Physics:Virial stress

From HandWiki
Short description: Measure of mechanical stress at the atomic scale


In mechanics, virial stress is a measure of stress on an atomic scale for homogeneous systems. The name is derived from la vis 'force': "Virial is then derived from Latin as well, stemming from the word virias (plural of vis) meaning forces."[1] The expression of the (local) virial stress can be derived as the functional derivative of the free energy of a molecular system with respect to the deformation tensor.[2]

Volume averaged Definition

The instantaneous volume averaged virial stress is given by

τij=1ΩkΩ[m(k)(ui(k)u¯i)(uj(k)u¯j)+12Ω(xi()xi(k))fj(k)] where

  • k and are atoms in the domain,
  • Ω is the volume of the domain,
  • m(k) is the mass of atom k,
  • ui(k) is the i-th component of the velocity of atom k,
  • u¯j is the j-th component of the average velocity of atoms in the volume,
  • xi(k) is the i-th component of the position of atom k, and
  • fi(k) is the i-th component of the force applied on atom k by atom .

At zero kelvin, all velocities are zero so we have τij=12Ωk,Ω(xi()xi(k))fj(k)

This can be thought of as follows. The τ11 component of stress is the force in the x1-direction divided by the area of a plane perpendicular to that direction. Consider two adjacent volumes separated by such a plane. The 11-component of stress on that interface is the sum of all pairwise forces between atoms on the two sides.

The volume averaged virial stress is then the ensemble average of the instantaneous volume averaged virial stress.

In a three dimensional, isotropic system, at equilibrium the "instantaneous" atomic pressure is usually defined as the average over the diagonals of the negative stress tensor:

𝒫at=13Tr(τ).

The pressure then is the ensemble average of the instantaneous pressure[3] Pat=𝒫at. This pressure is the average pressure in the volume Ω.

Equivalent Definition

It's worth noting that some articles and textbook[3] use a slightly different but equivalent version of the equation

τij=1ΩkΩ[m(k)(ui(k)u¯i)(uj(k)u¯j)12Ωxi(k)fj(k)]

where xi(k) is the i-th component of the vector oriented from the -th atoms to the k-th calculated via the difference

xik=xi(k)xi()

Both equation being strictly equivalent, the definition of the vector can still lead to confusion.

Derivation

The virial pressure can be derived, using the virial theorem and splitting forces between particles and the container[4] or, alternatively, via direct application of the defining equation P=F(N,V,T)V and using scaled coordinates in the calculation.

Inhomogeneous Systems

If the system is not homogeneous in a given volume the above (volume averaged) pressure is not a good measure for the pressure. In inhomogeneous systems the pressure depends on the position and orientation of the surface on which the pressure acts. Therefore, in inhomogeneous systems a definition of a local pressure is needed.[5] As a general example for a system with inhomogeneous pressure you can think of the pressure in the atmosphere of the earth which varies with height.

Instantaneous local virial stress

The (local) instantaneous virial stress is given by:[2]

τab(r)=i=1Nδ(rr(i))[m(i)ua(i)ub(i)+12j=1,jiN(r(i)r(j))afb(ij)],

Measuring the virial pressure in molecular simulations

The virial pressure can be measured via the formulas above or using volume rescaling trial moves.[6]

Virial pressure in active matter

The virial pressure in active matter is an extension of the classical virial pressure of equilibrium statistical mechanics to systems composed of self-propelled particles. In active systems, pressure contains an additional contribution originating from persistent self-propulsion, commonly referred to as the swim pressure or active pressure. For active Brownian particles (ABPs), the total pressure can be separated into contributions from thermal fluctuations, interparticle interactions, and the active motion of particles.[7] The swim pressure arises from the continuous propulsion of active particles and represents the mechanical stress generated by their self-driven motion.[8] Unlike equilibrium fluids, the pressure of generic active systems can depend on the nature of particle–wall interactions and confinement geometry; therefore, a universal equation of state does not generally exist for active matter.[9] However, for specific systems such as spherical ABPs without aligning interactions, a well-defined bulk pressure and equation of state can be obtained.[10]

The global pressure of an active system represents the spatially averaged mechanical stress and is commonly obtained using virial approaches or momentum transport arguments. In contrast, local pressure describes the spatial variation of stress inside the system and provides information about inhomogeneous regions such as interfaces, boundaries, and density gradients. Studies of local stress in active Brownian systems have shown that, for spherical ABPs, the local bulk stress can correspond to the mechanical pressure measured at confining walls, supporting the existence of an equation of state.[10] However, the active contribution to the global pressure, particularly the swim pressure, does not always directly correspond to the local stress tensor. This difference becomes important in confined, inhomogeneous, or anisotropic active systems where particle orientation and boundary-induced polarization influence stress transmission.[9]

In active systems with translational and rotational inertia, the virial stress contains contributions from translational motion, rotational motion, interparticle forces, and active propulsion forces. The translational inertial contribution arises from particle momentum, while rotational inertia introduces an additional stress contribution associated with angular motion. The interaction contribution originates from forces between particles, and the active contribution is generated by self-propulsion. These terms together describe the mechanical stress carried by inertial active particles and generalize the stress description of active Brownian systems.[11]

In the overdamped limit, where translational and rotational inertia are neglected, the inertial contributions disappear and the stress reduces to the commonly used active Brownian particle pressure formulations.[7] Studies of active Brownian particles with translational and rotational inertia have shown that the swim stress obtained from the global virial expression does not necessarily represent the local stress tensor, demonstrating that global pressure and local stress can have different physical interpretations in inertial active matter systems.[11]

See also

References

  1. Wasalwar, Yash (May 23, 2023). "Spotlight: the Virial Theorem". Medium. https://medium.com/quantaphy/spotlight-meet-the-virial-theorem-9ee1188927d6. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Morante, S., G. C. Rossi, and M. Testa. "The stress tensor of a molecular system: An exercise in statistical mechanics." The Journal of chemical physics 125.3 (2006): 034101, http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2214719.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Allen, MP; Tildesley, DJ (1991). Clarendon Press. ed. Computer Simulations of Liquids. Oxford. pp. 46–50. 
  4. Navet, M.; Jamin, E.; Feix, M. R. (1980-02-01). "" Virial " pressure of the classical one-component plasma" (in en). Journal de Physique Lettres 41 (3): 69–73. doi:10.1051/jphyslet:0198000410306900. ISSN 0302-072X. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231724. 
  5. Loison, Claire (2005) (in en). Numerical Simulations of a Smectic Lamellar Phase of Amphiphilic Molecules. Cuvillier Verlag. ISBN 978-3-86537-655-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=rPpegGthzO4C&dq=local+pressure+tensor&pg=PA40. 
  6. Miguel, Enrique de; Jackson, George (2006-10-30). "The nature of the calculation of the pressure in molecular simulations of continuous models from volume perturbations" (in en). The Journal of Chemical Physics 125 (16): 164109. doi:10.1063/1.2363381. ISSN 0021-9606. PMID 17092065. Bibcode2006JChPh.125p4109D. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Winkler, Roland G.; Wysocki, Adam; Gompper, Gerhard (2015). "Virial pressure in systems of spherical active Brownian particles". Soft Matter 11: 6680–6691. doi:10.1039/C5SM01412C. 
  8. Takatori, Sho C.; Brady, John F. (2015). "Swim stress, motion, and deformation of active matter: effect of hydrodynamic interactions". Physical Review E 91 (3). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032117. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 Solon, Alexandre P.; Cates, Michael E.; Tailleur, Julien (2015). "Pressure is not a state function for generic active fluids". Nature Physics 11: 673–678. doi:10.1038/nphys3377. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 Das, Shibananda; Gompper, Gerhard; Winkler, Roland G. (2019). "Local stress and pressure in an inhomogeneous system of spherical active Brownian particles". Scientific Reports 9: 6608. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43077-x. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 Tiwari, Chandranshu; Singh, Sunil P.; Winkler, Roland G. (2026). "Virial stress in systems of active Brownian particles in the presence of translational and rotational inertia". The Journal of Chemical Physics 164: 224901.