Universal hypothesis testing

From HandWiki
Short description: Special setting of hypothesis testing


In statistics, universal hypothesis testing is a special case of binary simple hypothesis testing. The universal problem is to distinguish between a simple null hypothesis H0:Q=P, and the most general composite alternative H1:Q≠P, using independent and identically distributed samples from Q. The setting is sometimes referred to as goodness of fit testing, or one-sample testing. Note that "universal hypothesis testing" is sometimes used to refer to composite hypothesis testing problems using universal inference estimators, which are statistics that work without regularity assumptions.[1]

A simple binary hypothesis testing problem involves distinguishing between H0:Q=P0 and H1:Q=P1, using samples X1,…,Xn∼i.i.d.Q. In the traditional setting of hypothesis testing P0,P1 are known apriori. A composite version of this problem involves sets of probability distributions Ω0,Ω1, and asks to distinguish between H0:Q∈Ω0 and H1:Q∈Ω1. In contrast, the universal setting corresponds to the special case of composite hypothesis testing, where the null hypothesis is simple, Ω0=P and the alternative hypothesis is the set of all distributions other than P, Ω1={F:F≠P}. For example, someone might want to know if a particular coin was fair, i.e. ℙ[X=H]=12=ℙ[X=T] or not, i.e. ℙ[X=H]≠ℙ[X=T], where H,T denote the coin coming up heads or tails.

The asymptotics of universal hypothesis testing were first discussed in Hoeffding's work on optimal tests for multinomial distributions.[2] There have been many subsequent works on the topic[3][4][5] in many directions. While Hoeffding's initial results were restricted to distributions with finite supports, later results developed solutions for continuous distributions using extensions of the Kullback-Leibler Divergence,[6] or kernel methods.[7][8]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Moniri, Behrad. "Universal Inference". University of Pennsylvania. https://www.engineering.upenn.edu/~bemoniri/Talks/ClassicStat/Universal_Inference/slides.pdf. 
  2. ↑ Hoeffding, Wassily (April 1965). "Asymptotically Optimal Tests for Multinomial Distributions". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36 (2): 369–401. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177700150. ISSN 0003-4851. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoms/1177700150. 
  3. ↑ Levitan, E.; Merhav, N. (August 2002). "A competitive Neyman-Pearson approach to universal hypothesis testing with applications". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 48 (8): 2215–2229. doi:10.1109/TIT.2002.800478. ISSN 0018-9448. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1019834/. 
  4. ↑ Zeitouni, O.; Gutman, M. (March 1991). "On universal hypotheses testing via large deviations". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 37 (2): 285–290. doi:10.1109/18.75244. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/75244/. 
  5. ↑ Li, Yun; Nitinawarat, Sirin; Veeravalli, Venugopal V. (July 2014). "Universal Outlier Hypothesis Testing". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 60 (7): 4066–4082. doi:10.1109/TIT.2014.2317691. ISSN 0018-9448. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6799184/. 
  6. ↑ Yang, Pengfei; Chen, Biao (April 2019). "Robust Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Universal Hypothesis Testing for Continuous Distributions". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 65 (4): 2360–2373. doi:10.1109/TIT.2018.2879057. ISSN 0018-9448. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8528471/. 
  7. ↑ Zhu, Shengyu; Chen, Biao; Chen, Zhitang; Yang, Pengfei (April 2021). "Asymptotically Optimal One- and Two-Sample Testing With Kernels". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 67 (4): 2074–2092. doi:10.1109/TIT.2021.3059267. ISSN 0018-9448. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9354188/. 
  8. ↑ Zhu, Shengyu; Chen, Biao; Yang, Pengfei; Chen, Zhitang (2019-04-11). "Universal Hypothesis Testing with Kernels: Asymptotically Optimal Tests for Goodness of Fit". Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (PMLR): 1544–1553. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v89/zhu19b.html.