Medicine:Social franchising

From HandWiki
Short description: Adaptation of commercial franchising for achieving social gains

Social franchising is the application of commercial franchising concepts to achieve socially beneficial ends, rather than profit.[1]

Overview

Social franchising is the application of the principles of commercial franchising to promote social benefit rather than private profit.

In the first sense, it refers to a contractual relationship wherein an independent coordinating organization (usually a non-governmental organization, but occasionally a governmental body or private company[2]) offers individual independent operators the ability to join into a franchise network for the provision of selected services over a specified area in accordance with an overall blueprint devised by the franchisor.[3] Once joining the network, operators are given the right to employ previously tested incentives including: professional training, use of brands or brand advertisements, subsidized or proprietary supplies and equipment, support services, and access to professional advice.[4] Members also gain beneficial spin-off effects such as increased consumer volume and improved reputation due to brand affiliation.[1] Franchisees must adhere to a range of requirements including: providing socially beneficial services, meeting quality and pricing standards, undergoing mandatory education on provision of services, subjecting outlets to quality assurance mechanisms, reporting service and sales statistics, and occasionally, paying fixed or profit-share fees.[1][5] Social franchises have been used for primary health services, pharmaceutical sales of essential drugs, HIV testing and counseling, and reproductive health services in the developing world.

A second application of social franchising is as a means of enabling social enterprises and the social economy to create more employment for disadvantaged people and achieve social aims. This is done principally by enabling joint working and knowledge sharing and transfer. The European Social Franchising Network has identified over 60 social franchises of this type in Europe, which employ over 13,000 people and more recently in 2012 The International Centre for Social Franchising identified 140.[6] The largest of these is De Kringwinkel in Flanders employing 5,000 people. Others, like the Le Mat hotel and tourism social franchise or the School for Social Entrepreneurs operate in more than one country. Social franchising provides an opportunity to rapidly grow the sector to the benefit of disadvantaged people and society more generally.

Support Organisations

The international Centre for Social Franchising (ICSF) was founded to help replicate proven social ventures to scale. They have a number of useful resources and have published papers such as Investing in Social Franchising[6] which looks at the viability of investment into franchised social enterprise in the UK and Social Franchising: Innovation and the Power of Old Ideas [7] which is a comparison between McDonald's and the social franchise Foodbank.

The ICSF has recently (2015) developed and launched a social franchising toolkit with NESTA, Bertelsmann Foundation, London School of Economics and others to help the best social ideas develop as a franchise. The group recently carried out research into replicable health care models with significant social benefit[8] with GlaxoSmithKline the pharmaceutical company, published in May 2013.

Social franchising for health services

There are a number of social franchising set ups in the area of health care and social mobility. According to the components of Human Development Index, "Health" and "Living Standards" are the two major components of HDI (Human Development Index). Social franchising for essential health services is an emerging technique used by governments and aid-donors in developing countries where a substantial percentage of health services are provided by private sector (including non-profit NGOs and private for-profit) to improve access, equity, effectiveness, and quality. Clinical franchising often takes the form of a fractional model where franchised services are added to an existing medical practice, but also can exist as a stand-alone practice wherein the site exclusively provides franchise supported services or commodities. Social franchising has been used to deliver a wide range of services including DOTS tuberculosis treatment,[9] sexual transmitted infection management,[10][11] primary care, and HIV / AIDS treatment.[12][13]

Strengths and weaknesses of social franchising

Strengths

By organizing small independent providers into larger units, social franchises can yield returns to scale in investment in physical capital, supply chains, advertising, and worker training and supervision.[2] Additionally, social franchises can offer the ability to: faster scale up programs, decrease transaction costs, provide uniform services to a broad market, collectively negotiate financial reimbursement mechanisms, and replicate best practice services among a large group.[11] Franchisees can also cross-subsidize less profitable services with the more profitable ones supported by the franchisor. The use of brand advertising makes social franchising compatible with social marketing.[1][14] In addition, social franchising for health services allows an expansion of services because of cross-subsidization, addition of less-profitable services if fractionally franchised, and access to costly medicines if subsidized by the coordinating organization.

Weaknesses

Several inherent logistical and economic weaknesses are present within the social franchising model. These include the difficulty in standardizing medical care among participants, the need for networks to be sufficiently large to attain an economy of scale, the cost and challenge of regulatory oversight of outlets, and the need to base organizational decisions on the population demand which may not maximize quality or minimize cost.[14] There also exists the possibility of “tragedy of the commons” wherein franchisees provide low quality, low cost due to incomplete monitoring.[1] Social franchising for health services runs the risk of overly procedural, “cookie cutter” medical provision, overtreatment of disease conditions, and the possibility of fraud if oversight is not present.

Social Franchise Enterprises

The Social Franchise Enterprise is a type of Social initiative directed to achieve development goals through private ventures that provide goods and services to unserved markets, at a viable price. The Social Franchise enterprise creates self sustainable economic activity for the franchisees by using the franchise model to provide them with Capacity Building (know-how & training), Access to Market (bulk procurement of standard supplies, network clients, brand) and Access to Credit (benchmarking leading to Bankability). Franchisees then become capable to supply a given population with much needed goods or services.

By maintaining the transaction element, the Social Franchise Enterprise generates the revenue to both the Franchisees and to the Social Franchiser, who becomes self sustainable and can further extend its footprint and further supply unserved markets, enforce monitoring and continue to provide added value services to the Franchisees network.

Telephone/communication kiosks have been studied by the WB since 1995. Currently, rural electrification and rural mobile providers represent attractive fields to develop Social Franchise Enterprises that create economic activity and provide communities with electricity and access to communications.[15]

History of Social Franchise Programs

The first significant implementation of social franchising was conducted in 1995 by the Greenstar franchise in Pakistan. Since its inception, Greenstar has trained over 24,000 providers, and provides family planning, sexual and reproductive health services, maternal and child health services, and tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment through over 80,000 retail outlets.[16] Since then, over 35 additional social franchise programs have arisen, with much of the increase in the number and size of social franchises occurring in the last four years. Franchises have additionally expanded their services from mostly family planning to testing and treatment of malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV / AIDS.[17]

Existing Clinical Social Franchises[17]

Franchise Name Country Coordinating Organization Date Founded Number of Clinics Family Planning HIV Sexual and Reproductive Health Maternal and Child Health Tuberculosis Malaria Other
AMUA Kenya Marie Stopes International 2004 144 Yes
Andalan Indonesia DKT International 2001 5,000 Yes Yes Yes
ARV Care South Africa BroadReach 2002 4500 Yes Yes
Biruh Tesfa Ethiopia Pathfinder International 2000 130 Yes Yes Yes
Blue Star (Bangladesh) Bangladesh Social Marketing Company 1998 3600 Yes
BlueStar (Ethiopia) Ethiopia Marie Stopes International 2007 107 Yes Yes
BlueStar (Ghana) Ghana Marie Stopes International 2008 102 Yes Yes
BlueStar (Malawi) Malawi Marie Stopes International 2008 59 Yes Yes Yes
BlueStar (Philippines) Philippines Marie Stopes International 2007 66 Yes Yes
BlueStar (Sierra Leone) Sierra Leone Marie Stopes International 2008 70 Yes
BlueStar (Vietnam) Vietnam Marie Stopes International 2007 32 Yes Yes
Confiance Democratic Republic of the Congo Population Services International 2004 78 Yes Yes
CFWshops Kenya Kenya Child and Family Wellness Shops CFW 2000 67 Yes Yes Yes
CFWshops Rwanda Rwanda Child and Family Wellness Shops CFW 2008 2 Yes Yes
DiMPA Network India PSP-One 1998 1150 Yes
FriendlyCare (Philippines) Philippines FriendlyCare 1999 6 Yes Yes
Greenstar Pakistan Population Services International 1995 8000 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Gold Star Kenya Family Health International 2006 279 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Merrygold Health India Hindustan Latex FP Trust 2007 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Intimo Mozambique DKT International 2011 9 Yes Yes Yes
Key Clinics India Population Services International 2004 701 Yes Yes
K-Met (Kenya) Kenya K-MET 1995 200 Yes Yes
Mexico (Community Doctors Program Mexico Mexfam 1986 300 Yes
New Start (South Africa) South Africa Population Services International 2007 11 Yes
New Start (Lesotho) Lesotho Population Services International 2004 6 Yes
New Start (Swaziland) Swaziland Population Services International 2003 16 Yes Yes
New Start (Zambia) Zambia Population Services International 2002 8 Yes
New Start (Zimbabwe) Zimbabwe Population Services International 1999 41 Yes Yes Yes
POPSHOPS Philippines DKT International 2005 300 Yes Yes
Operation Light House India Population Services International 2002 12 Yes
ProFam (Benin) Benin Population Services International 2004 30 Yes Yes Yes Yes
ProFam (Cameroon) Cameroon Population Services International 2004 25 Yes Yes
ProFam (Mali) Mali Population Services International 2005 33 Yes
PSI Togo Togo Population Services International 2002 13 Yes
PSI Uganda Uganda Population Services International 2007 2 Yes
RedPlan Salud Peru INPPARES 2002 1668 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sahath Al-om (MotherHealth) Sudan DKT International 2011 12 Yes Yes
Sangini Nepal Nepal CRS Company 1994 2928 Yes Yes Yes Yes
SkyHealth / SkyCare Centres India World Health Partners 2008 Yes Yes Yes
Smiling Sun Bangladesh Chemonics International 2008 40 Yes Yes Yes
Society for Family Health Nigeria Population Services International 2006 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sun Quality Health (Myanmar) Myanmar Population Services International 2001 846 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sun Quality Health (Cambodia) Cambodia Population Services International 2002 164 Yes Yes Yes Yes
Surya Clinics India Janani/DKT International 2000 63 Yes Yes Yes
Top Reseau Madagascar Population Services International 2001 155 Yes Yes Yes
Well-Family Midwife Clinics Philippines Well-Family Midwife Clinic 1997 100 Yes Yes
Vitaloc Station Hong Kong Vitaloc Station 2012 3 Yes

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Montagu, D. (2002). "Franchising of Health Services in Developing Countries" (PDF). Health Policy and Planning 17 (2): 121–130. doi:10.1093/heapol/17.2.121. PMID 12000772. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=big. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Bishai, D. (2008). "Social Franchising to Improve Quality and Access in Private Health Care in Developing Countries". Harvard Health Policy Review 9 (1): 184–197. Archived from the original on 2011-10-20. https://web.archive.org/web/20111020075338/http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~hhpr/currentissue/184-197%20Health%20Highlights_Bishai_edited.pdf. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  3. Stanworth, J. (1995). "Franchising as a source of technology transfer to developing economies.". Special Studies Series, No 7 ed. I.F.R. Center. Vol 7. Westminster: University of Westminster Press. 
  4. Koehlmoos, T. (2008). Koehlmoos, Tracey Perez. ed. "The effect of social franchising on access to and quality of health services in low- and middle-income countries". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD007136. (1): CD007136. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007136.pub2. PMID 19160323. 
  5. Prata, N.; Montagu, D; Jefferys, E (2005). "Private Sector, Human Resources and Health Franchising in Africa". Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83 (4): 274–279. PMID 15868018. PMC 2626208. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862005000400011. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Berelowitz, D; Richardson, M (2012). Investing in Social Franchising. http://www.the-icsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ICSF-Social-Franchising-Complete-Report.pdf. 
  7. Berelowitz, D (2012). Social Franchising: Innovation and the Power of Old Ideas. http://www.the-icsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Social-Franchising-Innovation-and-the-Power-of-Old-Ideas-Dan-Berelowitz-Nov-2012.pdf. 
  8. Berelowitz, D (2013). Identifying Replicable Healthcare Delivery: Models with Significant Social Benefit. http://www.the-icsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/GSK-ICSF-replicable-healthcare-report.pdf. 
  9. Lonnroth, K. (2007). "Social franchising of TB care through private GPs in Myanmar: an assessment of treatment results, access, equity and financial protection.". Health Policy and Planning 22 (3): 156–166. doi:10.1093/heapol/czm007. PMID 17434870. http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/czm007v1. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  10. Peters, D. (2004). "Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they?". Health Policy and Planning 19 (Supplement 1): i5–i21. doi:10.1093/heapol/czh041. PMID 15452011. http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/suppl_1/i5. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 World Health Organization and USAID. (2007). Public policy and franchising reproductive health: current evidence and future directions. Guidance from a technical consultation meeting.. https://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/publicpolicy_franchising/index.html. 
  12. Perrot, J. (2006). "Different approaches to contracting in health systems.". Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84 (11): 859–866. doi:10.1590/S0042-96862006001100010. PMID 17143459. PMC 2627549. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862006001100010&script=sci_arttext. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  13. Montagu, D.; Elzinga (2003). "Innovations in access to TB and HIV/AIDS care in sub-Saharan Africa: dynamic engagement of the private sector.". Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2 (4): 175–180. PMID 15119536. http://www.healthfranchise.org/docs/AppliedHealthEconomics2003.pdf. Retrieved 2008-03-06. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Private Healthcare in Developing Countries
  15. Hidalgo E, A (2012). The Franchise as a Development Tool - The Social Franchise Enterprise. http://www.wattjet.com/pdf/SocialFranchiseEntreprise.pdf. 
  16. "Greenstar Social Marketing: Social Franchising Private Health Services". 2009-01-25. http://www.greenstar.org.pk/what-we-do.htm. Retrieved 2009-03-29. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 Montagu, D.; the Global Health Group (2009). Clinical Social Franchising 2009: Annual description of country programs worldwide. Archived from the original on 2011-07-20. https://web.archive.org/web/20110720082300/http://www.globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/pdf/SocialFranchisingCompendium.pdf.