Physics:Uranium–thorium dating
Uranium–thorium dating, also called thorium-230 dating, uranium-series disequilibrium dating or uranium-series dating, is a radiometric dating technique established in the 1960s which has been used since the 1970s to determine the age of calcium carbonate materials such as speleothem or coral.[1][2] Unlike other commonly used radiometric dating techniques such as rubidium–strontium or uranium–lead dating, the uranium-thorium technique does not measure accumulation of a stable end-member decay product. Instead, it calculates an age from the degree to which secular equilibrium has been restored between the radioactive isotope thorium-230 and its radioactive parent uranium-234 within a sample.
Background
Thorium is not soluble in natural water under conditions found at or near the surface of the earth, so materials grown in or from this water do not usually contain thorium.[citation needed] In contrast, uranium is soluble to some extent in all natural water, so any material that precipitates or is grown from such water also contains trace uranium, typically at levels of between a few parts per billion and few parts per million by weight. As time passes after such material has formed, uranium-234 in the sample with a half-life of 245,000 years decays to thorium-230.[3] Thorium-230 is itself radioactive with a half-life of 75,000 years,[3] so instead of accumulating indefinitely (as for instance is the case for the uranium–lead system), thorium-230 instead approaches secular equilibrium with its radioactive parent uranium-234. At secular equilibrium, the number of thorium-230 decays per year within a sample is equal to the number of thorium-230 produced, which also equals the number of uranium-234 decays per year in the same sample.
History
In 1908, John Joly, a professor of geology at Trinity College Dublin, found higher radium contents in deep sediments than in those of the continental shelf, and suspected that detrital sediments scavenged radium out of seawater. Piggot and Urry found in 1942, that radium excess corresponded with an excess of thorium. It took another 20 years until the technique was applied to terrestrial carbonates (speleothems and travertines). In the late 1980s, the method was refined by mass spectrometry, with significant contributions from Larry Edwards.[4][5] After Viktor Viktorovich Cherdyntsev's landmark book about uranium-234 had been translated into English, U-Th dating came to widespread research attention in Western geology.[6]:7
Methods
U-series dating is a family of methods which can be applied to different materials over different time ranges. Each method is named after the isotopes measured to obtain the date, mostly a daughter and its parent. Eight methods are listed in the table below.
| Isotope ratio measured | Analytical method | Time range (ka) | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|
| 230Th/234U | Alpha spec.; mass spec. | 1–350 | Carbonates, phosphates, organic matter |
| 231Pa/235U | Alpha spec. | 1–300 | Carbonates, phosphates |
| 234U/238U | Alpha spec.; mass spec. | 100–1,000 | Carbonates, phosphates |
| U-trend | Alpha spec. | 10–1,000(?) | Detrital sediment |
| 226Ra | Alpha spec. | 0.5–10 | Carbonates |
| 230Th/232Th | Alpha spec. | 5–300 | Marine sediment |
| 231Pa/230Th | Alpha spec. | 5–300 | Marine sediment |
| 4He/U | mass spec. (gas) | 20–400(?) | Coral |
The 234U/238U method is based on the fact that 234U is dissolved preferentially over 238U because when a 238U atom decays by emitting an alpha ray the daughter atom is displaced from its normal position in the crystal by atomic recoil.[7] This produces a 234Th atom which quickly becomes a 234U atom. Once the uranium is deposited, the ratio of 234U to 238U goes back down to its secular equilibrium (at which the radioactivities of the two are equal), with the distance from equilibrium decreasing by a factor of 2 every 245,000 years.
A material balance gives, for some unknown constant A, these expressions for activity rations (assuming that the 230Th starts at zero):
- [math]\displaystyle{ ^{234}\text{U}/^{238}\text{U}=1+A\times 2^{-t/245000} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ ^{230}\text{Th}/^{238}\text{U}=1+\frac A{1-75000/245000}\times 2^{-t/245000}-\left(1+\frac A{1-75000/245000}\right)\times 2^{-t/75000} }[/math]
We can solve the first equation for A in terms of the unknown age, t:
- [math]\displaystyle{ A=(^{234}\text{U}/^{238}\text{U}-1)\times 2^{t/245000} }[/math]
Putting this into the second equation gives us an equation to be solved for t:
- [math]\displaystyle{ ^{230}\text{Th}/^{238}\text{U}=1+\frac{^{234}\text{U}/^{238}\text{U}-1}{1-75000/245000}-2^{-t/75000}-\frac{^{234}\text{U}/^{238}\text{U}-1}{1-75000/245000}\times 2^{t/245000-t/75000} }[/math]
Unfortunately there is no closed-form expression for the age, t, but it is easily found using equation solving algorithms.
Dating limits
Uranium–thorium dating has an upper age limit of somewhat over 500,000 years, defined by the half-life of thorium-230, the precision with which one can measure the thorium-230/uranium-234 ratio in a sample, and the accuracy to which one knows the half-lives of thorium-230 and uranium-234. Using this technique to calculate an age, the ratio of uranium-234 to its parent isotope uranium-238 must also be measured.[citation needed]
Precision
U-Th dating yields the most accurate results if applied to precipitated calcium carbonate, that is in stalagmites, travertines, and lacustrine limestones. Bone and shell are less reliable. Mass spectrometry can achieve a precision of ±1%. Conventional alpha counting's precision is ±5%. Mass spectrometry also uses smaller samples.[8]
See also
References
- ↑ Davis, Owen (Spring 2005). "Uranium-Thorium Dating". Biogeography ECOLOGY 438/538. Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona. http://www.geo.arizona.edu/Antevs/ecol438/uthdating.html.
- ↑ Costa, Kassandra M.; Hayes, Christopher T.; Anderson, Robert F.; Pavia, Frank J.; Bausch, Alexandra; Deng, Feifei; Dutay, Jean-Claude; Geibert, Walter et al. (2020). "230Th Normalization: New Insights on an Essential Tool for Quantifying Sedimentary Fluxes in the Modern and Quaternary Ocean" (in en). Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 35 (2): e2019PA003820. doi:10.1029/2019PA003820. ISSN 2572-4525. Bibcode: 2020EGUGA..22.2186C.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Aitken, M.J. (25 February 2014). Science-Based Dating in Archaeology. Routledge. p. 124. ISBN 978-1-317-87149-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=FQntAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA124.
- ↑ "These two geochemists have one of the largest publishing networks in science" (in en). 2020-06-26. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/these-two-geochemists-have-one-of-the-largest-publishing-networks-in-science-environmental-earth-research.
- ↑ "Uranium–Thorium Dating of Speleothems". https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/elements/article-pdf/17/2/87/5358177/gselements-17-2-87.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Schwarcz, Henry P. (January 1989). "Uranium series dating of Quaternary deposits". Quaternary International 1: 7–17. doi:10.1016/1040-6182(89)90005-0. Bibcode: 1989QuInt...1....7S. (Subscription content?)
- ↑ M. B. Anderson (Dec 8, 2010). "Precise determination of the open ocean 234U/238U composition". Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 11 (12). doi:10.1029/2010GC003318. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010GC003318.
- ↑ Schwarcz, Henry P. (2005). "Uranium series dating in paleoanthropology". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 1 (2): 56–62. doi:10.1002/evan.1360010207.
External links
- Shakhashiri, Bassam Z.. "Uranium". Chemical of the Week on scifun.org. University of Wisconsin-Madison Chemistry Department. http://scifun.chem.wisc.edu/chemweek/uranium/uclock.htm.
 |  |
