Biology:Cymbospondylus

From HandWiki
Revision as of 00:19, 12 February 2024 by WikiEd2 (talk | contribs) (fixing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Extinct genus of reptiles

Cymbospondylus
Temporal range: Middle Triassic, Middle to Late Anisian
Cymbospondylus buchseri skeleton 01.jpg
Partial holotype skeleton of C. buchseri (PIMUZ T 4351), on display at the Paleontological Museum of the University of Zurich, Switzerland .
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: †Ichthyosauria
Family: †Cymbospondylidae
Genus: †Cymbospondylus
Leidy, 1868
Species
Synonyms

Cymbospondylus (meaning "cupped vertebrae") is an extinct genus of large ichthyosaurs, of which he is among the oldest representatives, that lived during the Anisian stage of the Middle Triassic in what are now North America and Europe. The first known fossils of this taxon are a set of more or less complete vertebrae which were discovered in the 19th century in various mountain ranges of Nevada, in the United States , before being named and described by Joseph Leidy in 1868. It is in the beginning of the 20th century that more complete fossils were discovered through several expeditions launched by the University of California, and described in more detail by John Campbell Merriam in 1908, thus visualizing the overall anatomy of the animal. While many species have been assigned to the genus, only five are recognized as valid, the others being considered synonymous, doubtful or belonging to other genera. Cymbospondylus was formerly classified as a representative of the Shastasauridae, but more recent studies consider it to be more basal, view as the type genus of the Cymbospondylidae.

As an ichthyosaur, Cymbospondylus had flippers for limbs and a fin on the tail. Like other non-parvipelvian ichthyosaurs, Cymbospondylus has a very slender profile, unlike later ichthyosaurs which have a morphology similar to those of dolphins. The different species of Cymbospondylus vary greatly in size, with the smallest reaching around 4 metres (13 ft) to 5 metres (16 ft) in length. The largest known species, C. youngorum, is estimated to be around 17 metres (56 ft) long, making Cymbospondylus one of the largest ichthyosaurs identified to date, but also one of the largest animals known of its time. The animal has a skull with a long, thin snout, proportionally small eye sockets, an elongated trunk, and a less pronounced tail than in later ichthyosaurs. The teeth are conical and pointed, having longitudinal ridges, indicating a diet of fishes and cephalopods, and possibly other marine reptiles for larger species.

Research history

Discovery and identification

In 1868, American paleontologist Joseph Leidy described two new genera of ichthyosaurs dating from the Middle Triassic on the basis of fossil vertebrae discovered in several localities in Nevada, United States , all of which were transmitted through the geologist Josiah Dwight Whitney. One of the two genera he names is Cymbospondylus, to which he assigns two species. The first one is C. piscosus, which Leidy named on the basis of several more or less complete vertebrae having been discovered in different mountain ranges of the state.[1] The holotype of C. piscosus is a block containing five incomplete dorsal vertebrae that was discovered in the New Pass Range, northwest of the city of Austin.[2][3][4][lower-alpha 1] Leidy attributes two other specimens to the species, one being a series of eight caudal vertebrae discovered at Star Canyon in the Humboldt Range, and the other being a single vertebrae, probably also caudal, discovered in the Toiyabe Range, in the Reese River, northeast of Austin. The second species is C. petrinus, named from five large dorsal vertebrae discovered in the Humboldt Range.[1] The genus name Cymbospondylus derives from the Ancient Greek words κύμβη (kymbē, "cup") and σπόνδυλος (spondylos, "vertebra"), all taken together literally meaning cupped vertebrae, in reference to the rather obvious shape of this part of the skeleton.[5] As no type species was designated in the 1868 article, it was not until 1902 that John Campbell Merriam assigned C. piscosus to this title,[6] the latter being the first named in Leidy's official description of the genus.[1]

Drawing of a gray ichthyosaur skull on a white background
Drawing of an ichthyosaur skeleton on white background
Sketches representing the skull and fossil skeleton of UCMP 9950, one of the specimens of C. petrinus having been discovered during expeditions led by the University of California at the beginning of the 20th century

Between 1901 and 1907, the University of California sent ten expeditions across different corners of the United States to recover as many ichthyosaur fossils as possible dating from the Triassic, in order to be analyzed in more detail. These same expeditions were led by Merriam and were almost all financed by Annie Montague Alexander. The research finally collected more than fifty specimens, each preserving a significant portion of their skeletons.[7] Among these fossils are several specimens of excellent quality from C. petrinus, including an almost complete skeleton, cataloged as UCMP 9950, all discovered in the origin locality mentioned by Leidy. Like the other ichthyosaurs mentioned in the work, Merriam describes the taxon in more depth based on new known fossil material.[8][9] Merriam's anatomical descriptions of C. petrinus are still recognized as viable, and are even used in comparative anatomy in later studies of the genus Cymbospondylus, thus lending validity to the species.[3][10][4][11][12]

Unlike C. petrinus, no additional fossils of the type species C. piscosus have been discovered. In Merriam's works, the latter recognized C. piscosus as distinct on the basis of its smaller size and by the regularly concave faces of the vertebrae of the holotype specimen.[6][13] Only later did the validity of C. piscosus begin to be questioned, with authors mentioning the questionable nature of the fossils.[3] In their work published in 2003, Christopher McGowan and Ryosuke Motani assert that the fossil vertebrae attributed to C. piscosus do not present distinctive characteristics to prove its validity. This would therefore pose a taxonomic problem, because if the type species turns out to be a nomen dubium, the genus to which it is classified will also be. To try to resolve this problem, the two authors suggest that the most complete known skeleton of C. petrinus (UCMP 9950) could be designated as a neotype of C. piscosus.[14] However, as no formal ICZN appeal has been established to date, the name C. petrinus for the proposed neotype should be retained until further notice.[4] In 2017, Andrzej Stefan Wolniewicz referred all additional fossil material described by Merriam to C. piscosus and synonymized C. petrinus to the latter.[15] However, As the proposal remains restricted to a PhD thesis, it is defined as an unpublished work per Article 8 of the ICZN and therefore is not formally valid.[16][17] Therefore, C. piscosus is not included in most descriptions of the genus, although it is still recognized as the type species.[11][12]

Recognized species

In 1927, a partial skeleton of a large ichthyosaur was discovered in the Grenzbitumenzone Member at the Monte San Giorgio fossil site in Switzerland and was mentioned by Bernhard Peyer in 1944.[18] Twenty years later, in 1964, Emil Kuhn-Schnyder (de) published a photo of this same specimen and suggested that it shared affinities with Cymbospondylus, then only known from North America at that time.[19] The specimen in question, cataloged as PIMUZ T 4351, was formally described for the first time in 1989 under the name C. buchseri by Paul Martin Sander (de), thus confirming the presence of the genus in Europe. The specific epithet buchseri is named in honor of Fritz Buchser, a member of the Museum of Paleontology at the University of Zurich, the latter having prepared the holotype skeleton in 1931 as his first major professional achievement.[3]

Partial holotype skeleton of C. nichollsi (FMNH PR 2251), on display at the Field Museum, Chicago

While C. petrinus was for a time seen as the only valid species of the genus known from Nevada, it was not until the early 21st century that later discoveries contradicted this assertion. In 2006, Nadia Fröbisch and colleagues described the species C. nichollsi based on an incomplete skeleton, cataloged as FMNH PR 2251, which was discovered in the Augusta Mountains. The fossil was originally exhumed in the hope of finding a new specimen of C. petrinus, but the number of significant anatomical differences led researchers to establish a separate species. The species in question is named in honor to Elizabeth Nicholls, an American-Canada paleontologist specializing in Triassic marine reptiles, who made a major contribution to the ichthyosaurs that lived during this period.[4][5] In their description, Fröbisch and his colleagues consider that an almost complete skull attributed to C. petrinus, cataloged as UCMP 9913,[lower-alpha 2] could in fact belong to C. nichollsi, because it presents similar characteristics. However, as the specimen has been relatively little described in the scientific literature, the authors do not know whether it would show intraspecific variations within C. petrinus, judging therefore that a more in-depth description is necessary.[4] Subsequent studies carried out on the genus Cymbospondylus nevertheless always refer specimen UCMP 9913 to C. petrinus,[21] but still mentioning some notable differences.[11]

In 2011, a notable new Cymbospondylus fossil was also discovered in the Augusta Mountains, then exhumed three years later in 2014. This discovery was a partial skeleton that was briefly mentioned in a 2013 in a secondary article describing the large contemporary ichthyosaur Thalattoarchon,[22] as well as in a 2018 histological study, where it is among the specimens analyzed.[23] However, it was only later that the specimen, cataloged as LACM DI 158109, was formally designated a holotype for the species C. duelferi by Nicole Klein and colleagues in 2020. The species name duelferi was chosen in honor of Olaf Dülfer, fossil preparer who made many practical contributions to research on Mesozoic marine reptiles.[11][5]

In 1998, still in the Augusta Mountains, Sander discovered another notable specimen of Cymbospondylus, and exhumed it with his colleagues between 2014 and 2015.[21] After preparation of the fossils, the specimen, cataloged as LACM DI 157871, consists of a large complete skull, some cervical vertebrae, the right humerus as well as fragments of the shoulder girdle. It was in 2021, just one year after the identification of C. duelferi, that a new species of the genus was named from this specimen in Science Magazine by Sander and his colleagues.[12] This species, C. youngorum, is named in honor of Tom and Bonda Young,[12] these latter having financially supported the fossil exhumation project.[24] However, in their main article, the anatomical description of this taxon is limited and is mainly focused on the evolution of the size of the oldest ichthyosaurs,[12] the detailed anatomical descriptions being documented in a secondary article.[21]

Specimens that may belong to the genus

Cymbospondylus is located in Earth
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
Cymbospondylus
class=notpageimage|
The various points on the map show the localities where Cymbospondylus fossils have been discovered: the orange points represent the recognized North American species, the red point represents C. buchseri and the turquoise points the possible other specimens of the genus[3][10][25][4][11][12]

Many other more partial specimens of Cymbospodylus have been discovered in various geological formations in Europe, but their specific attribution cannot be determined, the latter are then referred to under the name Cymbospondylus sp. in the scientific literature. Below, the list of specimens that could potentially belong to Cymbospondylus according to a listing made by Marco Balini and Silvio C. Renesto in 2012:[25]

  • In 1980, Kuhn-Schnyder described an anterior partial skeleton of an ichthyosaur discovered in Monte Seceda (it), Italy. The described specimen was first referred by the author to Shastasaurus sp.,[26] before being referred to Cymbospondylus in the official description of C. buchseri by Sander in 1989,[3] an attribution which seems to still be recognized today.[25]
  • In 1992, Sander described two specimens attributed to Cymbospondylus having been discovered in different localities of Spitsbergen, located in the Norway archipelago of Svalbard. The first and the better preserved of the two specimens described in the article, consists of a series of 17 vertebrae associated with ribs which was discovered in 1961 in the Botneheia mountain, being cataloged as PIMUZ A/III 496. The second consists of two isolated vertebrae, cataloged as PIMUZ A/III 554 and 555, which were both discovered in the bay of Wichebukta.[27]
  • In 2001, Olivier Rieppel and Fabio Marco Dalla Vecchia listed a set of fossils of marine reptiles from the Triassic and having been discovered in the comune of Forni di Sotto, in Italy, including two that they attributed with doubt to Cymbospondylus. The first of these collections consists of a single vertebra, a neural spine and three rib fragments, while the second consists of two isolated vertebrae.[28]
  • In 2012, Balini and Renesto described four more or less partial vertebrae attributed to Cymbospondylus which were discovered in the comune of Piazza Brembana, in Italy, being cataloged MCSNB 11689 A, B, C, and D.[25]

Formerly assigned species

Although many valid and distinct species have been assigned to Cymbospondylus throughout its taxonomic history, some of these have been reassigned to different genera or are considered synonymous or even doubtful.[4] In his 1868 paper describing Cymbospondylus, Leidy also named another ichthyosaur as Chonespondylus grandis, based on a fragment of a caudal vertebra found at Star Canyon in the Humboldt Range.[1] In 1902, Merriam listed Leidy's discoveries, but having found no features distinguishing Chonespondylus from Cymbospondylus, he decided to synonymize the first name with the second, under the name C. (?) grandis.[6] In 1908, after the discovery of new very complete fossils from C. petrinus, Merriam decided to definitively synonymize C. (?) grandis with the latter.[29][4] In 1873, John Whitaker Hulke described a species of Ichthyosaurus, I. polaris, named after two sets of vertebrae associated with rib fragments that were discovered on Isfjorden, Spitsbergen, an island in Norway .[30] In 1902, the Russia n paleontologist Nikolai Nikolajewitch Yakowlew moved the species within the genus Shastasaurus, referring an isolated vertebra to this taxon.[31] In 1908, Merriam in turn moved this species into the genus Cymbospondylus, under the name C. (?) polaris. Merriam still expresses some hesitation about this attribution, asserting that the true generic identity cannot be determined for this species due to the few known fossils.[32] In 1910, the species was moved to the newly erected genus Pessosaurus by Carl Wiman, as P. polaris,[33] to which it has always been referred by this name ever since. Although this taxon is declared as a nomen dubium according to studies published at the end of the 20th century, it is seen as a species inquirenda according to McGowan and Motani in 2003, i.e. a taxon under investigation, as numerous fossils that have since been referred to P. polaris could make it once again as valid.[34]

Still in his 1908 work, Merriam erects two new species of the genus, coming from the same locality from which C. petrinus is known. The first is C. nevadanus, named from fossils constituting a hind limb. Merriam distinguishes this species from C. petrinus on the basis of its larger size and the different proportions of some bones.[35] However, the C. nevadanus material is not sufficiently diagnostic to support the validity of this species, and is considered a species inquireda according to McGowan and Motani in 2003.[36][4] The second species erected by Merriam is C. natans, which he names from an isolated humerus, to which he attributes a radius, an ulna, carpals and a series of caudal vertebrae. In his article, he notes the similarity of these bones with those of Mixosaurus,[37] leading the author to rename the species to M (?) natans in 1911.[38] For much of the 20th century, M (?) natans was recognized as a valid species of Mixosaurus until 1999, when it was synonymized with M. nordenskioeldii.[39] Although M. nordenskioeldii itself has been considered a nomen dubium since 2005,[40] the fossil material concerned remains attributed to the family Mixosauridae and is no longer attributable to Cymbospondylus.[4]

In a review of German ichthyosaurs published in 1916, Friedrich von Huene described two other species of Cymbospondylus whose fossils were discovered in the Muschelkalk of the town of Laufenburg in the state of Baden-Württemberg. The first is C. germanicus, which Huene names from a single vertebra associated with other vertebrae as well as a basioccipital.[41] Immediately afterwards, the validity of C. germanicus was questioned the same year by Ferdinand Broili, the latter citing that the fossils concerned did not present notable features to be recognized as distinct.[42][4] Additionally, the fossils appear to be very poorly preserved to be distinguished as a valid species,[3] and is therefore a nomen dubium.[43][44]

Fossil skeleton of Guizhouichthyosaurus exhibited at the Geological Museum of Guizhou, China , to which one of the specimens belonging to this genus was assigned to Cymbospondylus

In 2002, paleontologists Chun Li and Hai-Lu You named a new species as C. asiaticus based on a complete skull discovered in the Xiaowa Formation, located in Guizhou Province, China , and it was considered as the most recent known representative of the genus.[45] In the official description of C. nichollsi published in 2006, the authors are doubtful regarding the attribution of this species to Cymbospondylus. They mention that the latter does not share any notable commonalities with the three then recognized species of the genus at the time, namely C. petrinus, C. buchseri and C. nichollsi, and suggest that it would in fact be a junior synonym of Guizhouichthyosaurus tangae.[4] The synonymy proposed by Fröbisch and colleagues was accepted in 2009 by Qing-Hua Shang and Li after the discovery of an almost complete skeleton of Guizhouichthyosaurus from the same formation. However, considering that Guizhouichthyosaurus is similar to Shastasaurus, they moved the species as S. tangae.[46] This synonymy was contested the following year, in 2010, in which Michael W. Maisch provisionally reclassified Guizhouichthyosaurus as a distinct genus.[47] In 2011, Sander and his colleagues considered that Guizhouichthyosaurus was distinct,[48] while a 2013 study by Shang and Li still synonymizes it with Shastasaurus.[49] However, numerous phylogenetic and morphological analyzes subsequently published consider Guizhouichthyosaurus to be distinct genus from Shastasaurus.[50][51][52][53]

Description

Life restoration of C. petrinus

Ichthyosaurs like Cymbospondylus are marine reptiles, with two pairs of flippers for limbs and a fin on the tail.[54][55] Being one of the oldest and most basal (least derived) ichthyosaurs known from the fossil record, Cymbospondylus has an anatomy very different from those of the parvipelvians, the latter presenting the archetypal anatomy of this group of this now extinct marine reptiles (long and thin snout, large eye sockets and a homocercal caudal fin). The anatomy of Cymbospondylus, like other non-parvipelvians ichthyosaurs, is more "primitive", having a poorly developed or absent dorsal fin as well a less pronounced tail.[56] In its overall anatomy, Cymbospondylus has a long trunk and a hypocercal fin.[55][57] In a simplified manner, the anatomy of Cymbospodylus is more slender, its morphology closer to that of a crocodile than a dolphin as seen in later representatives.[25] The anatomy of this type of ichthyosaur is similar to those of other marine vertebrates such as mosasaurs, marine crocodylomorphs, and archaeocete whales through convergent evolution.[58]

Size

Life restoration and size comparison of a C. youngorum with a human

The size and weight of Cymbospondylus varies greatly between recognized species.[4][11][21] Possessing a skull which would measure a total of 65–70 cm (26–28 in), C. duelferi is the smallest known species of the genus, having a size estimated at 4.3 m (170 in) long in the study officially describing it.[11] The measurements of the species are estimated again at 5 m (200 in) for a body mass of 520 kg (1,150 lb) in the secondary article by Sander and colleagues in 2021.[21] The estimated size of the C. buchseri holotype is slightly larger, reaching a length of 5.5 m (220 in) with a skull 68 cm (27 in) long, although no estimate of its weight has yet been published[3][53] Estimating the size of C. nichollsi is more complex, because although the holotype specimen is known from a significant portion of the skeleton, the latter preserves only half of the skull. However, based on the comparison with C. buchseri and C. petrinus, the total length of the skull is estimated at 97 cm (38 in) for an animal measuring 7.6 m (300 in) long,[4][11] all for a body mass of 3 metric tons (3.3 short tons)[21]

Estimates of the size of C. petrinus have changed relatively little since 1908, mainly due to the almost complete skeleton of specimen UCMP 9950, considered the best known specimen of Cymbospondylus.[59] Merriam suggests that C. petrinus would reach a size exceeding 9.1 m (360 in) in length based on specimens UCMP 9947 and 9950.[60][3][4] In 2020, Klein and colleagues increased the size estimate of C. petrinus a little further, seeing them as reaching 9.3 m (370 in) for a 1.16 m (46 in) skull.[11] In the secondary article published by Sander and colleagues in 2021, C. petrinus is estimated to be 12.56 m (494 in) long for about 5.7 t (6.3 short tons), while keeping the same cranial measurements.[21] The holotype specimen of C. youngorum having a skull measuring almost 2 m (79 in) long and its humerus being the second largest bone of this type recorded in an ichthyosaur, the maximum size of the animal is therefore estimated at 17.65 m (57.9 ft) for a weight of 44.7 metric tons (49.3 short tons).[lower-alpha 3] This estimate not only makes C. youngourum one of the largest ichthyosaurians identified to date behind Shastasaurus sikanniensis, but also makes it one of the largest animals known of its time.[12] The antiquity as well as such an imposing size for an animal dating from the beginning of the Middle Triassic makes C. youngorum qualify as "the first aquatic giant" according to Lene Liebe Delsett and Nicholas David Pyenson.[24]

Classification

The exact placement of Cymbospondylus within Ichthyosauria is poorly understood with its position varying between different studies, sometimes being recovered as more and sometimes as less derived than mixosaurids.[61] However it is agreed upon that Cymbospondylus is a rather basal member of the clade. Early phylogenies placed Cymbospondylus within Shastasauridae.[62] In the analysis of Bindellini et al. (2021), Cymbospondylus is placed at the very base of Ichthyosauria, outside the more derived members of Hueneosauria (including Mixosauridae and Shastasauridae).[53] In the publication describing C. duelferi, Klein and colleagues recovered that all species from the Fossil Hill Member in Nevada form a clade with one another.[11] The description of C. youngorum further supports this Nevadan clade, recovering C. youngorum as its most derived member while C. buchseri from Europe sits at the base of the genus. Much like in the analysis by Bindellini and colleagues, shastasaurids and mixosaurids were recovered as more derived ichthyosaurs.[12]

Like in many analyses prior, the type species was not included in the dataset due to its questionable and fragmentary nature.[12] This causes Cymbospondylus to have a very convoluted taxonomy, with it being suggested that the type species should be neglected.[4][11] The 2020 study reviewed the skull morphology of C. nichollsi and found the species to be valid, as the skull morphology accords with that of C. petrinus but is distinct enough to be separate, such as the upper temporal fenestra shape being oval in C. nichollsi but triangular in C. petrinus. In their phylogenetic analysis the authors did not recover a definite placement for C. buchseri, leading them to state that further study was needed to determine whether the Swiss species belonged to the genus.[11]

The following cladogram shows the position of Cymbospondylus within the Ichthyosauria after Sander et al., (2021):[12][21]

Ichthyosauromorpha
 

Hupehsuchus nanchangensis

 
 
 
 

Sclerocormus parviceps

 
 

Cartorhynchus lenticarpus

 
 
 
 

Chaohusaurus chaoxianensis

 
 
 

Chaohusaurus geishanensis

 
 
 

Chaohusaurus zhangjiawanensis

 
 
 

Utatsusaurus hataii

 
 
 

Grippia longirostris

 
 
 

Gulosaurus helmi

 
 
 

Parvinatator wapitiensis

 
Ichthyosauria
 

Xinminosaurus catactes

 
 
 
 

Pessopteryx nisseri

 
 
 

Cymbospondylus buchseri

 
 
 

Cymbospondylus nichollsi

 
 
 

Cymbospondylus petrinus

 
 
 

Cymbospondylus duelferi

 
 

Cymbospondylus youngorum

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mixosauridae

 
 
 

Phantomosaurus neubigi

 
 
 

Qianichthyosaurus zhoui

 
 
 

Qianichthyosaurus xingyiensis

 
 

Wimanius odontopalatus

 
 
 
Merriamosauria
 

Besanosaurus leptorhynchus

 
 
 
 

Thalattoarchon saurophagis

 
 

Shastasauridae

 
 
 
 
 
 

Guizhouichthyosaurus tangae

 
 

Shonisaurus popularis

 
 
 

Euichthyosauria

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Palaeobiology

Massare & Callaway (1990) propose that many Triassic ichthyosaurs including Cymbospondylus may have been ambush predators. They argue that the long neck and torso would create drag in water while the laterally-flattened tail lacking the lunate fluke of later ichthyosaur taxa was more suited for an undulating swimming style. In their research they suggest that the elongated flexible bodies of early ichthyosaurs were built to support an undulating swimming style while the powerful tail would provide bursts of speed, both of which they cite as being possible adaptations to ambush prey. Massare & Callaway put this in contrast with Jurassic taxa, known for their compact, dolphin-like bodies adapted for more continuous swimming favorable to pursuit predators.[63] A strikingly similar bauplan was later obtained by two other large bodied marine amniote groups, mosasaurs and archaeocete whales.

Direct evidence for its diet exists for the medium-sized Cymbospondylus buchseri from Switzerland , which was found with its stomach contents exclusively consisting of hooks belonging to soft-bodied coleoid cephalopods. However, this does not exclude the possibility that C. buchseri could have taken larger prey, as its last meal may not reflect its typical diet accurately. Bindellini and colleagues suggest that C. buchseri may have employed a more forceful feeding strategy with a slower feeding cycle and a higher biteforce, supported by the animal's robust rostrum. In the Besano Formation, Cymbospondylus would have coexisted with two other smaller ichthyosaurs, the more gracile skulled Besanosaurus and small mixosaurs. Whether or not C. buchseri would have gone after large vertebrate prey, all three taxa display clear adaptations for different hunting strategies and prey preferences, however the details of their ecologies are not yet fully understood.[53]

Examples of longirostrine ichthyosaurs of the Triassic, E is C. buchseri

For C. youngorum a generalist diet of squid and fish is inferred based on the blunt and conical teeth in combination with the elongated rostrum. However, as with C. buchseri, Sander et al. entertain the possibility that C. youngorum could have fed on large-bodied vertebrates as well, including the other Cymbospondylus species of the region.[12]

Cymbospondylus was especially diverse in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret and Prida formations of Nevada, which preserves a pelagic environment from the middle to late Anisian (ca. 246 - 242 million years ago). The Fossil Hill Member specifically preserves some of the greatest ichthyosaur diversity recorded, with eight distinct taxa present. This includes four species of Cymbospondylus, the early macropredatory Thalattoarchon, the small Phalarodon fraasi and P. callawayi as well as the poorly understood Omphalosaurus. Other animals present in the environment include a single sauropterygian, Augustasaurus hagdorni, halobiid bivalves but only few remains of fish. However this may be due to preservation bias. Despite this abundance of amniote fossils, analysis of the preserved ecosystem indicates that the Fossil Hill Member represents a stable food web largely dominated by said amniotes, occupying niches held by fish in modern marine ecosystems. Furthermore, the analysis conducted by Eva Maria Griebeler in the study of Sander and colleagues indicates the presence of an energy surplus, which may indicate the presence of an as of yet unknown animal in the Fossil Hill fauna or that this energy surplus may have been exploited by animals that evolved later. The ecosystem could have supported another giant marine reptile, assuming it were a bulk feeder specialised on small prey that's lower in the food chain. Such an animal could have for example been a filter feeder, a niche not yet occupied by any animal in the fauna of the Fossil Hill Member.[12]

Bindellini and colleagues notes that shastasaurid diversity may have profited from the extinction of Cymbospondylus, such as the Carnian of China, known to have supported three ecologically different shastasaurids but no examples of cymbospondylids, which had gone extinct by that time.[53]

Reproduction

The holotype of C. duelferi preserves three small strings of articulated vertebrae located within the trunk region of the specimen.[11] These vertebrae, which are only a third the size of the adult specimen, have been interpreted to represent the remains of three fetuses, with one specimen specifically facing towards the rear end of the putative mother. Following this interpretation, Cymbospondylus would have given live birth to a minimum of three offspring.[citation needed]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Leidy gives a slightly different description of the holotype in his 1868 paper, stating that it had only four dorsal vertebrae, due to the preservation of the fossil block.[1]
  2. ↑ This specimen is one of the several additional C. petrinus fossils described by Meriam in 1908.[20]
  3. ↑ Sander and colleagues estimate animal size based on the 95 % prediction interval in C. youngorum. Two additional estimates were also made by the team. The prediction interval less than 95 % gives a length of 12.5 m (41 ft) for a weight of 14.7 metric tons (16.2 short tons), while that which is greater than 95 % gives a length of 25 m (82 ft) for a weight of 135.8 metric tons (149.7 short tons).[12] As estimates do not come close to 95 %, these measurements are not considered to be the probable maximum sizes of C. youngorum.[21]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Joseph Leidy (1868). "Notice of some reptilian remains from Nevada". Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences 20: 177-178. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/9768327#page/185/mode/1up. 
  2. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 123.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 P. Martin Sander (1989). "The large ichthyosaur Cymbospondylus buchseri, sp. nov., from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland), with a survey of the genus in Europe". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9 (2): 163-173. doi:10.1080/02724634.1989.10011750. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254313617. 
  4. ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 Nadia Fröbisch; P. Martin Sander; Olivier Rieppel (2006). "A new species of Cymbospondylus (Diapsida, Ichthyosauria) from the Middle Triassic of Nevada and a re-evaluation of the skull osteology of the genus". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 147 (4): 515-538. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00225.x. 
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 "Cymbospondylus". http://www.paleofile.com/Ichthyosaurs/Cymbospondylus.asp. 
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 John C. Merriam (1902). "Triassic Ichthyopterygia from California and Nevada". University of California Publications. Bulletin of the Department of Geology 3: 63-108. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/148596#page/91/mode/1up. 
  7. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 5-6.
  8. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 65-70.
  9. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 104-122.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Michael W. Maisch; Andreas T. Matzke (2004). "Observations on Triassic ichthyosaurs. Part XIII: New data on the cranial osteology of Cymbospondylus petrinus (LEIDY, 1868) from the Middle Triassic Prida Formation of Nevada". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Monatshefte 2004 (6): 370-384. doi:10.1127/njgpm/2004/2004/370. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260273528. 
  11. ↑ 11.00 11.01 11.02 11.03 11.04 11.05 11.06 11.07 11.08 11.09 11.10 11.11 11.12 Nicole Klein; Lars Schmitz; Tanja Wintrich; P. Martin Sander (2020). "A new cymbospondylid ichthyosaur (Ichthyosauria) from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of the Augusta Mountains, Nevada, USA". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 18 (14): 1167-1191. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1748132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340802048. 
  12. ↑ 12.00 12.01 12.02 12.03 12.04 12.05 12.06 12.07 12.08 12.09 12.10 12.11 12.12 P. Martin Sander; Eva Maria Griebeler; Nicole Klein; Jorge Velez Juarbe; Tanja Wintrich; Liam J. Revell; Lars Schmitz (2021). "Early giant reveals faster evolution of large body size in ichthyosaurs than in cetaceans". Science 374 (6575): eabf5787. doi:10.1126/science.abf5787. PMID 34941418. 
  13. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 123-124.
  14. ↑ McGowan & Motani 2003, p. 65-66.
  15. ↑ Andrzej S. Wolniewicz (2017). The Anatomy, Taxonomy and Systematics of Middle Triassic–Early Jurassic Ichthyosaurs (Reptilia: Ichthyopterygia) and the Phylogeny of Ichthyopterygia (PhD). University of Oxford.
  16. ↑ International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (2012). "Article 8. What constitutes published work". International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. https://code.iczn.org/criteria-of-publication/article-8-what-constitutes-published-work/. 
  17. ↑ Mike Taylor (June 8, 2010). "Notes on Early Mesozoic Theropods and the future of zoological nomenclature". https://svpow.com/2010/06/08/notes-on-early-mesozoic-theropods-and-the-future-of-zoological-nomenclature. 
  18. ↑ Bernhard Peyer (1944). "Die Reptilien vom Monte San Giorgio" (in de). Neujahrsblau der Naturforschcnden Gesellschaft in Zürich 146: 1-95. 
  19. ↑ Emil Kuhn-Schnyder (1964). "Die Wirbellierfauna der Tessiner Kalkalpen" (in de). Geologische Rundschau 53: 393-412. doi:10.1007/BF02040759. 
  20. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 105-110.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.5 21.6 21.7 21.8 P. Martin Sander; Eva Maria Griebeler; Lars Schmitz (2021). "Supplementary Materials for Early giant reveals faster evolution of large body size in ichthyosaurs than in cetaceans". Science. https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1126%2Fscience.abf5787&file=science.abf5787_sm.pdf. 
  22. ↑ Nadia B. Fröbisch; Jörg Fröbisch; P. Martin Sander; Lars Schmitz; Olivier Rieppel (2013). "Supporting Information". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://www.pnas.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1073%2Fpnas.1216750110&file=pnas.201216750si.pdf. 
  23. ↑ Alexandra Houssaye; Yasuhisa Nakajima; P. Martin Sander (2018). "Structural, functional, and physiological signals in ichthyosaur vertebral centrum microanatomy and histology". Geodiversitas 40 (2): 161-170. doi:10.5252/geodiversitas2018v40a7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324484636. 
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Lene Liebe Delsett; Nicholas D. Pyenson (2021). "Early and fast rise of Mesozoic ocean giants". Science 374 (6575): 1554-1555. doi:10.1126/science.abm3751. PMID 34941421. Bibcode: 2021Sci...374.1554D. 
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 Marco Balini; Silvio C. Renesto (2012). "Cymbospondylus vertebrae (Ichthyosauria, Shastasauridae) from the Upper Anisian Prezzo Limestone (Middle Triassic, Southern Alps) with an overview of the chronostratigraphic distribution of the group". Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 118 (1): 155-172. doi:10.13130/2039-4942/5996. 
  26. ↑ Emil Kuhn-Schnyder (1980). "Über Reste eines großen Ichthyosauriers aus den Buchensteiner Schichten (ladinische Stufe der Trias) der Seceda (NE St. Ulrich/Ortisei, Prov. Bozen, Italien)" (in de). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 83: 231-244. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/ANNA_83_0231-0244.pdf. 
  27. ↑ P. Martin Sander (1992). "Cymbospondylus (Shastasauridae: Ichthyosauria) from the Middle Triassic of Spitsbergen: filling a paleobiogeographic gap". Journal of Paleontology 66 (2): 332-337. doi:10.1017/S0022336000033825. Bibcode: 1992JPal...66..332S. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260391769. 
  28. ↑ Olivier Rieppel; Fabio Marco Dalla Vecchia (2001). "Marine reptiles from the Triassic of the Tre Venezie Area, Northeastern Italy". Fieldiana, Geology. New Series 44: 1-25. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/25238#page/3/mode/1up. 
  29. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 104.
  30. ↑ John W. Hulke (1873). "Memorandum on some fossil vertebrate remains collected by the Swedish expeditions to Spitzbergen in 1864 and 1868". Bihang Till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 1 (9): 1-11. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/49831#page/419/mode/1up. 
  31. ↑ Nikolai N. Yakowlew (1902). "Neue funde von Trias-Sauriern auf Spitzbergen" (in de). Verhandlungen der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft zu St. Petersburg 40: 179-202. 
  32. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 149-150.
  33. ↑ Carl Wiman (1910). "Ichthyosaurier aus der Trias Spitzbergens" (in de). Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala 10: 124-148. https://paleoarchive.com/literature/Wiman1910-IchthyosaurierTriasSpitzbergens.pdf. 
  34. ↑ McGowan & Motani 2003, p. 128.
  35. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 124-127.
  36. ↑ McGowan & Motani 2003, p. 125.
  37. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 150-152.
  38. ↑ John C. Merriam (1911). "Notes on the relationships of the marine saurian fauna described from the Triassic of Spitzbergen by Wiman". University of California Publications. Bulletin of the Department of Geology 6 (13): 317-327. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/139555#page/427/mode/1up. 
  39. ↑ Elizabeth L. Nicholls; Donald B. Brinkman; Jack M. Callaway (1999). "New Material of Phalarodon (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria) from the Triassic of British Columbia and its Bearing on the Interrelationships of Mixosaurs". Palaeontographica Abteilung A 252 (1): 1-22. doi:10.1127/pala/252/1998/1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286357136. 
  40. ↑ Lars Schmitz (2005). "The taxonomic status of Mixosaurus nordenskioeldii (Ichthyosauria)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 (4): 983-985. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0983:TTSOMN2.0.CO;2]. 
  41. ↑ Friedrich von Huene (1916). "Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Ichthyosaurier im deutschen Muschelkalk" (in de). Palaeontographica 68: 1-68. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/110906#page/13/mode/1up. 
  42. ↑ Von F. Broili (1916). "Einige Bemerkungen über die Mixosauridae" (in de). Anatomischer Anzeiger 49: 474-494. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/47658#page/490/mode/1up. 
  43. ↑ Jack M. Callaway; Judith A. Massare (1989). "Geographic and stratigraphic distribution of the Triassic Ichthyosauria (Reptilia; Diapsida)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 178: 37-58. 
  44. ↑ McGowan & Motani 2003, p. 129.
  45. ↑ Chun Li; Hai-Lu You (2002). "Cymbospondylus from the Upper Triassic of Guizhou, China" (in zh, en). Vertebrata PalAsiatica 40: 9-16. http://www.ivpp.cas.cn/cbw/gjzdwxb/xbwzxz/200901/W020090813372039067086.pdf. 
  46. ↑ Qing-Hua Shang; Chun Li (2009). "On the occurrence of the ichthyosaur Shastasaurus in the Guanling biota (Late Triassic), Guizhou, China" (in zh, en). Vertebrata PalAsiatica 47 (3): 178-193. http://www.ivpp.cas.cn/cbw/gjzdwxb/xbwzxz/200909/P020090917531791680790.pdf. 
  47. ↑ Michael W. Maisch (2010). "Phylogeny, systematics, and origin of the Ichthyosauria – the state of the art". Palaeodiversity 3: 151–214. http://www.palaeodiversity.org/pdf/03/Palaeodiversity_Bd3_Maisch.pdf. 
  48. ↑ P. Martin Sander; Xiaohong Chen; Long Cheng; Xiaofeng Wang (2011). "Short-Snouted Toothless Ichthyosaur from China Suggests Late Triassic Diversification of Suction Feeding Ichthyosaurs". PLOS ONE 6 (5): e19480. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019480. PMID 21625429. Bibcode: 2011PLoSO...619480S. 
  49. ↑ Qing-Hua Shang; Chun Li (2013). "On the sexual dimorphism of Shastasaurus tangae (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria) from the Triassic Guanling Biota, China" (in zh, en). Vertebrata PalAsiatica 51 (4): 253-264. http://www.ivpp.cas.cn/cbw/gjzdwxb/xbwzxz/201312/P020131205319316919512.pdf. 
  50. ↑ Cheng Ji; Da-Yong Jiang; Ryosuke Motani; Olivier Rieppel; Wei-Cheng Hao; Zuo-Yu Sun (2016). "Phylogeny of the Ichthyopterygia incorporating recent discoveries from South China". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 36 (1): e1025956. doi:10.1080/02724634.2015.1025956. Bibcode: 2016JVPal..36E5956J. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283840343. 
  51. ↑ Benjamin C. Moon (2019). "A new phylogeny of ichthyosaurs (Reptilia: Diapsida)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 17 (2): 129-155. doi:10.1080/14772019.2017.1394922. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/146503337.pdf. 
  52. ↑ Da-Yong Jiang; Ryosuke Motani; Andrea Tintori; Olivier Rieppel; Cheng Ji; Min Zhou; Xue Wang; Hao Lu et al. (2020). "Evidence supporting predation of 4-m marine reptile by Triassic megapredator". iScience 23 (9): 101347. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101347. PMID 32822565. Bibcode: 2020iSci...23j1347J. 
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 53.4 Gabriele Bindellini; Andrzej S. Wolniewicz; Feiko Miedema; Torsten M. Scheyer; Cristiano Dal Sasso (2021). "Cranial anatomy of Besanosaurus leptorhynchus Dal Sasso & Pinna, 1996 (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria) from the Middle Triassic Besano Formation of Monte San Giorgio, Italy/Switzerland: taxonomic and palaeobiological implications". PeerJ 9: e11179. doi:10.7717/peerj.11179. PMID 33996277. 
  54. ↑ P. Martin Sander (2000). "Ichthyosauria: their diversity, distribution, and phylogeny". Paläontologische Zeitschrift 74 (1): 1-35. doi:10.1007/BF02987949. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226305457. 
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 Ryosuke Motani (2005). "Evolution of Fish-Shaped Reptiles (reptilia: Ichthyopterygia) in Their Physical Environments and Constraints". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 395-420. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122707. Bibcode: 2005AREPS..33..395M. http://mygeologypage.ucdavis.edu/motani//pdf/Motani2005AnnRev.pdf. 
  56. ↑ Ryan Marek (2015). "Fossil Focus: Ichthyosaurs". Palaeontology Online 5: 8. https://www.palaeontologyonline.com/articles/2015/fossil-focus-ichthyosaurs/. Retrieved 13 June 2020. 
  57. ↑ Judith M. Pardo-Pérez; Benjamin P. Kear; Erin E. Maxwell (2020). "Skeletal pathologies track body plan evolution in ichthyosaurs". Scientific Reports 10 (1): 4206. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61070-7. PMID 32144303. Bibcode: 2020NatSR..10.4206P. 
  58. ↑ Johan Lindgren; Michael W. Caldwell; Takuya Konishi; Luis M. Chiappe (2010). "Convergent Evolution in Aquatic Tetrapods: Insights from an Exceptional Fossil Mosasaur". PLOS ONE 5 (8): e11998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011998. PMID 20711249. Bibcode: 2010PLoSO...511998L. 
  59. ↑ McGowan & Motani 2003, p. 66.
  60. ↑ Merriam 1908, p. 105.
  61. ↑ Michael W. Maisch (2010). "Phylogeny, systematics, and origin of the Ichthyosauria – the state of the art". Palaeodiversity 3: 151–214. http://www.palaeodiversity.org/pdf/03/Palaeodiversity_Bd3_Maisch.pdf. 
  62. ↑ Ryosuke Motani (1999). "Phylogeny of the Ichthyopterygia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19 (3): 472–495. doi:10.1080/02724634.1999.10011160. http://mygeologypage.ucdavis.edu/motani/pdf/Motani1999c.pdf. Retrieved 2011-10-19. 
  63. ↑ Massare, J.A.; Callaway, JM (1990). "The affinities and ecology of Triassic ichthyosaurs". Geological Society of America Bulletin 102 (4): 409–416. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<0409:TAAEOT>2.3.CO;2. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/102/4/409/182405/The-affinities-and-ecology-of-Triassic. 

Bibliography

External links

Wikidata ☰ Q133027 entry



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Cymbospondylus&oldid=3579898"