Biology:Δ34S

From HandWiki
Short description: Standardized measurement method


The δ34S (pronounced delta 34 S) value is a standardized method for reporting measurements of the ratio of two stable isotopes of sulfur, 34S:32S, in a sample against the equivalent ratio in a known reference standard. Presently, the most commonly used standard is Vienna-Canyon Diablo Troilite (VCDT). Results are reported as variations from the standard ratio in parts per thousand, per mil or per mille, using the ‰ symbol. Heavy and light sulfur isotopes fractionate at different rates and the resulting δ34S values, recorded in marine sulfate or sedimentary sulfides, have been studied and interpreted as records of the changing sulfur cycle throughout the earth's history.

Calculation

Of the 25 known isotopes of sulfur, four are stable.[1] In order of their abundance, those isotopes are 32S (94.93%), 34S (4.29%), 33S (0.76%), and 36S (0.02%).[2] The δ34S value refers to a measure of the ratio of the two most common stable sulfur isotopes, 34S:32S, as measured in a sample against that same ratio as measured in a known reference standard. The lowercase delta character is used by convention, to be consistent with use in other areas of stable isotope chemistry.[3] That value can be calculated in per mil (‰, parts per thousand) as:[4]

[math]\displaystyle{ \delta \ce{^{34}S} = \left( \frac{\left( \frac\ce{^{34}S}\ce{^{32}S} \right)_\mathrm{sample}}{\left( \frac\ce{^{34}S}\ce{^{32}S} \right)_\mathrm{standard}} - 1 \right) \times 1000 }[/math] ‰

Less commonly, if the appropriate isotope abundances are measured, similar formulae can be used to quantify ratio variations between 33S and 32S, and 36S and 32S, reported as δ33S and δ36S, respectively.[5]

Reference standard

A worn brown-red-gold space rock covered in smoothed pock-marks sits mounted in a museum.
Troilite from the Canyon Diablo meteorite was the first reference standard for δ34S.

Sulfur from meteorites was determined in the early 1950s to be an adequate reference standard because it exhibited a small variability in isotopic ratios.[6] It was also believed that because of their extraterrestrial provenances, meteors represented primordial terrestrial isotopic conditions.[7] During a meeting of the National Science Foundation in April 1962, troilite from the Canyon Diablo meteorite found in Arizona, US, was established as the standard with which δ34S values (and other sulfur stable isotopic ratios) could be calculated.[6][8] Known as Canyon Diablo Troilite (CDT), the standard was established as having a 32S:34S ratio of 22.220 and was used for around three decades.[6] In 1993, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) established a new standard, Vienna-CDT (VCDT), based on artificially prepared silver sulfide (IAEA-S-1) that was defined to have a δ34SVCDT value of −0.3‰.[8] In 1994, the original CDT material was found not to be isotopically homogeneous, with internal variations as great as 0.4‰, confirming its unsuitability as a reference standard.[6]

Causes of variations

A graph with δ34S values from -50 to 40‰, with meteorites around 0‰, igneous rocks -5 to 15‰, petroleum and coal -10 to 20‰, modern seawater sulfate around 20‰, ancient marine evaporites at 10 to 35‰, and modern and ancient sedimentary pyrite at -50 to 15‰.
δ34SVCDT values for several geologic reservoirs

Two mechanisms of fractionation occur that alter sulfur stable isotope ratios: kinetic effects, especially due to the metabolism of sulfate-reducing bacteria, and isotope exchange reactions that occur between sulfide phases based on temperature.[9] With VCDT as the reference standard, natural δ34S value variations have been recorded between -72‰ and +147‰.[10][11]

The presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, which reduce sulfate (SO2−4) to hydrogen sulfide (H2S), has played a significant role in the oceanic δ34S value throughout the earth's history. Sulfate-reducing bacteria metabolize 32S more readily than 34S, resulting in an increase in the value of the δ34S in the remaining sulfate in the seawater.[7] Archean pyrite found in barite in the Warrawoona Group, Western Australia, with sulfur fractionations as great as 21.1‰ hint at the presence of sulfate-reducers as early as 3,470 million years ago.[12]

It is now better known that the degree of isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction depends on the cell-specific sulfate reduction rate of the sulfate-reducing microorganism.[13][14] The relative extent of sulfur isotope fractionating activities, including sulfate reduction, sulfide reoxidation and disproportionation, determines the isotopic compositions of the minerals or fluid measured.[15] Other than microbial activities and environmental conditions, isotopic compositions also change due to diffusion, accumulation and mixing after burial.[16][17][15]

The δ34S value, recorded by sulfate in marine evaporites, can be used to chart the sulfur cycle throughout earth's history.[7][4] The Great Oxygenation Event around 2,400 million years ago altered the sulfur cycle radically, as increased atmospheric oxygen permitted an increase in the mechanisms that could fractionate sulfur isotopes, leading to an increase in the δ34S value from ~0‰ pre-oxygenation. Approximately 700 million years ago, the δ34S values in seawater sulfates began to vary more and those in sedimentary sulfates grew more negative. Researchers have interpreted this excursion as indicative of an increase in water column oxygenation with continued periods of anoxia in the deepest waters. Modern seawater sulfate δ34S values are consistently 21.0 ± 0.2‰ across the world's oceans, while sedimentary sulfides vary widely. Seawater sulfate δ34S and δ18O values exhibit similar trends not seen in sedimentary sulfide minerals.[7]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "The NUBASE evaluation of nuclear and decay properties". Nuclear Physics A 729 (1): 3–128. December 2003. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.001. Bibcode: 2003NuPhA.729....3A.  closed access
  2. ↑ Hoefs 2009, p. 71.
  3. ↑ Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. New York City: Springer Science+Business Media. 2000. p. 511. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4557-6. ISBN 978-1-4615-4557-6. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-1-4615-4557-6%2F1.pdf. 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 "Biogeochemistry of Sulfur Isotopes". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 43 (1): 607–636. 2001. doi:10.2138/gsrmg.43.1.607. Bibcode: 2001RvMG...43..607C.  closed access
  5. ↑ "Multiple Sulfur Isotope Determination by SIMS: Evaluation of Reference Sulfides for Δ33S with Observations and a Case Study on the Determination of Δ36S". Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 37 (1): 19–33. March 2013. doi:10.1111/j.1751-908X.2012.00188.x.  closed access
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 "Variations in the sulfur isotope composition of troilite from the Cañon Diablo iron meteorite". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58 (19): 4253–4255. October 1994. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(94)90277-1. Bibcode: 1994GeCoA..58.4253B.  closed access
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 "Sulfur Isotope Geochemistry of Sulfide Minerals". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 61 (1): 633–677. 2006. doi:10.2138/rmg.2006.61.12. Bibcode: 2006RvMG...61..633S. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1354&context=usgsstaffpub.  closed access
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Hoefs 2009, p. 72.
  9. ↑ Hoefs 2009, pp. 73, 77.
  10. ↑ "Evidence for microbial carbon and sulfur cycling in deeply buried ridge flank basalt". Science 339 (6125): 1305–1308. March 2013. doi:10.1126/science.1229240. PMID 23493710. Bibcode: 2013Sci...339.1305L. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00176/28767/.  closed access
  11. ↑ "Biosignatures of ancient microbial life are present across the igneous crust of the Fennoscandian shield" (in en). Communications Earth & Environment 2 (1): 1–13. June 2021. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00170-2. 
  12. ↑ "Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era". Nature 410 (6824): 77–81. March 2001. doi:10.1038/35065071. PMID 11242044. Bibcode: 2001Natur.410...77S.  closed access
  13. ↑ "Intracellular metabolite levels shape sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate respiration". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (51): 18116–18125. December 2014. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407502111. PMID 25362045. Bibcode: 2014PNAS..11118116W. 
  14. ↑ "Electron carriers in microbial sulfate reduction inferred from experimental and environmental sulfur isotope fractionations". The ISME Journal 12 (2): 495–507. October 2017. doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.185. PMID 29087380. 
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 "Sulfur isotope fractionation derived from reaction-transport modelling in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific". Journal of the Geological Society 179 (5). July 2022. doi:10.1144/jgs2021-068. ISSN 0016-7649. Bibcode: 2022JGSoc.179...68T. 
  16. ↑ "A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments: II. Calculation from mathematical models" (in en). Geomicrobiology Journal 1 (1): 29–47. January 1978. doi:10.1080/01490457809377722. ISSN 0149-0451. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01490457809377722. 
  17. ↑ Early Diagenesis: A Theoretical Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2020. doi:10.1515/9780691209401. ISBN 978-0-691-20940-1. OCLC 1164642477. http://worldcat.org/oclc/1164642477. 

Sources



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Δ34S&oldid=3593611"