History:Microhistory

From HandWiki
Short description: Intensive historical investigation of a well-defined smaller unit of research
An edition of the 1560 account of the trial of the French imposter Martin Guerre who would serve as the subject for Natalie Zemon Davis's landmark The Return of Martin Guerre (1982)

Microhistory is a genre of history that focuses on small units of research, such as an event, community, individual or a settlement. In its ambition, however, microhistory can be distinguished from a simple case study insofar as microhistory aspires to "[ask] large questions in small places", according to the definition given by Charles Joyner.[1] It is closely associated with social and cultural history.

Origins

Microhistory became popular in Italy in the 1970s.[2] According to Giovanni Levi, one of the pioneers of the approach, it began as a reaction to a perceived crisis in existing historiographical approaches.[3] Carlo Ginzburg, another of microhistory's founders, has written that he first heard the term used around 1977, and soon afterwards began to work with Levi and Simona Cerutti on Microstorie, a series of microhistorical works.[4]

The word "microhistory" dates back to 1959, when the American historian George R. Stewart published Pickett's Charge: A Microhistory of the Final Attack on Gettysburg, July 3, 1863, which tells the story of the final day of the Battle of Gettysburg.[5] Another early use was by the Annales historian Fernand Braudel, for whom the concept had negative connotations, being overly concerned with the history of events.[6] A third early use of the term was in the title of Luis González's 1968 work Pueblo en vilo: Microhistoria de San José de Gracia.[6] González distinguished between microhistory, for him synonymous with local history, and "petite histoire", which is primarily concerned with anecdotes.[6]

Approach

The most distinctive aspect of the microhistorical approach is the small scale of investigations.[2] Microhistorians focus on small units in society, as a reaction to the generalisations made by the social sciences which do not necessarily hold up when tested against these smaller units.[7] For instance, Ginzburg's 1976 work The Cheese and the Worms – "probably the most popular and widely read work of microhistory"[2] – investigates the life of a single sixteenth-century Italian miller, Menocchio. The individuals microhistorical works are concerned with are frequently those whom Richard M. Tristano describes as "little people", especially those considered heretics.[8]

Carlo Ginzburg has written that a core principle of microhistory is making obstacles in sources, such as lacunae, part of the historical account.[9] Relatedly, Levi has said that the point of view of the researcher becomes part of the account in microhistory.[10] Other notable aspects of microhistory as a historical approach are an interest in the interaction of elite and popular culture,[11] and an interest in the interaction between micro- and macro-levels of history.[12]

See also

Notable microhistorians

  • Wolfgang Behringer
  • Robert Bickers
  • Jaroslav Čechura [cs]
  • Simona Cerutti
  • Alain Corbin
  • John J. Curry
  • Robert Darnton
  • Natalie Zemon Davis
  • Arie van Deursen
  • Clifford Geertz
  • Carlo Ginzburg
  • Luis González y González
  • Maurizio Gribaudi
  • Craig Harline
  • Cynthia A. Kierner
  • Mark Kurlansky
  • Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie
  • Giovanni Levi
  • Sigurður Gylfi Magnússon
  • Luis Mott
  • Sue Peabody
  • Leslie Peirce
  • Detlev Peukert
  • Osvaldo Raggio
  • Jacques Revel
  • Guido Ruggiero
  • David Sabean
  • Mimi Sheller
  • Carolyn Steedman
  • Jonathan D. Spence
  • Alan Taylor
  • Stella Tillyard
  • E. P. Thompson
  • Laurel Thatcher Ulrich
  • Alfred F. Young


Citations

  1. ↑ Joyner, Charles W. (1999). Shared Traditions: Southern History and Folk Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois. p. 1. ISBN 9780252067723. https://books.google.com/books?id=XH0gSiHYhrQC&q=answers+to+large+questions&pg=PA1. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Tristano 1996, p. 26.
  3. ↑ Burke 1991, p. 93-94.
  4. ↑ Ginzburg, Tedeschi & Tedeschi 1993, p. 10.
  5. ↑ Ginzburg, Tedeschi & Tedeschi 1993, p. 11.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Ginzburg, Tedeschi & Tedeschi 1993, p. 12.
  7. ↑ Magnússon, Sigurdur Gylfi (2003). "'The Singularization of History': Social History and Microhistory within the Postmodern State of Knowledge". Journal of Social History 36 (3): 709. doi:10.1353/jsh.2003.0054. 
  8. ↑ Tristano 1996, p. 26-27.
  9. ↑ Ginzburg, Tedeschi & Tedeschi 1993, p. 28.
  10. ↑ Burke 1991, p. 106.
  11. ↑ Tristano 1996, p. 28.
  12. ↑ Tristano 1996, p. 27.

General and cited references

  • Burke, Peter (1991). "On Microhistory". in Levi, Giovanni. New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Cambridge: Polity Press. pp. 254. ISBN 9780271008271. https://books.google.com/books?id=yD3xAAAAMAAJ. 
  • Ginzburg, Carlo; Tedeschi, John; Tedeschi, Anne C. (1993). "Microhistory: Two or Three Things That I Know about It". Critical Inquiry (The University of Chicago Press) 20 (1): 10-35. doi:10.1086/448699. 
  • Künzel, Geraldien von Frijtag Drabbe; Galimi, Valeria (2019). "Microcosms of the Holocaust: Exploring New Venues into Small-Scale Research of the Holocaust". Journal of Genocide Research 21 (3): 335–341. doi:10.1080/14623528.2019.1631517. 
  • Tristano, Richard M. (1996). "Microhistory and Holy Family Parish: Some Historical Considerations". U.S. Catholic Historian (Catholic University of America Press) 14 (3: Parishes and Peoples: Religious and Social Meanings, Part Two): 23–30. 

External links

  • Microhistory—The website of the Center for Microhistorical Research at the Reykjavik Academy in Iceland
  • "What Is Microhistory?", Sigurdur Gylfi Magnusson, chair of the Center for Microhistorical Research
  • Microhistory Network—A group of historians interested in microhistory (2007–)



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=History:Microhistory&oldid=3219101"