Hydrological optimization
Hydrological optimization applies mathematical optimization techniques (such as dynamic programming, linear programming, integer programming, or quadratic programming) to water-related problems. These problems may be for surface water, groundwater, or the combination. The work is interdisciplinary, and may be done by hydrologists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, and operations researchers.
Simulation versus optimization
Groundwater and surface water flows can be studied with hydrologic simulation. A typical program used for this work is MODFLOW. However, simulation models cannot easily help make management decisions, as simulation is descriptive. Simulation shows what would happen given a certain set of conditions. Optimization, by contrast, finds the best solution for a set of conditions. Optimization models have three parts:
- An objective, such as "Minimize cost"
- Decision variables, which correspond to the options available to management
- Constraints, which describe the technical or physical requirements imposed on the options
To use hydrological optimization, a simulation is run to find constraint coefficients for the optimization. An engineer or manager can then add costs or benefits associated with a set of possible decisions, and solve the optimization model to find the best solution.
Examples of problems solved with hydrological optimization
- Contaminant remediation in aquifers.[1] The decision problem is where to locate wells, and choose a pumping rate, to minimize the cost to prevent spread of a contaminant. The constraints are associated with the hydrogeological flows.
- Water allocation to improve wetlands. This optimization model recommends water allocation and invasive vegetation control to improve wetland habitat of priority bird species. These recommendations are subject to constraints like water availability, spatial connectivity, hydraulic infrastructure capacities, vegetation responses, and available financial resources.[2]
- Maximizing well abstraction subject to environmental flow constraints.[3] The goal is to measure the effects of each user's water use on other users and on the environment, as accurately as possible, and then optimize over the available feasible solutions.
- Improving water quality. A simple optimization model identifies the cost-minimizing mix of best management practices to reduce the excess of nutrients in a watershed.[4]
- Hydrological optimization is now being proposed for use with smart markets for water-related resources.[5]
- Pipe network optimization with genetic algorithms.[6]
PDE-constrained optimization
Partial differential equations (PDEs) are widely used to describe hydrological processes, suggesting that a high degree of accuracy in hydrological optimization should strive to incorporate PDE constraints into a given optimization. Common examples of PDEs used in hydrology include:
Other environmental processes to consider as inputs include:
See also
- Drainage research
- Geographic information system
- Integrated water resources management
- Optimal control
- Pipe network analysis
- Water in California
References
- ↑ Ahlfeld, David P.; Mulvey, John M.; Pinder, George F.; Wood, Eric F. (1988). "Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 1. Model development" (in en). Water Resources Research 24 (3): 431–441. doi:10.1029/WR024i003p00431. ISSN 1944-7973. Bibcode: 1988WRR....24..431A.
- ↑ Alminagorta, Omar (2016). "Systems modeling to improve the hydro-ecological performance of diked wetlands". Water Resources Research 52 (9): 7070–7085. doi:10.1002/2015WR018105. Bibcode: 2016WRR....52.7070A. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=water_pubs.
- ↑ Feyen, Luc; Gorelick, Steven M. (2005). "Framework to evaluate the worth of hydraulic conductivity data for optimal groundwater resources management in ecologically sensitive areas". Water Resources Research 41 (3): 03019. doi:10.1029/2003WR002901. Bibcode: 2005WRR....41.3019F.
- ↑ Alminagorta, Omar; Tesfatsion, Bereket; Rosenberg, David E.; Neilson, Bethany (2013). "Simple Optimization Method to Determine Best Management Practices to Reduce Phosphorus Loading in Echo Reservoir, Utah". Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 139: 122–125. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000224. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1773&context=cee_facpub.
- ↑ Santhosh, Apoorva; Farid, Amro M.; Youcef-Toumi, Kamal (2014). "Real-time economic dispatch for the supply side of the energy-water nexus". Applied Energy 122: 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.062. http://amfarid.scripts.mit.edu/resources/Journals/EWN-J10.pdf.
- ↑ Dandy, Graeme C.; Simpson, Angus R.; Murphy, Laurence J. (1996). "An improved genetic algorithm for pipe network optimization". Water Resources Research 32 (2): 449–458. doi:10.1029/95WR02917. Bibcode: 1996WRR....32..449D. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/14f3/7a77cb58a1d29eb5de08faf64cc7f2c476b9.pdf.
Further reading
- Boyd, Stephen P.; Vandenberghe, Lieven (2004). Convex Optimization (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN:978-0-521-83378-3.
- Loucks, Daniel P.; van Beek, Eelco (2017). Water Resource Systems Planning and Management: An Introduction to Methods, Models, and Applications. Springer. ISBN:9783319442327.
- Nocedal, Jorge; Wright, Stephen (2006). Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, Springer. ISBN:9780387303031.
- Qin, Youwei; Kavetski, Dmitri; Kuczera, George (2018). "A Robust Gauss-Newton Algorithm for the Optimization of Hydrological Models: Benchmarking Against Industry-Standard Algorithms". Water Resources Research. 54 (11): 9637-9654.
- Tayfur, Gokmen (2017). "Modern Optimization Methods in Water Resources Planning, Engineering and Management". Water Resources Management. 31: 3205-3233.
External links
- Water Resource Systems (MIT OpenCourseWare)
 |  |
