Biology:Nemegtosauridae
| Nemegtosaurids | |
|---|---|
| |
| Cast of the skull of Nemegtosaurus, on a mounted Opisthocoelicaudia skeleton, Museum of Evolution of Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Clade: | Dinosauria |
| Clade: | Saurischia |
| Clade: | †Sauropodomorpha |
| Clade: | †Sauropoda |
| Clade: | †Macronaria |
| Clade: | †Titanosauria |
| Clade: | †Eutitanosauria |
| Superfamily: | †Saltasauroidea |
| Family: | †Nemegtosauridae Upchurch, 1995 |
| Genera | |
Nemegtosauridae is a family of titanosaurian sauropod dinosaurs based on their diplodocid-like skulls.[1][2][3] Only three species are known:[4] Nemegtosaurus, Quaesitosaurus and possibly Tapuiasaurus, each from the Cretaceous.
History of classification
Due to the diplodocid-like nature of the taxa placed in Nemegtosauridae, the systematic position of this family in Sauropoda was disputed until recently. McIntosh (1990) included both these animals in the family Diplodocidae, subfamily Dicraeosaurinae, as they resemble the skull of Dicraeosaurus, although differing in certain details. Although the skull of Nemegtosaurus was found in the same formation as the headless skeleton of Opisthocoelicaudia, McIntosh (1990) kept Nemegtosaurus in Diplodocoidea while keeping Opisthocoelicaudia separate from the former, a position reiterated by Upchurch (1995,[5] 1999[6]), and Upchurch et al. (2004). A cladistic analysis published in 2002 transferred Nemegtosaurus and Opisthocoelicaudia from Diplodocoidea to Titanosauria.[1]
Apesteguia (2004), in a paper describing a new Patagonian sauropod, Bonitasaura salgadoi, may have been the first to properly define the taxon, although without the use of cladistic analysis: the stemclade consisting of all titanosaurs more closely related to Nemegtosaurus than to Saltasaurus. He argued for a close relationship between Nemegtosaurus, Quaesitosaurus, Rapetosaurus, and Bonitasaura and referred to the previous phylogenetic analysis and use of Nemegtosauridae by Wilson (2002).[7]
In his redescription of the Nemegtosaurus holotype, Wilson (2005) elaborated on the titanosaurian nature of Nemegtosaurus, defining Nemegtosauridae as a stem-based clade that includes all titanosaurs more closely related to Nemegtosaurus than to Saltasaurus. He also suggested that Opisthocoelicaudia may eventually be shown to be a junior synonym of Nemegtosaurus.[8] For her part, Kristina Curry Rogers (see also Cuury Rogers and Forster [2001][9]) agreed with Wilson that both Nemegtosaurus and Quaesitosaurus were titanosaurs rather than diplodocoids, but rejected the validity of Nemegtosauridae and the clade concepts given under that name. Quaesitosaurus was placed in the Saltasaurinae and Nemegtosaurus in a new, unnamed "Rapetosaurus clade" (which, under ICZN rules, would, if named, be termed subfamily Nemegtosaurinae or tribe Nemegtosaurini, depending on its position). Opisthocoelicaudia was placed in a separate clade, the Opisthocoelicaudiinae. All three clades are included in the Saltasauridae (= Titanosauridae).[10]
In a paper discussing new anatomical data on the skull of Tapuiasaurus, Wilson and his colleagues cast doubt on the monophyly of Nemegtosauridae, judging from a rescoring of the Zaher et al. 2011 cladistic analysis regarding cranial characters. Tapuiasaurus was recovered as basal to Lithostrotia, rendering its position within Nemegtosauridae questionable.[11] A 2014 cladistic analysis gleaning new anatomical data from Diamantinasaurus also rendered Nemegtosauridae paraphyletic, with Rapetosaurus falling out as a member of Saltasauridae closer to Isisaurus than to Nemegtosaurus.[12] The cladistic analysis of Patagotitan recovered Tapuiasaurus as the sister taxon of Rapetosaurus and Isisaurus but not Nemegtosaurus.[13]
Nemegtosauridae was retained as a potentially useful clade of titanosaurs by Carballido and colleagues in 2022, who noted that it was either resolved as a small clade of titanosaurs, or an extensive group of taxa closer to Nemegtosaurus than Saltasaurus. Further work on the discovered postcrania was required to resolve the relationships of Nemegtosaurus and Opisthocoelicaudia, but it was preliminarily retained as a clade of saltasauroid that may end up as a synonym of Opisthocoelicaudiinae or even Lirainosaurinae.[14]
Phylogeny
The cladogram below follows Zaher et al. (2011).[15]
| Lithostrotia |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Wilson, J.A. (13 September 2002). "Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (The Linnean Society of London) 136 (2): 215–275. doi:10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00029.x. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73066/1/j.1096-3642.2002.00029.x.pdf.
- ↑ McIntosh, J. S., 1990, "Sauropoda" in The Dinosauria, Edited by David B. Weishampel, Peter Dodson, and Halszka Osmólska. University of California Press, pp. 345–401.
- ↑ Upchurch, P., Barrett, P.M. and Dodson, P. 2004. Sauropoda. In The Dinosauria, 2nd edition. D. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmólska (eds.). University of California Press, Berkeley. pp. 259–322.
- ↑ Re: Family Nemegtosauridae
- ↑ Upchurch, P (1995). "The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 349 (1330): 365–390. doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0125. Bibcode: 1995RSPTB.349..365U. http://doc.rero.ch/record/16651/files/PAL_E2783.pdf.
- ↑ Upchurch, P (1999). "The phylogenetic relationships of the Nemegtosauridae (Saurischia, Sauropoda)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 106–125. doi:10.1080/02724634.1999.10011127.
- ↑ Apesteguía, S. (10 September 2004). "Bonitasaura salgadoi gen. et sp. nov.: a beaked sauropod from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia". Naturwissenschaften 91 (10): 493–497. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0560-6. PMID 15729763. Bibcode: 2004NW.....91..493A.
- ↑ Wilson, J.A. (24 August 2005). "Redescription of the Mongolian sauropod Nemegtosaurus mongoliensis Nowinski (Dinosauria: Saurischia) and comments on Late Cretaceous sauropod diversity". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology (The Natural History Museum) 3 (3): 283–318. doi:10.1017/S1477201905001628. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231914267.
- ↑ Rogers, K.C.; Forster, C.A. (2 August 2001). "The last of the dinosaur titans: a new sauropod from Madagascar". Nature 412 (6846): 530–534. doi:10.1038/35087566. PMID 11484051. Bibcode: 2001Natur.412..530C. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11859160.
- ↑ Rogers, K.C.; Wilson, J. (2005). The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology. University of California Press. pp. 50–103. ISBN 0520246233. https://archive.org/details/sauropodsevoluti00roge.
- ↑ Wilson, J.A.; Pol, D.; Carvalho, A.B.; Zaher, H. (9 February 2016). "The skull of the titanosaur Tapuiasaurus macedoi (Dinosauria: Sauropoda), a basal titanosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (The Linnean Society of London) 178 (3): 611–662. doi:10.1111/zoj.12420. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301761005.
- ↑ Poropat, S.F.; Upchurch, P.; Mannion, P.D.; Hocknull, S.; Kear, B.P.; Sloan, T.; Sinapius, G.H.K.; Elliott, D.A. (18 April 2014). "Revision of the sauropod dinosaur Diamantinasaurus matildae Hocknull et al. 2009 from the mid-Cretaceous of Australia: Implications for Gondwanan titanosauriform dispersal". Gondwana Research 27 (3): 995–1033. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.03.014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261715244.
- ↑ Jose, C.; Pol, D.; Otero, A.; Cerda, I.A.; Salgado, L.; Garrido, A.; Ramezani, J.; Cunéo, R. et al. (6 July 2017). "A new giant titanosaur sheds light on body mass evolution among sauropod dinosaurs". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (The Royal Society Publishing) 284 (1860): 20171219. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1219. PMID 28794222.
- ↑ Carballido, J.L.; Otero, A.; Mannion, P.D.; Salgado, L.; Moreno, A.P. (2022). "Titanosauria: A Critical Reappraisal of Its Systematics and the Relevance of the South American Record". in Otero, A.; Carballido, J.L.; Pol, D.. South American Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs. Record, Diversity and Evolution. Springer. pp. 269–298. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95959-3. ISBN 978-3-030-95958-6.
- ↑ Hussam Zaher, Diego Pol, Alberto B. Carvalho, Paulo M. Nascimento, Claudio Riccomini, Peter Larson, Rubén Juarez-Valieri, Ricardo Pires-Domingues, Nelson Jorge da Silva Jr., Diógenes de Almeida Campos (2011). "A Complete Skull of an Early Cretaceous Sauropod and the Evolution of Advanced Titanosaurians". PLOS ONE 6 (2): e16663. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016663. PMID 21326881. Bibcode: 2011PLoSO...616663Z.
Wikidata ☰ Q134474 entry
 |  |
