Omnitruncation

From HandWiki
Short description: Geometric operation

In geometry, an omnitruncation of a convex polytope is a simple polytope of the same dimension, having a vertex for each flag of the original polytope and a facet for each face of any dimension of the original polytope. Omnitruncation is the dual operation to barycentric subdivision.[1] Because the barycentric subdivision of any polytope can be realized as another polytope,[2] the same is true for the omnitruncation of any polytope.

When omnitruncation is applied to a regular polytope (or honeycomb) it can be described geometrically as a Wythoff construction that creates a maximum number of facets. It is represented in a Coxeter–Dynkin diagram with all nodes ringed.

It is a shortcut term which has a different meaning in progressively-higher-dimensional polytopes:

  • Uniform polytope truncation operators
    • For regular polygons: An ordinary truncation, [math]\displaystyle{ t_{0,1}\{ p \} = t\{ p\} = \{ 2p\} }[/math].
      • Coxeter-Dynkin diagram CDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.png
    • For uniform polyhedra (3-polytopes): A cantitruncation, [math]\displaystyle{ t_{0,1,2}\{ p,q \} = tr\{ p,q\} }[/math]. (Application of both cantellation and truncation operations)
      • Coxeter-Dynkin diagram: CDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel q.pngCDel node 1.png
    • For uniform polychora: A runcicantitruncation, [math]\displaystyle{ t_{0,1,2,3}\{ p,q,r \} }[/math]. (Application of runcination, cantellation, and truncation operations)
      • Coxeter-Dynkin diagram: CDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel q.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel r.pngCDel node 1.png, CDel nodes 11.pngCDel split2.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.png, CDel node 1.pngCDel split1.pngCDel nodes 11.pngCDel split2.pngCDel node 1.png
    • For uniform polytera (5-polytopes): A steriruncicantitruncation, t0,1,2,3,4{p,q,r,s}. [math]\displaystyle{ t_{0,1,2,3,4}\{ p,q,r,s \} }[/math]. (Application of sterication, runcination, cantellation, and truncation operations)
      • Coxeter-Dynkin diagram: CDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel q.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel r.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel s.pngCDel node 1.png, CDel nodes 11.pngCDel split2.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel p.pngCDel node 1.pngCDel q.pngCDel node 1.png, CDel branch 11.pngCDel 3ab.pngCDel nodes 11.pngCDel split2.pngCDel node 1.png
    • For uniform n-polytopes: [math]\displaystyle{ t_{0,1,...,n-1}\{ p_1, p_2,...,p_n \} }[/math].

See also

References

  1. Matteo, Nicholas ( 2015), Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits,  Northeastern University, ProQuest 1680014879  See p. 22, where the omnitruncation is described as a "flag graph".
  2. Ewald, G.; Shephard, G. C. (1974), "Stellar subdivisions of boundary complexes of convex polytopes", Mathematische Annalen 210: 7–16, doi:10.1007/BF01344542 

Further reading

  • Coxeter, H.S.M. Regular Polytopes, (3rd edition, 1973), Dover edition, ISBN 0-486-61480-8 (pp. 145–154 Chapter 8: Truncation, p 210 Expansion)
  • Norman Johnson Uniform Polytopes, Manuscript (1991)
    • N.W. Johnson: The Theory of Uniform Polytopes and Honeycombs, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto, 1966

External links