Philosophy:Tao Te Ching

From HandWiki
Short description: Chinese classic text


Tao Te Ching
Mawangdui LaoTsu Ms2.JPG
Ink on silk manuscript of the Tao Te Ching, 2nd century BC, unearthed from Mawangdui
AuthorLaozi (traditionally credited)
Original title道德經
CountryChina (Zhou)
LanguageClassical Chinese
GenrePhilosophy
Publication date
4th century BC
Published in English
1868
Original text
道德經 at Chinese Wikisource
TranslationTao Te Ching at Wikisource
Tao Te Ching
Script error: No such module "Infobox multi-lingual name".
Other names
Script error: No such module "Infobox multi-lingual name".

The Tao Te Ching[note 1] (Chinese: 道德經; pinyin: Dàodéjīng)[note 2] is a Chinese classic text and foundational work of Taoism written around 400 BC and traditionally credited to the sage Laozi,[7][8] though the text's authorship, date of composition and date of compilation are debated.[9] The oldest excavated portion dates back to the late 4th century BC,[10] but modern scholarship dates other parts of the text as having been written—or at least compiled—later than the earliest portions of the Zhuangzi.[11]

The Tao Te Ching is a foundational text in both philosophical and religious forms of Taoism, alongside Zhuangzi. It has also had significant influence on other schools of philosophy and religion throughout Chinese history, including Legalism, Confucianism, and particularly Chinese Buddhism, whose interpretations largely used Taoist terminology upon its original introduction to the country. Many artists, including poets, painters, calligraphers, and gardeners, have used the Tao Te Ching as a source of inspiration.[citation needed] Its influence has spread widely within the globe's artistic and academic spheres. It is one of the most translated texts in world literature.[10]

Title

In English, the title is commonly rendered Tao Te Ching /ˌtaʊtiːˈtʃɪŋ/, following Wade–Giles romanisation, or Dao De Jing /ˌdaʊdɛˈdʒɪŋ/, following pinyin. It can be translated as The Classic of the Way and its Power,[12] The Book of the Tao and Its Virtue,[13] The Book of the Way and of Virtue,[14][15] The Tao and its Characteristics,[5] The Canon of Reason and Virtue,[6] The Classic Book of Integrity and the Way,[16] or A Treatise on the Principle and Its Action.[17][18]

Ancient Chinese books were commonly referenced by the name of their real or supposed author, in this case the "Old Master",[19] Laozi. As such, the Tao Te Ching is also sometimes referred to as the Laozi, especially in Chinese sources.[10]

The title "Daodejing", with its status as a classic, was only first applied from the reign of Emperor Jing of Han (157–141 BC) onward.[20] Other titles of the work include the honorific "Sutra (or "Perfect Scripture") of the Way and Its Power" (Daode Zhenjing) and the descriptive "5,000-Character Classic" (Wuqian Wen).

Text

Tao Te Ching has a long and complex textual history. Known versions and commentaries date back two millennia, including ancient bamboo, silk, and paper manuscripts discovered in the twentieth century.[citation needed]

Internal structure

The Tao Te Ching is a text of around 5,000 Chinese characters in 81 brief chapters or sections (章). There is some evidence that the chapter divisions were later additions—for commentary, or as aids to rote memorisation—and that the original text was more fluidly organised. It has two parts, the Tao Ching (道經; chapters 1–37) and the Te Ching (德經; chapters 38–81), which may have been edited together into the received text, possibly reversed from an original Te Tao Ching. The written style is laconic, has few grammatical particles, and encourages varied, contradictory interpretations. The ideas are singular; the style is poetic. The rhetorical style combines two major strategies: short, declarative statements and intentional contradictions. The first of these strategies creates memorable phrases, while the second forces the reader to reconcile supposed contradictions.[21]

The Chinese characters in the original versions were probably written in seal script, while later versions were written in clerical script and regular script styles.[citation needed]

Victor H. Mair thought that Taoists in the early history of the faith had positive "cultural relations" with Hindu groups and that the Tao Te Ching was written in reaction to Indian philosophy and that the author(s) viewed Brahman as being the same as Tao.[22]

Historicity of the purported author

The Tao Te Ching is ascribed to Laozi, whose historical existence has been a matter of scholarly debate. His name, which means "Old Master", has only fuelled controversy on this issue.[23]

Laozi riding a water buffalo

The first biographical reference to Laozi is in the Records of the Grand Historian,[24] by Chinese historian Sima Qian (c. 145–86 BC), which combines three stories.[25] In the first, Laozi was a contemporary of Confucius (551–479 BC). His surname was Li (李), and his personal name was Er (耳) or Dan (聃). He was an official in the imperial archives, and wrote a book in two parts before departing to the West; at the request of the keeper of the Han-ku Pass, Yinxi, Laozi composed the Tao Te Ching. In the second story, Laozi, also a contemporary of Confucius, was Lao Laizi (老莱子), who wrote a book in 15 parts. Third, Laozi was the grand historian and astrologer Lao Dan (老聃), who lived during the reign of Duke Xian of Qin (秦獻公, Template:Reigned 384–362 BC).[citation needed]

Three-quarters of the Tao Te Ching rhymes, "according to...reconstructed phonetic values of Ancient Chinese."[26]

Generations of scholars have debated the historicity of Laozi and the dating of the Tao Te Ching. Linguistic studies of the text's vocabulary and rhyme scheme point to a date of composition after the Shijing yet before the Zhuangzi. Legends claim variously that Laozi was "born old" and that he lived for 996 years, with twelve previous incarnations starting around the time of the Three Sovereigns before the thirteenth as Laozi. Some scholars have expressed doubts over Laozi's historical existence.[27]

Many Taoists venerate Laozi as Daotsu, the founder of the school of Dao, the Daode Tianzun in the Three Pure Ones, and one of the eight elders transformed from Taiji in the Chinese creation myth.[citation needed]

The predominant view among scholars today is that the text is a compilation or anthology representing multiple authors. The current text might have been compiled c. 250 BCE, drawn from a wide range of texts dating back a century or two.[28]

Principal versions

Among the many transmitted editions of the Tao Te Ching text, the three primary ones are named after early commentaries. The "Yan Zun Version", which is only extant for the Te Ching, derives from a commentary attributed to Han dynasty scholar Yan Zun (巖尊, fl. 80 BC – 10 AD). The "Heshang Gong Version" is named after the legendary Heshang Gong (河上公 'Riverside Sage') who supposedly lived during the reign (180–157 BC) of Emperor Wen of Han. This commentary has a preface written by Ge Xuan (葛玄, 164–244 AD), granduncle of Ge Hong, and scholarship dates this version to around the 3rd century AD. The "Wang Bi Version" has more verifiable origins than either of the above. Wang Bi (王弼, 226–249 AD) was a Three Kingdoms period philosopher and commentator on the Tao Te Ching and the I Ching.[citation needed]

Tao Te Ching scholarship has advanced from archaeological discoveries of manuscripts, some of which are older than any of the received texts. Beginning in the 1920s and 1930s, Marc Aurel Stein and others found thousands of scrolls in the Mogao Caves near Dunhuang. They included more than 50 partial and complete manuscripts. One written by the scribe So/Su Dan (Template:Zhi) is dated 270 AD and corresponds closely with the Heshang Gong version. Another partial manuscript has the Xiang'er (想爾) commentary, which had previously been lost.[29]:95ff[30]

Mawangdui and Guodian texts

In 1973, archaeologists discovered copies of early Chinese books, known as the Mawangdui Silk Texts, in a tomb dating from 168 BC.[10] They included two nearly complete copies of the text, referred to as Text A (甲) and Text B (乙), both of which reverse the traditional ordering and put the Te Ching section before the Tao Ching, which is why the Henricks translation of them is named "Te-Tao Ching". Based on calligraphic styles and imperial naming taboo avoidances, scholars believe that Text A can be dated to about the first decade and Text B to about the third decade of the 2nd century BC.[31]

In 1993, the oldest known version of the text, written on bamboo slips, was found in a tomb near the town of Guodian (郭店) in Jingmen, Hubei, and dated prior to 300 BC.[10] The Guodian Chu Slips comprise about 800 slips of bamboo with a total of over 13,000 characters, about 2,000 of which correspond with the Tao Te Ching.[citation needed]

Both the Mawangdui and Guodian versions are generally consistent with the received texts, excepting differences in chapter sequence and graphic variants. Several recent Tao Te Ching translations utilise these two versions, sometimes with the verses reordered to synthesize the new finds.[32]

Themes

Versions and translations

The Tao Te Ching has been translated into Western languages over 250 times, mostly to English, German, and French.[33] According to Holmes Welch, "It is a famous puzzle which everyone would like to feel he had solved."[34] The first English translation of the Tao Te Ching was produced in 1868 by the Scottish Protestant missionary John Chalmers, entitled The Speculations on Metaphysics, Polity, and Morality of the "Old Philosopher" Lau-tsze.[35] It was heavily indebted[36] to Julien's French translation[14] and dedicated to James Legge,[4] who later produced his own translation for Oxford's Sacred Books of the East.[5]

Other notable English translations of the Tao Te Ching are those produced by Chinese scholars and teachers: a 1948 translation by linguist Lin Yutang, a 1961 translation by author John Ching Hsiung Wu, a 1963 translation by sinologist Din Cheuk Lau, another 1963 translation by professor Wing-tsit Chan, and a 1972 translation by Taoist teacher Gia-Fu Feng together with his wife Jane English.

Many translations are written by people with a foundation in Chinese language and philosophy who are trying to render the original meaning of the text as faithfully as possible into English. Some of the more popular translations are written from a less scholarly perspective, giving an individual author's interpretation. Critics of these versions claim that their translators deviate from the text and are incompatible with the history of Chinese thought.[37] Russell Kirkland goes further to argue that these versions are based on Western Orientalist fantasies and represent the colonial appropriation of Chinese culture.[38][39] Other Taoism scholars, such as Michael LaFargue[40] and Jonathan Herman,[41] argue that while they do not pretend to scholarship, they meet a real spiritual need in the West. These Westernized versions aim to make the wisdom of the Tao Te Ching more accessible to modern English-speaking readers by, typically, employing more familiar cultural and temporal references.

Translational difficulties

The Tao Te Ching is written in Classical Chinese, which poses a number of challenges to complete comprehension. As Holmes Welch notes, the written language "has no active or passive, no singular or plural, no case, no person, no tense, no mood."[42] Moreover, the received text lacks many grammatical particles which are preserved in the older Mawangdui and Beida texts, which permit the text to be more precise.[43] Lastly, many passages of the Tao Te Ching are deliberately vague and ambiguous.[citation needed]

Since there are no punctuation marks in Classical Chinese, it can be difficult to conclusively determine where one sentence ends and the next begins. Moving a full-stop a few words forward or back or inserting a comma can profoundly alter the meaning of many passages, and such divisions and meanings must be determined by the translator. Some editors and translators argue that the received text is so corrupted (from originally being written on one-line bamboo strips linked with silk threads) that it is impossible to understand some chapters without moving sequences of characters from one place to another.[citation needed]

Notable translations

See also


Notes

  1. ↑ Mandarin: [tâu tɤ̌ tɕíŋ] (About this soundlisten); in English often UK: /ˌtaʊ tiː ˈtʃɪŋ/,[1] US: /ˌdaʊ dɛ ˈdʒɪŋ/;[2]
  2. ↑ Less common, older romanisations include Tao-te-king,[3] Tau Tĕh King[4] and Tao Teh King.[5][6]

References

Citations

  1. ↑ "Tao-te-Ching". Tao-te-Ching. Oxford University Press. http://www.lexico.com/definition/Tao-te-Ching. 
  2. ↑ "Tao Te Ching". Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/Tao-Te-Ching. 
  3. ↑ Julien (1842), p. ii.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Chalmers (1868), p. v.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Legge & al. (1891).
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 Suzuki & al. (1913).
  7. ↑ Ellwood, Robert S. (2008). The Encyclopedia of World Religions. Infobase Publishing. p. 262. ISBN 978-1-4381-1038-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=1pGbdI4L0qsC&pg=PA262. 
  8. ↑ "The Tao Te Ching by Laozi: ancient wisdom for modern times" (in en). 27 December 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/dec/27/comfort-reading-tao-te-ching-laozi. 
  9. ↑ Eliade (1984), p. 26
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Chan (2013).
  11. ↑ Creel (1970), p. 75.
  12. ↑ Waley, Arthur, ed (1958). The Way and its Power: A study of the Tao tê ching and its place in Chinese thought. New York: Grove. ISBN 0802150853. OCLC 1151668016. https://archive.org/details/wayitspowerstudy0000wale. 
  13. ↑ Kohn & al. (1998), p. 1.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Julien (1842).
  15. ↑ Giles & al. (1905), Introduction.
  16. ↑ Mair (1990).
  17. ↑ Wieger (1913), p. 3.
  18. ↑ Bryce & al. (1991), p. ix.
  19. ↑ Chalmers (1868), p. ix.
  20. ↑ Seidel, Anna (1969) (in fr). La divinisation de Lao-tseu dans le taoïsme des Han. Paris: École française d'Extrême‑Orient. pp. 24, 50. 
  21. ↑ Austin, Michael (2010). Reading the World: Ideas that Matter. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-393-93349-9. 
  22. ↑ Laozi; Mair, Victor H. (1998). Tao Te Ching: The Classic Book of Integrity and the Way. New York: Quality Paperback Book Club. pp. 135, 142, 160. ISBN 978-0-9650647-5-0. 
  23. ↑ Cao Feng (20 October 2017) (in en). Daoism in Early China: Huang-Lao Thought in Light of Excavated Texts. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-55094-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=Vf06DwAAQBAJ. 
  24. ↑ Shiji, vol. 63, tr. Chan 1963:35–37.
  25. ↑ "Vol. 63: 老子韓非列傳" (in zh). Records of the Grand Historian. Zhonghua Shuju. 1959. 
  26. ↑ Minford, John (2018) (in en-US). Tao Te Ching: The Essential Translation of the Ancient Chinese Book of the Tao. New York: Viking Press. pp. ix-x. ISBN 978-0-670-02498-8. 
  27. ↑ Lao Tzu (1963) (in en). Tao Te Ching. Penguin Publishing Group. pp. 162. ISBN 978-0-14-044131-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=n4GMEAAAQBAJ. "The tentative conclusion we have arrived at concerning Lao Tzu the man is this. There is no certain evidence that he was a historical figure." 
  28. ↑ Chan, Alan, "Laozi", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), retrieved 3 February 2020
  29. ↑ Boltz, William G. (1982). "The Religious and Philosophical Significance of the 'Hsiang erh' "Lao tzu" 相爾老子 in the Light of the "Ma-wang-tui" Silk Manuscripts"". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 45. 
  30. ↑ Zandbergen, Robbert (2022). "The Ludibrium of Living Well". Monumenta Serica 70 (2): 367–388. doi:10.1080/02549948.2022.2131802. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02549948.2022.2131802. 
  31. ↑ Loewe, Michael (1993) (in en). Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide. Society for the Study of Early China. pp. 269. ISBN 978-1-55729-043-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=e10hAQAAIAAJ. 
  32. ↑ See Lau (1989), Henricks (1989), Mair (1990), Henricks 2000, Allan and Williams 2000, and Roberts 2004
  33. ↑ LaFargue & al. (1998), p. 277.
  34. ↑ Welch, Holmes (1966) (in en). Taoism: The Parting of the Way. Beacon Press. pp. 7. ISBN 978-0-8070-5973-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=Fe7XAAAAMAAJ. 
  35. ↑ Chalmers (1868).
  36. ↑ Chalmers (1868), p. xix.
  37. ↑ Eoyang, Eugene (1990). "Review: Tao Te Ching: A New English Translation by Stephen Mitchell". The Journal of Religion (University of Chicago Press) 70 (3): 492–493. doi:10.1086/488454. 
  38. ↑ Kirkland, Russell (1997). "The Taoism of the Western Imagination and the Taoism of China: De-Colonizing the Exotic Teachings of the East". University of Tennessee. https://religion.uga.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/TENN97.pdf. 
  39. ↑ Russell Kirkland (2004). Taoism: The Enduring Tradition. Taylor & Francis. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-203-64671-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=Gg0XCJcGDhYC&pg=PP1. 
  40. ↑ [1][|permanent dead link|dead link}}]
  41. ↑ Herman, Jonathan R. (1998). "Reviewed work: Tao te Ching: A Book about the Way and the Power of the Way, Ursula K. Le Guin". Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66 (3): 686–689. doi:10.1093/jaarel/66.3.686. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1466152. 
  42. ↑ Welch (1965), p. 9
  43. ↑ Henricks (1989), p. xvi

Sources

External links



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Philosophy:Tao_Te_Ching&oldid=3287283"