Medicine:Vipeholm experiments

From HandWiki
Short description: Unethical human experiments in Sweden, 1945–55
Main building of Vipeholm hospital, now a secondary school

The Vipeholm experiments or Vipeholm Study (Swedish: Vipeholmsexperimenten) were a series of human experiments where patients of Vipeholm Hospital for the intellectually disabled in Lund, Sweden, were fed large amounts of sweets, including "extra sticky toffee"[clarification needed] to provoke dental caries (1945–1955). The experiments were sponsored both by the sugar industry and the dentist community, in an effort to determine whether carbohydrates affected the formation of cavities.

The experiments provided extensive knowledge about dental health and resulted in enough empirical data to link the intake of sugar to dental caries.[1] However, today they are considered to have violated multiple principles of medical ethics.[2][3]

History

The National Dental Service of Sweden was established in 1938.[4] The state of dental health was not well-studied at the time, and cavities were widespread. It was suspected high sugar diets caused tooth decay, but there was no scientific proof. In 1945, the Medical Board commissioned a study on the subject, which would then become the Vipeholm experiments.[5]

Vipeholm was Sweden's largest facility for people with "severe intellectual and developmental disabilities"[6] and was chosen to be the site of the largest experiment ever run on humans in Sweden at the time.[7] Initially, Vipeholm employees were also a part of the experiment.[8]

What began in 1945 as government-sanctioned vitamin trials were converted in 1947 without the knowledge of the government. In consultation with the Medical Board, the researchers decided to substitute sugar for the vitamins.[8]

From 1947 to 1949, a group of patients were used as subjects in a full-scale experiment designed to bring about tooth decay. They were fed copious amounts of sweets, including toffee and chocolate.[9]

The sugar experiment lasted for two years. In 1949, the trials were revised again, now to test a more "normal" carbohydrate-rich diet. By then, the teeth of about fifty of the 660 subjects in the experiment had been completely damaged.[8] Nonetheless, the researchers felt that, scientifically speaking, the experiment was a success.[2]

One of the practical results of the study was the recommendation that it was better for children's teeth to eat sweets once per week, compared to a smaller total amount spread out over most of the week. This practice established itself in Swedish society, and still today many parents only allow their children sweets on Saturdays, known as lördagsgodis (Saturday candy).[10]

Delayed results

The confectionery industry supported the experiments[11] through donations of money and sweets.[12] Because the experiments had shown a clear link between sugar intake and dental cavities, the industry was not pleased with the results, and researchers delayed publication. When the study was finally made public in 1953, public debate arose over why the results had not been published earlier.[12]

The scientists were accused of having been bought by the industry. However, at the time there was not any public debate about the ethics of the experiments themselves. Modern attitudes in the dental profession are very different: a participant in the Vipeholm study, Bo Krasse, writes "It is obvious that a research ethics committee would not accept a project like the Vipeholm Study today." He explains "The need for the study was obvious to us as dentists" and states that the Swedish Parliament and then the news media debated the ethics of the study as early as 1953.[2]

Revelations

It was not until the 1990s that studies appeared about the ethical aspects of the Vipeholm experiments.[13] In 2000, the Swedish ombudsman for the disabled reported that the "excesses" of the study were not justified by the results.[14]

Elin Bommenel, a historian and doctoral student at Linköping University, performed a thorough study of the Vipeholm experiments in her dissertation, published in 2006.[15] She was the first researcher to gain access to the original documents from the experimental period at Vipeholm. Her research describes how the scientists found themselves caught between the divergent goals of research and patient care as well as being under immense pressure from both political and economic interests.[16]

References

  1. ↑ Gustafsson, BE; Quensel, CE; Lanke, LS; Lundqvist, C; Grahnen, H; Bonow, BE; Krasse, B (1954). "The Vipeholm dental caries study; the effect of different levels of carbohydrate intake on caries activity in 436 individuals observed for five years". Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 11 (3–4): 232–64. doi:10.3109/00016355308993925. PMID 13196991. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Krasse, Bo (September 2009). "The Vipeholm Dental Caries Study: Recollections and Reflections 50 Years Later". Journal of Dental Research 80 (9): 1785–1788. doi:10.1177/00220345010800090201. ISSN 0022-0345. PMID 11926233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800090201. 
  3. ↑ Ismail, Amid I.; Hasson, Hana; Sohn, Woosung (October 2001). "Dental Caries in the Second Millennium". Journal of Dental Education 65 (10): 953–959. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03469.x. ISSN 0022-0337. PMID 11699996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03469.x. 
  4. ↑ Nordenram, Ake; Astrand, Per; Nord, Per-Gunnar; Paulin, Gunnar; Feldmann, Hartmut (2005-01-01). "[Surgical treatment of diseases in the oral cavity and jaws"]. Svensk Medicinhistorisk Tidskrift 9 (1): 155–162. ISSN 1402-9871. PMID 17153182. https://europepmc.org/article/med/17153182. 
  5. ↑ Manley, Maxwell Christopher Graham; Lane, H. L.; Doshi, M. (2021-08-09). "Dental disadvantage for people with disability: a potential solution for a problematic area of care". Disability & Society 36 (7): 1197–1202. doi:10.1080/09687599.2021.1927672. ISSN 0968-7599. 
  6. ↑ "The Swedish cavity experiments: How dentists rotted the teeth of the mentally handicapped to study candy's effect". https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/health/swedish-cavity-experiment-wellness/index.html. 
  7. ↑ Höjer, J. Axel; Maunsrach, Arvid Bernhard (1953-01-01). "Purposes and Organisation". Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 11 (3–4): 195–206. doi:10.3109/00016355308993923. ISSN 0001-6357. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016355308993923. 
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Seeman, Mary V. (2006-12-01). "Starvation in Psychiatric Institutions in Sweden". International Journal of Mental Health 35 (4): 81–87. doi:10.2753/IMH0020-7411350409. ISSN 0020-7411. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411350409. 
  9. ↑ Bommenel, Elin (2006). Sockerförsöket. Kariesexperimenten 1943–1960 på Vipeholms sjukhus för sinnesslöa (Doktorsavhandling (monografi) thesis). Arkiv.
  10. ↑ Lundqvist, Ida. "Vipeholmsexperimenten - P3 Dokumentär" (in sv). https://sverigesradio.se/avsnitt/65245. 
  11. ↑ Krasse, Bo (April 1989). "Why was the Vipeholm Study done and why have this symposium?". European Journal of Oral Sciences 97 (2): 99–102. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb01436.x. ISSN 0909-8836. PMID 2704980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb01436.x. 
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Bommenel, Elin (2006-03-31). "Sugar experiments at Vipeholm" (in en-GB). https://www.expertsvar.se/en/pressmeddelanden/sugar-experiments-at-vipeholm/. 
  13. ↑ Petersson B (1993). The mentally retarded as research subjects. A research ethics study of the Vipeholm investigations of 1945-1955. In: Studies in Research Ethics. No. 3. Hallberg M, editor. Göteborg: Centre for Research Ethics, pp. 1-32.[verification needed]
  14. ↑ Lööw, L (2000). "Ombudsman of the disabled: The excesses in Vipeholm are not worthy the result". Läkartidningen 97 (6): 616, 619. PMID 10707490. 
  15. ↑ Sugar experiments of mental patients, Innovations Report 2006-03-31
  16. ↑ Three short lectures on Vipeholm Hospital in Lund, Dr. Elin Bommenel talks about her research



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Medicine:Vipeholm_experiments&oldid=3269967"