Lévy hierarchy

From HandWiki

In set theory and mathematical logic, the Lévy hierarchy, introduced by Azriel Lévy in 1965, is a hierarchy of formulas in the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZFC), which is typically called just the language of set theory. This is analogous to the arithmetical hierarchy, which provides a similar classification for sentences of the language of arithmetic.

Definitions

In the language of set theory, atomic formulas are of the form x = y or x ∈ y, standing for equality and set membership predicates, respectively.

The first level of the Lévy hierarchy is defined as containing only formulas with no unbounded quantifiers and is denoted by Δ0=Σ0=Π0.[1] The next levels are given by finding a formula in prenex normal form that is provably equivalent over ZFC, and counting the number of alternations of quantifiers:[2]p. 184

A formula A is called:[1][3]

  • Σi+1 if A is equivalent to x1...xnB in ZFC, where B is Πi
  • Πi+1 if A is equivalent to x1...xnB in ZFC, where B is Σi
  • If a formula is both Σi and Πi form, it is called Δi.


Lévy's original notation was ΣiZFC (respectively ΠiZFC) due to the provable logical equivalence,[4] strictly speaking the above levels should be referred to as ΣiZFC (respectively ΠiZFC) to specify the theory in which the equivalence is carried out, however it is usually clear from context.[5]pp. 441–442 Pohlers has defined Δ1 in particular semantically, in which a formula is "Δ1 in a structure M".[6]

The Lévy hierarchy is sometimes defined for other theories S. In this case Σi and Πi by themselves refer only to formulas that start with a sequence of quantifiers with at most i−1 alternations, and ΣiS and ΠiS refer to formulas equivalent to Σi and Πi formulas in the language of the theory S. So strictly speaking the levels Σi and Πi of the Lévy hierarchy for ZFC defined above should be denoted by ΣiZFC and ΠiZFC.

Examples

Σ000 formulas and concepts

  • x = {y, z}[7]p. 14
  • x ⊆ y [8]
  • x is a transitive set[8]
  • x is an ordinal, x is a limit ordinal, x is a successor ordinal[8]
  • x is a finite ordinal[8]
  • The first infinite ordinal ω [8]
  • x is an ordered pair. The first entry of the ordered pair x is a. The second entry of the ordered pair x is b [7]p. 14
  • f is a function. x is the domain/range of the function f. y is the value of f on x [7]p. 14
  • The Cartesian product of two sets.
  • x is the union of y [8]
  • x is a member of the αth level of Gödel's L[9]
  • R is a relation with domain/range/field a [7]p. 14
  • X is Hausdorff.

Δ1-formulas and concepts

Σ1-formulas and concepts

  • x is countable.
  • |X|≤|Y|, |X|=|Y|.
  • x is constructible.
  • g is the restriction of the function f to a [7]p. 23
  • g is the image of f on a [7]p. 23
  • b is the successor ordinal of a [7]p. 23
  • The Mostowski collapse of (x,) [7]p. 29

Π1-formulas and concepts

Δ2-formulas and concepts

Σ2-formulas and concepts

Π2-formulas and concepts

Δ3-formulas and concepts

Σ3-formulas and concepts

Π3-formulas and concepts

Σ4-formulas and concepts

Properties

Let n1. The Lévy hierarchy has the following properties:[2]p. 184

  • If ϕ is Σn, then ¬ϕ is Πn.
  • If ϕ is Πn, then ¬ϕ is Σn.
  • If ϕ and ψ are Σn, then xϕ, ϕψ, ϕψ, (xz)ϕ, and (xz)ϕ are all Σn.
  • If ϕ and ψ are Πn, then xϕ, ϕψ, ϕψ, (xz)ϕ, and (xz)ϕ are all Πn.
  • If ϕ is Σn and ψ is Πn, then ϕψ is Πn.
  • If ϕ is Πn and ψ is Σn, then ϕψ is Σn.

Devlin p. 29

See also

References

Citations

  1. 1.0 1.1 Walicki, Michal (2012). Mathematical Logic, p. 225. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. ISBN 9789814343862
  2. 2.0 2.1 T. Jech, 'Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, revised and expanded'. Springer Monographs in Mathematics (2006). ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
  3. J. Baeten, Filters and ultrafilters over definable subsets over admissible ordinals (1986). p.10
  4. 4.0 4.1 A. Lévy, 'A hierarchy of formulas in set theory' (1965), second edition
  5. K. Hauser, "Indescribable cardinals and elementary embeddings". Journal of Symbolic Logic vol. 56, iss. 2 (1991), pp.439--457.
  6. W. Pohlers, Proof Theory: The First Step into Impredicativity (2009) (p.245)
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 Jon Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic (1975)
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 D. Monk 2011, Graduate Set Theory (pp.168--170). Archived 2011-12-06
  9. W. A. R. Weiss, An Introduction to Set Theory (chapter 13). Accessed 2022-12-01
  10. K. J. Williams, Minimum models of second-order set theories (2019, p.4). Accessed 2022 July 25.
  11. F. R. Drake, Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (p.83). Accessed 1 July 2022.
  12. Akihiro Kanamori, The Higher Infinite: Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings (p.5). Springer (2009)
  13. F. R. Drake, Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals (p.127). Accessed 4 October 2024.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Azriel Lévy, "On the logical complexity of several axioms of set theory" (1971). Appearing in Axiomatic Set Theory: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13 part 1, pp.219--230