Biology:Somatic hypermutation

From HandWiki
Short description: Cellular mechanism in B cells

Somatic hypermutation (or SHM) is a cellular mechanism by which the immune system adapts to the new foreign elements that confront it (e.g. microbes). A major component of the process of affinity maturation, SHM diversifies B cell receptors used to recognize foreign elements (antigens) and allows the immune system to adapt its response to new threats during the lifetime of an organism.[1] Somatic hypermutation involves a programmed process of mutation affecting the variable regions of immunoglobulin genes. Unlike germline mutation, SHM affects only an organism's individual immune cells, and the mutations are not transmitted to the organism's offspring.[2] Because this mechanism is merely selective and not precisely targeted, somatic hypermutation has been strongly implicated in the development of B-cell lymphomas[3] and many other cancers.[4][5]

Targeting

Simplistic overview of V(D)J recombination and somatic hypermutations at the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region. Abbreviation of the regions: C = constant, D = diversity, J = joining, V = variable, L = light, H = heavy, FW = frame work, CDR = complementarity-determining regions, N = junctional diversity sequence.

When a B cell recognizes an antigen, it is stimulated to divide (or proliferate). During proliferation, the B-cell receptor locus undergoes an extremely high rate of somatic mutation that is at least 105–106 fold greater than the normal rate of mutation across the genome.[2] Variation is mainly in the form of single-base substitutions, with insertions and deletions being less common. These mutations occur mostly at "hotspots" in the DNA, which are concentrated in hypervariable regions. These regions correspond to the complementarity-determining regions; the sites involved in antigen recognition on the immunoglobulin.[6] The "hotspots" of somatic hypermutation vary depending on the base that is being mutated. RGYW for a G, WRCY for a C, WA for an A and TW for a T.[7][8] The overall result of the hypermutation process is achieved by a balance between error-prone and high fidelity repair.[9] This directed hypermutation allows for the selection of B cells that express immunoglobulin receptors possessing an enhanced ability to recognize and bind a specific foreign antigen.[1]

Mechanisms

Cytosine
Uracil

The mechanism of SHM involves deamination of cytosine to uracil in DNA by the enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase, or AID.[10][11] A cytosine:guanine pair is thus directly mutated to a uracil:guanine mismatch. Uracil residues are not normally found in DNA, therefore, to maintain the integrity of the genome, most of these mutations must be repaired by high-fidelity Base excision repair enzymes. The uracil bases are removed by the repair enzyme, uracil-DNA glycosylase,[11] followed by cleavage of the DNA backbone by apurinic endonuclease. Error-prone DNA polymerases are then recruited to fill in the gap and create mutations.[10][12]

The synthesis of this new DNA involves error-prone DNA polymerases, which often introduce mutations at the position of the deaminated cytosine itself or neighboring base pairs. The introduction of mutations in the rapidly proliferating population of B cells ultimately culminates in the production of thousands of B cells, possessing slightly different receptors and varying specificity for the antigen, from which the B cell with highest affinities for the antigen can be selected. The B cells with the greatest affinity will then be selected to differentiate into plasma cells producing antibody and long-lived memory B cells contributing to enhanced immune responses upon reinfection.[2]

The hypermutation process also utilizes cells that auto-select against the 'signature' of an organism's own cells. It is hypothesized that failures of this auto-selection process may also lead to the development of an auto-immune response.[13]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Janeway, C.A.; Travers, P.; Walport, M.; Shlomchik, M.J. (2005). Immunobiology (6th ed.). Garland Science. ISBN 978-0-8153-4101-7. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Oprea, M. (1999) Antibody Repertoires and Pathogen Recognition: The Role of Germline Diversity and Somatic Hypermutation (Thesis) University of Leeds.
  3. ↑ Odegard V.H.; Schatz D.G. (2006). "Targeting of somatic hypermutation". Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6 (8): 573–583. doi:10.1038/nri1896. PMID 16868548. 
  4. ↑ Steele, E.J.; Lindley, R.A. (2010). "Somatic mutation patterns in non-lymphoid cancers resemble the strand biased somatic hypermutation spectra of antibody genes". DNA Repair 9 (6): 600–603. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.007. PMID 20418189. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/4482/1/Somatic_mutation_patterns.pdf. 
  5. ↑ Lindley, R.A.; Steele, E.J. (2013). "Critical analysis of strand-biased somatic mutation signatures in TP53 versus Ig genes, in genome -wide data and the etiology of cancer". ISRN Genomics 2013 Article ID 921418: 18 pages. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/921418/. 
  6. ↑ Li, Z.; Wool, C.J.; Iglesias-Ussel; M.D., Ronai, D.; Scharff, M.D. (2004). "The generation of antibody diversity through somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination". Genes & Development 18 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1101/gad.1161904. PMID 14724175. http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/18/1/1.full. 
  7. ↑ Dunn-Walters, DK; Dogan, A; Boursier, L; MacDonald, CM; Spencer, J (1998). "Base-specific sequences that bias somatic hypermutation deduced by analysis of out of frame genes.". J. Immunol. 160: 2360–64. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.160.5.2360. 
  8. ↑ Spencer, J; Dunn-Walters, DK (2005). "Hypermutation at A-T base pairs: The A nucleotide replacement spectrum is affected by adjacent nucleotides and there is no reverse complementarity of sequences around A and T nucleotides.". J. Immunol. 175 (8): 5170–77. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5170. PMID 16210621. 
  9. ↑ Liu, M.; Schatz, D.G. (2009). "Balancing AID and DNA repair during somatic hypermutation". Trends in Immunology 30 (4): 173–181. doi:10.1016/j.it.2009.01.007. PMID 19303358. http://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/abstract/S1471-4906%2809%2900042-8. 
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Teng, G.; Papavasiliou, F.N. (2007). "Immunoglobulin Somatic Hypermutation". Annu. Rev. Genet. 41: 107–120. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130340. PMID 17576170. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Larson, E.D.; Maizels, N. (2004). "Transcription-coupled mutagenesis by the DNA deaminase AID". Genome Biol. 5 (3): 211. doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-3-211. PMID 15003109. PMC 395756. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15003109. 
  12. ↑ Bachl, J.; Ertongur, I.; Jungnickel, B. (2006). "Involvement of Rad18 in somatic hypermutation". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (32): 12081–86. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605146103. PMID 16873544. Bibcode: 2006PNAS..10312081B. 
  13. ↑ Metzger, T.C. (2011). "Control of Central and Peripheral Tolerance by Aire". Immunological Reviews 241 (1): 89–103. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01008.x. PMID 21488892. 

External links



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Biology:Somatic_hypermutation&oldid=3686160"