Biology:Directed mutagenesis
Directed mutagenesis, also known as directed mutation, was a hypothesis proposing that organisms can respond to environmental stresses by orthogenetically directing mutations to certain genes or areas of the genome.
History
Early work
The Russian ichthyologist Lev Berg proposed directed mass mutations as the main mechanism for evolution in his anti-Darwinian book Nomogenesis; or, Evolution Determined by Law (1922). Berg's theory was both mutationist (involving mutation in place of selection) and orthogenetic (involving direction).[1] Early studies of "directed mutation" were performed by German geneticists. Richard Goldschmidt claimed to have produced evidence for directed mutation in 1929 in his experiments on Drosophila fruit flies exposed to elevated temperatures. Viktor Jollos (1887–1941) in the 1930s had also carried out experiments on Drosophila and written that his results had confirmed Goldschmidt's work which was evidence for directed mutation in contrast to natural selection. However, later American geneticists were unable to replicate these experiments and the concepts fell out of favour compared to the standard Darwinian mechanism of randomly occurring mutations.[2][3]
Recent studies
Directed mutagenesis was re-proposed in 1988[4] by John Cairns who was studying Escherichia coli that lacked the ability to metabolize lactose. He grew these bacteria in media in which lactose was the only source of energy. In doing so, he found that the rate at which the bacteria evolved the ability to metabolize lactose was many orders of magnitude higher than would be expected if the mutations were truly random. This inspired him to propose that the mutations that had occurred had been directed at those genes involved in lactose utilization.[5]
Later support for this hypothesis came from Susan Rosenberg, then at the University of Alberta, who found that an enzyme involved in DNA recombinational repair, recBCD, was necessary for the directed mutagenesis observed by Cairns and colleagues in 1989. The directed mutagenesis hypothesis was challenged in 2002, by work showing that the phenomenon was due to general hypermutability due to selected gene amplification, followed by natural selection, and was thus a standard Darwinian process.[6][7] Later research from 2007 however, concluded that amplification could not account for the adaptive mutation and that "mutants that appear during the first few days of lactose selection are true revertants that arise in a single step".[8]
References
- ↑ Levit, Georgy S.; Olsson, Lennart (2006). "Evolution on Rails: Mechanisms and Levels of Orthogenesis". in Wissemann, Volker. Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology. 11. Universitätsverlag Göttingen. pp. 112–3. ISBN 978-3-938616-85-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=TJso832AGXEC&pg=PA112.
- ↑ Harwood, Jonathan (15 February 1993). "3. Genetics and the Evolutionary Process". Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900–1933. University of Chicago Press. pp. 121–4. ISBN 978-0-226-31882-0. https://books.google.com/books?id=dygUxfsyaTwC&pg=PA121.
- ↑ Popov, Igor. "The Problem of Constraints on Variation from Darwin to the Present". http://www.ludusvitalis.org/textos/32/32-11_popov.pdf.
- ↑ Cairns, J.; Overbaugh, J.; Miller, S. (September 1988). "The origin of mutants". Nature 335 (6186): 142–5. doi:10.1038/335142a0. PMID 3045565.
- ↑ Symonds, N (21 September 1991). "A fitter theory of evolution?: Biologists have always denied that organisms can adapt their genes to suit a new environment. But some startling discoveries about bacteria are making them think again". New Scientist (1787): pp. 30–. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117874.200-a-fitter-theory-of-evolution-biologists-have-always-denied-that-organisms-can-adapt-their-genes-to-suit-a-new-environment-but-some-startling-discoveries-about-bacteria-are-making-them-think-again.html?page=1.
Concar, D (21 September 1991). "A fitter theory of evolution?". New Scientist (1787): pp. 30. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117874.300-a-fitter-theory-of-evolution.html. - ↑ Slechta, E. Susan; Liu, Jing; Andersson, Dan I.; Roth, John R. (2002-07-01). "Evidence That Selected Amplification of a Bacterial lac Frameshift Allele Stimulates Lac+ Reversion (Adaptive Mutation) With or Without General Hypermutability". Genetics 161 (3): 945–956. PMID 12136002. PMC 1462195. http://www.genetics.org/content/161/3/945.
- ↑ Slechta, E. Susan; Harold, Jennifer; Andersson, Dan I.; Roth, John R. (2002-05-01). "The effect of genomic position on reversion of a lac frameshift mutation (lacIZ33) during non-lethal selection (adaptive mutation)". Molecular Microbiology 44 (4): 1017–1032. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02934.x. PMID 12010495.
- ↑ Stumpf, Jeffrey D.; Poteete, Anthony R.; Foster, Patricia L. (2007-03-15). "Amplification of lac Cannot Account for Adaptive Mutation to Lac+ in Escherichia coli". Journal of Bacteriology 189 (6): 2291–2299. doi:10.1128/JB.01706-06. PMID 17209030.
 |
