Radical of an ideal

From HandWiki

In ring theory, a branch of mathematics, the radical of an ideal I of a commutative ring is another ideal defined by the property that an element x is in the radical if and only if some power of x is in I. Taking the radical of an ideal is called radicalization. A radical ideal (or semiprime ideal) is an ideal that is equal to its radical. The radical of a primary ideal is a prime ideal.

This concept is generalized to non-commutative rings in the semiprime ring article.

Definition

The radical of an ideal I in a commutative ring R, denoted by rad(I) or I, is defined as

I={rRrnI for some n+},

(note that II). Intuitively, I is obtained by taking all roots of elements of I within the ring R. Equivalently, I is the preimage of the ideal of nilpotent elements (the nilradical) of the quotient ring R/I (via the natural map π:RR/I). The latter proves that I is an ideal.[Note 1]

If the radical of I is finitely generated, then some power of I is contained in I.[1] In particular, if I and J are ideals of a Noetherian ring, then I and J have the same radical if and only if I contains some power of J and J contains some power of I.

If an ideal I coincides with its own radical, then I is called a radical ideal or semiprime ideal.

Examples

  • Consider the ring of integers.
    1. The radical of the ideal 4 of integer multiples of 4 is 2 (the evens).
    2. The radical of 5 is 5.
    3. The radical of 12 is 6.
    4. In general, the radical of m is r, where r is the product of all distinct prime factors of m, the largest square-free factor of m (see Radical of an integer). In fact, this generalizes to an arbitrary ideal (see the Properties section).
  • Consider the ideal I=(y4)[x,y]. It is trivial to show I=(y) (using the basic property In=I), but we give some alternative methods:[clarification needed] The radical I corresponds to the nilradical 0 of the quotient ring R=[x,y]/(y4), which is the intersection of all prime ideals of the quotient ring. This is contained in the Jacobson radical, which is the intersection of all maximal ideals, which are the kernels of homomorphisms to fields. Any ring homomorphism R must have y in the kernel in order to have a well-defined homomorphism (if we said, for example, that the kernel should be (x,y1) the composition of [x,y]R would be (x,y4,y1), which is the same as trying to force 1=0). Since is algebraically closed, every homomorphism R𝔽 must factor through , so we only have to compute the intersection of {ker(Φ):ΦHom(R,)} to compute the radical of (0). We then find that 0=(y)R.

Properties

This section will continue the convention that I is an ideal of a commutative ring R:

  • It is always true that I=I, i.e. radicalization is an idempotent operation. Moreover, I is the smallest radical ideal containing I.
  • I is the intersection of all the prime ideals of R that contain II=R𝔭I𝔭 prime𝔭,and thus the radical of a prime ideal is equal to itself.[Note 2][Note 3]
  • Specializing the last point, the nilradical (the set of all nilpotent elements) is equal to the intersection of all prime ideals of R[Note 4] 0=𝔑R=𝔭R prime𝔭.This property is seen to be equivalent to the former via the natural map π:RR/I, which yields a bijection u: {ideals JRJI}u{ideals JJR/I}, defined by u:JJ/I={r+IrJ}.[2][Note 5]
  • An ideal I in a ring R is radical if and only if the quotient ring R/I is reduced.
  • The radical of a homogeneous ideal is homogeneous.
  • The radical of an intersection of ideals is equal to the intersection of their radicals: IJ=IJ.
  • The radical of a primary ideal is prime. If the radical of an ideal I is maximal, then I is primary.[3]
  • If I is an ideal, In=I. Since prime ideals are radical ideals, 𝔭=𝔭 for any prime ideal 𝔭.
  • Let I,J be ideals of a ring R. If I,J are comaximal, then I,J are comaximal.[Note 6]
  • Let M be a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring R. Then[4]annR(M)=𝔭suppM𝔭=𝔭assM𝔭 where suppM is the support of M and assM is the set of associated primes of M.

Applications

One of the primary motivations for studying radicals of ideals is to understand algebraic sets and varieties in algebraic geometry.

For a subset of polynomials S𝕜[x1,,xn] and subset of points X𝕜n, where 𝕜 is an algebraically closed field, let

V(S)={x𝕜nf(x)=0 for all fS}

and

I(X)={f𝕜[x1,,xn]f(x)=0 for all xX}

be the zero locus of S and vanishing ideal of X, respectively.

If (S) is the ideal in 𝕜[x1,,xn] generated by the elements of S, then V(S)=V((S))=V((S)). Moreover, the vanishing ideal is always a radical ideal: I(X)=I(X).

The operations V and I are, in a sense, inverses of each other:

For any subset of points X, V(I(X))=X, where X is the closure of X in the Zariski topology. In particular, V(I(X))=X if X is an algebraic set, since algebraic sets are closed in the Zariski topology.

Hilbert's Nullstellensatz is a fundamental result in commutative algebra and algebraic geometry that addresses the composition of V and I in the opposite order. One version of this celebrated theorem states that for any ideal of polynomials J, we have

I(V(J))=J.

(Geometrically, this says that if an affine algebraic set V is cut out by the polynomial equations f1(x1,,xn)=0,,fm(x1,,xn)=0, then the only other polynomials that vanish on V are those in the radical of the ideal (f1,,fm).)

As a corollary, I(V(J))=J if J is a radical ideal. Thus, we can state more precisely that the V and I operations give a bijective correspondence between radical ideals and algebraic sets:

{radical ideals𝕜[x1,,xn]} VI {algebraic sets𝕜n}.

See also

Notes

  1. Here is a direct proof that I is an ideal. Start with a,bI with some powers an,bmI. To show that a+bI, we use the binomial theorem (which holds for any commutative ring):
    (a+b)n+m1=i=0n+m1(n+m1i)aibn+m1i.
    For each i, we have either in or n+m1im. Thus, in each term aibn+m1i, one of the exponents will be large enough to make that factor lie in I. Since any element of I times an element of R lies in I (as I is an ideal), this term lies in I. Hence (a+b)n+m1I, and so a+bI. To finish checking that the radical is an ideal, take aI with anI, and any rR. Then (ra)n=rnanI, so raI. Thus the radical is an ideal.
  2. Proof: On one hand, every prime ideal is radical, and so this intersection contains I. On the other hand, suppose r is an element of R that is not in I, and let S be the set {rnn=0,1,2,}. By the definition of I, S must be disjoint from I. S is also multiplicatively closed. Thus, by a variant of Krull's theorem, there exists a prime ideal 𝔭 that contains I and is still disjoint from S (see Prime ideal and Zorn's lemma). Since 𝔭 contains I, but not r, this shows that r is not in the intersection of prime ideals containing I.
  3. The statement may be strengthened a bit: the radical of I is the intersection of all prime ideals of R that are minimal among those containing I.
  4. For a direct proof, see also the characterisation of the nilradical of a ring.
  5. This fact is also known as fourth isomorphism theorem (or correspondence theorem, or lattice theorem).
  6. Proof: R=I+J=I+J implies I+J=R.

Citations

  1. Atiyah & Macdonald 1994, Proposition 7.14
  2. Aluffi, Paolo (2009). Algebra: Chapter 0. AMS. pp. 142. ISBN 978-0-8218-4781-7. https://bookstore.ams.org/gsm-104. 
  3. Atiyah & Macdonald 1994, Proposition 4.2
  4. Lang 2002, Ch X, Proposition 2.10

References