Zipf–Mandelbrot law

From HandWiki
Short description: Discrete probability distribution
Zipf–Mandelbrot
Parameters N∈{1,2,3…} (integer)
q∈[0;∞) (real)
s>0 (real)
Support k∈{1,2,…,N}
pmf 1HN,q,s1(k+q)s
CDF Hk,q,sHN,q,s
Mean HN,q,s−1HN,q,s−q
Mode 1
Entropy sHN,q,s∑k=1Nln⁡(k+q)(k+q)s+ln⁡(HN,q,s)

In probability theory and statistics, the Zipf–Mandelbrot law is a discrete probability distribution. Also known as the Pareto–Zipf law, it is a power-law distribution on ranked data, named after the linguist George Kingsley Zipf, who suggested a simpler distribution called Zipf's law, and the mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot, who subsequently generalized it.

The probability mass function is given by

f(k;N,q,s)=1HN,q,s1(k+q)s,

where HN,q,s is given by

HN,q,s=∑i=1N1(i+q)s,

which may be thought of as a generalization of a harmonic number. In the formula, k is the rank of the data, and q and s are parameters of the distribution. In the limit as N approaches infinity, this becomes the Hurwitz zeta function ζ(s,q). For finite N and q=0 the Zipf–Mandelbrot law becomes Zipf's law. For infinite N and q=0 it becomes a zeta distribution.

Applications

The distribution of words ranked by their frequency in a random text corpus is approximated by a power-law distribution, known as Zipf's law.

If one plots the frequency rank of words contained in a moderately sized corpus of text data versus the number of occurrences or actual frequencies, one obtains a power-law distribution, with exponent close to one (but see Powers, 1998 and Gelbukh & Sidorov, 2001). Zipf's law implicitly assumes a fixed vocabulary size, but the Harmonic series with s = 1 does not converge, while the Zipf–Mandelbrot generalization with s > 1 does. Furthermore, there is evidence that the closed class of functional words that define a language obeys a Zipf–Mandelbrot distribution with different parameters from the open classes of contentive words that vary by topic, field and register.[1]

In ecological field studies, the relative abundance distribution (i.e. the graph of the number of species observed as a function of their abundance) is often found to conform to a Zipf–Mandelbrot law.[2]

Within music, many metrics of measuring "pleasing" music conform to Zipf–Mandelbrot distributions.[3]

Notes

  1. ↑ Powers, David M. W. (1998). "Applications and explanations of Zipf's law". Joint conference on new methods in language processing and computational natural language learning. Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 151–160. 
  2. ↑ Mouillot, D.; Lepretre, A. (2000). "Introduction of relative abundance distribution (RAD) indices, estimated from the rank-frequency diagrams (RFD), to assess changes in community diversity". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (Springer) 63 (2): 279–295. doi:10.1023/A:1006297211561. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1411186. Retrieved 24 Dec 2008. 
  3. ↑ Manaris, B.; Vaughan, D.; Wagner, C. S.; Romero, J.; Davis, R. B.. "Evolutionary Music and the Zipf–Mandelbrot Law: Developing Fitness Functions for Pleasant Music". Proceedings of 1st European Workshop on Evolutionary Music and Art (EvoMUSART2003) 611. http://shaunwagner.com/writings_computer_evomus.html. Retrieved 2021-11-26. 

References

  • Silagadze, Z. K. (1999). "Citations and the Zipf-Mandelbrot's law". arXiv:physics/9901035.
  • NIST: Zipf's law
  • W. Li's References on Zipf's law
  • Gelbukh & Sidorov, 2001: Zipf and Heaps Laws’ Coefficients Depend on Language
  • C++ Library for generating random Zipf–Mandelbrot deviates.