
  42. ↑ Re: Looking for GEDCOM versions 4 & 5.xx "Brian C. Madsen" – "A GEDCOM 5.5 Errata Sheet dated 10 January 1996 supposedly contains corrections to pages 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 29, 29, 33, 34, 39, 57, 79, and 85."
  43. ↑ Gedcom Documentation Library , Chronoplex Software
  44. ↑ GEDCOM Specification Future Direction (1999-07-07)
  45. ↑ "LISTSERV - GEDCOM-L Archives - LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU". https://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0002C&L=GEDCOM-L&P=R351&I=-3. 
  46. ↑ Comments on the GEDCOM Future Directions document Michael H. Kay, 17 May 1998
  47. ↑ Subject:GEDCOM Future Directions – From:John Nairn – Date:Mon, 11 May 1998 13:38:45 -0600 – GEDCOM-L Archives – May 1998, week 2 (#3)
  48. ↑ GEDCOM 5.51 data model in UML format – Software Renovation Corporation
  49. ↑ "Gedcom 5.5.1 – GenWiki". http://wiki-en.genealogy.net/Gedcom_5.5.1. 
  50. ↑ "THE GEDCOM STANDARD Release 5.5.1". https://edge.fscdn.org/assets/img/documents/ged551-5bac5e57fe88dd37df0e153d9c515335.pdf. 
  51. ↑ Subject:Re: GEDCOM History From:STEFANO BOSCOLO – Date:Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:54:06 +0100 – GEDCOM-L Archives – February 2001, week 3 (#1)
  52. ↑ Subject: Re: GEDCOM History From:"Rafal T. Prinke" – Date:Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:14:55 +0100 – GEDCOM-L Archives – February 2001, week 3 (#4)
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 "Draft Specification for GEDCOM XML 6.0". http://www.familysearch.org/GEDCOM/GedXML60.pdf. 
  54. ↑ "Web site for GEDCOM 7.0". http://gedcom.io/. 
  55. ↑ "GEDCOM 7.0 at Louis Kessler's Behold Blog". https://beholdgenealogy.com/blog/?p=3724. 
  56. ↑ "The FamilySearch GEDCOM Specification Release 7.0.9". https://github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/releases/download/v7.0.9/gedcom.pdf. 
  57. ↑ "The FamilySearch GEDCOM Specification Release 7.0.9". https://github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/releases/download/v7.0.13/gedcom.pdf. 
  58. ↑ 58.0 58.1 GEDCOM Standard 5.5, pp. 26–27.
  59. ↑ "Why GEDCOM Files are Not in Sync with All Genealogy Programs". family-genealogy.com. 2011-04-24. http://www.family-genealogy.com/downloads/GEDCOM_Sync_Issues.pdf. 
  60. ↑ "Aldfaer, Hét gratis stamboomprogramma" (in Dutch). Netherlands. http://www.aldfaer.nl. Retrieved 2022-10-01. 
  61. ↑ GEDCOM Standard 5.5, p. 28.
  62. ↑ Draft GEDCOM Standard 5.5.1, p. 6.
  63. ↑ GEDCOM Standard 5.5, p. 45.
  64. ↑ GEDCOM Standard 5.5, p. 27.
  65. ↑ GEDCOM Draft 5.5.1, p. 38
  66. ↑ 66.0 66.1 "GEDCOM X". FamilySearch. http://www.gedcomx.org/. 
  67. ↑ "Ryan Heaton: A New GEDCOM". The Ancestry Insider. 2012-02-04. http://ancestryinsider.blogspot.com/2012/02/ryan-heaton-new-gedcom.html. 
  68. ↑ "RootsTech Learning #3 – GEDCOM X and/or BetterGEDCOM and/or FHISO". Stardust 'n' Roots. 2012-02-13. http://geneapoppop.blogspot.com/2012/02/rootstech-learning-3-gedcom-x-andor.html. 
  69. ↑ 2012-08-31 GEDCOM X: no industry standard, FamilySearch abandons GEDCOM X push, By Tamura Jones, Modern Software Experience.
  70. ↑ "General FAQs" (in en). https://gedcom.io/generalfaqs/. 
  71. ↑ CommSoft to Return? Dick Eastman Online 3/14/2001 – Archive – Ancestry.com
  72. ↑ RootsWeb: TMG-L [TMG] InterGED/Event GEDCOM Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:33:18 -0700
  73. ↑ "Commsoft: The Roots Story". http://sonic.net/~commsoft/rstory.html. 
  74. ↑ "TMGL Archives: Event-oriented". 2000-06-29. http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/TMG/2000-06/0962255126. 
  75. ↑ "Family History Information Standards Organisation". FHISO. http://fhiso.org/. 
  76. ↑ "Annual Report to Members for 2018" (in en-US). https://fhiso.org/report-2018/. 

External links

General



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=GEDCOM&oldid=3359958"