Physics:Kitaev chain

From HandWiki
Short description: Model for topological superconductors in physics

In condensed matter physics, the Kitaev chain or Kitaev–Majorana chain is a simplified model for a topological superconductor. It models a one dimensional lattice featuring Majorana bound states. The Kitaev chain has been used as a toy model of semiconductor nanowires for the development of topological quantum computers.[1][2] The model was first proposed by Alexei Kitaev in 2000.[3]

Description

Hamiltonian

The tight binding Hamiltonian of a Kitaev chain considers a one dimensional lattice with N site and spinless particles at zero temperature, subjected to nearest neighbour hopping interactions, given in second quantization formalism as[4]

H=μj=1N(cjcj12)+j=1N1[t(cj+1cj+cjcj+1)+|Δ|(cj+1cj+cjcj+1)]

where μ is the chemical potential, cj,cj are creation and annihilation operators, t0 the energy needed for a particle to hop from one location of the lattice to another, Δ=|Δ|eiθ is the induced superconducting gap (p-wave pairing) and θ is the coherent superconducting phase. This Hamiltonian has particle-hole symmetry, as well as time reversal symmetry.[5]

The Hamiltonian can be rewritten using Majorana operators, given by[4]

{γjA=cj+cjγjB=i(cjcj),

which can be thought as the real and imaginary parts of the creation operator cj=12(γjA+iγjB). These Majorana operator are Hermitian operators, and anticommutate,

{γjα,γkβ}=2δjkδαβ.

Using these operators the Hamiltonian can be rewritten as[4]

H=iμ2j=1NγjBγjA+i2j=1N1(ω+γjBγj+1A+ωγj+1BγjA)

where ω±=|Δ|±t.

Trivial phase

In the limit t=|Δ|0, we obtain the following Hamiltonian

H=iμ2j=1NγjBγjA

where the Majorana operators are coupled on the same site. This condition is considered a topologically trivial phase.[5]

Non-trivial phase

In the limit μ0 and |Δ|t, we obtain the following Hamiltonian

HM=itj=1N1γjBγj+1A

where every Majorana operator is coupled to a Majorana operator of a different kind in the next site. By assigning a new fermion operator c~j=12(γjB+iγj+1A), the Hamiltonian is diagonalized, as

HM=2tj=1N1(c~jc~j+12)

which describes a new set of N-1 Bogoliubov quasiparticles with energy t. The missing mode given by c~M=12(γNB+iγ1A) couples the Majorana operators from the two endpoints of the chain, as this mode does not appear in the Hamiltonian, it requires zero energy. This mode is called a Majorana zero mode and is highly delocalized. As the presence of this mode does not change the total energy, the ground state is two-fold degenerate.[4] This condition is a topological superconducting non-trivial phase.[5]

The existence of the Majorana zero mode is topologically protected from small perturbation due to symmetry considerations. For the Kitaev chain the Majorana zero mode persist as long as μ<2t and the superconducting gap is finite.[6] The robustness of these modes makes it a candidate for qubits as a basis for topological quantum computer.[7]

Bulk case

Using Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism it can be shown that for the bulk case (infinite number of sites), that the energy yields[6]

E(k)=±(2tcosk+μ)2+4|Δ|2sin2k,

and it is gapped, except for the case μ=2t and wave vector k=0. For the bulk case there are no zero modes. However a topological invariant exists given by

Q=sign{pf[iH(k=0)]pf[iH(k=π)]},

where pf[x] is the Pfaffian operation. For μ>2t, the invariant is strictly Q=1 and for μ<2t, Q=1 corresponding to the trivial and non-trivial phases from the finite chain, respectively. This relation between the topological invariant from the bulk case and the existence of Majorana zero modes in the finite case is called a bulk-edge correspondence.[6]

Experimental efforts

One possible realization of Kitaev chains is using semiconductor nanowires with strong spin–orbit interaction to break spin-degeneracy,[8] like indium antimonide or indium arsenide.[9] A magnetic field can be applied to induce Zeeman coupling to spin polarize the wire and break Kramers degeneracy.[8] The superconducting gap can be induced using Andreev reflection, by putting the wire in the proximity to a superconductor.[8][9] Realizations using 3D topological insulators have also been proposed.[9]

There is no single definitive way to test for Majorana zero modes. One proposal to experimentally observe these modes is using scanning tunneling microscopy.[9] A zero bias peak in the conductance could be the signature of a topological phase.[9] Josephson effect between two wires in superconducting phase could also help to demonstrate these modes.[9]

In 2023 QuTech team from Delft University of Technology reported the realization of a poor man's Majorana, a Kitaev chain with two or three sites that produces a Majorana bound state that is not topologically protected and therefore only stable for a very small range of parameters.[1][2] It was obtained in a Kitaev chain consisting of two quantum dots in a superconducting nanowire strongly coupled by normal tunneling and Andreev tunneling with the state arising when the rate of both processes match.[1][2] Some researches have raised concerns, suggesting that an alternative mechanism to that of Majorana bound states might explain the data obtained.[2][7]

In 2024, the first experiment in an optomechanical network was conducted to create a bosonic analogue of a Kitaev chain.[10]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Wright, Katherine (2023-02-15). "Evidence Found for a Majorana "Cousin"" (in en). Physics 16. doi:10.1103/Physics.16.24. Bibcode2023PhyOJ..16...24W. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/24#c1. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 "'Poor man's Majoranas' offer testbed for studying possible qubits" (in en-GB). 2024. https://physicsworld.com/a/poor-mans-majoranas-offer-testbed-for-studying-possible-qubits/. 
  3. Kitaev, A Yu (2001-10-01). "Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires". Physics-Uspekhi 44 (10S): 131–136. doi:10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29. ISSN 1468-4780. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Schäpers, Thomas (2021-05-10) (in en). Semiconductor Spintronics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. ISBN 978-3-11-063900-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=vdIuEAAAQBAJ&dq=kitaev+chain&pg=PA349. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Stanescu, Tudor D. (2024-07-02) (in en). Introduction to Topological Quantum Matter & Quantum Computation. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-040-04198-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=gg4GEQAAQBAJ. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Topology course team (2021). "Bulk-edge correspondence in the Kitaev chain". https://topocondmat.org/w1_topointro/1D.html. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 Ball, Philip (2021-09-29). "Major Quantum Computing Strategy Suffers Serious Setbacks" (in en). https://www.quantamagazine.org/major-quantum-computing-strategy-suffers-serious-setbacks-20210929/. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Topology course team (2021). "From Kitaev chain to a nanowire". https://topocondmat.org/w2_majorana/nanowire.html. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 Chen, Fei; Matern, Stephanie (2014). "Kitaev Chain". Oberseminar: Quantum Knots - Prof. Dr A. Rosch, Prof. Dr. S. Trebst - University of Cologne. https://www.thp.uni-koeln.de/trebst/Lectures/Seminar14/Handout8.pdf. 
  10. Slim, Jesse J.; Wanjura, Clara C.; Brunelli, Matteo; del Pino, Javier; Nunnenkamp, Andreas; Verhagen, Ewold (2024-03-28). "Optomechanical realization of the bosonic Kitaev chain" (in en). Nature 627 (8005): 767–771. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07174-w. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 38538943. Bibcode2024Natur.627..767S. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07174-w.