# Physics:Probe tip

Scanning probe microscopes (SPMs) are used to make nanoscale images of surfaces and structures. They use a probe to scan across the surface of a sample. The probe tip is mounted on the end of a cantilever and can be as sharp as a single atom. In microscopy, probe tip geometry (length, width, shape, aspect ratio, and tip apex radius) and the composition (material properties) of the tip and the surface being probed directly affect resolution and imaging quality. Tip size and shape are extremely important in monitoring and detecting interactions between surfaces.[1][2][3] SPMs can precisely measure electrostatic forces, magnetic forces, chemical bonding, van der Waals forces and capillary forces, and reveal the morphology and topography of a surface.

The thrust in probe-based tools began after the invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), collectively called scanning probe microscopy (SPM), by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer at the IBM Zurich research laboratory in 1982.[4][5] It opened a new era for probing the nanoscale world of individual atoms and molecules as well as studying surface science, due to their unprecedented capability to characterize the mechanical, chemical, magnetic and optical functionalities of various samples at nanometer-scale resolution in a vacuum, ambient or fluid environment.

The increasing demand for sub-nanometer probe tips is attributable to their robustness and versatility. Applications of sub-nanometer probe tips exist in the fields of nanolithography,[6] nanoelectronics,[7] biosensor,[8] electrochemistry,[9] semiconductor,[10] micromachining[11] and biological studies.[12]

## History and development

The discovery of a sharp probe tip has always been of significant interest among researchers considering its importance in the material, life and biological sciences for mapping the surface structure and material properties at molecular or atomic dimensions. The history of the tip can be tracked back to the nineteenth century during the invention of the phonautograph in 1859. The Phonautograph is the predecessor of the modern gramophone. It was invented by Scott and Koenig. It consisted of a parchment diaphragm with an attached stylus (sort of a pen-holder), along with a hog's hair, which was used to trace a wavy line on a lamp-blacked surface. In the later development of the gramophone, along with other replacements, the hog's hair was replaced by a needle to reproduce sound. In 1940, a pantograph was built utilizing a shielded probe and adjustable tip. A stylus was free to slide vertically to be in contact with the paper.[13] In 1948, a tip was employed in the probe circuit to measure peak voltage.[14] The fabrication of electrochemically etched sharp tungsten, copper, nickel and molybdenum tips were reported by Muller in 1937.[15] The revolution for sharp tips occurred in producing a variety of tips with different shapes, sizes, aspect ratios composed of tungsten wire, silicon, diamond and carbon nanotubes occurred with Si-based circuit technologies. This allowed the production of tips for numerous applications in the broad spectrum of nanotechnological fields. Following STM,[4] came the invention of atomic force microscopy (AFM)[5] by Gerd Binnig, Calvin F. Quate, and Christoph Gerber in 1986. In their instrument, they used a broken piece of a diamond as the tip sticking it to a hand-cut gold foil cantilever. Focused ion and electron beam techniques for the fabrication of strong, stable, reproducible Si3N4 pyramidal tips with 1.0 μm length and 0.1 μm diameter were reported by Russell in 1992.[16] Ground breaking advancement came through the introduction of microfabrication methods for the fabrication of precise conical or pyramidal silicon and silicon nitride tips.[17] Later, numerous research experiments were explored to fabricate comparatively less expensive and more robust tungsten tips, with a need to attain less than 50 nm radius of curvature.[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]

The new horizon in the field of fabrication of probe tips was revealed when the carbon nanotube, which is basically an approximately 1 nm cylindrical shell of graphene, was introduced.[27] The use of single wall carbon nanotubes is less vulnerable to breaking or crushing during imaging due to their flexibility.[27] Probe tips made up of carbon nanotubes can be efficiently used to get high-resolution images of both soft and weakly absorbed biomolecules like DNA on the surface at molecular resolution.[28]

Multifunctional hydrogel nano-probe techniques uncovered a new scope for initiating a completely new concept for the fabrication of tips and their extended ease of applicability for inorganic and biological samples in both air and liquid. The biggest advantage of this mechanical method is that the tip can be made in different shapes, such as hemispherical, embedded spherical, pyramidal, and distorted pyramidal, with diameters ranging from 10 nm – 1000 nm for applications including topography or functional imaging, force spectroscopy on soft matter, biological, chemical and physical sensors.[29] Table 1. Summarizes various fabrication, material, and application of tips.

 Fabrication Method Material Application References Grinding, cutting, fracture, center aligned Diamond, Nanoindentation, 2D profiling in semiconductor, doping type and concentration of native silicon oxide [30][31] Beam Ion Milling Diamond Local electrical characterization of thin metal–oxide–semiconductor dielectrics, conducting AFM [32][33] Field ion microscope(y) SiOx, Si3N4, quartz Nanoelectronics, bond strength in biomolecules [34][35][36] etching W, W, Ag, Pt, Ir, Au Semiconductor, nano-patterning, metal surface imaging [19][37] Hydrogel Poly- (ethylene glycol) diacrylate Biological soft and hard sample, dip-pen nanolithography [29][6] RIE-Reactive-ion etching Diamond, Forces (SFM), optical properties (SNOM) [38] Glue Polymers, carbon nanotube Charge density waves on the surface of conducting material, imaging of single atom [27] Single atom functionalized Single CO2 molecule attached to metal tip Bond-order, catalysis, chemical structure [39][40][41] Electron beam deposition Silicon Lithography, high resolution imaging [42] Chemical vapor deposition CNT, diamond Electronic devices, Semi-conductor [43][33][44]

## Tunneling current and force measurement principle

The tip itself does not have any working principle for imaging, but depending on the instrumentation, mode of application, and the nature of the sample under investigation, the probe tip may follow different principles to image the surface of the sample. For example, when a tip is integrated with STM, it measures the tunneling current that arises from the interaction between the sample and the tip.[4][3] In AFM, short-ranged force deflection during the raster scan by the tip across the surface is measured.[5] A conductive tip is essential for the STM instrumentation whereas AFM can use conductive[8][30] and non-conductive[31] probe tip. Although the probe tip is used in various techniques with different principles, for STM and AFM coupled with probe tip is discussed in detail.[27][32][33][34][35]

### Conductive probe tip

Somewhat, the name implies STM utilizes tunneling charge transfer principle from tip to surface or vice versa thereby recording the current response. This concept originates from a particle in a box concept, that is, if potential energy for a particle is small, the electron may be found outside of the potential well which is a classically forbidden region. This phenomenon is called tunneling.[36]

Expression derived from Schrödinger equation for transmission charge transfer probability is as follow:

$\displaystyle{ T=16\epsilon(1-\epsilon)^{-2k} }$

where

$\displaystyle{ \epsilon = \frac{E}{V} = \text{Kinetic energy/potential energy} }$
$\displaystyle{ k = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{2mE}{h}} }$
$\displaystyle{ h }$ is the Planck constant

### Non-conductive probe tip

Non-conductive nano-scale tips are widely used for AFM measurements. For non-conducting tip, surface forces acting on the tip/cantilever, are responsible for deflection or attraction of tip.[38] These attractive or repulsive forces are used for surface topology, chemical specifications, magnetic and electronic properties. The distance dependent forces between substrate surface and tip are responsible for imaging in AFM.[45] These interactions include are van der Waals forces, capillary forces, electrostatic forces, Casimir forces and solvation forces. One unique repulsion force is Pauli Exclusion repulsive force[41] is responsible for single atom imaging as in references[41][39][35] and Figures 10 & 11 (contact region in Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Typical forces dependence on probe substrate distance.

## Fabrication methods

Tip fabrication techniques fall generally into two classifications: mechanical and physicochemical. In the early stage of the development of probe tips, mechanical procedures were popular because of the ease of fabrication.

### Mechanical methods

A few reported mechanical methods to fabricate tips include cutting[46][47] grinding[48][49] and pulling.[50][51] For example, cutting a wire at certain angles with razor blade or wire cutter or scissor.[47] Another mechanical method for tip preparation is fragmentation of bulk pieces into small pointy pieces. Grinding a metal wire/rod into a sharp tip was also a method used.[48][49] These mechanical procedures usually leave rugged surfaces with many tiny asperities protruding from the apex which led to atomic resolution on flat surfaces. However, irregular shape and large macroscopic radius of curvature result in poor reproducibility and decreased stability especially for probing rough surfaces. Another main disadvantage of making probes by this method is that it creates many mini tips which lead to many different signals, yielding error in imaging.[52] Cutting, grinding and pulling procedures can only be adapted for metallic tips like W, Ag, Pt, Ir, Pt-Ir and gold. Non-metallic tips cannot be fabricated by these methods.

In contrast, a sophisticated mechanical method for tip fabrication is based on the hydro-gel method.[29] This method is based on a bottom-up strategy to make probe tips by a molecular self-assembly process. First, a cantilever is formed in a mold by curing pre-polymer solution, then it is brought into contact with the mold of the tip which also contains the pre-polymer solution. The polymer is cured with ultraviolet light which helps to provide a firm attachment of the cantilever to the probe. This fabrication method is shown in Fig. 2.[29]

### Physio-chemical procedures

Physiochemical procedures are fabrication methods of choice these days which yield extremely sharp and symmetric tips with more reproducibility compared to mechanical fabrication-based tips. Among physicochemical method, the electrochemical etching method[21] is one of the most popular methods. Etching is a two or more step procedure. The "zone electropolishing" is the second step which further sharpens the tip in a very controlled manner. Other physicochemical methods include chemical vapor deposition,[53] and electron beam deposition onto pre-existing tips.[54] Other tip fabrication methods include field ion microscopy[55] and ion milling.[56] In field ion microscopy techniques, consecutive field evaporation of single atoms yields specific atomic configuration at the probe tip which yields very high resolution.[52]

#### Fabrication through etching

Electrochemical etching is one of the easiest, least expensive, most practical, reliable, and most widely accepted metallic probe tip fabrication methods with desired quality and reproducibility.[22] Three commonly used electrochemical etching methods for tungsten tip fabrication are: single lamella drop-off methods,[52] double lamella drop-off method[26] and submerged method.[57] Various cone shape tips can be fabricated by this method by minor changes in the experimental setup. A DC potential is applied between the tip and a metallic electrode (usually W wire) immersed in solution (Figure 3 a-c); electrochemical reactions at cathode and anode in basic solutions (2M KOH or 2M NaOH) are usually used.[20] The overall etching process involved is written here:

Anode;

$\ce{ W (s) + 8OH- -> WO4 + 4H2O + 6e- (E= 1.05V) }$

Cathode:

$\ce{ 6H2O + 6e- -> 3H2 + 6OH- (E=-2.48V) }$

Overall:

$\ce{ W (s) + 2OH- -> WO4^2- + 2H2O (l) + 6e- + 3H2 (g) (E= -1.43V) }$

Here, all the potentials are reported vs. SHE.

Fig. 3: Schematics of the fabrication method of probe tip through electrochemical etching method.

The schematics of the fabrication method of probe tip production through the electrochemical etching method is shown in Fig. 3.[58]

In the electrochemical etching process, W is etched at the liquid, solid, and air interface (due to surface tension), as shown in Fig. 3. Etching is called static if the W wire is kept stationary. Once the tip is etched, the lower part falls due to the lower tensile strength than the weight of the lower part of the wire. The irregular shape is produced by the shifting of the meniscus. However, slow etching rates can produce regular tips when the current flows slowly through the electrochemical cells. Dynamic etching involves slowly pulling up the wire from the solution, or sometimes the wire is moved up and down (oscillating wire) producing smooth tips.[24]

#### Submerged method

In this method a metal wire is vertically etched reducing the diameter from 0.25 mm ~ 20 nm. A schematic diagram for probe tip fabrication with submerged electrochemical etching method is illustrated in Fig 4. These tips can be used for high-quality STM images.[52]

Fig. 4: Schematic diagram for probe tip fabrication with submerged electrochemical etching method (W wire)

#### Lamella method

In the double lamella method, the lower part of the metal is etched away, and the upper part of the tip is not etched further.[26] Further etching of the upper part of the wire is prevented by covering it with a polymer coating. This method is usually limited to laboratory fabrication.[52] The double lamella method schematic is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5: A typical double-lamella drop-off electrochemical etching set up

### Single atom tip preparation

Transitional metals like Cu, Au and Ag adsorb single molecules linearly on their surface due to weak van der Waals forces.[41] This linear projection of single molecules allows interactions of the terminal atoms of the tip with the atoms of the substrate resulting in Pauli repulsion for single molecule or atom mapping studies. Gaseoss deposition on the tip is carried out in an ultrahigh vacuum (5 x 10−8 mbar) chamber at a low temperature (10K). Depositions of Xe, Kr, NO, CH4 or CO [59] on tip have been successfully prepared and used for imaging studies. However, these tips preparations rely on the attachment of single atoms or molecules on the tip and the resulting atomic structure of the tip is not known exactly.[39][60] The probability of attachment of simple molecules on metal surfaces is very tedious and required great skill. Therefore, this method is not widely used.

### Chemical vapor deposition (CVD)

Sharp tips used in SPM are fragile and prone to wear and tear under high working loads. Diamond is considered the best option to address this issue. Diamond tips for SPMs are fabricated by fracturing, grinding, and polishing a bulk diamond, resulting in a considerable loss of diamond.[61] One alternative is depositing a thin diamond film on Silicone tips by CVD.[62] In CVD, diamond is deposited directly on silicon or W cantilevers. A is shown in Fig. 6. In this method, the flow of methane and hydrogen gas is controlled to maintain an internal pressure of 40 Torr inside the chamber. CH4 and H2 dissociate at 2100 °C with the help of the Ta filament, and nucleation sites are created on the tip of the cantilever. Once CVD is complete, the flow of CH4 is stopped and the chamber is cooled under the flow of H2. A schematic diagram of a CVD setup used for diamond tip fabrication for AFM application is shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6: Schematics of CVD set up for diamond tip fabrication for AFM application

### Reactive ion etching (RIE) fabrication

A groove or structure is made on a substrate to form a template. Next, the desired material is deposited in that template. Once the tip is formed, the template is etched off, leaving the tip and cantilever. Fig. 7 illustrates diamond tip fabrication on silicon wafers using this method.[63]

### Focused ion beam (FIB) milling

FIB milling is a sharpening method for probe tips in SPM. A blunt tip is first fabricated by other etching methods, such as CVD, or the use of a pyramid mold for pyramidal tips. This tip is then sharpened by FIB milling as shown in Fig. 8. The diameter of the focused ion beam, which directly affects the tip's final diameter, is controlled through a programmable aperture.[32]

Fig 8: Schematics of focused ion beam milling method for probe tip sharpening

### Glue

This method is used to attach carbon nanotubes to a cantilever or blunt tip. A strong adhesive (such as soft acrylic glue) is used to bind CNT with the silicon cantilever. CNT is robust, stiff and increases the durability of probe tips, and can be used for both contact and tapping mode.[27][64]

## Cleaning procedures

Electrochemically etched tips are usually covered with contaminants on their surfaces which cannot be removed simply by rinsing in water, acetone or ethanol. Some oxide layers on metallic tips, especially on tungsten, need to be removed by post-fabrication treatment.

### Annealing

To clean W sharp tips, it is highly desirable to remove contaminant and the oxide layer. In this method a tip is heated in an UHV chamber at elevated temperature which desorb the contaminated layer. The reaction details are shown below.[65]

2WO3 + W → 3WO2

WO2 → W (sublimation at $\displaystyle{ \backsim }$1075K)

At elevated temperature, trioxides of W are converted to WO2 which sublimates around 1075°K, and cleaned metallic W surfaces are left behind. An additional advantage provided by annealing is the healing of crystallographic defects produced by fabrication, and the process also smoothens the tip surface.

### HF chemical cleaning

In the HF cleaning method, a freshly prepared tip is dipped in 15% concentrated hydrofluoric acid for 10 to 30 seconds, which dissolves the oxides of W.[66]

### Ion milling

In this method, argon ions are directed at the tip surface to remove the contaminant layer by sputtering. The tip is rotated in a flux of argon ions at a certain angle, in a way that allows the beam to target the apex. The bombardment of ions at the tip depletes the contaminants and also results in a reduction of the radius of the tip.[32] The bombardment time needs to be finely tuned with respect to the shape of the tip. Sometimes, short annealing is required after ion milling.[65]

### Self-sputtering

This method is very similar to ion milling, but in this procedure, the UHV chamber is filled with neon at a pressure of 10−4 mbar. When a negative voltage is applied on the tip, a strong electric field (produced by tip under negative potential) will ionize the neon gas, and these positively charged ions are accelerated back to the tip where they cause sputtering. The sputtering removes contaminants and some atoms from the tip which, like ion milling, reduces the apex radius. By changing the field strength, one can tune the radius of the tip to 20 nm.[65]

## Coating

The surface of silicon-based tips cannot be easily controlled because they usually carry the silanol group. The Si surface is hydrophilic and can be contaminated easily by the environment. Another disadvantage of Si tips is the wear and tear of the tip. It is important to coat the Si tip to prevent tip deterioration, and the tip coating may also enhance image quality. First, an adhesive layer is pasted (usually chromium layer on 5 nm thick titanium) and then gold is deposited by vapor deposition (40-100 nm or less). Sometimes, the coating layer reduces the tunneling current detection capability of probe tips.[65][67]

## Characterization

The most important aspect of a probe tip is imaging the surfaces efficiently at nanometer dimensions. Some concerns involving credibility of the imaging or measurement of the sample arise when the shape of the tip is not determined accurately. For example, when an unknown tip is used to measure a linewidth pattern or other high aspect ratio feature of a surface, there may remain some confusion when determining the contribution of the tip and of the sample in the acquired image.[68] Consequently, it is important to fully and accurately characterize the tips. Probe tips can be characterized for their shape, size, sharpness, bluntness, aspect ratio, radius of curvature, geometry and composition using many advanced instrumental techniques.[29][47][57][69][70][71] For example, electron field emission measurement, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning tunneling spectroscopy as well as more easily accessible optical microscope. In some cases, optical microscopy cannot provide exact measurements for small tips in nanoscale due to the resolution limitation of the optical microscopy.

### Electron field emission current measurement

In the electron field emission current measurement method, a high voltage is applied between the tip and another electrode followed by measuring field emission current employing Fowler-Nordheim curves $\displaystyle{ [\log_{10}(1/V^2) vs. (1/V)] }$.[72] Large fields-emission current measurements may indicate that the tip is sharp and low field-emission current indicates that the tip is blunt, molten or mechanically damaged. A minimum voltage is essential to facilitate the release of electrons from the surface of the tip which in turn indirectly is used to obtain the tip curvature. Although this method has several advantages, a disadvantage is that the high electric field required for producing strong electric force can melt the apex of the tip, or might change the crystallographic tip nature.[20][69]

### Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy

The size and shape of the tip can be obtained by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy measurements.[57][73] In addition, TEM images are helpful to detect any layer of insulating materials on the surface of the tip as well as to estimate the size of the layer. These oxides are formed gradually on the surface of tip soon after fabrication due to the oxidation of the metallic tip by reacting with the O2 present in the surrounding atmosphere.[70] SEM has a resolution limitation of below 4 nm, TEM may be needed to observe even a single atom theoretically and practically. Tip grain down to 1-3 nm or thin polycrystalline oxides or carbon or graphite layers at the tip apex are routinely measured using TEM. The orientation of tip crystal i.e. the angle between the tip plane in the single-crystal and the tip normal can be estimated.[47][57][70][73][74]

### Optical microscopy

In the past, optical microscope has been only used to investigate if the tip is bent microscale imaging at many microscales. This is because the resolution limitation of an optical microscope is about 200 nm. Imaging software including ImageJ allows determination of the curvature, and aspect ratio of the tip. One drawback of this method is that it renders an image of tip which is an object due to the uncertainty in the nanoscale dimension. This problem can be resolved taking images of tip multiple times followed by putting them together into image by confocal microscope with some fluorescent material coating on the tip. Also, it is a time-consuming process considering the necessity of monitoring the wear or damage or degradation of tip by the collision with the surface during scanning the surface after each scan.[75][76][77][78][79]

### Scanning tunneling spectroscopy

The scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) is spectroscopic form of STM in which spectroscopic data based on curve is obtained to analyze the existence of any oxides or impurities on the tip by monitoring the linearity of the curve which represents metallic tunnel junction.[80] Generally, cure is non-linear and hence, the tip has a gap like shape around zero bias voltage for oxidized or impure tip whereas the opposite is observed for sharp pure un-oxidized tip.[81]

### Auger electron spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

In Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), any oxides present on the tip surface are sputtered out during in-depth analysis with argon ion beam generated by differentially pumped ion pump followed by comparing the sputtering rate of the oxide with experimental sputtering yields.[82] These Auger measurements may estimate the nature of oxides because of the surface contamination and/or composition can be revealed and in some cases thickness of the oxide layer down to 1-3 nm can be estimated. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy also performs similar characterization for the chemical and surface composition by providing information on the binding energy of the surface elements.[80][82]

Overall, the aforementioned characterization methods of tips can be categorized into three major classes.[83] They are:

• Imaging tip using microscopy- is used to take image of tip with microscopy except scanning probe microscopy (SPM) e.g. scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) are reported in the references.[77][78][79]
• Using known tip characterizer- shape of tip is deduced by taking an image of a sample of known measurement which is known as tip characterizer.[84][85][86][87]
• Blind method- tip characterizer of either known or unknown measurement is used.[88][89][90][91]

## Applications

Probes tips have a wide variety of applications in different fields of science and technology. One of the major areas where probe tips are used is for application in SPM i.e., STM[3] and AFM.[92] For example, carbon nanotube tips in conjunction with AFM provides an excellent tool for surface characterization in the nanometer realm. CNT tips are also used in tapping-mode Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM), which is a technique where a tip taps a surface by a cantilever driven near resonant frequency of the cantilever. The CNT probe tips fabricated using CVD technique can be used for imaging of biological macromolecules,[93] semiconductor[44] and chemical structure.[41] For example, it is possible to obtain an intermittent AFM contact image of IgM macromolecules with excellent resolution using a single CNT tip. Individual CNT tips can be used for high resolution imaging of protein molecules.

In another application, multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) tips were used to image amyloid β (1-40) derived protofibrils and fibrils by tapping mode AFM.[12] Functionalized probes can be used in Chemical Force Microscopy (CFM) to measure intermolecular forces and map chemical functionality.[94] Functionalized SWCNT probes can be used for chemically sensitive imaging with high lateral resolution and to study binding energy in chemical and biological system.[94] Probe tips that have been functionalized with either hydrophobic or hydrophilic molecules can be used to measure the adhesive interaction between hydrophobic-hydrophobic,[95] hydrophobic-hydrophilic,[96] and hydrophilic-hydrophilic[97] molecules. From these adhesive interactions the friction image of patterned sample surface can be found.[35] Probe tips used in force microscopy can provide imaging of structure and dynamics of adsorbate at the nanometer scale.[98] Self-assembled functionalized organic thiols on the surface of Au coated Si3N4 probe tips have been used to study the interaction between molecular groups.[99] Again, carbon nanotube probe tips in conjunction with AFM can be used for probing crevices that occur in microelectronic circuits with improved lateral resolution.[27] Functionality modified probe tips have been to measure the binding force between single protein-ligand pairs.[100] Probe tips have been used as a tapping mode technique to provide information about the elastic properties of materials.[101] Probe tips are also used in the mass spectrometer. Enzymatically active probe tips have been used for the enzymatic degradation of analyte. They have also been used as devices to introduce samples into the mass spectrophotometer. For example, trypsin-activated gold (Au/trypsin) probe tips can be used for the peptide mapping of the hen egg lysozyme.[102]

Atomically sharp probe tips can be used for imaging a single atom in a molecule.[41] An example of visualizing single atoms in water cluster can be seen in Fig. 10.[103] By visualizing single atoms in molecules present on a surface, scientists can determine bond length, bond order and discrepancies,[39][60] if any, in conjugation which was previously thought to be impossible in experimental work. Fig. 9 shows the experimentally determined bond order in a poly-aromatic compound which was thought to be very hard in the past.[104]

Fig. 9: On-surface homocoupling of precursor 5c yields fully planar and neutral diaza-HBC 7c on Ag(111). a Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) overview of reaction product and unreacted species on Ag(111). V s = 30 mV, I t = 10 pA. b Constant-height STM data of diaza-HBC with partially superposed molecular model. V s = 5 mV. c Frequency-modulated atomic force microscopy (FM-AFM) and d Laplace-filtered FM-AFM data reveal details in the molecular structure. Apparent C = C distance 1.0 Å (black), and N–C 1.8 Å (blue). e FM-AFM simulations of 7c employing a neutral tip. Apparent C = C distance 1.5 Å (black), N–C 1.5 Å (blue). f FM-AFM simulations employing a negatively charged probe tip. Apparent C = C distance 1.3 Å (black), N-C 1.9 Å (blue). For simulation parameters see Methods. gn Constant-height STM data (g, i, k, m) at different biases and corresponding (h, j, l, n) DFT simulations. White arrows point to N atoms oriented along the diaza-HBC symmetry axis. Scale bars (a) 20 Å, (bf) 2 Å, (gn) 5 Å[104]
Fig. 10: (a) Schematic of STM/AFM measurement for pentagonal water chains on Cu(110) with a CO-terminal tip. Red, black, white and brown spheres show O, C, H and Cu atoms, respectively. (b) Side-view schematic of the water chain. Red (yellow) spheres represent O atoms of horizontal (vertical) H2O. (c) STM image of the water chains on Cu(110) with a CO-terminal tip (sample bias V=30 mV, tunneling current I=20 pA). The zigzag chains have terminals (red ellipses). (d,e) STM (V=30 mV, I=20 pA) and AFM (V=0 mV, oscillation amplitude A=2 Å) images, respectively, of a water chain including a kink and a terminal. An atomic structure of the chain is superposed in d. The tip height in e was set over the bare surface under the same conditions as in d. (f) Δf map of the pentagonal chain at a tip height Δz=−2 Å (A=1 Å). (g) Δf(Δz) curves recorded over the markers in f. (h) Force map of the chain at Δz=−1.95 Å after subtraction of the force for the bare surface FCu. (i) Force curves over the makers in f after subtraction of FCuz). Scale bars, 50 Å (c); 10 Å (d,e); 3 Å (f,h).[103]

## References

1. Keller, David (1991-08-01). "Reconstruction of STM and AFM images distorted by finite-size tips". Surface Science 253 (1–3): 353–364. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(91)90606-S.
2. Tersoff, J.; Hamann, D. R. (1985-01-15). "Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope". Physical Review B 31 (2): 805–813. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.31.805. PMID 9935822. Bibcode1985PhRvB..31..805T.
3. Tersoff, J.; Hamann, D. R. (1983-06-20). "Theory and Application for the Scanning Tunneling Microscope". Physical Review Letters 50 (25): 1998–2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1998.
4. Binnig, G.; Rohrer, H.; Gerber, Ch.; Weibel, E. (1982-07-05). "Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy". Physical Review Letters 49 (1): 57–61. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.57. Bibcode1982PhRvL..49...57B.
5. Binnig, G; Quate, C. F; Gerber, Ch (1986). "Atomic Force Microscope". Physical Review Letters 56 (9): 930–933. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930. PMID 10033323. Bibcode1986PhRvL..56..930B.
6. Rajasekaran, Pradeep Ramiah; Zhou, Chuanhong; Dasari, Mallika; Voss, Kay-Obbe; Trautmann, Christina; Kohli, Punit (2017-06-01). "Polymeric lithography editor: Editing lithographic errors with nanoporous polymeric probes". Science Advances 3 (6): e1602071. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602071. PMID 28630898.
7. Wei, Zhongqing; Wang, Debin; Kim, Suenne; Kim, Soo Young; Hu, Yike; Yakes, Michael K.; Laracuente, Arnaldo R.; Dai, Zhenting et al. (2010-06-11). "Nanoscale tunable reduction of graphene oxide for graphene electronics". Science 328 (5984): 1373–6. doi:10.1126/science.1188119. PMID 20538944. Bibcode2010Sci...328.1373W.
8. Müller, Daniel J.; Dufrêne, Yves F. (May 2008). "Atomic force microscopy as a multifunctional molecular toolbox in nanobiotechnology". Nature Nanotechnology 3 (5): 261–9. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.100. PMID 18654521.
9. Maynor, Benjamin W; Li, Yan; Liu, Jie (2001). "Au 'Ink' for AFM 'Dip-Pen' Nanolithography". Langmuir 17 (9): 2575–2578. doi:10.1021/la001755m.
10. Li, Xiaolin; Wang, Xinran; Zhang, Li; Lee, Sangwon; Dai, Hongjie (2008-02-29). "Chemically derived, ultrasmooth graphene nanoribbon semiconductors". Science 319 (5867): 1229–1232. doi:10.1126/science.1150878. PMID 18218865.
11. Kranz, Christine; Friedbacher, Gernot; Mizaikoff, Boris; Lugstein, Alois; Smoliner, Jürgen; Bertagnolli, Emmerich (2001). "Integrating an Ultramicroelectrode in an AFM Cantilever: Combined Technology for Enhanced Information". Analytical Chemistry 73 (11): 2491–2500. doi:10.1021/ac001099v. PMID 11403290.
12. Wong, Stanislaus S.; Harper, James D.; Lansbury, Peter T.; Lieber, Charles M. (January 1998). "Carbon Nanotube Tips: High-Resolution Probes for Imaging Biological Systems". Journal of the American Chemical Society 120 (3): 603–604. doi:10.1021/ja9737735.
13. Simpson, John A (1941). "A Scanning Device for Plotting Equipotential Lines". Review of Scientific Instruments 12: 37. doi:10.1063/1.1769778.
14. Bowdler, G.W (1948). "The measurement of peak voltage at a frequency of 600 Mc/s by means of a modified probe circuit". Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers - Part I: General 95 (87): 133–134. doi:10.1049/ji-1.1948.0064.
15. Müller, Erwin W. (1937-09-01). "Elektronenmikroskopische Beobachtungen von Feldkathoden" (in de). Zeitschrift für Physik 106 (9–10): 541–550. doi:10.1007/BF01339895. Bibcode1937ZPhy..106..541M.
16. Ximen, Hongyu; Russell, Phillip E (1992-07-01). "Microfabrication of AFM tips using focused ion and electron beam techniques". Ultramicroscopy 42–44: 1526–1532. doi:10.1016/0304-3991(92)90477-2.
17. Albrecht, T. R; Akamine, S; Carver, T. E; Quate, C. F (1990). "Microfabrication of cantilever styli for the atomic force microscope". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 8 (4): 3386–3396. doi:10.1116/1.576520.
18. Ibe, J. P; Bey, P. P; Brandow, S. L; Brizzolara, R. A; Burnham, N. A; Dilella, D. P; Lee, K. P; Marrian, C. R. K et al. (1990). "On the electrochemical etching of tips for scanning tunneling microscopy". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 8 (4): 3570–3575. doi:10.1116/1.576509.
19. Ekvall, Inger; Wahlström, Erik; Claesson, Dan; Olin, Håkan; Olsson, Eva (1999). "Preparation and characterization of electrochemically etched W tips for STM". Measurement Science and Technology 10 (1): 11. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/10/1/006.
20. Müller, A.-D; Müller, F; Hietschold, M; Demming, F; Jersch, J; Dickmann, K (1999). "Characterization of electrochemically etched tungsten tips for scanning tunneling microscopy". Review of Scientific Instruments 70 (10): 3970–3972. doi:10.1063/1.1150022.
21. Ju, Bing-Feng; Chen, Yuan-Liu; Ge, Yaozheng (2011). "The art of electrochemical etching for preparing tungsten probes with controllable tip profile and characteristic parameters". Review of Scientific Instruments 82 (1): 013707. doi:10.1063/1.3529880. PMID 21280837.
22. Chang, Wei-Tse; Hwang, Ing-Shouh; Chang, Mu-Tung; Lin, Chung-Yueh; Hsu, Wei-Hao; Hou, Jin-Long (2012). "Method of electrochemical etching of tungsten tips with controllable profiles". Review of Scientific Instruments 83 (8): 083704. doi:10.1063/1.4745394. PMID 22938300.
23. Khan, Yasser; Al-Falih, Hisham; Zhang, Yaping; Ng, Tien Khee; Ooi, Boon S. (June 2012). "Two-step controllable electrochemical etching of tungsten scanning probe microscopy tips". Review of Scientific Instruments 83 (6): 063708. doi:10.1063/1.4730045. PMID 22755635.
24. Bani Milhim, Alaeddin; Ben Mrad, Ridha (2014). "Electrochemical etching technique: Conical-long-sharp tungsten tips for nanoapplications". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 32 (3): 031806. doi:10.1116/1.4873700.
25. Valencia, Victor A; Thaker, Avesh A; Derouin, Jonathan; Valencia, Damian N; Farber, Rachael G; Gebel, Dana A; Killelea, Daniel R (2015). "Preparation of scanning tunneling microscopy tips using pulsed alternating current etching". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 33 (2): 023001. doi:10.1116/1.4904347.
26. Schoelz, James K; Xu, Peng; Barber, Steven D; Qi, Dejun; Ackerman, Matthew L; Basnet, Gobind; Cook, Cameron T; Thibado, Paul M (2012). "High-percentage success method for preparing and pre-evaluating tungsten tips for atomic-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 30 (3): 033201. doi:10.1116/1.3701977.
27. Dai, Hongjie; Hafner, Jason H.; Rinzler, Andrew G.; Colbert, Daniel T.; Smalley, Richard E. (November 1996). "Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy". Nature 384 (6605): 147–50. doi:10.1038/384147a0.
28. Li, Jun; Cassell, Alan M.; Dai, Hongjie (1999-08-01). "Carbon nanotubes as AFM tips: measuring DNA molecules at the liquid/solid interface". Surface and Interface Analysis 28 (1): 8–11. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9918(199908)28:1<8::aid-sia610>3.0.co;2-4.
29. Lee, Jae Seol; Song, Jungki; Kim, Seong Oh; Kim, Seokbeom; Lee, Wooju; Jackman, Joshua A.; Kim, Dongchoul; Cho, Nam-Joon et al. (2016-05-20). "Multifunctional hydrogel nano-probes for atomic force microscopy". Nature Communications 7: 11566. doi:10.1038/ncomms11566. PMID 27199165.
30. Houzé, F; Meyer, R; Schneegans, O; Boyer, L (1996). "Imaging the local electrical properties of metal surfaces by atomic force microscopy with conducting probes". Applied Physics Letters 69 (13): 1975–1977. doi:10.1063/1.117179.
31. Kaiser, Uwe; Schwarz, Alexander; Wiesendanger, Roland (March 2007). "Magnetic exchange force microscopy with atomic resolution". Nature 446 (7135): 522–5. doi:10.1038/nature05617. PMID 17392782.
32. Gray, Robert C.; Fishman, Victor A.; Bard, Allen J. (May 1977). "Simple sample cell for examination of solids and liquids by photoacoustic spectroscopy". Analytical Chemistry 49 (6): 697–700. doi:10.1021/ac50014a009.
33. Inouye, Yasushi; Kawata, Satoshi (1994). "Near-field scanning optical microscope with a metallic probe tip". Optics Letters 19 (3): 159. doi:10.1364/OL.19.000159. PMID 19829577.
34. Müller, M (2002). "Science, medicine, and the future: Microdialysis". BMJ 324 (7337): 588–91. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7337.588. PMID 11884326.
35. Frisbie, C. Daniel; Rozsnyai, Lawrence F.; Noy, Aleksandr; Wrighton, Mark S.; Lieber, Charles M. (1994-09-30). "Functional Group Imaging by Chemical Force Microscopy". Science 265 (5181): 2071–4. doi:10.1126/science.265.5181.2071. PMID 17811409. Bibcode1994Sci...265.2071F.
36. Wolf, E. L (2011). "Introduction". Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy Second Edition. pp. 1–22. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589494.003.0001. ISBN 9780199589494.
37. Atkins, P. (2006). Atkin's Physical Chemistry. New York. p. 77.
38. Allen, S; Davies, J; Dawkes, A.C; Davies, M.C; Edwards, J.C; Parker, M.C; Roberts, C.J; Sefton, J et al. (1996). "In situ observation of streptavidin-biotin binding on an immunoassay well surface using an atomic force microscope". FEBS Letters 390 (2): 161–164. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(96)00651-5. PMID 8706850.
39. Gross, Leo; Mohn, Fabian; Moll, Nikolaj; Schuler, Bruno; Criado, Alejandro; Guitián, Enrique; Peña, Diego; Gourdon, André et al. (2012-09-14). "Bond-Order Discrimination by Atomic Force Microscopy". Science 337 (6100): 1326–9. doi:10.1126/science.1225621. PMID 22984067.
40. Uchihashi, Takayuki; Iino, Ryota; Ando, Toshio; Noji, Hiroyuki (2011-08-05). "High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy Reveals Rotary Catalysis of Rotorless F1-ATPase". Science 333 (6043): 755–8. doi:10.1126/science.1205510. PMID 21817054.
41. Gross, Leo; Mohn, Fabian; Moll, Nikolaj; Liljeroth, Peter; Meyer, Gerhard (2009-08-28). "The Chemical Structure of a Molecule Resolved by Atomic Force Microscopy". Science 325 (5944): 1110–4. doi:10.1126/science.1176210. PMID 19713523. Bibcode2009Sci...325.1110G.
42. Wendel, M.; Lorenz, H.; Kotthaus, J. P. (1995-12-18). "Sharpened electron beam deposited tips for high resolution atomic force microscope lithography and imaging". Applied Physics Letters 67 (25): 3732–3734. doi:10.1063/1.115365. Bibcode1995ApPhL..67.3732W.
43. Niedermann, P; Hänni, W; Morel, D; Perret, A; Skinner, N; Indermühle, P.-F; Not Available, N.-F. de Rooij (1998). "CVD diamond probes for nanotechnology". Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 66 (7): S31–S34. doi:10.1007/s003390051094.
44. Nguyen, Cattien V.; Chao, Kuo-Jen; Stevens, Ramsey M. D.; Delzeit, Lance; Cassell, Alan; Han, Jie; Meyyappan, M. (2001). "Carbon nanotube tip probes: stability and lateral resolution in scanning probe microscopy and application to surface science in semiconductors". Nanotechnology 12 (3): 363. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/12/3/326.
45. Barattin, Régis; Voyer, Normand (2008). "Chemical modifications of AFM tips for the study of molecular recognition events". Chemical Communications (13): 1513–32. doi:10.1039/B614328H. PMID 18354789.
46. Gorbunov, A. A; Wolf, B; Edelmann, J (1993). "The use of silver tips in scanning tunneling microscopy". Review of Scientific Instruments 64 (8): 2393–2394. doi:10.1063/1.1143892.
47. Garnaes, J; Kragh, F; Mo/Rch, K. A; Thölén, A. R (1990). "Transmission electron microscopy of scanning tunneling tips". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 8: 441–444. doi:10.1116/1.576417.
48. Mate, C. Mathew; McClelland, Gary M.; Erlandsson, Ragnar; Chiang, Shirley (1987-10-26). "Atomic-scale friction of a tungsten tip on a graphite surface". Physical Review Letters 59 (17): 1942–1945. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1942. PMID 10035374.
49. Liu, Hsue Yang.; Fan, Fu Ren F.; Lin, Charles W.; Bard, Allen J. (June 1986). "Scanning electrochemical and tunneling ultramicroelectrode microscope for high-resolution examination of electrode surfaces in solution". Journal of the American Chemical Society 108 (13): 3838–3839. doi:10.1021/ja00273a054.
50. Lazarev, Alexander; Fang, Nicholas; Luo, Qi; Zhang, Xiang (2003). "Formation of fine near-field scanning optical microscopy tips. Part II. By laser-heated pulling and bending". Review of Scientific Instruments 74 (8): 3684–3688. doi:10.1063/1.1589584.
51. Essaidi, N.; Chen, Y.; Kottler, V.; Cambril, E.; Mayeux, C.; Ronarch, N.; Vieu, C. (1998-02-01). "Fabrication and characterization of optical-fiber nanoprobes for scanning near-field optical microscopy". Applied Optics 37 (4): 609–615. doi:10.1364/AO.37.000609. PMID 18268630.
52. Gobind, Basnet (2013). Fabrication of Tungsten Tips Suitable for Scanning Probe Microscopy by Electrochemical Etching Methods (Thesis). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
53. Cheung, Chin Li; Hafner, Jason H.; Lieber, Charles M. (2000-04-11). "Carbon nanotube atomic force microscopy tips: Direct growth by chemical vapor deposition and application to high-resolution imaging". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97 (8): 3809–13. doi:10.1073/pnas.050498597. PMID 10737761.
54. Martinez, J.; Yuzvinsky, T. D.; Fennimore, A. M.; Zettl, A.; García, R.; Bustamante, C. (2005). "Length control and sharpening of atomic force microscope carbon nanotube tips assisted by an electron beam". Nanotechnology 16 (11): 2493. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/16/11/004.
55. Lucier, Anne-Sophie; Mortensen, Henrik; Sun, Yan; Grütter, Peter (2005-12-19). "Determination of the atomic structure of scanning probe microscopy tungsten tips by field ion microscopy". Physical Review B 72 (23): 235420. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.235420.
56. Meister, A; Liley, M; Brugger, J; Pugin, R; Heinzelmann, H (2004). "Nanodispenser for attoliter volume deposition using atomic force microscopy probes modified by focused-ion-beam milling". Applied Physics Letters 85 (25): 6260–6262. doi:10.1063/1.1842352.
57. Zhang, R (1996). "Preparation of sharp polycrystalline tungsten tips for scanning tunneling microscopy imaging". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 14: 1. doi:10.1116/1.589029.
58. Lee, Chanwoo; Kim, Sung Tae; Jeong, Byeong Geun; Yun, Seok Joon; Song, Young Jae; Lee, Young Hee; Park, Doo Jae; Jeong, Mun Seok (2017-01-13). "Tip-Enhanced Raman Scattering Imaging of Two-Dimensional Tungsten Disulfide with Optimized Tip Fabrication Process". Scientific Reports 7: 40810. doi:10.1038/srep40810. PMID 28084466.
59. Kim, Minjung; Chelikowsky, James R (2015). "CO tip functionalization in subatomic resolution atomic force microscopy". Applied Physics Letters 107 (16): 163109. doi:10.1063/1.4934273.
60. Zhang, Jun; Chen, Pengcheng; Yuan, Bingkai; Ji, Wei; Cheng, Zhihai; Qiu, Xiaohui (2013-11-01). "Real-Space Identification of Intermolecular Bonding with Atomic Force Microscopy". Science 342 (6158): 611–614. doi:10.1126/science.1242603. PMID 24072819.
61. Kulisch, W; Ackermann, L; Sobisch, B (1996). "On the Mechanisms of Bias Enhanced Nucleation of Diamond". Physica Status Solidi A 154: 155–174. doi:10.1002/pssa.2211540113.
62. Germann, G. J; McClelland, G. M; Mitsuda, Y; Buck, M; Seki, H (1992). "Diamond force microscope tips fabricated by chemical vapor deposition". Review of Scientific Instruments 63 (9): 4053–4055. doi:10.1063/1.1143265.
63. Calafiore, Giuseppe; Koshelev, Alexander; Darlington, Thomas P.; Borys, Nicholas J.; Melli, Mauro; Polyakov, Aleksandr; Cantarella, Giuseppe; Allen, Frances I. et al. (2017-05-10). "Campanile Near-Field Probes Fabricated by Nanoimprint Lithography on the Facet of an Optical Fiber". Scientific Reports 7 (1): 1651. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01871-5. PMID 28490793. Bibcode2017NatSR...7.1651C.
64. Nguyen, Cattien V.; Ye, Qi; Meyyappan, M. (2005). "Carbon nanotube tips for scanning probe microscopy: fabrication and high aspect ratio nanometrology". Measurement Science and Technology 16 (11): 2138. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/11/003.
65. Méndez, J; Luna, M; Baró, A.M (1992). "Preparation of STM W tips and characterization by FEM, TEM and SEM". Surface Science 266 (1–3): 294–298. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(92)91036-B.
66. Method of cleaning probe tips of cards and apparatus for implementing the method, 1996-04-03, retrieved 2018-05-15
67. Frammelsberger, Werner; Benstetter, Guenther; Kiely, Janice; Stamp, Richard (2007). "C-AFM-based thickness determination of thin and ultra-thin SiO 2 films by use of different conductive-coated probe tips". Applied Surface Science 253 (7): 3615–3626. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.070. Bibcode2007ApSS..253.3615F.
68. Dai, Gaoliang; Pohlenz, Frank; Danzebrink, Hans-Ulrich; Xu, Min; Hasche, Klaus; Wilkening, Guenter (2004). "Metrological large range scanning probe microscope". Review of Scientific Instruments 75 (4): 962–969. doi:10.1063/1.1651638.
69. Meyer, J.A; Stranick, S.J; Wang, J.B; Weiss, P.S (1992-07-01). "Field emission current-voltage curves as a diagnostic for scanning tunneling microscope tips". Ultramicroscopy 42–44: 1538–1541. doi:10.1016/0304-3991(92)90479-4.
70. Biegelsen, D. K; Ponce, F. A; Tramontana, J. C; Koch, S. M (1987). "Ion milled tips for scanning tunneling microscopy". Applied Physics Letters 50 (11): 696–698. doi:10.1063/1.98070.
71. Lisowski, W; Van Den Berg, A. H. J; Kip, G. A. M; Hanekamp, L. J (1991). "Characterization of tungsten tips for STM by SEM/AES/XPS". Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry 341 (3–4): 196–199. doi:10.1007/BF00321548.
72. De Heer, W. A; Ch Telain, A; Ugarte, D (1995). "A Carbon Nanotube Field-Emission Electron Source". Science 270 (5239): 1179–1180. doi:10.1126/science.270.5239.1179. Bibcode1995Sci...270.1179D.
73. Hutter, Jeffrey L; Bechhoefer, John (1993). "Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips". Review of Scientific Instruments 64 (7): 1868–1873. doi:10.1063/1.1143970.
74. Fasth, J E; Loberg, B; Nordén, H (1967). "Preparation of contamination-free tungsten specimens for the field-ion microscope". Journal of Scientific Instruments 44 (12): 1044–1045. doi:10.1088/0950-7671/44/12/428.
75. Cricenti, A; Paparazzo, E; Scarselli, M. A; Moretto, L; Selci, S (1994). "Preparation and characterization of tungsten tips for scanning tunneling microscopy". Review of Scientific Instruments 65 (5): 1558–1560. doi:10.1063/1.1144891.
76. Colton, R. J; Baker, S. M; Baldeschwieler, J. D; Kaiser, W. J (1987). "Oxide‐free tip for scanning tunneling microscopy". Applied Physics Letters 51 (5): 305–307. doi:10.1063/1.98451.
77. Hacker, B; Hillebrand, A; Hartmann, T; Guckenberger, R (1992-07-01). "Preparation and characterization of tips for scanning tunneling microscopy of biological specimens". Ultramicroscopy 42–44: 1514–1518. doi:10.1016/0304-3991(92)90475-Y.
78. Schwarz, U. D; Haefke, H; Reimann, P; Güntherodt, H.-J (1994). "Tip artefacts in scanning force microscopy". Journal of Microscopy 173 (3): 183–197. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1994.tb03441.x.
79. DeRose, J. A.; Revel, J.-P. (May 1997). "Examination of Atomic (Scanning) Force Microscopy Probe Tips with the Transmission Electron Microscope". Microscopy and Microanalysis 3 (3): 203–213. doi:10.1017/S143192769797015X. ISSN 1435-8115.
80. Feenstra, Randall M (1994). "Scanning tunneling spectroscopy". Surface Science 299–300: 965–979. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(94)90710-2.
81. Feenstra, R.M; Stroscio, Joseph A; Fein, A.P (1987). "Tunneling spectroscopy of the Si(111)2 × 1 surface". Surface Science 181 (1–2): 295–306. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(87)90170-1. Bibcode1987SurSc.181..295F.
82. Chang, Chuan C (1971). "Auger electron spectroscopy". Surface Science 25: 53–79. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(71)90210-X.
83. Dongmo, Samuel; Villarrubia, John S.; Jones, Samuel N.; Renegar, Thomas B.; Postek, Michael T.; Song, Jun-Feng (1998-03-01). Tip Characterization for Scanned Probe Microscope Width Metrology. NIST.
84. Hierlemann, Andreas; K. Campbell, J; Baker, Lane; M. Crooks, R; Ricco, Antonio (1998-06-01). "Structural Distortion of Dendrimers on Gold Surfaces: A Tapping-Mode AFM Investigation". Journal of the American Chemical Society 120 (21): 5323–5324. doi:10.1021/ja974283f.
85. VAN CLEEF, M.; HOLT, S. A.; WATSON, G. S.; MYHRA, S. (January 1996). "Polystyrene spheres on mica substrates: AFM calibration, tip parameters and scan artefacts". Journal of Microscopy 181 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.74351.x.
86. Todd, Brian A; Eppell, Steven J (2001). "A method to improve the quantitative analysis of SFM images at the nanoscale". Surface Science 491 (3): 473–483. doi:10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01313-9.
87. Dixson, Ronald G; Koening, Rainer G; Tsai, Vincent W; Fu, Joseph; Vorburger, Theodore V (1999). "Dimensional metrology with the NIST calibrated atomic force microscope". in Singh, Bhanwar. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII. Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIII. 3677. pp. 20. doi:10.1117/12.350822.
88. Dongmo, Samuel (1996-03-01). "Blind restoration method of scanning tunneling and atomic force microscopy images". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 14 (2): 1552. doi:10.1116/1.589137. Bibcode1996JVSTB..14.1552D.
89. Villarrubia, J. S (1996). "Scanned probe microscope tip characterization without calibrated tip characterizers". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 14 (2): 1518. doi:10.1116/1.589130.
90. Williams, P. M (1996). "Blind reconstruction of scanning probe image data". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 14 (2): 1557. doi:10.1116/1.589138.
91. Villarrubia, J. S. (July 1997). "Algorithms for Scanned Probe Microscope Image Simulation, Surface Reconstruction, and Tip Estimation". Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 102 (4): 425–454. doi:10.6028/jres.102.030. PMID 27805154.
92. Yu, Min-Feng; Lourie, Oleg; Dyer, Mark J.; Moloni, Katerina; Kelly, Thomas F.; Ruoff, Rodney S. (2000-01-28). "Strength and Breaking Mechanism of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Under Tensile Load". Science 287 (5453): 637–640. doi:10.1126/science.287.5453.637. PMID 10649994. Bibcode2000Sci...287..637Y.
93. Hafner, Jason H.; Cheung, Chin Li; Lieber, Charles M. (April 1999). "Growth of nanotubes for probe microscopy tips". Nature 398 (6730): 761–762. doi:10.1038/19658.
94. Wong, Stanislaus S.; Woolley, Adam T.; Joselevich, Ernesto; Cheung, Chin Li; Lieber, Charles M. (August 1998). "Covalently-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Probe Tips for Chemical Force Microscopy". Journal of the American Chemical Society 120 (33): 8557–8. doi:10.1021/ja9817803.
95. Wang, Zhigang; Zhou, Chunqing; Wang, Chen; Wan, Lijun; Fang, Xiaohong; Bai, Chunli (October 2003). "AFM and STM study of beta-amyloid aggregation on graphite". Ultramicroscopy 97 (1–4): 73–79. doi:10.1016/S0304-3991(03)00031-7. PMID 12801659.
96. Wilson, Neil R.; Macpherson, Julie V. (2009-07-13). "Carbon nanotube tips for atomic force microscopy". Nature Nanotechnology 4 (8): 483–491. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.154. PMID 19662008.
97. Patel, N.; Davies, M. C.; Heaton, R. J.; Roberts, C. J.; Tendler, S. J. B.; Williams, P. M. (1998-03-01). "A scanning probe microscopy study of the physisorption and chemisorption of protein molecules onto carboxylate terminated self-assembled monolayers". Applied Physics A 66 (1): S569–S574. doi:10.1007/s003390051203.
98. Noy, Aleksandr; Frisbie, C. Daniel; Rozsnyai, Lawrence F.; Wrighton, Mark S.; Lieber, Charles M. (August 1995). "Chemical Force Microscopy: Exploiting Chemically-Modified Tips To Quantify Adhesion, Friction, and Functional Group Distributions in Molecular Assemblies". Journal of the American Chemical Society 117 (30): 7943–7951. doi:10.1021/ja00135a012.
99. Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Noy, A.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. (1994-09-30). "Functional group imaging by chemical force microscopy". Science 265 (5181): 2071–2074. doi:10.1126/science.265.5181.2071. PMID 17811409. Bibcode1994Sci...265.2071F.
100. Lieber, Charles M.; Wong, Stanislaus S.; Joselevich, Ernesto; Woolley, Adam T.; Cheung, Chin Li (1998-07-02). "Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre- sized probes in chemistry and biology". Nature 394 (6688): 52–55. doi:10.1038/27873. PMID 9665127. Bibcode1998Natur.394...52W.
101. Howard, A. J.; Rye, R. R.; Houston, J. E. (1996-02-15). "Nanomechanical basis for imaging soft materials with tapping mode atomic force microscopy". Journal of Applied Physics 79 (4): 1885–1890. doi:10.1063/1.361090. Bibcode1996JAP....79.1885H.
102. Dogruel, David.; Williams, Peter.; Nelson, Randall W. (December 1995). "Rapid Tryptic Mapping Using Enzymically Active Mass Spectrometer Probe Tips". Analytical Chemistry 67 (23): 4343–4348. doi:10.1021/ac00119a022. PMID 8633777.
103. Shiotari, Akitoshi; Sugimoto, Yoshiaki (2017-02-03). "Ultrahigh-resolution imaging of water networks by atomic force microscopy". Nature Communications 8: 14313. doi:10.1038/ncomms14313. PMID 28155856.
104. Wang, Xiao-Ye; Richter, Marcus; He, Yuanqin; Björk, Jonas; Riss, Alexander; Rajesh, Raju; Garnica, Manuela; Hennersdorf, Felix et al. (2017). "Exploration of pyrazine-embedded antiaromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons generated by solution and on-surface azomethine ylide homocoupling". Nature Communications 8 (1): 1948. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01934-1. PMID 29208962.