Social:Inanna of Zabalam

Short description: Mesopotamian goddess, hypostasis of Inanna

Inanna of Zabalam
Tutelary goddess of Zabalam
A foundation figurine dedicated to Inanna of Zabalam from the reign of Warad-Sin of Larsa
Other names	Supālītum, Sugallītu, Nin-Zabalam
Major cult center	Zabalam, Larsa
Personal information
Children	Shara

Inanna of Zabalam (also Supālītum, Sugallītu, Nin-Zabalam) was a hypostasis of the Mesopotamian goddess Inanna associated with the city of Zabalam. It has been proposed that she was initially a separate deity, perhaps known under the name Nin-UM, who came to be absorbed by the goddess of Uruk at some point in the prehistory of Mesopotamia and lost her unknown original character in the process, though in certain contexts she nonetheless could still be treated as distinct. She was regarded as the mother of Shara, the god of Umma, a city located near Zabalam.

The worship of Inanna of Zabalam is already attested in the early texts from the Uruk period, which makes her one of the oldest tutelary goddesses of specific cities known from Mesopotamian sources. Her temple was known under the ceremonial name Gigunna. It is attested in sources from Early Dynastic, Sargonic and Ur III periods, and from various literary texts. Later on, she came to be associated with the city of Larsa. An inscription of king Warad-Sin mentions the construction of a temple dedicated to her, the Ekalamtanigurru, possibly identical with the older sanctuary. She is also attested in various religious texts and in theophoric names from Larsa. Further cities where she was worshiped in the Old Babylonian period include Nippur, Uruk, Isin, Kisurra and Babylon. It is presumed that her main cult center, Zabalam, was eventually abandoned, though she is still mentioned in documents from the reign of the First Sealand dynasty and references to various temples dedicated to her occur in the Canonical Temple List from the subsequent Kassite period.

Origin and names

Inanna of Zabalam is among the oldest attested examples of distinct manifestations of deities tied to specific geographical locations. She was the tutelary goddess of the city of Zabalam, also known as Sugal in Akkadian (modern Tell Ibzeikh in Iraq). It is agreed that while to a degree the local manifestations of Inanna shared a "common essence," they also could have distinct, unique traits, and interpretations presenting them as facets of one goddess or as distinct figures could coexist. For example, in the Weidner god list, Inanna of Zabalam occurs separately from Inanna herself and Dumuzi, alongside other local manifestations, which might indicate in this context she was not strictly viewed as a hypostasis, but rather as a separate local goddess.

According to Joan Goodnick Westenholz, the original character of the tutelary goddess of Zabalam was lost prior to the beginning of recorded history in a process in which "her selfhood was swallowed up by that of Inana of Uruk." While it is presumed that many cities adopted the cult of Inanna from Uruk in the Uruk period already, in Zabalam the introduction of the Urukean goddess might have resulted in such a situation due to the geographic proximity of both cities. Westenholz suggests her original name might have been Nin-UM, attested in the zame hymns from the Early Dynastic period. Antoine Cavigneaux and Manfred Krebernik in the corresponding entry in Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie maintain more caution, and refer to Nin-UM neutrally as a deity, rather than specifically a goddess, though they accept the name might refer to a hypostasis of Inanna in all contexts it is attested in. The meaning of the name Nin-UM is unknown, and a connection with the month name ne-UM from the local calendar of Ur has been ruled out.

Inanna of Zabalam could be referred to with the name Supālītum (Supallītu), derived from the Akkadian spelling of the toponym, and through a folk etymology connected with the word supālu (sāpalu), "juniper." It was commonly used in Babylonian lexical texts. It occurs in the god list An = Anum as explanation of ^dInanna-su-bala^ki (tablet IV, line 134). A second similar name was Sugallītu (Šugallītu; "she of Zabalam"), whose spelling might have been influenced by the term Esugal, referring to a ziggurat dedicated to Ishtar located in the city of Akkad, or alternatively by the word sukkallu. The latter name could be written logographically as ^dZU.GAL or ^dSU.GAL. A further possible name, ^dZA-BA-AD, perhaps to be read as DIĜIR Zabalam, "the goddess of Zabalam," has been identified on an exercise tablet from Susa. Texts from Umma from the Ur III period also use the epithet Nin-Zabalam, "lady of Zabalam," especially when referring to the worship of this goddess in the settlement A-ka-sal₄^ki.

Associations with other deities

The god Shara, commonly referred to simply as a son of Inanna in modern literature aimed at general audiences, was specifically regarded as the son of the goddess of Zabalam. The translation of the only passage mentioning his father is uncertain. Julia M. Asher-Greve suggests this tradition was a secondary development, and Shara was only assigned to Inanna as a son to make it possible to refer to her with the epithet ama, mother, though she also notes it was seemingly not related to motherhood, but rather to senior position in the pantheon and authority over specific cities. Manuel Molina instead assumes that it reflected the close relation between their respective cult centers.

An inscription of Warad-Sin refers to Inanna of Zabalam as a daughter of Suen. The circle of deities associated with her also included Apiriĝmaḫ, as well as two goddesses attested in an analogous role in Uruk, Ninshubur and Nanaya.

In the Zame hymns, Nin-UM, possibly identical with Inanna of Zabalam, appears in association with the god Ištaran. She is also equated with Inanna-kur, an early hypostasis of Inanna known already from sources from the Uruk period. However, the latter also maintained an independent identity and could be instead linked with ^dMen, a deity presumed to be a deified crown.

Worship

Early history

The oldest evidence for the existence of Zabalam and for the worship of its tutelary goddess comes from the Uruk III period (c. 3100 – 2900 BCE). The name of the city was written in cuneiform logographically as MUŠ₃.UNUG, following a typical early pattern in which the combination of the name of a local deity, in this case, Inanna (MUŠ₃) and the sign "sanctuary" (UNUG) was used to render the name of city. Analogously, Larsa was rendered as UTU. UNUG and Ur - NANNA_x.UNUG. Later on the sign ZA was added as a phonetic indicator, though the writing continued to be variable until the Old Babylonian period. The only other female tutelary deities of specific cities known from comparably early sources as Inanna of Zabalam are Inanna of Uruk, Nanshe, Ezina and Nisaba.

Third millennium BCE

Inanna of Zabalam belonged to the local pantheon of the state (later province) of Umma, though as noted by Manuel Molina, her cult likely had "supraregional" significance already in the late Uruk period. In the Early Dynastic period she appears in the zame hymns, and one of the strophes directly identifies her with Nin-UM, her possible earlier name.

Literary texts such as Inanna's Descent and the hymn Inanna F indicate that Inanna's temple in Zabalam was known as Gigunna (Gi-gun₄^ki-na). In the Sargonic period, it was rebuilt by Naram-Sin or Shar-Kali-Sharri. However, only remnants of a later Old Babylonian structure have been found during excavations, last of which took part in 2001–2002 on behalf of State Board of Antiquities and Heritage of Iraq, but further research on the site is not possible due to extensive looting in the aftermath of the Iraq War rendering it "almost completely destroyed and virtually irrecoverable to archaeology." The temple was seemingly the center of economic activity of the city. Most of the documents which presumably originated in Zabalam come from the temple's archive, though provenance is often difficult to establish due to the entire area surrounding ancient Umma and Zabalam being affected by looting.

According to textual sources in the Ur III period the temple was nominally maintained by the governor of Umma, though the city of Zabalam was effectively under direct control of the royal family due to its religious and economic significance for the state. Queen Abi-simti was known for her devotion to Inanna of Zabalam, despite not originating in this city. However, she did own a house there, and it is possible that an estate of the royal family was located nearby. Texts from Umma from the same period indicate that Inanna of Zabalam ("Nin-Zabalam") was also worshiped in the settlement A-ka-sal₄^ki, and mention a gudu₄ priest and a herdsman in her service.

Second millennium BCE

Inanna of Zabalam retained her religious importance after the fall of the Third Dynasty of Ur, during the successive periods of the reigns of dynasties of Isin, Larsa and Babylon. She came to be strongly associated with the second of these three cities. A year formula of Warad-Sin of Larsa mentions the construction of a temple dedicated to her, the Ekalamtanigurru, "house which inspires dread in the land," according to Andrew R. George possibly to be identified with the earlier structure in Zabalam rebuilt by Shar-Kali-Shari. In the city of Larsa, she and a local manifestation of Inanna, "Queen-of-Larsa," were worshiped separately from each other. Her cult involved maḫḫûm (prophetic "ecstatics"), who are otherwise sparsely attested in southern Mesopotamia, and more commonly occur in texts from the west. Apparently both men and women could fulfill this function. Under the name Šugallītu, Inanna of Zabalam also appears in a greeting formula in a letter from this city (alongside Shamash), in a wisdom text mentioning offerings made to her, and in theophoric names such as Ubar-Šugallītu, Warad-Šugallītu, Šugallītu-gamil (in all cases the spellings used are logographic) and Kuk-Šugallītum (the theonym is spelled syllabically; the first element is Elamite).

Inanna of Zabalam was also worshiped in Nippur, Isin and Uruk. There are also references to the worship of "Inanna-Zabalam of Uruk" in Larsa. She additionally seemingly came to be viewed as one of the tutelary deities of the city Umma. Earlier this role belonged only to Shara and Ninura. A loan document mentions a month named after her, ITI na-ab-ri-ì (from nabrium, a type of festival) ša su-ga-li-ti-im. It comes from the early Old Babylonian period, though its point of origin is difficult to ascertain, and various features of the text might point at the influence of traditions of Mari or the Diyala area. According to Witold Tyborowski, it might have been a variant name of a month in the local calendar of Kisurra. The theophoric element Sugallitum can be found in a single name from this city, Amat-Sugallitum.

In Zabalam itself, Hammurabi of Babylon built a temple named Ezikalamma ("house - the life of the land"), as indicated by inscribed bricks found during excavations. References to the goddess of Zabalam also occur in sources from the capital of his kingdom. A priest of Sugallîtum is attested in a text from this city from the late Old Babylonian period, in which he acts as a witness. It has been suggested that his presence in Babylon was the result of the arrival of refugees from Larsa.

After the Old Babylonian period, Zabalam was likely abandoned. However, the archives of the First Sealand dynasty still contain references to offerings made to ^dINANA NIN-SU.GAL, "Inanna-lady-of-Zabalam." According to Manfred Krebernik, a reference to ^dŠu-gal-li-tum also occurs in an incantation postdating the Old Babylonian period in an enumeration of various names of Ishtar. In the Canonical Temple List, most likely composed in the Kassite period, cult centers of Inanna of Zabalam (referred to as Supālītum) are listed in a separate short section. They include the Etemennigurru (location unknown; entry 319), the Esusuĝarra ("house where meals are set out"), likely in Uruk (entry 320), the E.AN-kum in an unknown location (entry 321), and the Egigunna in Muru (entry 322). In a lamentation, the Esiguz, "house of goat hair," located in Guabba, is associated with her.

References

Bibliography

• Asher-Greve, Julia M.; Westenholz, Joan G. (2013). Goddesses in Context: On Divine Powers, Roles, Relationships and Gender in Mesopotamian Textual and Visual Sources. ISBN 978-3-7278-1738-0. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/135436/1/Asher-Greve_Westenholz_2013_Goddesses_in_Context.pdf. Retrieved 2022-10-24. 
• Barberon, Lucile (2014). "To Dedicate or Marry a Nadîtu-Woman of Marduk in Old Babylonian Society". La famille dans le Proche-Orient ancien: réalités, symbolismes et images. Penn State University Press. pp. 267–274. doi:10.1515/9781575068886-019. ISBN 9781575068886. 
• Black, Jeremy; Green, Anthony (1992). Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary. The British Museum Press. ISBN 0-7141-1705-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=05LXAAAAMAAJ. Retrieved 2022-10-24. 
• Boivin, Odette (2018). The First Dynasty of the Sealand in Mesopotamia. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9781501507823. ISBN 978-1-5015-0782-3. 
• Cavigneaux, Antoine; Krebernik, Manfred (1998) (in de) 
• Cavigneaux, Antoine; Krebernik, Manfred (1998a) (in de) 
• Frayne, Douglas (1990). Old Babylonian Period (2003-1595 B.C.). The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia. University of Toronto Press. doi:10.3138/9781442678033. ISBN 978-1-4426-7803-3. 
• George, Andrew R. (1993). House most high: the temples of ancient Mesopotamia. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. ISBN 0-931464-80-3. OCLC 27813103. 
• Huber Vulliet, Fabienne (2011) (in fr) 
• Krebernik, Manfred (2013) (in de) 
• Krebernik, Manfred (2013a) (in de) 
• Krebernik, Manfred (2016) (in de) 
• Michalowski, Piotr (1986). "An Early Old Babylonian Loan Document". Journal of Cuneiform Studies (American Schools of Oriental Research) 38 (2): 167–171. doi:10.2307/1359798. ISSN 0022-0256. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1359798. Retrieved 2022-10-21. 
• Molina, Manuel (2016) 
• Powell, Marvin A. (1976). "Evidence for Local Cults at Presargonic Zabala". Orientalia (GBPress - Gregorian Biblical Press) 45: 100–104. ISSN 0030-5367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43074689. Retrieved 2022-10-21. 
• Pryke, Louise M. (2017). Ishtar. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138--86073-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=fggqDwAAQBAJ. Retrieved 2022-10-24. 
• Sharlach, Tonia (2021). "Local and Imported Religion at Ur Late in the Reign of Shulgi". Ur in the Twenty-First Century CE. Penn State University Press. pp. 429–440. doi:10.1515/9781646021512-031. ISBN 9781646021512. https://www.academia.edu/60085141. 
• Sibbing-Plantholt, Irene (2022). The Image of Mesopotamian Divine Healers. Healing Goddesses and the Legitimization of Professional Asûs in the Mesopotamian Medical Marketplace. Boston: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-51241-2. OCLC 1312171937. 
• Tyborowski, Witold (2013). "New Tablets from Kisurra and the Chronology of Central Babylonia in the Early Old Babylonian Period". Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie (Walter de Gruyter GmbH) 102 (2): 245–269. doi:10.1515/za-2012-0014. ISSN 1613-1150. 
• Waetzoldt, Hartmut (2014) (in de) 
• Westenholz, Joan Goodnick; Westenholz, Aage (2006). Cuneiform inscriptions in the collection of the Bible Lands Museum Jerusalem: the old Babylonian inscriptions. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-474-0838-3. OCLC 320326253.