Unsolved:Irlen filters

From HandWiki
Short description: Coloured overlay filters or tinted lenses


Irlen spectral filters or Irlen lenses are coloured overlay filters or tinted lenses crafted specifically for the wearer and worn as glasses or contact lenses. They are intended to help people with the supposed perceptual processing difficulty known as Irlen syndrome, also known as scotopic sensitivity syndrome or visual stress, in which sensitivity to specific wavelengths of light provokes difficulty and discomfort when performing visually intensive activities such as reading. The existence of Irlen syndrome is controversial.[1] The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO) came out strongly against Irlen syndrome, saying there was no evidence the condition existed or the treatment of reading difficulties with Irlen lenses worked.[2] However, there is a small body of research supporting the use of colour to alleviate the symptoms associated with Irlen syndrome.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

Scotopic sensitivity syndrome

Scotopic sensitivity syndrome is said to be a visual-perceptual defect related to difficulties[vague] with light source, glare, luminance, wavelength, and contrast. According to Irlen, these difficulties lead to reading problems, eye strain, headaches, migraines, and other physical difficulties that can be alleviated by the use of person specific tinted lenses, known as Irlen spectral filters, worn as glasses or contact lenses.

The syndrome has six characteristics:

  1. photophobia
  2. eye strain
  3. poor visual resolution
  4. a reduced span of focus
  5. impaired depth perception
  6. poor sustained focus

Scotopic sensitivity syndrome is diagnosed by interviewing the client and by observing responses to certain visual tasks such as interpreting geometric figures and reading.[10]

History and research

The idea of page based distortion was initially suggested in 1980 by Olive Meares,[11] to improve the reading ability of people with a learning disability, specifically a certain type of dyslexia. Later this was taken further by psychologist Helen Irlen. The proposition by Irlen was made at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association in 1983. At that time, there was little research made on the effect of tinted lenses. Irlen gained notable publicity demonstrating the efficacy of her method on television. Tinted lenses became a commercial success, and testing and prescribing centers were opened throughout USA.[12]

Diagnosis of Irlen Syndrome and treatment with Irlen Spectral Filters has been reviewed by the USA Medical Board,[which?] and has been determined as not the practice of medicine; it has also been reviewed by various USA Boards of Optometry[which?] and has been found to be inconclusive and not to be the practice of optometry. Binocular and accommodative anomalies may occur in conjunction with the syndrome, but are not considered to be the underlying physiological basis of the condition.[13][14]

Commercial claims of utility

According to Irlen, the lenses are supposedly used to treat a wide variety of problems that are associated with light sensitivity, discomfort and distortions, including head injury, concussion, whiplash, perceptual problems, neurologic impairment, memory loss, language deficits, headaches and migraine, autoimmune disease, fibromyalgia, macular degeneration, cataracts, retinitis pigmentosa, complications from an eye operation, depression, chronic anxiety and others.[1] She has also claimed that a treatment for scotopic sensitivity syndrome could help a number of incarcerated individuals and delinquent children.[1]

Criticism

The Irlen method has been criticised for being put to the market prior to serious research.[1] According to Helveston, the scotopic sensitivity syndrome and its treatment has, as a phenomenon, resulted in classic group behaviour and has the characteristics of a fad with a charismatic personality as a leader and the supporting evidence being mostly anecdotal—even though those with visual stress are spread around the world, mostly don't know each other, and have no interest in Helen Irlen, all of which conditions would need to be met to fulfill the criteria of group dynamics.[1] A 2002 study by Professor Arnold Wilkins at Essex University, though, indicates that there may be some benefit for reading difficulties [15][citation needed], and also for people with migraines.[16]

See also


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Helveston, Eugene M. (2004). "Tinted Lenses". IDA Information Packet: 12–13. http://csl.georgetown.edu/publications/ControversialTherapies.pdf. 
  2. "RANZCO Position Statement: Irlen Syndrome". https://ranzco.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Irlen-Syndrome-Position-Statement-May-2018-1.pdf. 
  3. "A functional neuroimaging case study of Meares-Irlen syndrome/visual stress (MISViS)". Brain Topogr 25 (3): 293–307. July 2012. doi:10.1007/s10548-011-0212-z. PMID 22124535. 
  4. "fMRI evidence that precision ophthalmic tints reduce cortical hyperactivation in migraine". Cephalalgia 31 (8): 925–36. June 2011. doi:10.1177/0333102411409076. PMID 21622479. 
  5. Noble, Jeanne; Orton, Michelle; Irlen, Sandra; Robinson, Greg (2004). "A controlled field study of the use of coloured overlays on reading achievement". Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities 9 (2): 14–22. doi:10.1080/19404150409546760. ISSN 1324-8928. 
  6. "Scotopic sensitivity/Irlen syndrome and the use of coloured filters: a long-term placebo controlled and masked study of reading achievement and perception of ability". Perceptual and Motor Skills 89 (1): 83–113. August 1999. doi:10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.83. PMID 10544403. 
  7. Whiting, P., Robinson, G.L., & Parrot, C.F. (1994). "Irlen coloured filters for reading: a six year follow up". Australian Journal of Remedial Education 26: 13–19. http://www.dyslexiaservices.com.au/Six-Year_Follow-Up.htm. 
  8. Wilkins, Arnold (2002). "Coloured overlays and their effects on reading speed: a review". Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 (5): 448–454. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00079.x. ISSN 0275-5408. PMID 12358317. 
  9. "Double-masked placebo-controlled trial of precision spectral filters in children who use coloured overlays". Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14 (4): 365–70. October 1994. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00126.x. PMID 7845693. 
  10. "Testing & Treatment". Irlen Institute. http://irlen.com/index.php?id=5. 
  11. Meares, O. (1980). Figure/ground, brightness contrast and reading disabilities. Visible Lang. 14, 13-29
  12. Silver, Larry B. (2004). "Theme editor's note". IDA Information Packet: 12. http://csl.georgetown.edu/publications/ControversialTherapies.pdf. 
  13. "A review of the management of 323 consecutive patients seen in a specific learning difficulties clinic". Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19 (6): 454–66. November 1999. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1999.00465.x. PMID 10768028. 
  14. "Coloured overlays in schools: orthoptic and optometric findings". Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 22 (2): 156–65. March 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00009.x. PMID 12014489. 
  15. Scott, Lorna; McWhinnie, Hazel; Taylor, Lynette; Stevenson, Nicola; Irons, Peter; Lewis, Elizabeth; Evans, Marylyn; Evans, Bruce et al. (2002). "Coloured overlays in schools: orthoptic and optometric findings" (in en). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 (2): 156–165. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00009.x. ISSN 1475-1313. PMID 12014489. 
  16. Evans, B. J. W.; Patel, R.; Wilkins, A. J. (2002). "Optometric function in visually sensitive migraine before and after treatment with tinted spectacles" (in en). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 22 (2): 130–142. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00017.x. ISSN 1475-1313. PMID 12014487. 

External links