Physics:Wheatstone bridge

From HandWiki
A Wheatstone bridge has four resistors forming the sides of a diamond shape. A battery is connected across one pair of opposite corners, and a galvanometer across the other pair.
Wheatstone bridge circuit diagram. The unknown resistance Rx is to be measured; resistances R1, R2 and R3 are known, where R2 is adjustable. When the measured voltage VG is 0, both legs have equal voltage ratios: R2/R1Rx/R3 and RxR3R2/R1.

A Wheatstone bridge is an electrical circuit used to measure an unknown electrical resistance by balancing two legs of a bridge circuit, one leg of which includes the unknown component. The primary benefit of the circuit is its ability to provide extremely accurate measurements (in contrast with something like a simple voltage divider).[1] Its operation is similar to the original potentiometer.

The Wheatstone bridge was invented by Samuel Hunter Christie (sometimes spelled "Christy") in 1833 and improved and popularized by Sir Charles Wheatstone in 1843. One of the Wheatstone bridge's initial uses was for soils analysis and comparison.[2]

Operation

In the figure, Rx is the fixed, yet unknown, resistance to be measured.

R1, R2, and R3 are resistors of known resistance and the resistance of R2 is adjustable. The resistance R2 is adjusted until the bridge is "balanced" and no current flows through the galvanometer Vg. At this point, the potential difference between the two midpoints (B and D) will be zero. Therefore the ratio of the two resistances in the known leg (R2 / R1) is equal to the ratio of the two resistances in the unknown leg (Rx / R3). If the bridge is unbalanced, the direction of the current indicates whether R2 is too high or too low.

At the point of balance,

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \frac{R_2}{R_1} &= \frac{R_x}{R_3} \\[4pt] \Rightarrow R_x &= \frac{R_2}{R_1} \cdot R_3 \end{align} }[/math]

Detecting zero current with a galvanometer can be done to extremely high precision. Therefore, if R1, R2, and R3 are known to high precision, then Rx can be measured to high precision. Very small changes in Rx disrupt the balance and are readily detected.

Alternatively, if R1, R2, and R3 are known, but R2 is not adjustable, the voltage difference across or current flow through the meter can be used to calculate the value of Rx, using Kirchhoff's circuit laws. This setup is frequently used in strain gauge and resistance thermometer measurements, as it is usually faster to read a voltage level off a meter than to adjust a resistance to zero the voltage.

Derivation

Directions of currents arbitrarily assigned

Quick derivation at balance

At the point of balance, both the voltage and the current between the two midpoints (B and D) are zero. Therefore, [math]\displaystyle{ I_1 = I_2 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ I_3 = I_x }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ V_D = V_B }[/math], and:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} \frac{V_{DC}}{V_{AD}}&=\frac{V_{BC}}{V_{AB}} \\[4pt] \Rightarrow \frac{I_2R_2}{I_1R_1} &= \frac{I_xR_x}{I_3R_3}\\[4pt] \Rightarrow R_x &= \frac{R_2}{R_1} \cdot R_3 \end{align} }[/math]

Full derivation using Kirchhoff's circuit laws

First, Kirchhoff's first law is used to find the currents in junctions B and D:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} I_3 - I_x + I_G &= 0 \\ I_1 - I_2 - I_G &= 0 \end{align} }[/math]

Then, Kirchhoff's second law is used for finding the voltage in the loops ABDA and BCDB:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} (I_3 \cdot R_3) - (I_G \cdot R_G) - (I_1 \cdot R_1) &= 0 \\ (I_x \cdot R_x) - (I_2 \cdot R_2) + (I_G \cdot R_G) &= 0 \end{align} }[/math]

When the bridge is balanced, then IG = 0, so the second set of equations can be rewritten as:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} I_3 \cdot R_3 &= I_1 \cdot R_1 \quad \text{(1)} \\ I_x \cdot R_x &= I_2 \cdot R_2 \quad \text{(2)} \end{align} }[/math]

Then, equation (1) is divided by equation (2) and the resulting equation is rearranged, giving:

[math]\displaystyle{ R_x = {{R_2 \cdot I_2 \cdot I_3 \cdot R_3}\over{R_1 \cdot I_1 \cdot I_x}} }[/math]

Due to: I3 = Ix and I1 = I2 being proportional from Kirchhoff's First Law in the above equation I3 I2 over I1 Ix cancel out of the above equation. The desired value of Rx is now known to be given as:

[math]\displaystyle{ R_x = {{R_3 \cdot R_2}\over{R_1}} }[/math]

On the other hand, if the resistance of the galvanometer is high enough that IG is negligible, it is possible to compute Rx from the three other resistor values and the supply voltage (VS), or the supply voltage from all four resistor values. To do so, one has to work out the voltage from each potential divider and subtract one from the other. The equations for this are:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} V_G & = \left({R_2\over{R_1 + R_2}} - {R_x \over {R_x + R_3}}\right)V_s \\[6pt] R_x & = {{R_2 \cdot V_s - (R_1+R_2) \cdot V_G}\over {R_1 \cdot V_s + (R_1+R_2) \cdot V_G}} R_3 \end{align} }[/math]

where VG is the voltage of node D relative to node B.

Significance

The Wheatstone bridge illustrates the concept of a difference measurement, which can be extremely accurate. Variations on the Wheatstone bridge can be used to measure capacitance, inductance, impedance and other quantities, such as the amount of combustible gases in a sample, with an explosimeter. The Kelvin bridge was specially adapted from the Wheatstone bridge for measuring very low resistances. In many cases, the significance of measuring the unknown resistance is related to measuring the impact of some physical phenomenon (such as force, temperature, pressure, etc.) which thereby allows the use of Wheatstone bridge in measuring those elements indirectly.


Modifications of the fundamental bridge

Kelvin bridge

The Wheatstone bridge is the fundamental bridge, but there are other modifications that can be made to measure various kinds of resistances when the fundamental Wheatstone bridge is not suitable. Some of the modifications are:

See also

References

  1. "Circuits in Practice: The Wheatstone Bridge, What It Does, and Why It Matters", as discussed in this MIT ES.333 class video
  2. "The Genesis of the Wheatstone Bridge" by Stig Ekelof discusses Christie's and Wheatstone's contributions, and why the bridge carries Wheatstone's name. Published in "Engineering Science and Education Journal", volume 10, no 1, February 2001, pages 37–40.

External links

pl:Mostek (elektronika)#Mostek Wheatstone'a