Biology:Alierasaurus
| Alierasaurus | |
|---|---|
| |
| Reconstruction of Alierasaurus by Emiliano Troco. | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Synapsida |
| Clade: | †Caseasauria |
| Family: | †Caseidae |
| Genus: | †Alierasaurus Romano and Nicosia, 2014 |
| Species: | †A. ronchii
|
| Binomial name | |
| †Alierasaurus ronchii Romano and Nicosia, 2014
| |
Alierasaurus is an extinct genus of caseid synapsid that lived during the early Middle Permian (Roadian)[1] in what is now Sardinia.[2] It is represented by a single species, the type species Alierasaurus ronchii. Known from a very large partial skeleton found within the Cala del Vino Formation, Alierasaurus is one of the largest known caseids. It closely resembles Cotylorhynchus, another giant caseid from the San Angelo Formation in Texas. The dimensions of the preserved foot elements and caudal vertebrae suggest an estimated total length of about 6 or 7 m (20 or 23 ft) for Alierasaurus.[3][4][5] In fact, the only anatomical features that differ between Alierasaurus and Cotylorhynchus are found in the bones of the feet; Alierasaurus has a longer and thinner fourth metatarsal and it has ungual bones at the tips of the toes that are pointed and claw-like rather than flattened as in other caseids. Alierasaurus and Cotylorhynchus both have very wide, barrel-shaped rib cages indicating that they were herbivores that fed primarily on high-fiber plant material.[3]
Etymology
The generic name refers to Aliera, the name in local dialect of the town of Alghero, and ‘saurus’ meaning lizard. The specific name is in honor of Ausonio Ronchi the discoverer of the specimen.[3]
Description
The paleontologists Marco Romano and Umberto Nicosia have identified several autapomorphies in the feet anatomy of Alierasaurus: metatarsal IV with distinct axial region, length about twice that of the corresponding proximal phalanx, not short and massive as in other large caseids; metatarsal IV proximal head not orthogonal to the bone axis, forming an angle of 120° with the shaft: with this conformation, the proximal and distal heads are much closer along the medial side of the metatarsal; claw-shaped ungual phalanges proportionally shorter than in Cotylorhynchus, with a double ventral flexor tubercle very close to the proximal rim of the phalanx; ungual phalangeal axis bent downward and medially; distal transverse section subtriangular, not spatulate as in Cotylorhynchus.[3]
Discovery
The holotype of Alierasaurus was discovered in the uppermost levels of the Permian Cala del Vino Formation, on top of the Torre del Porticciolo promontory, which separates the Porticciolo Gulf from the northern coast (near the town of Alghero, Nurra, northwest Sardinia).[2] Some bones were found loose on the ground surface, and others still embedded in mudstone-siltstone layer. These sediments were deposited in a former alluvial plain under a relatively mild semi-arid climate.[2] The known material consist of eight articulated caudal vertebrae, two isolated caudal vertebrae, four distal caudal centra, numerous large fragments referable to at least eight other vertebrae, seven proximal portions of hemal arches, three proximal portions (vertebral segment) of dorsal ribs, ten undetermined fragmentary ribs, poorly preserved right scapula and badly crushed right coracoid plate, distal head of the left ulna, and several autopodial elements represented by a fragmentary calcaneum, three metapodials, five non-ungual phalanges, an almost complete ungual phalanx, and two ungual phalanges lacking distal ends.[3] These remains were firstly regarded as belonging possibly to Cotylorhynchus (cf Cotylorhynchus sp. in the publication of Ronchi et al.) or to a closely related taxon. Later, despite the absence of the most diagnostic elements (notably the skull) for the comparison with other caseids in general and with Cotylorhynchus in peculiar, the Sardinian specimen was assigned to a new genus named Alierasaurus, on the basis of some differences in feet anatomy.[2][3] In 2017, Marco Romano and colleagues described other bones belonging to the same individual (some caudal vertebrae and fragments of chevrons and ribs).[4] More recently, the same levels have yielded remains of an undescribed sphenacodontid pelycosaur, and footprints of a third animal which was only known in the south of France in slightly younger rocks (ichnogenus Merifontichnus from the La Lieude Formation (Wordian) in the Lodève basin).[5][1]
Taphonomy
Remains of Alierasaurus were discovered grouped together on an area of a few square meters. Some lay on the ground, exposed by erosion, while others were still in the sediment. Most of the bones were isolated except for two foot bones and 8 caudal vertebrae found articulated. The bones still in place in the rock were not all on the same bedding plane but were buried at different depths within a 40 cm thick red siltstone layer. Several bones were fractured before burial. The taphonomy of the site indicates a complex burial process in several phases. Shortly after the death of the animal, the carcass was transported from the death place to a second burial place. This short transport was violent enough to break some bones. Subsequently, the corpse, still on the surface of the sediments, underwent a further rather short phase of decomposition before a new flash flood packed all the remains into a large amount of fine-grained sediment, transported them, and finally deposits them all together in a third place close to the previous one. This third phase of deposition explains why the bones are found at different depths in the sedimentary layer.[2]
Paleogeography
In Guadalupian time, most of the landmasses were united in one supercontinent, Pangea. It was roughly C-shaped: its northern (Laurasia) and southern (Gondwana) parts were connected to the west, but separated to the east by the very large Tethys Sea.[6] A long string of microcontinents, grouped under the name Cimmeria, divided the Tethys in two : the Paleo-Tethys in the north, and the Neo-Tethys in the south.[7] Sardinia was located in the equatorial belt of the time, at the level of the 10th parallel north. It was not an island at all and was part of Pangea. At that time, Sardinia (and Corsica) was connected to what is now southeastern France .[8][9] The precise paleoposition of the Sardinia-Corsica block was determined in the early 2000s from detailed lithostratigraphic correlations between the Permian and Triassic successions of the Nurra region in northwestern Sardinia and the Toulon-Cuers Basin in Var department (where the Saint-Mandrier Formation is equivalent to the Cala del Vino Formation). The remarkable lithological similarities of the Nurra region with that of Toulon-Cuers Basin indicate that the two regions were initially closely faced each other and were parts of the same basin.[9][10][nb 1] The Sardinia-Corsica block was rotated 60° clockwise from its current orientation. The south of Sardinia was then located near the east of the Pyrenees (whose mountains did not yet exist), and the north-west of Corsica was positioned in front of the Massif de l'Esterel (the rhyolites of the Scandola peninsula aligning with those of the Esterel, of similar age and composition).[9][11]
Stratigraphic range
No radiometric dating is available for the Cala del Vino formation. Its age estimates range from late Kungurian to early Capitanian.[2][1][12][13] These ages are inferred on the basis of direct and indirect stratigraphic correlations with the Permian basins of Provence (including the Toulon-Cuers basin which constituted a single sedimentary basin with the Nurra region) and coupled with paleontological data from Provence and Occitania. The Cala del Vino Formation is lithostratigraphically correlated with the Saint-Mandrier Formation of the Toulon-Cuers basin. The Saint-Mandrier Formation has not yet yielded any fossils, but it probably dates from the Guadalupian because it locally overlies lacustrine limestones and black mudstones of the Bau Rouge Member of the Les Salettes Formation which have yielded macroflora and microflora, respectively, suggesting a late Kungurian - early Roadian age. The lower part of the Saint-Mandrier Formation is correlated with the Les Pradineaux Formation of the Esterel basin in Provence. This formation overlies, above an unconformity, a rhyolitic formation (the A7 Rhyolite) dated at 272.5 ± 0.3 Ma.[10][14] This absolute age, formerly considered as late Kungurian,[10][14] corresponds now to the early Roadian.[12] On the other hand, the Les Pradineaux Formation contains in its lower part the A11 Rhyolite which itself is undated but which is crossed by a fluorite-barite vein with adularia dated at 264 ± 2 Ma corresponding to the Capitanian, indicating an older age for the A11 Rhyolite and the Les Pradineaux Formation.[15] Marc Durand suggests a Wordian age, the erosional gap at the top of the A7 Rhyolite corresponding according to him to a large part of the Roadian.[10][15] The Les Pradineaux Formation has, however, yielded plants and pollens suggesting a Roadian age, an ostracod fauna indicative of a late Roadian age, and vertebrate tracks including the ichnogenus Brontopus characteristic of the Guadalupian.[10][16][17][12][18] From these stratigraphic correlations, the Sardinian Cala del Vino Formation could thus be dated to the Roadian - Wordian. According to Werneburg and colleagues the age of the Cala del Vino formation could also extend from the Roadian to the early Capitanian like the La Lieude Formation of the Lodève basin, due to sedimentological similarities and the co-occurrence in the two formations of the caseids synapsids and the ichnogenus Merifontichnus.[13]
Phylogeny
In 2017 Marco Romano and colleagues published the first phylogenetic analysis including the genus Alierasaurus. It is recovered as the sister taxon of the genus Cotylorhynchus.[4]
Below the cladogram published by Romano and colleagues in 2017.[4]
| Caseasauria |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In describing the genus Martensius in 2020, Berman and colleagues published two cladograms. In the first, the position of caseids more derived than Martensius is poorly resolved. Alierasaurus forms a polytomy with Angelosaurus romeri and the three species of Cotylorhynchus. In the second cladogram, Alierasaurus is positioned above the genus Angelosaurus and forms a polytomy with Cotylorhynchus romeri and a clade containing the species C. bransoni and C. hancocki.[19]
Below the two cladograms published by Berman and colleagues in 2020.[19]
| Caseidae |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caseidae |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 2022, Werneburg and colleagues described the genus Lalieudorhynchus and published a phylogenetic analysis which concluded that Angelosaurus and Cotylorhynchus would be paraphyletic, both genera being possibly represented only by their type species. In this analysis, Cotylorhynchus romeri is positioned just above the genus Angelosaurus, and forms a polytomy with a clade containing Ruthenosaurus and Caseopsis and another clade containing Alierasaurus, the other two species of Cotylorhynchus and Lalieudorhynchus. Within the latter clade, Alierasaurus is the sister group of “Cotylorhynchus” bransoni and a more derived clade including Lalieudorhynchus and “Cotylorhynchus” hancocki.[13]
Below is the cladogram published by Werneburg and colleagues in 2022.[13]
| Caseidae |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Citton, P.; Ronchi, A.; Maganuco, S.; Caratelli, M.; Nicosia, U.; Sacchi, E.; Romano, M. (2019). "First tetrapod footprints from the Permian of Sardinia and their palaeontological and stratigraphical significance". Geological Journal 54 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1002/gj.3285.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Ronchi, A.; Sacchi, E.; Romano, M.; Nicosia, U. (2011). "A huge caseid pelycosaur from north-western Sardinia and its bearing on European Permian stratigraphy and palaeobiogeography". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (4): 723–738. doi:10.4202/app.2010.0087.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Romano, M.; Nicosia, U. (2014). "Alierasaurus ronchii, gen. et sp. nov., a caseid from the Permian of Sardinia, Italy". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34 (4): 900–913. doi:10.1080/02724634.2014.837056. Bibcode: 2014JVPal..34..900R.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Romano, M.; Ronchi, A.; Maganuco, S.; Nicosia, U (2017). "New material of Alierasaurus ronchii (Synapsida, Caseidae) from the Permian of Sardinia (Italy), an dits phylogenetic affinities". Palaeontologia Electronica 20.2.26A: 1–27. doi:10.26879/684.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Romano, M.; Citton, P.; Maganuco, S.; Sacchi, E.; Caratelli, M.; Ronchi, A.; Nicosia, U. (2018). "New basal synapsid discovery at the Permian outcrop of Torre del Porticciolo (Alghero, Italy)". Geological Journal 54 (3): 1–13. doi:10.1002/gj.3250.
- ↑ McLoughlin, S. (2001). "The breakup history of Gondwana and its impact on pre-Cenozoic floristic provincialism". Australian Journal of Botany 49 (3): 271–300. doi:10.1071/BT00023.
- ↑ Şengör, A.M.C. (1987). "Tectonics of the Tethysides: orogenic collage development in a collisional setting". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 15: 214–244. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.001241. Bibcode: 1987AREPS..15..213C.
- ↑ Westphal, M.; Orsini, J.; Vellutini, P. (1976). "Le microcontinent Corso-Sarde, sa position initiale: données paléomagnétiques et raccords géologiques". Tectonophysics 30 (1–2): 141–157. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(76)90142-6. Bibcode: 1976Tectp..30..141W.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Cassinis, G.; Durand, M.; Ronchi, A. (2003). "Permian-Triassic continental sequences of Northwest Sardinia and South Provence: stratigraphic correlations and palaeogeographical implications". Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana (Volume speciale) (2): 119–129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311542543.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Durand, M. (2006). "The problem of the transition from the Permian to the Triassic Series in southeastern France". in Lucas, S.G.. Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology. London: Geological Society, Special Publication 265. pp. 281–296. ISBN 978-1-86239-206-9.
- ↑ "Le volcanisme rhyolitique permien du Sud de la France : Estérel, Corse, Briançonnais et Béarn". Pierre Thomas. https://planet-terre.ens-lyon.fr/ressource/Img685-2020-09-14.xml. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Schneider, J.W.; Lucas, S.G.; Scholze, F.; Voigt, S.; Marchetti, L.; Klein, H.; Opluštil, S.; Werneburg, R. et al. (2020). "Late Paleozoic–early Mesozoic continental biostratigraphy — Links to the Standard Global Chronostratigraphic Scale". Palaeoworld 29 (2): 186–238. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2019.09.001.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Werneburg, R.; Spindler, F.; Falconnet, J.; Steyer, J.-S.; Vianey-Liaud, M.; Schneider, J.W. (2022). "A new caseid synapsid from the Permian (Guadalupian) of the Lodève basin (Occitanie, France)". Palaeovertebrata 45 (45(2)-e2): e2. doi:10.18563/pv.45.2.e2. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03851911/file/Werneburg%20et%20al%202022%20A%20new%20caseid%20synapsid%20from%20the%20Permian%20of%20the%20Lod%C3%A8ve%20Basin.pdf.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Gand, G.; Durand, M. (2006). "Tetrapod footprint ichno-associations from French Permian basins. Comparisons with other Euramerican ichnofaunas". in Lucas, S.G.. Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology. London: Geological Society, Special Publication 265. pp. 157–177. ISBN 978-1-86239-206-9.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Durand, M. (2008). "Permian to Triassic continental successions in southern Provence (France): an overview". Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 127 (3): 697–716. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287901566.
- ↑ Marchetti, L.; Klein, H.; Buchwitz, M.; Ronchi, A.; Smith, R.M.H.; De Klerk, W.J.; Sciscio, L.; Groenewald, G.H. (2019). "Permian-Triassic vertebrate footprints from South Africa: Ichnotaxonomy, producers and biostratigraphy through two major faunal crises". Gondwana Research 72 (72): 139–168. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2019.03.009. Bibcode: 2019GondR..72..139M.
- ↑ Marchetti, L.; Voigt, S.; Lucas, S.G. (2019). "An anatomy-consistent study of the Lopingian eolian tracks of Germany and Scotland reveals the first evidence of the end-Guadalupian mass extinction at low paleolatitudes of Pangea". Gondwana Research 73 (73): 32–53. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2019.03.013. Bibcode: 2019GondR..73...32M.
- ↑ Marchetti, L.; Logghe, A.; Mujal, E.; Barrier, B.; Montenat, C.; Nel, A.; Pouillon, J.-M.; Garrouste, R. et al. (2022). "Vertebrate tracks from the Permian of Gonfaron (Provence, Southern France) and their implication for the late Capitanian terrestrial extinction event". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 599 (599): 111043. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111043. Bibcode: 2022PPP...599k1043M.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Berman, D.S.; Maddin, H.C.; Henrici, A.C.; Sumida, S.S.; Scott, D.; Reisz, R.R. (2020). "New primitive Caseid (Synapsida, Caseasauria) from the Early Permian of Germany". Annals of Carnegie Museum 86 (1): 43–75. doi:10.2992/007.086.0103.
Wikidata ☰ Q18351206 entry
 |  |
