Khintchine inequality

From HandWiki
Short description: Theorem in probability

thumb The Khintchine inequality, is a result in probability also frequently used in analysis bounding the expectation a weighted sum of Rademacher random variables with square-summable weights. It is named after Aleksandr Khinchin and spelled in multiple ways in the Latin alphabet.

It states that for each p(0,) there exist constants Ap,Bp>0 depending only on p such that for every sequence x=(x1,x2,)2, and i.i.d. Rademacher random variables ϵ1,ϵ2,,

Ap𝔼[|n=1ϵnxn|p]1/px2Bp.

As a particular case, consider N complex numbers x1,,xN, which can be pictured as vectors in a plane. Now sample N random signs ϵ1,,ϵN{1,+1}, with equal independent probability. The inequality states that |iϵixi||x1|2++|xN|2 with a bounded error.

Statement

Let {εn}n=1N be i.i.d. random variables with P(εn=±1)=12 for n=1,,N, i.e., a sequence with Rademacher distribution. Let 0<p< and let x1,,xN. Then

Ap(n=1N|xn|2)1/2(E|n=1Nεnxn|p)1/pBp(n=1N|xn|2)1/2

for some constants Ap,Bp>0 depending only on p (see Expected value for notation). More succinctly, (E|n=1Nεnxn|p)1/p[Ap,Bp]for any sequence x with unit 2 norm.

The sharp values of the constants Ap,Bp were found by Haagerup (Ref. 2; see Ref. 3 for a simpler proof). It is a simple matter to see that Ap=1 when p2, and Bp=1 when 0<p2.

Haagerup found that

Ap={21/21/p0<pp0,21/2(Γ((p+1)/2)/π)1/pp0<p<212p<andBp={10<p221/2(Γ((p+1)/2)/π)1/p2<p<,

where p01.847 and Γ is the Gamma function. One may note in particular that Bp matches exactly the moments of a normal distribution.

Uses in analysis

The uses of this inequality are not limited to applications in probability theory. One example of its use in analysis is the following: if we let T be a linear operator between two Lp spaces Lp(X,μ) and Lp(Y,ν), 1<p<, with bounded norm T<, then one can use Khintchine's inequality to show that

(n=1N|Tfn|2)1/2Lp(Y,ν)Cp(n=1N|fn|2)1/2Lp(X,μ)

for some constant Cp>0 depending only on p and T.[1]

Generalizations

For the case of Rademacher random variables, Pawel Hitczenko showed[2] that the sharpest version is:

A(p(n=b+1Nxn2)1/2+n=1bxn)(E|n=1Nεnxn|p)1/pB(p(n=b+1Nxn2)1/2+n=1bxn)

where b=p, and A and B are universal constants independent of p.

Here we assume that the xi are non-negative and non-increasing.

See also

References

  1. Tao, Terence. "Amplification, arbitrage, and the tensor power trick". https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/amplification-arbitrage-and-the-tensor-power-trick/. 
  2. Pawel Hitczenko, "On the Rademacher Series". Probability in Banach Spaces, 9 pp 31-36. ISBN 978-1-4612-0253-0
  1. Thomas H. Wolff, "Lectures on Harmonic Analysis". American Mathematical Society, University Lecture Series vol. 29, 2003. ISBN 0-8218-3449-5
  2. Uffe Haagerup, "The best constants in the Khintchine inequality", Studia Math. 70 (1981), no. 3, 231–283 (1982).
  3. Fedor Nazarov and Anatoliy Podkorytov, "Ball, Haagerup, and distribution functions", Complex analysis, operators, and related topics, 247–267, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 113, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2000.