Unsolved:List of scientific debates

From HandWiki
Short description: none

This is a list of notable scientific debates in the history of science and mathematics.

Biology

Chemistry and nanoscience

Mathematics

Physics and astronomy

Philosophy of science

Theology and science

See also

  • List of scientific priority disputes
  • Math wars

References

  1. Roe, Shirley A. (1985). "Voltaire Versus Needham: Atheism, Materialism, and the Generation of Life". Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (1): 65–87. doi:10.2307/2709776. ISSN 0022-5037. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2709776?seq=1. 
  2. Appel, Toby A. (1987-03-26) (in en). The Cuvier-Geoffrey Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-536480-4. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/The_Cuvier_Geoffrey_Debate/-BwUGDw1pQcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Cuvier%E2%80%93Geoffroy+debate&printsec=frontcover. 
  3. "The Great Debate" (in en). https://oumnh.ox.ac.uk/great-debate. 
  4. "From the Archives: 'I’ll let him know his place in nature'" (in en). https://www.linnean.org/news/2022/06/29/from-the-archives-ill-let-him-know-his-place-in-nature. 
  5. Bueno, Otávio (2006), "The drexler-smalley debate on nanotechnology: incommensurability at work?", Nanotechnology Challenges (WORLD SCIENTIFIC): pp. 29–48, doi:10.1142/9789812773975_0003, ISBN 978-981-256-729-1, https://worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812773975_0003, retrieved 2025-01-31 
  6. "History of Probability | Research Starters | EBSCO Research" (in en). https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/mathematics/history-probability. 
  7. Jesseph, Douglas (2018-10-10). "Geometry, religion and politics: context and consequences of the Hobbes–Wallis dispute". Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 72 (4): 469–486. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2018.0026. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsnr.2018.0026. 
  8. Goldstine, H. H. (2012-12-06) (in en). A History of Numerical Analysis from the 16th through the 19th Century. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4684-9472-3. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/A_History_of_Numerical_Analysis_from_the/r7ffBwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=leibniz+and+bernoulli+negative+logarithms&pg=PA121&printsec=frontcover. 
  9. "First Links in the Markov Chain" (in en). 2017-02-06. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/first-links-in-the-markov-chain. 
  10. Hellman, Hal (2010-12-17) (in en). Great Feuds in Mathematics: Ten of the Liveliest Disputes Ever. Turner Publishing Company. ISBN 978-1-118-04011-9. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Great_Feuds_in_Mathematics/UIDuEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0. 
  11. Carl, J. Posy (1998). "Brouwer versus Hilbert: 1907–1928" (in en). Science in Context 11 (2): 291–325. doi:10.1017/S0269889700003021. ISSN 1474-0664. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/science-in-context/article/abs/brouwer-versus-hilbert-19071928/F4176AACA951F91DF54D853386C4DF6D. 
  12. "20th WCP: Leibniz's Theory of Space in the Correspondence with Clarke and the Existence of Vacuums". https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Mode/ModeMalz.htm. 
  13. Darrigol, Olivier (2005). Worlds of flow : a history of hydrodynamics from the Bernoullis to Prandtl. Internet Archive. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-856843-8. https://archive.org/details/worldsofflowhist0000darr/mode/2up?q=debate. 
  14. Darrigol, Olivier (2002). "Stability and instability in nineteenth-century fluid mechanics" (in en). Revue d'histoire des mathématiques 8 (1): 5–65. ISSN 1777-568X. https://www.numdam.org/item/RHM_2002__8_1_5_0/. 
  15. Lindley, David (2015-12-19) (in en). Boltzmanns Atom: The Great Debate That Launched A Revolution In Physics. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-5011-4267-3. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Boltzmanns_Atom/I3DkCgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0. 
  16. "This Month in Physics History" (in en). https://www.aps.org/archives/publications/apsnews/200004/history.cfm. 
  17. Earman, John; Janssen, Michel; Norton, John D. (1993-12-01) (in en). The Attraction of Gravitation: New Studies in the History of General Relativity. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-8176-3624-1. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/The_Attraction_of_Gravitation/mCOtbqBPNhQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22bad+nauheim%22+lenard+gehrcke&pg=PA248&printsec=frontcover. 
  18. Ball, Phillip (2024-04-10). "Entangled entities: Bohr, Einstein and the battle over quantum fundamentals" (in en-GB). https://physicsworld.com/a/entangled-entities-bohr-einstein-and-the-battle-over-quantum-fundamentals/. 
  19. "Chandrasekhar Eddington" (in en). https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Chandrasekhar_Eddington/. 
  20. Hiscott, Laura (2021-12-22). "Two scientists' debate over whether the universe had a beginning – and how the elements were created" (in en-GB). https://physicsworld.com/a/two-scientists-debate-over-whether-the-universe-had-a-beginning-and-how-the-elements-were-created/. 
  21. Fuller, Steve (2006) (in en). Kuhn Vs Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science. Icon Books. ISBN 978-1-84046-722-2. https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Kuhn_Vs_Popper/AValPwAACAAJ?hl=en. 
  22. Chappell, Bill (2014-02-06). "Who 'Won' The Creation Vs. Evolution Debate?" (in en). NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/02/06/272535141/who-won-the-creation-vs-evolution-debate.