Social:ʿAṯtar

Short description: Semitic deity associated with Venus

ʿAṯtar
Deity of the Morning and Evening Star
South Arabian fragment of a stela depicting a reclining ibex and three Arabian oryx heads, which were associated with ʿAṯtar.
Planet	Venus
Animals	Gazelle (in Syria and Arabia)
Equivalents
Mesopotamian equivalent	Lugal-Marada, Zababa (through equation with Aštabi), Ninurta (through equation with Aštabi and Lugal-Marada)
Hurrian equivalent	Aštabi

ʿAṯtar is an ancient Semitic deity whose role, name, and even gender varied across the cultures of West Asia. In both genders, ʿAṯtar is identified with the planet Venus, the morning and evening star, in some manifestations of Semitic mythology.

Name

The name appears in various Semitic languages as:

• the feminine form (𒀭𒀹𒁯) in Akkadian;
• the masculine form (عثتر) in Arabic;
• and the masculine form (ዐስተር) in Ethiosemitic.

Attestations

Among Amorites

At Ugarit

The Ugaritic masculine variant of ʿAṯtar, 𐎓𐎘𐎚𐎗 (), appears in the Baʿal Cycle.

The Northwest Semitic feminine form of ʿAṯtar, the Great Goddess 𐎓𐎘𐎚𐎗𐎚 (), is often mentioned in Ugaritic ritual texts, but played a minor role in mythological texts.

Among Aramaeans

Among the Aramaeans, ʿAṯtar appears in a masculine form as the god 𐡏𐡕𐡓 (), in which capacity he was identified with the baetyl as 𒁹𒀀𒋻𒋡𒈬 (, lit. ʿAttar is the baetyl).

Within the ancient Aramaean religion, the deceased ancestors of the clans, called , were worshipped as idealised figures who could become assimilated to ʿAttar, as evidenced by personal names such as 𒁹𒀀𒋻𒄩𒄠 𒁹𒀀𒋻𒄩𒈬 (, lit. ʿAttar is the ancestor), and 𒁹𒀀𒀜𒋻 and 𒁹𒀀𒈨𒀀𒋻 (, lit. My ancestor is ʿAttar).

The use of the name of the god ʿAttar as a theophoric element is attested in the name 𐡁𐡓𐡏𐡕𐡓 (, lit. Son of ʿAttar), which is attested on an 8th-century BC stamp seal and was also the name of the earliest known ruler of Laqē, as well as 𐡏𐡕𐡓𐡎𐡌𐡊 (, lit. ʿAttar is my support), which was the name of two rulers of the kingdom of Bēt-Gūš. The name of this god always appears in the masculine form even in women's names, such as ʿAttar-ramat and ʿAttar-ṭabat, thus attesting that the Aramaean ʿAttar was a distinctly masculine deity.

One of the hypostases of the Aramaean ʿAttar was 𐡏𐡕𐡓𐡔𐡌𐡉𐡍‎ (), that is the ʿAttar of the Heavens: in this role, ʿAttar was the incarnation of the sky's procreative power in the form of the moisture provided by rain, which made fertile his consort, the goddess of the Earth which has been dried up by the summer heat. Due to ʿAttar's role as a provider of rain, his epithet "of the Heavens" refers to his manifestation as lightning and thunder in the skies.

The name of the goddess who was the consort of ʿAttar is itself not attested in Aramaic, but is recorded in Sabaic as 𐩠𐩥𐩨𐩪 () or 𐩠𐩨𐩪 (), which was derived from the South Semitic root 𐩺-𐩨-𐩪 (), itself a declension of the Semitic root , meaning "to be dry." The position of Hūbis/Huwbis as the consort of ʿAttar-Šamayin is attested by the depiction of a goddess in front of a standing worshipper on an 8th-century Aramaean cylinder seal, with the image of a vulva, the symbol of Hūbis/Huwbis, being present behind the goddess and over a recumbent gazelle - the sacred animal of ʿAttar - over which was also inscribed the name of the god himself.

The earliest record of ʿAttar-Šamayin is from an Aramaic inscription on the 8th-century BC cylinder seal belonging to an individual named , who is described in the inscription as a 𐡏𐡁𐡃 𐡏𐡕𐡓𐡔𐡌𐡉𐡍‎ (. lit. servant of ʿAttar-Šamayin); Barruq's own name, which means "thunder," was a reference to ʿAttar-Šamayin in his role as a god associated with thunder and lightning.

In South Arabia

Among the ancient South Arabians, 𐩲𐩻𐩩𐩧 () was a masculine deity who had retained the prominence of his role as the deity of the planet Venus as the Morning Star, and was a god presiding over thunderstorms and who provided natural irrigation as rain. ʿAṯtar thus held a very important place within the ancient South Arabian pantheon, in which he replaced the old Semitic high god ʾIl as the supreme deity.

In the Kingdom of Axum situated in modern-day Ethiopia, 'Attar was worshiped as the god of the sun and moon and as the father of the other members of the Axumite pantheon: Maher and Beher, the former of which they shared with the Himyarites. He was associated with the Hellenic god Zeus.

The name of ʿAṯtar was suffixed with a mimation in the South Arabian kingdom of Ḥaḍramawt, thus giving the Ḥaḑramitic form 𐩲𐩯𐩩𐩧𐩣 ().

Within South Arabian polytheism, ʿAṯtar held a supreme position within the cosmology of the ancient South Arabians as the god presiding over the whole world, always appeared first in lists, and had various manifestations with their own epithets. The rulers of the ancient South Arabian states would offer ritual banquets in honour of ʿAṯtar, with the banquet being paid for from the tithe offered to the god by the populace.

The patron deity of the Qatabānians, however, was the Moon-god, variously called 𐩲𐩣 (, in Qatabān) or 𐪊𐪚𐩬 (, in Ḥaḍramawt), who was seen as being closer to the people compared to the more distant figure of ʿAṯtar, and the people of these states consequently called themselves the children of their respective Moon-god.

The hunter god

The South Arabian ʿAṯtar was a hunter god, and the ancient South Arabians performed ritual hunts in his honour as fertility rites with the goal of making the rain fall. The chosen prey during these hunts were probably gazelles, which were sacred to ʿAṯtar.

This hunter aspect of ʿAṯtar is also present in his Northwest Semitic feminine variant, who is called 𐎓𐎘𐎚𐎗𐎚𐎟𐎕𐎆𐎄𐎚 (, lit. ʿAṯtart the huntress) in one passage of an Ugaritic text. The Sabaic hallowed phrase 𐩺𐩥𐩣 𐩮𐩵 𐩮𐩺𐩵 𐩲𐩻𐩩𐩧 (, lit. the day when he performed the hunt for ʿAṯtar) itself had a parallel in a reference to 𒄿𒈾 𒌋𒐋 𒌓𒈪 𒍝𒁺 𒊭 𒀭𒀸𒁯 (, lit. on the 16th day is the hunt of ʿAṯtart) in a text from Emar.

One of the hypostases of the South Arabian ʿAṯtar was 𐩫𐩧𐩥𐩣 (), whose name, which was a -pattern Semitic word formation meaning "rainfall," was related to Geʽez ክራምት (), Amharic ክረምት (), Tigrē ካራም (), and Eastern Gurage ከርም (), all meaning "rainy season." Kirrūm was thus a form of ʿAṯtar who provided fertility in the form of the rain he dispensed.

The Babylonians identified Kirrūm, under the name 𒀭𒆥𒀸𒈠 (), with their own goddess 𒀭𒀹𒁯 (), who was herself the goddess of the planet Venus as well as the Mesopotamian feminine form of ʿAṯtar.

Another hypostasis of the South Arabian ʿAṯtar was 𐩲𐩻𐩩𐩧𐩦𐩧𐩤𐩬 (), that is ʿAṯtar of the East, who was invoked especially in curses as an avenger god against enemies.

Among Arabs

ʿAṯtar was worshipped as a masculine deity among the ancient Arabs, who during the Iron Age were located principally in the Syrian Desert and North Arabia.

Similarly to the link between ʿAttar and the ancestral cult of the among the Aramaeans, there also existed a connection between ʿAttar and the cult of the ancestors among Arabs which is attested from as early as the 7th century BC in the form of a personal name recorded in Akkadian as 𒀭𒀀𒋫𒊏𒋛𒈠 (), from an original Ancient North Arabian form , in which the divine patron of a clan or tribe, the 𐪆𐪚𐪃 (, of which is the -type broken plural), is assimilated to ʿAttar.

One 8th century BC Aramaic inscription found in a tomb in a region of the Zagros Mountains close to a Mannaean royal tomb mentions ʿAttar as 𐡀‎𐡕𐡓𐡌𐡑𐡍 (), that is a variant of ʿAttar whose epithet was the Old Arabic plural form of مصر (), lit. march, with ʿAttar-Muṣurūn thus being ʿAttar of the Marches. The name "the Marches" itself was the designation assigned by the Mesopotamians to the northern Ḥijāz and the Negev. The name of the deity is followed by the title 𐡍𐡂𐡔 (), corresponding to Ancient North Arabian 𐪌𐪔𐪆 () and Ethiosemitic ንጉሥ (), and meaning "the ruler."

ʿAttar-Muṣurūn was thus the main deity of North Arabia, and the tomb in which his name was found inscribed likely belonged to an Arab who had been deported by the Assyrians to their northeastern border regions.

In Qedar

The Qedarite Arabs worshipped ʿAṯtar in his form of , whose name is attested in Ancient North Arabian as 𐪒𐪉𐪇𐪊𐪃 (). Assyrian records mention this god, referred to in Akkadian as 𒀭𒀀𒋻𒊓𒈠𒀀𒀀𒅔 (, reflecting the Aramaic form rather than the Ancient North Arabian ), as one of the Qedarite deities whose idols were captured as war booty by the Neo-Assyrian king Sîn-ahhī-erība and was returned to the Qedarites by his son and successor Aššur-aḫa-iddina.

The worship of ʿAṯtar in his form of was also practised by the Qedarites, as attested by an inscription of the Neo-Assyrian king Aššur-aḫa-iddina mentioning this deity in Akkadian as 𒀭𒀀𒋻𒆪𒊒𒈠𒀀 (), with the dissimilation of the epithet into reflecting the influence of Akkadian 𒆪𒌝𒀸 () and Aramaic 𐡊𐡅𐡌𐡓𐡅‎ (), meaning "priest."

In Palmyra

At Palmyra, where lived a large Arab population, the Arab ʿAṯtar was assimilated with the Arameo-Canaanite great god, Baʿal, in the form of , later 𐡡𐡥𐡫𐡰𐡯𐡶𐡴 (), that is Baʿal-ʿAṯtar.

In Canaan

The masculine form 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓 () existed among the Canaanite peoples as an astral deity, which is attested by his mention along with the Moon-God Šaggar in the 9th or 7th century BC Dayr ʿAllā inscription, the subject of which is largely the Sun-goddess Šamāš, thus forming a triad of the Sun, Moon, and Venus similarly to the one attested in South Arabia, and suggesting a South Arabian religious influence in Moab. The hypostases of ʿAṯtar who appear among the various Canaanite peoples might have been an indigenous Transjordanian variation of his or local adaptations of the North Arabian variant of the god.

In Phoenicia

A possible Phoenician variant of might be attested as a theophoric element 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓 () in a personal name from Byblos, 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓𐤇𐤍 ().

In the 5th century BC, under the Achaemenid Empire, a shrine dedicated to existed in the Sharon Plain in Canaan, at a location corresponding to the present-day Israeli town of Elyakhin, where he was worshipped by Phoenicians, Aramaeans, and Arabs.

Arabian units of the Achaemenid army stationed in Canaan during the 5th century BC who participated in the cult of have left inscriptions recording his name, suffixed with a mimation to differentiate him from the Canaanite feminine form of ʿAṯtar, 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓𐤕 (), in the Phoenician and Aramaic scripts as 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓𐤌 and 𐡏𐡔𐡕𐡓𐡌 (). This form of the god's name was distinctly North Arabian, showing that the worshippers who had left these inscriptions were originally from North Arabia, possibly from Taymāʿ or Dadān.

The Moabite deity Kamōš

In Moab

ʿAštar was attested among the Canaanite people of the Moabites during the 9th century BC, when he was identified with the patron god of Moab, 𐤊𐤌𐤔 (), in the form of 𐤏𐤔𐤕𐤓𐤊𐤌𐤔‎ ().

According to the inscription of the Moabite king Mōšaʿ on the victory stele commemorating his triumph in a war against the Israelites, he had sacrificed the whole population of the town of Nebo to ʿAštar-Kamōš. This was likely due to the influence of the South Arabian ʿAṯtar-Šariqān, that is of ʿAštar's hypostasis as an avenger deity who was invoked in curses against enemies.

Legacy

In popular culture

ʿAštar appears as the demon Ashtar in the video game Shin Megami Tensei II.

See also

• Venus in culture

Sources

• Bryce, Trevor (2009). The Routledge Handbook of the Peoples and Places of Ancient Western Asia: From the Early Bronze Age to the Fall of the Persian Empire. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-39485-7. 
• Frayne, Douglas R.; Stuckey, Johanna H. (2021), A Handbook of Gods and Goddesses of the Ancient Near East: Three Thousand Deities of Anatolia, Syria, Israel, Sumer, Babylonia, Assyria, and Elam, Penn State University Press, ISBN 9781646021277, https://books.google.com/books?id=lKUeEAAAQBAJ&dq=ares+attar+god&pg=PT290 .
• George, Andrew R. (1993). House most high: the temples of ancient Mesopotamia. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. ISBN 0-931464-80-3. OCLC 27813103. 
• Hoyland, Robert G. (2002). Arabia and the Arabs: From the Bronze Age to the Coming of Islam. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-64634-0. https://archive.org/details/ARABIAANDTHEARABSFromTheBronzeAgeToTheComingOfIslamRobertG.Hoyland. 
• Lipiński, Edward (1975). Studies in Aramaic Inscriptions and Onomastics. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta. 1. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press. ISBN 978-9-061-86019-8. 
• Lipiński, Edward (1995) (in fr). Dieux et déesses de l'univers phénicien et punique. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta. 64. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press. ISBN 978-9-068-31690-2. 
• Lipiński, Edward (2000). The Aramaeans: Their Ancient History, Culture, Religion. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta. 100. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters Publishers. ISBN 978-9-042-90859-8. 
• Lipiński, Edward (2006). On the Skirts of Canaan in the Iron Age: Historical and Topographical Researches. Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta. 153. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters Publishers. ISBN 978-9-042-91798-9. 
• Tugendhaft, Aaron (2016). "Gods on clay: Ancient Near Eastern scholarly practices and the history of religions". in Grafton, Anthony. Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 164. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316226728.009. https://www.academia.edu/28102179. 
• Van Beek, Gus W. (1997a). "Ḥadhramaut". The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East. 2. Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York City , United States: Oxford University Press. pp. 452–453. 
• Van Beek, Gus W. (1997b). "Qataban". The Oxford Encyclopedia of Archaeology in the Near East. 4. Oxford, United Kingdom ; New York City , United States: Oxford University Press. pp. 383–384. ISBN 978-0-195-06512-1. 
• Archi, Alfonso (1997). "Studies in the Ebla Pantheon II". Orientalia (GBPress - Gregorian Biblical Press) 66 (4): 414–425. ISSN 0030-5367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43078145. Retrieved 2022-03-09. 
• Ayali-Darshan, Noga (2014). "The Role of Aštabi in the Song of Ullikummi and the Eastern Mediterranean "Failed God" Stories". Journal of Near Eastern Studies (University of Chicago Press) 73 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1086/674665. ISSN 0022-2968. https://www.academia.edu/44462602. 
• Archi, Alfonso (2013). "The West Hurrian Pantheon and Its Background". in Collins, B. J.; Michalowski, P.. Beyond Hatti: a tribute to Gary Beckman. Atlanta: Lockwood Press. ISBN 978-1-937040-11-6. OCLC 882106763. https://www.academia.edu/7003610.