Religion:Eastern Orthodox view of sin

From HandWiki
Short description: none
Part of a series on the
Eastern Orthodox Church
Christ Pantocrator (Deesis mosaic detail)
Mosaic of Christ Pantocrator, Hagia Sophia
Overview
Background
Organization
Autocephalous jurisdictions
Autocephalous Churches who are officially part of the communion:

Autocephaly recognized universally de facto, by some Autocephalous Churches de jure:

Autocephaly recognized by Constantinople and 3 other Autocephalous Churches:

Noncanonical jurisdictions
Ecumenical councils
  • Other Ecumenical Councils:
  • Other important councils:
History
Theology
Liturgy and worship
Liturgical calendar
  • The four fasting periods:
Major figures
Other topics

The Eastern Orthodox Church presents a view of sin distinct from views found in Catholicism and in Protestantism, that sin is viewed primarily as a terminal spiritual sickness, rather than a state of guilt, a self-perpetuating illness which distorts the whole human being and energies, corrupts the Image of God inherent in those who bear the human nature, diminishes the divine likeness within them, disorients their understanding of the world as it truly is, and distracts a person from fulfilling his natural potential to become deified in communion with God.

Overview

As in Western Christianity, in Eastern Orthodoxy the goal is union with God. Orthodoxy also understands sin as a disease of the soul, a condition where the soul is lacking in God's grace. Orthodoxy regards the mysteries of the Church, also known as sacraments in the West, as vehicles leading towards union with God.

Ancestral sin

The Eastern Orthodox church accepts the teachings of John Cassian[1] and the doctrine of ancestral sin, but not original guilt.[2][3] Ancestral sin (Greek: προγονικὸν ἁμάρτημα, romanized: progonikon hamartēma, lit. 'ancestral fault') is distinguished from the Western formulation of original sin. Humanity is understood to inherit the consequences of the primordial transgression, namely morality, corruption, and inclination to sin, instead of guilt based on the actions of Adam. The fall introduces a condition in which human beings are born into a disordered and corruptible existence, without bearing personal culpability for the first sin.[4]

Sources and modern scholarship describe ancestral sin in ontological rather than juridical terms. In Greek patristic tradition, sin is primarily compiled as a state of corruption and separation from God, instead of it being inherited as legal guilt.[5]

Original guilt

However, Orthodox doctrine doesn't affirm original guilt. The Orthodox Church affirms the understanding that humanity inherits sin's consequences and a fallen environment, but explicitly denies inherited guilt or a fallen nature.[2] Kallistos Ware writes that, while human beings inherit the fallen condition marked by morality and corruption, they don't inherit the guilt of Adam's transgression:[6]

Orthodoxy, holding as it does a less exalted idea of the human state before the fall, is also less severe than the west in its view of the consequences of the fall.

John Meyendorff observes that the Greek Fathers didn't develop the concept of inherited guilt characteristic of later Western theology, instead describing the fall in terms of corruption and death affecting human nature.[7] Furthermore, original sin isn't transmitted as personal culpability but as a condition into which each individual is born.[8]

Sexuality

The Eastern Orthodox Church does not hold that sex is inherently sinful, but rather condemns seeing sex as something which can be divorced from the loving act between a married couple.[9]

Marriage

One of the Fathers of the Church, John Chrysostom, in elaborating on the words of Paul the Apostle and writing commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians 7 in his homilies, states that:[10]

But 1 Corinthians 7:8 I say to the unmarried and to widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I: 1 Corinthians 7:9 but if they have not continency let them marry? Do you see the strong sense of Paul how he both signifies that continence is better, and yet puts no force on the person who cannot attain to it; fearing lest some offense arise?

Homosexuality

Template:Christianity and sexual orientation Despite varying views from different jurisdictions, the Orthodox Church has consistently condemned homosexuality, including notes from the early Church Fathers and Byzantine Empire.[11][12] Today, they're mostly consistent in agreeing that homosexuality is damaging to the human person and that temptation is an ascetic struggle.[13] Evidence from the New and Old Testament suggests how homosexuality is viewed as sinful, including Romans 1:26-27:

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

The Orthodox Church in America (OCA) also provides detailed advice on homosexuality in their 1992 10th All-American Council:[14]

Men and women with homosexual feelings and emotions are to be treated with the understanding, acceptance, love, justice and mercy due to all human beings... Persons struggling with homosexuality who accept the Orthodox faith and strive to fulfill the Orthodox way of life may be communicants of the Church with everyone else who believes and struggles.

Idolatry and iconoclasm

Idolatry

In Eastern Orthodox theology, idolatry is defined as the worship (λατρεία) of created objects as though they were divine. The tradition distinguishes this from the veneration (προσκύνησις) accorded to icons, which is directed not to the material object but to the prototype it presents. The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 AD formalized this distinction, affirming that "the honor paid to the image passes the prototype" and thereby rejecting the identification of icon veneration with idolatry.[15]

Patristic and later sources interpret biblical prohibitions such as Exodus 20:4 ("You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below") within the context of pagan idol worship instead of condemnation on sacred images. John of Damascus wrote that the Incarnation establishes the legitimacy of depicting Christ, since the invisible God has become visible in human form.[16] Modern Orthodox scholarship maintains this distinction.[17]

Iconoclasm

This refers to the rejection and destruction of religious images, particularly during the Byzantine Iconoclastic Controversy (c. 726 – c. 843). Imperial policies under Leo III and his successors prohibited the use of icons, leading to sustained theological and political conflict within the Byzantine Empire. The controversy culminated in the restoration of icons in 843, commemorated in the Orthodox Church as the Feast of Orthodoxy.[18]

Theologically, iconoclasm was opposed because it compromised the doctrine of the Incarnation. Iconophile writers, including John of Damascus and Theodore the Studite, argued that the denial of icons implied a denial of Christ's true humanity and visibility. The Seventh Ecumenical Council condemned iconoclasm as a doctrinal error.[19]

Notes

  1. ↑ Elton, Geoffrey Rudolph (1964). Reformation Europe, 1517–1559 (3rd ed.). University of Michigan: HarperCollins. p. 136. ISBN 0006321240. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FrZmAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 "St. Augustine & Original Sin". https://www.oca.org/questions/teaching/st.-augustine-original-sin. 
  3. ↑ Papavassiliou, Fr. Vassilios (9 June 2020). "Original Sin: Orthodox Doctrine or Heresy?". https://www.pravmir.com/original-sin-orthodox-doctrine-or-heresy/. 
  4. ↑ Ware, Timothy (in en-UK). The Orthodox Church (New ed.). Penguin Books. pp. 216–218. ISBN 9780141980638. 
  5. ↑ Meyendorff, John (1987) (in en). Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes. Fordham University Press. p. 142. ISBN 9780823209675. 
  6. ↑ Timothy, Ware (2015). The Orthodox Church (New ed.). Penguin Books. p. 217. ISBN 9780141980638. 
  7. ↑ Meyendorff, John (1963). Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes. Fordham University Press. p. 143. ISBN 9780823209675. 
  8. ↑ Florovsky, Georges (1976). "Redemption". Creation and Redemption. III. Belmont, Massachusetts: Nordland Publishing Company. p. 95. ISBN 0913124109. https://www.bulgarian-orthodox-church.org/rr/lode/florovsky3.pdf. 
  9. ↑ Mileant, Bishop Alexander (29 June 2005). "Celibacy, Marriage or "free love" – Which way to choose?". https://www.pravmir.com/celibacy-marriage-or-free-love-which-way-to-choose/. 
  10. ↑ Chrysostom, John (1889). "Homily 19 on First Corinthians". in Schaff, Philip. Homilies on First Corinthians. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/220119.htm. 
  11. ↑ Kazhdan, A. P (1991). The Oxford dictionary of Byzantium. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504652-8. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:oxfbyzan. Retrieved 2010-05-18. 
  12. ↑ Ferguson, Everett; Michael P McHugh; Frederick W Norris (1997). Encyclopedia of Early Christianity. Garland reference library of the humanities; v. 1839 (2nd ed.). New York: Garland Pub.. ISBN 0-8153-1663-1. 
  13. ↑ Hopko, Thomas (2006). Christian Faith and Same-Sex Attraction: Eastern Orthodox Reflections. Ben Lomond, Calif.: Conciliar Press. ISBN 1-888212-75-6. 
  14. ↑ "Synodal Affirmations on Marriage, Family, Sexuality, and the Sanctity of Life". July 1992. http://www.oca.org/DOCmarriage.asp?SID=12&ID=26. 
  15. ↑ Tanner, Norman P., ed (1990). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. 1. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 135–136. ISBN 9780878404902. https://brill.com/display/title/11945. 
  16. ↑ John of Damascus (2003). Three Treatises on the Divine Images. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. pp. 23–25. ISBN 9780881412451. 
  17. ↑ Ouspensky, Leonid; Lossky, Vladimir (1982). The Meaning of Icons. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. pp. 30–33. ISBN 9780913836774. https://archive.org/details/meaningoficons0000ousp/page/12/mode/2up. 
  18. ↑ Brubaker, Leslie; Haldon, John (2011). Byzantium in the Iconoclast Era (ca 680–850): The Sources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 9780521430937. https://www.routledge.com/Byzantium-in-the-Iconoclast-Era-ca-680-850-The-Sources-An-Annotated-Survey/Brubaker-Haldon/p/book/9781315260976. 
  19. ↑ Tanner, Norman P., ed (1990). Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. 1. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 135–142. ISBN 9780878404902. https://brill.com/display/title/11945. 



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Religion:Eastern_Orthodox_view_of_sin&oldid=4426494"