Biology:Hypsilophodontidae

From HandWiki
Short description: Extinct family of dinosaurs

Hypsilophodontidae
Temporal range: Early Cretaceous, 130–125 Ma
Hypsilophodon Melb Museum email.jpg
Hypsilophodon skeleton
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Ornithischia
Clade: Clypeodonta
Family: Hypsilophodontidae
Dollo, 1882[1]
Subgroups[2]
Synonyms
  • Hypsilophodontinae Nopcsa, 1928
  • Hypsilophodontia Cooper, 1985

Hypsilophodontidae (or Hypsilophodontia) is a traditionally used family of ornithopod dinosaurs, generally considered invalid today. It historically included many small bodied bipedal neornithischian taxa from around the world, and spanning from the Middle Jurassic until the Late Cretaceous. This inclusive status was supported by some phylogenetic analyses from the 1990s and mid 2000s,[3][4] although there have also been many finding that the family is an unnatural grouping which should only include the type genus, Hypsilophodon, with the other genera being within clades like Thescelosauridae and Elasmaria.[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] A 2014 analysis by Norman recovered a grouping of Hypsilophodon, Rhabdodontidae and Tenontosaurus, which he referred to as Hypsilophodontia.[2] All other analyses from around the same time have instead found these latter taxa to be within Iguanodontia.[12][16]

Linnaean usage

Skeleton of Laosaurus consors as drawn by Othniel Marsh (since named Othnielosaurus and later Nanosaurus)

Hypsilophodontidae was named originally in 1882 by Louis Dollo, as a family to include Hypsilophodon and other small ornithopods with a single row of teeth, four pedal digits, and a rhomboid sternum. For several decades after its naming the family only included Hypsilophodon.[4] In 1911 Karl von Zittel published a textbook on vertebrate classifications, in which he included multiple genera in "Hypsilophodontidae" (sic for Hypsilophodontidae[17]), including Hypsilophodon, Nanosaurus, Laosaurus and Dryosaurus. Zittel considered the family to unite all taxa that lacked premaxilla teeth, had a single row of maxilla teeth, neck vertebrae which have flat articulations or a flat front and round back, fused sacral vertebrae, a femur shorter than the tibia, 5 fingered manus' and 4 toed peds.[18] Thescelosaurus was named in 1913 by Charles Gilmore, and its skeleton was described in detail by the same author in 1915. Gilmore had originally classified Thescelosaurus within Camptosauridae, but in the 1915 description he determined that it shared far more features with Hypsilophodontidae. He reclassified Laosaurus, Nanosaurus and Dryosaurus in the family Laosauridae, leaving only Thescelosaurus and Hypsilophodon in Hypsilophodontidae. The characteristics of the family were also re-analysed, and Gilmore showed that the premaxilla actually had teeth, a characteristic of the family; the 3rd manus digit had 4 phalanges; the femur was either shorter or longer than the tibia; and dorsal ribs had only a single articulation point.[17]

Skeleton of Thescelosaurus edmontonensis in display as preserved

The first expansive analysis on the relationships of Hypsilophodontidae was that of Swinton in 1936, during a redescription of Hypsilophodon from new specimens. The possible hypsilophodonts Geranosaurus and Stenopelix were removed from the clade (then the subfamily Hypsilophodontinae), and considered to be intermediate basal ornithopods, as there were no features linking them to Hypsilophodon. Thescelosaurus was considered within the family, because of the large number of shared features, as well as Dysalotosaurus, from the Kimmeridgian of Tanzania. Laosaurus and Dryosaurus were not considered hypsilophodonts because of their lack of distinguishable features, as Swinton concluded that they were probably in the family Laosauridae, intermediate between Hypsilophodontidae and Iguanodontidae, and were probably synonyms of each other as well.[19] Charles M. Sternberg (1940) considered there to be multiple genera within the family, all sharing fully enamelled teeth, divided into two subfamilies, Hypsilophodontinae and Thescelosaurinae. Within Hypsilophodontinae–grouped by a longer scapula, thinner forelimb and femora shorter than tibiae–Sternberg included Hypsilophodon, Dysalotosaurus, and Parksosaurus (renaming of Thescelosaurus warreni). Only Thescelosaurus was included in Thescelosaurinae, as it had a tibia shorter than the femur.[20]

Peter M. Galton in 1972 re-studied the relationships of taxa within Ornithischia. Thescelosaurus was removed from Hypsilophodontidae because of its short limbs, meaning it was probably not cursorial, unlike all other hypsilophodonts. The presence of premaxilla teeth, once used to diagnose the group, was found to be present in unrelated taxa like Heterodontosaurus, Protoceratops and Silvisaurus. Galton made Hypsilophodontidae paraphyletic, as he considered Thescelosaurus to be a hypsilophodont, but excluded it from the family Hypsilophodontidae. The phylogenetic hypothesis of Galton is shown below. Taxa considered hypsilophodontids are enclosed by green.[21]

Ornithischia

Fabrosaurus -> Echinodon

Heterodontosaurus

Ankylosauria

Stegosauria

Pisanosaurus ->

Hadrosauridae

Iguanodon -> Tenontosaurus

Ceratopsia

Stenopelix -> Psittacosaurus

Camptosaurus leedsi -> Dysalotosaurus -> Dryosaurus -> Wealden ornithopod

Camptosaurus

Yaverlandia -> Stegoceras -> Pachycephalosaurus

Laosaurus

Parksosaurus

Hypsilophodon

Laosaurus minimus

Thescelosaurus

Cladistic usage

Question of monophyly

In 1992 David Weishampel and Ronald Heinrich reviewed the systematics and phylogenetics of Hypsilophodontidae. Hypsilophodontidae was supported as a monophyletic clade that encompassed "thescelosaurids", Hypsilophodon and Yandusaurus. The family was diagnosed by the absence of ridges that end as denticles in teeth (reversed in Hypsilophodon); presence of a single central ridge on dentary teeth; ossified sternal plates on torso ribs; and a straight and unexpanded shape of the prepubis. Their resulting cladogram is reproduced below:[4]

Euornithopoda
Iguanodontia

Tenontosaurus

Dryosaurus

Camptosaurus

Hypsilophodontidae

Thescelosaurus

Yandusaurus

Othnielia

Parksosaurus

Hypsilophodon

Zephyrosaurus

Orodromeus

The following cladogram of hypsilophodont relationships depicts the paraphyletic hypotheses; the "natural Hypsilophodontidae" hypothesis has been falling out of favor since the mid-late 1990s. It is after Brown et al. (2013), the most recent analysis of hypsilophodonts.[16] Ornithischia, Ornithopoda, and Iguanodontia were not designated in their result, and so are left out here. Additional ornithopods beyond Tenontosaurus are omitted. Dinosaurs traditionally described as hypsilophodonts are found from Agilisaurus or Hexinlusaurus to Hypsilophodon or Gasparinisaura.

Skeleton of Convolosaurus (the Proctor Lake hypsilophodont)
unnamed

Heterodontosaurus

Scutellosaurus

Lesothosaurus

Agilisaurus

Hexinlusaurus

Othnielosaurus

Thescelosauridae
Orodrominae

TMP 2008.045.0002

Oryctodromeus

Albertadromeus

Orodromeus

Zephyrosaurus

Thescelosaurinae

Parksosaurus

Changchunsaurus

Haya

Jeholosaurus

Thescelosaurus assiniboiensis

Thescelosaurus neglectus

Hypsilophodontidae

Hypsilophodon

Gasparinisaura

Tenontosaurus

Other ornithopods

Norman's Hypsilophodontia

A more recent alternate phylogeny, by Norman in 2014, resolved a monophyletic Hypsilophodontia (the family Hypsilophodontidae was not used because of its history). Hypsilophodon grouped with Rhabdodontidae and Tenontosaurus.[2]

Clypeodonta
Hypsilophodontia

Hypsilophodon

Tenontosaurus

Rhabdodontidae

Iguanodontia

Dryosauridae

Ankylopollexia

Camptosaurus

Styracosterna

Other research

In one analysis in her 2022 review of iguanodontian phylogenetic relationships, Karen E. Poole recovered a large Hypsilophodontidae as the sister taxon of Iguanodontia, which consisted of several "traditional" hypsilophodontids, as well as Thescelosauridae. The Bayesian topology of her phylogenetic analyses is shown in the cladogram below:[22]

Clypeodonta
Hypsilophodontidae

Othnielosaurus

Jeholosaurus

Haya

Hypsilophodon

Leallynasaura

Gasparinisaura

Macrogryphosaurus

Thescelosauridae

Zephyrosaurus

Orodromeus

Parksosaurus

Thescelosaurus spp.

Iguanodontia

Rhabdodontoidea

Dryomorpha

silhouette illustration of Vectidromeus insularis by Nick Longrich
The size of Hypsilophodon and the type specimen of Vectidromeus compared to a human

In 2023, Longrich et al. described Vectidromeus as a new genus of hypsilophodontid. Although they did not perform a phylogenetic analysis, they suggested that, since other taxa previously assigned to Hypsilophodontidae had subsequently been moved to other groups, Vectidromeus and Hypsilophodon remained as the only members of the clade.[23]

References

  1. Dollo, L. (1882). "Première note sur les dinosauriens de Bernissart". Bulletin du Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 1: 161–180. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Norman, D.B. (2014). "On the history, osteology, and systematic position of the Wealden (Hastings group) dinosaur Hypselospinus fittoni (Iguanodontia: Styracosterna)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 173: 92–189. doi:10.1111/zoj.12193. 
  3. Sues, Hans-Dieter; Norman, David B. (1990). "Hypsilophodontidae, Tenontosaurus, Dryosauridae". in Weishampel, David B.. The Dinosauria (1st ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 498–509. ISBN 978-0-520-06727-1. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Weishampel, David B.; Heinrich, Ronald E. (1992). "Systematics of Hypsilophodontidae and Basal Iguanodontia (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda)". Historical Biology 6 (3): 159–184. doi:10.1080/10292389209380426. http://doc.rero.ch/record/13899/files/PAL_E839.pdf. 
  5. Scheetz, Rodney D. (1998). "Phylogeny of basal ornithopod dinosaurs and the dissolution of the Hypsilophodontidae". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18 (3, Suppl): 1–94. doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011116. 
  6. Winkler, Dale A.; Murry, Phillip A.; Jacobs, Louis L. (1998). "The new ornithopod dinosaur from Proctor Lake, Texas, and the deconstruction of the family Hypsilophodontidae". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18 (3, Suppl): 87A. doi:10.1080/02724634.1998.10011116. 
  7. Buchholz, Peter W. (2002). "Phylogeny and biogeography of basal Ornithischia". The Mesozoic in Wyoming, Tate 2002. Casper, Wyoming: The Geological Museum, Casper College. pp. 18–34. 
  8. Weishampel, David B.; Jianu, Coralia-Maria; Csiki, Z.; Norman, David B. (2003). "Osteology and phylogeny of Zalmoxes (n.g.), an unusual euornithopod dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of Romania". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 1 (2): 1–56. doi:10.1017/S1477201903001032. 
  9. Norman, David B.; Sues, Hans-Dieter; Witmer, Larry M.; Coria, Rodolfo A. (2004). "Basal Ornithopoda". in Weishampel, David B.. The Dinosauria (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 393–412. ISBN 978-0-520-24209-8. 
  10. Varricchio, David J.; Martin, Anthony J.; Katsura, Yoshihiro (2007). "First trace and body fossil evidence of a burrowing, denning dinosaur". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274 (1616): 1361–1368. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0443. PMID 17374596. 
  11. Boyd, Clint A.; Brown, Caleb M.; Scheetz, Rodney D.; Clarke, Julia A. (2009). "Taxonomic revision of the basal neornithischian taxa Thescelosaurus and Bugenasaura". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29 (3): 758–770. doi:10.1671/039.029.0328. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 Boyd, Clint A. (2015). "The systematic relationships and biogeographic history of ornithischian dinosaurs". PeerJ 3 (e1523): e1523. doi:10.7717/peerj.1523. PMID 26713260. 
  13. Gasulla, José Miguel; Escaso, Fernando; Narváez, Iván; Ortega, Francisco; Sanz, José Luis (2015). "A New Sail-Backed Styracosternan (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) from the Early Cretaceous of Morella, Spain". PLOS ONE 10 (12): e0144167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144167. PMID 26673161. Bibcode2015PLoSO..1044167G. 
  14. Butler, Richard J.; Smith, Roger M.H.; Norman, David B. (2007). "A primitive ornithischian dinosaur from the Late Triassic of South Africa, and the early evolution and diversification of Ornithischia". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274 (1621): 2041–6. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0367. PMID 17567562. 
  15. Butler, Richard J.; Upchurch, Paul; Norman, David B. (2008). "The phylogeny of the ornithischian dinosaurs". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1017/S1477201907002271. 
  16. 16.0 16.1 Brown, C. M.; Evans, D. C.; Ryan, M. J.; Russell, A. P. (2013). "New data on the diversity and abundance of small-bodied ornithopods (Dinosauria, Ornithischia) from the Belly River Group (Campanian) of Alberta". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 33 (3): 495–520. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.746229. 
  17. 17.0 17.1 Gilmore, C.W. (1915). "Osteology of Thescelosaurus, an orthopodous dinosaur from the Lance Formation of Wyoming". Proceedings of the United States National Museum 49 (2127): 591–616. doi:10.5479/si.00963801.49-2127.591. https://archive.org/details/biostor-79442. 
  18. Zittel, K.A. von (1911) (in de). Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläzoologie) II. Abtielung Vertebrata (2 ed.). Berlin and München: Druck und verlad von R. Oldenbourg. p. 289. https://archive.org/stream/grundzgederpalon02zitt. 
  19. Swinton, W.E. (1936). "Notes on the Osteology of Hypsilophodon, and on the Family Hypsilophodontidae". Journal of Zoology 106 (2): 555–578. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1936.tb08518.x. 
  20. Sternberg, C.M. (1940). "Thescelosaurus edmontonensis, n. sp., and classification of the Hypsilophodontidae". Journal of Paleontology 14 (5): 481–494. 
  21. Galton, P.M. (1972). "Classification and Evolution of Ornithopod Dinosaurs". Nature 239 (5373): 464–466. doi:10.1038/239464a0. Bibcode1972Natur.239..464G. 
  22. Poole KE (2022). "Phylogeny of iguanodontian dinosaurs and the evolution of quadrupedality". Palaeontologia Electronica 25 (3): 25.3.a30. doi:10.26879/702. 
  23. Longrich, Nicholas R.; Martill, David M.; Munt, Martin; Green, Mick; Penn, Mark; Smith, Shaun (2023-09-13). "Vectidromeus insularis, a new hypsilophodontid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, England" (in en). Cretaceous Research 154: 105707. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105707. 

Wikidata ☰ Q131437 entry