Software:Comparison of backup software
From HandWiki
Short description: None
Feature comparison of backup software. For a more general comparison see List of backup software.
List
Package | Network optimized (rsync) | Versioning (diff, chunk, hardlink) | Full client side Encryption | Error Detection | Simple server | Distributed partials | Renames optimized | Web interface | Webmin module |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMANDA | ? | ? | Optional (separate download + cost) | ||||||
Areca Backup | ? | ? | No | ||||||
Attic | Yes | Yes; Buzhash chunking[1] | Yes; AES, SHA256 HMAC with PBKDF2 encrypted keyfiles[1] | Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext | No | No | Yes; through deduplication | No | No |
BackupPC | Yes | Yes; hard-links | No; but can be achieved via pluggable transfer mechanism | No | Yes; through deduplication | Yes | No | ||
Bacula | Yes | Yes; Incremental | Yes | Yes; Silent error detection (MD5 or SHA1). Backup certification Verify Job | Yes; *For Linux | Yes; Deduplication optimized storage driver | Yes | Yes | |
Back In Time | Yes | Yes; hard-links | Yes; EncFS | No | No | ||||
BitTorrent | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | ? |
Borg (fork of Attic) |
Yes | Yes; Buzhash chunking[1] | Yes; AES, SHA256 HMAC with PBKDF2 encrypted keyfiles[1] | Yes; by MAC of plaintext and ciphertext | No | No | Yes; through deduplication | (in development) | No |
Box Backup | ? | No | No | ||||||
Bup | Yes | Yes, chunk deduplication | No | Yes (Par2) | Yes | ? | Yes, through deduplication | Yes | No |
cpio | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | ? | Optional (separate download) |
Cobian Backup (v11) | ? | No | ? | ||||||
Cwrsync - Rsync for Windows | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
DirSync Pro | No | No | No | ||||||
DAR | Yes | Yes; Incremental; chunking; | Yes | Yes | ? | ? | ? | ? | |
dcfldd | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
dd | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
dump | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
duplicity | Yes | Yes; Incremental | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | |
Duplicati | Yes | Yes; Incremental | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
FlyBack | No | ? | No | ||||||
git | Yes | Yes; snapshot | Yes (via git-remote-gcrypt) | Yes | No | No | Yes | ? | ? |
git-annex | Yes | No | Partial (with remote block device) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
luckyBackup | No | No | No | ||||||
Mondo Rescue | Yes | Yes; Incremental | No | Yes | ? | No | |||
Redo Backup and Recovery | No | No | No | ||||||
rdiff-backup | Yes | Yes; reverse incremental | No | No | No | No | Yes; via Third-party | Yes | |
rsync | Yes | Yes; hard-links (--link-dest) | No | No | No | No | No | ? | Optional (separate downloads) |
star/gtar | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | ? | ? |
zsync | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
zpaq | Yes | Yes; Incremental | Yes; AES-256/CTR | Yes; SHA-1 | No | No | Yes; through deduplication | No | No |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 anarcat. "document internals better". https://github.com/jborg/attic/pull/155/files. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison of backup software.
Read more |