Template:Taxonomy/Angylocalyx

From HandWiki
< Template:Taxonomy
Revision as of 16:01, 4 August 2022 by imported>Jworkorg (import)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Bold ranks show taxa that will be shown in taxoboxes
because rank is principal or always_display=yes.

Ancestral taxa
Domain: Eukaryota  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Diaphoretickes  [Taxonomy; edit]
(unranked): Archaeplastida  [Taxonomy; edit]
Kingdom: Plantae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Streptophyta  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Embryophytes /Plantae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Polysporangiophytes /Plantae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Tracheophytes /Plantae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Spermatophytes /Plantae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Angiosperms  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Eudicots  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Core eudicots  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Superrosids  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Rosids  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: Fabids  [Taxonomy; edit]
Order: Fabales  [Taxonomy; edit]
Family: Fabaceae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Subfamily: Faboideae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Clade: ADA clade  [Taxonomy; edit]
Tribe: Angylocalyceae  [Taxonomy; edit]
Genus: Angylocalyx  [Taxonomy; edit]

Wikipedia does not yet have an article about Angylocalyx. The page that you are currently viewing contains information about Angylocalyx's taxonomy. Not sure why you're here? Get started with the automated taxobox system.

Parent: Angylocalyceae [Taxonomy; edit]
Rank: genus (displays as Genus)
Link: Angylocalyx
Extinct: no
Always displayed: yes (major rank)
Taxonomic references: Cardoso, D.; Pennington, R.T.; de Queiroz, L.P.; Boatwright, J.S.; Van Wyk, B.-E.; Wojciechowski, M.F.; Lavin, M. (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". South African Journal of Botany 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001. ISSN 0254-6299. 
Parent's taxonomic references: Cardoso, D.; Pennington, R.T.; de Queiroz, L.P.; Boatwright, J.S.; Van Wyk, B.-E.; Wojciechowski, M.F.; Lavin, M. (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". South African Journal of Botany 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001. ISSN 0254-6299.