Medicine:Pinopod

From HandWiki

Pinopodes (also known as pinopods and uterodomes) are protrusions on the apical cellular membrane of uterine epithelial cells.[1][2] Pinopodes have a pinocytotic role (hence the name pinopode - Greek for "drinking foot"), as well as a secretory role.[3] Their secretory vacuoles reach towards the lumen; The contents within the vesicle may provide necessary nutrients to the embryo. This feature also assists in its ability to attach to the uterine endometrium. With the development of pinipodes, there is a decrease in epithelial cell contact, which prompts blastocyst attachment and penetration.[2]

The usefulness of pinopodes as a marker for endometrial receptivity has been debated in past literature,[4] but is now generally accepted.[1]

Structure and morphology

Pinopodes are usually measured to be 5–10 μm. Their structure is dependent upon the organism's current stage of the menstrual cycle,[1] as pinopodes are regulated by the ovarian steroid hormones, estrogen and progesterone.[2] Progesterone stimulates development of pinopodes, while estrogen is responsible for regression.[5][6]

Generally, the first developmental stage occurs during the early luteal phase, around days 17-18 of the menstrual cycle. During this time, cellular bulging appears. The second mid-luteal stage of development, around days 20-22, is when the pinopodes are most prominent. During this peak phase, their structures look spherical and smooth, without microvilli.[7] Towards the end of the secretory phase, around days 23-35, the regression period occurs. In this stage, the structure shrivels and appears wrinkly.[8] Not every pinopode on the endometrial surface develops at the same time, affecting the consistency of distribution along the membrane.[2]

F-actin is found within pinopodes. The cytoskeleton is mainly made up of actin microfilaments. The structure varies between species. In rodents, pinopodes contain many vacuoles; Human pinopodes do not contain large vacuoles but do have secretory vesicles, a rough endoplasmic reticulum, and a golgi apparatus. Mitochondria and glycogen have been found in both rodent and human pinopodes.[2]

Endometrial receptivity

Previous literature had questioned the validity of the pinopodes' role in endometrial receptivity and implantation.[4] However, more recent literature has found correlations between the presence of pinopodes and endometrial receptivity. Women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high presence of pinopodes are more likely to have higher embryo implantation and pregnancy rates when compared to women with low pinopode coverage.[9] The implantation window is known as the period of time in which the endometrium is receptive to blastocyst attachment.[10] Due to pinopode development overlapping with the implantation window, blastocyst attachment takes place, which provides adhesion molecules necessary for the implantation process.[11] Current trials and research have shown pinopodes to be a reliable endometrial receptivity marker.[12]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Quinn, Kelsey E.; Matson, Brooke C.; Wetendorf, Margeaux; Caron, Kathleen M. (2020). "Pinopodes: Recent advancements, current perspectives, and future directions" (in en). Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 501: 110644. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2019.110644. PMID 31738970. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Rarani, Fahimeh Zamani; Borhani, Fatemeh; Rashidi, Bahman (2018). "Endometrial pinopode biomarkers: Molecules and microRNAs" (in en). Journal of Cellular Physiology 233 (12): 9145–9158. doi:10.1002/jcp.26852. ISSN 0021-9541. PMID 29968908. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcp.26852. 
  3. Kabir-Salmani, M et al. Secretory role for human uterodomes (pinopods): secretion of LIF. Molecular Human Reproduction 2005 11(8):553-559 http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/11/8/553
  4. 4.0 4.1 Quinn, CE and Casper, RF. Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity. Human Reproduction Update 2009 15(2):229-236 http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/2/229
  5. Singh, M.M; Trivedi, R.N; Chauhan, S.C; Srivastava, V.M.L; Makker, A; Chowdhury, S.R; Kamboj, V.P (1996). "Uterine estradiol and progesterone receptor concentration, activities of certain antioxidant enzymes and dehydrogenases and histoarchitecture in relation to time of secretion of nidatory estrogen and high endometrial sensitivity in rat" (in en). The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 59 (2): 215–224. doi:10.1016/S0960-0760(96)00102-1. PMID 9010337. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960076096001021. 
  6. Sarantis, Loukia; Roche, Daniele; Psychoyos, Alexandra (1988). "Displacement of receptivity for nidation in the rat by progesterone antagonist RU 486: a scanning electron microscopy study" (in en). Human Reproduction 3 (2): 251–255. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136688. ISSN 1460-2350. PMID 3356782. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/667291/Displacement. 
  7. Quinn, C.E.; Casper, R.F. (2008-11-05). "Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity" (in en). Human Reproduction Update 15 (2): 229–236. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn052. ISSN 1355-4786. PMID 18997181. https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/humupd/dmn052. 
  8. Nikas, George (2000). "Endometrial Receptivity: Changes in Cell-Surface Morphology". Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 18 (3): 229–236. doi:10.1055/s-2000-12561. PMID 11299962. http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2000-12561. 
  9. Qiong, Zhang; Jie, Hao; Yonggang, Wang; Bin, Xu; Jing, Zhao; Yanping, Li (2017). "Clinical validation of pinopode as a marker of endometrial receptivity: a randomized controlled trial" (in en). Fertility and Sterility 108 (3): 513–517.e2. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.006. PMID 28807395. 
  10. Harper, Michael J.K. (1992). "10 The implantation window" (in en). Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 6 (2): 351–371. doi:10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80092-6. PMID 1424330. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950355205800926. 
  11. Da Broi, Michele G.; Rocha, Carlos V.; Carvalho, Filomena M.; Martins, Wellington P.; Ferriani, Rui A.; Navarro, Paula A. (2017). "Ultrastructural Evaluation of Eutopic Endometrium of Infertile Women With and Without Endometriosis During the Window of Implantation: A Pilot Study" (in en). Reproductive Sciences 24 (10): 1469–1475. doi:10.1177/1933719117691142. ISSN 1933-7191. PMID 28173742. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1933719117691142. 
  12. Jin, X Y; Zhao, L J; Luo, D H; Liu, L; Dai, Y D; Hu, X X; Wang, Y Y; Lin, X et al. (2017-12-01). "Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles" (in en). Human Reproduction 32 (12): 2394–2403. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex312. ISSN 0268-1161. PMID 29040606. http://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/32/12/2394/4508783.