Linearly ordered group

From HandWiki
Short description: Group with translationally invariant total order

In mathematics, specifically abstract algebra, a linearly ordered or totally ordered group is a group G equipped with a total order "≤" that is translation-invariant. This may have different meanings. We say that (G, ≤) is a:

  • left-ordered group if ≤ is left-invariant, that is a ≤ b implies ca ≤ cb for all a, b, c in G,
  • right-ordered group if ≤ is right-invariant, that is a ≤ b implies ac ≤ bc for all a, b, c in G,
  • bi-ordered group if ≤ is bi-invariant, that is it is both left- and right-invariant.

A group G is said to be left-orderable (or right-orderable, or bi-orderable) if there exists a left- (or right-, or bi-) invariant order on G. A simple necessary condition for a group to be left-orderable is to have no elements of finite order; however this is not a sufficient condition. It is equivalent for a group to be left- or right-orderable; however there exist left-orderable groups which are not bi-orderable.

Further definitions

In this section, ≤ is a left-invariant order on a group G with identity element e. All that is said applies to right-invariant orders with the obvious modifications. Note that ≤ being left-invariant is equivalent to the order ≤′ defined by g≤′h if and only if h−1≤g−1 being right-invariant. In particular, a group being left-orderable is the same as it being right-orderable.

In analogy with ordinary numbers, we call an element g=e of an ordered group positive if e≤g. The set of positive elements in an ordered group is called the positive cone, it is often denoted with G+; the slightly different notation G+ is used for the positive cone together with the identity element.[1]

The positive cone G+ characterises the order ≤; indeed, by left-invariance we see that g≤h if and only if g−1h∈G+. In fact, a left-ordered group can be defined as a group G together with a subset P satisfying the two conditions that:

  1. for g,h∈P we have also gh∈P;
  2. let P−1={g−1∣g∈P}, then G is the disjoint union of P,P−1 and {e}.

The order ≤P associated with P is defined by g≤Ph⇔g−1h∈P; the first condition amounts to left-invariance and the second to the order being well-defined and total. The positive cone of ≤P is P.

The left-invariant order ≤ is bi-invariant if and only if it is conjugacy-invariant, that is if g≤h then for any x∈G we have xgx−1≤xhx−1 as well. This is equivalent to the positive cone being stable under inner automorphisms.

If a∈G, then the absolute value of a, denoted by |a|, is defined to be: |a|:={a,if a≥0,a−1,otherwise. If in addition the group G is abelian, then for any a,b∈G a triangle inequality is satisfied: |a+b|≤|a|+|b|.[2]

Examples

Any left- or right-orderable group is torsion-free, that is it contains no elements of finite order besides the identity. Conversely, F. W. Levi showed that a torsion-free abelian group is bi-orderable;[3] this is still true for nilpotent groups[4] but there exist torsion-free, finitely presented groups which are not left-orderable.

Archimedean ordered groups

Otto Hölder showed that every Archimedean group (a bi-ordered group satisfying an Archimedean property) is isomorphic to a subgroup of the additive group of real numbers, (Fuchs Salce). If we write the Archimedean l.o. group multiplicatively, this may be shown by considering the Dedekind completion, G^ of the closure of a l.o. group under nth roots. We endow this space with the usual topology of a linear order, and then it can be shown that for each g∈G^ the exponential maps g⋅:(ℝ,+)→(G^,⋅):limiqi∈ℚ↦limigqi are well defined order preserving/reversing, topological group isomorphisms. Completing a l.o. group can be difficult in the non-Archimedean case. In these cases, one may classify a group by its rank: which is related to the order type of the largest sequence of convex subgroups.

Other examples

Free groups are left-orderable. More generally this is also the case for right-angled Artin groups.[5] Braid groups are also left-orderable.[6]

The group given by the presentation ⟨a,b|a2ba2b−1,b2ab2a−1⟩ is torsion-free but not left-orderable;[7] note that it is a 3-dimensional crystallographic group (it can be realised as the group generated by two glided half-turns with orthogonal axes and the same translation length), and it is the same group that was proven to be a counterexample to the unit conjecture. More generally the topic of orderability of 3--manifold groups is interesting for its relation with various topological invariants.[8] There exists a 3-manifold group which is left-orderable but not bi-orderable[9] (in fact it does not satisfy the weaker property of being locally indicable).

Left-orderable groups have also attracted interest from the perspective of dynamical systems as it is known that a countable group is left-orderable if and only if it acts on the real line by homeomorphisms.[10] Non-examples related to this paradigm are lattices in higher rank Lie groups; it is known that (for example) finite-index subgroups in SLn(ℤ) are not left-orderable;[11] a wide generalisation of this was announced in 2020.[12]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Deroin, Navas & Rivas 2014, 1.1.1.
  2. ↑ For abelian groups see Def. 6 in Melnikov, Alexander G. (2010). "Computable ordered abelian groups and fields". Programs, proofs, processes. 6th conference on computability in Europe, CiE 2010. 6158. Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal: Springer. pp. 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13962-8_36. 
  3. ↑ Levi 1942.
  4. ↑ Deroin, Navas & Rivas 2014, 1.2.1.
  5. ↑ Duchamp, Gérard; Thibon, Jean-Yves (1992). "Simple orderings for free partially commutative groups". International Journal of Algebra and Computation 2 (3): 351–355. doi:10.1142/S0218196792000219. 
  6. ↑ Dehornoy, Patrick; Dynnikov, Ivan; Rolfsen, Dale; Wiest, Bert (2002). Why are braids orderable?. Paris: Société Mathématique de France. p. xiii + 190. ISBN 2-85629-135-X. 
  7. ↑ Deroin, Navas & Rivas 2014, 1.4.1.
  8. ↑ Boyer, Steven; Rolfsen, Dale; Wiest, Bert (2005). "Orderable 3-manifold groups". Annales de l'Institut Fourier 55 (1): 243–288. doi:10.5802/aif.2098. 
  9. ↑ Bergman, George (1991). "Right orderable groups that are not locally indicable". Pacific Journal of Mathematics 147 (2): 243–248. doi:10.2140/pjm.1991.147.243. 
  10. ↑ Deroin, Navas & Rivas 2014, Proposition 1.1.8.
  11. ↑ Witte, Dave (1994). "Arithmetic groups of higher \(\mathbb{Q}\)-rank cannot act on \(1\)-manifolds". Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 122 (2): 333–340. doi:10.2307/2161021. 
  12. ↑ Deroin, Bertrand; Hurtado, Sebastian (2020). "Non left-orderability of lattices in higher rank semi-simple Lie groups". arXiv:2008.10687 [math.GT].

References

  • Deroin, Bertrand; Navas, Andrés; Rivas, Cristóbal (2014). "Groups, orders and dynamics". arXiv:1408.5805 [math.GT].
  • Levi, F.W. (1942), "Ordered groups.", Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A16 (4): 256–263, doi:10.1007/BF03174799 
  • Fuchs, László; Salce, Luigi (2001), Modules over non-Noetherian domains, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 84, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-1963-0 
  • Ghys, É. (2001), "Groups acting on the circle.", L'Enseignement Mathématique 47: 329–407