Social:Petrostate

From HandWiki
Short description: Countries that primarily produce oil or natural gas

A petrostate or oil state is a country whose economy is heavily dependent on the extraction and export of oil or natural gas. The presence alone of large oil and gas industries does not define a petrostate: major oil producers that also have diversified economies are not classified as petrostates due to their ability to generate income from various industries and sectors beyond the oil industry.[1] Petrostates also have highly concentrated political and economic power, resting in the hands of an elite, as well as unaccountable political institutions which are susceptible to corruption.[2]

Countries considered to be petrostates

Various countries have been identified as current or former petrostates:



Economy

Petrostates rely on oil as a primary source of income, which can make their economies vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices. When oil prices are high, they tend to thrive, but they can struggle during periods of low oil prices.

Petrostates are typified by weak economies, where products are more frequently imported than domestically produced. Diversification can successfully occur in limited circumstances, such as Mexico becoming part of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or Dubai leveraging its location to become a hub of commerce and tourism. Most petrostates do not attempt economic diversification, instead seeking economic domination through large, state-owned oil companies.[1]

Governance

In some petrostates, leaders and governments may become more authoritarian as they accumulate significant wealth and power through the control of the oil sector. They may use these resources to maintain political control, suppress opposition, and stifle democratic institutions. For example, Steven Fish identifies oil wealth as one of the major reasons for Russia 's failed democratization. He explains that revenue from oil exports fueled corruption, and corruption, in turn, hampered Russia's political liberalization. Furthermore, he notes that United Kingdom 's and Norway 's resource wealth did not lead to authoritarianism because "sturdy democratic regimes" were already in place.[5] Similarly, Michael Ross argues that “the case of Russia since 1998 illustrates how oil revenues can endanger a weak democracy by boosting the popularity of an elected incumbent, who gradually removes checks and balances on their own authority”.[6]

Petrostates run by autocrats are also called petro-dictatorships.[7]

At the same time, in many petrostates, the government invest in social welfare programs, including healthcare, education, and subsidies for essential goods. For example, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar have invested in education, healthcare, and public amenities to improve the quality of life for their citizens.[8][9]

Social impacts

The reliance on oil and natural gas may preclude the development of other industries, known as Dutch disease. Light industries, including textiles and clothing, are key factors that drive women to participate in the workforce. Petrostates thus often have lower rates of female workers, which can impede women's access to social and political freedoms.[7]

Resource curse

Global energy prices can cause turbulent and unpredictable swings in a petrostate's economy. Undiversified reliance on oil and gas industries can cause political and economic crises when the price of oil drops. Over-investment in these industries at the expense of other sectors, such as manufacturing and agriculture, can hurt economic growth and competitiveness. Petrostates can suffer from the resource curse, meaning that their abundance of natural resources can have detrimental impacts on other parts of the economy, as well as negative social and political impacts.[2][10]

Environmental and climate concerns

The extraction and production of oil can have significant environmental and ecological impacts, including pollution, habitat destruction, and greenhouse gas emissions. This can lead to environmental concerns and criticism, both domestically and internationally.

Recent studies challenge the assumption that the transition to sustainable energy will lead to the decline of petrostates, suggesting that their future depends on production costs and social factors.[11][12] Furthermore, the low-carbon transition might provide new export opportunities for petrostates as energy-intensive sectors in developed countries decrease, potentially leading some to further specialize in high-carbon segments, particularly in the Middle East.[11]

Cultural narratives

The presence of a booming oil industry influences a nation's cultural landscape. It may manifest in conspicuous consumption, urban development, and the emergence of specific cultural symbols associated with wealth and status.

The petrostate narrative often becomes intertwined with the national identity.[13][14][15][16][17] The story of an oil-rich nation can influence collective memory and national pride. Cultural narratives might emphasize self-reliance, economic strength, or the role of oil in nation-building.

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 Ashford, Emma (7 October 2015). "Petrostates in a Changing World". https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/petrostates-changing-world. 
  2. ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 Cara Labrador, Rocio (24 January 2019). "Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate". https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/venezuela-crisis. 
  3. ↑ Darwish, Tamer K.; Mohamed, Abdul Fattaah; Wood, Geoffrey; Singh, Satwinder; Fleming, Jocelyne (2017). "Can HRM alleviate the negative effects of the resource curse on firms? Evidence from Brunei". Personnel Review 46 (8): 1931–1947. doi:10.1108/PR-04-2016-0081. http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4472/1/Main%20Document-PR.pdf. 
  4. ↑ Bindman, Polly; Ferris, Nick (April 4, 2023). "Inside Norway's efforts to move on from oil and gas". Energy Monitor. https://www.energymonitor.ai/policy/inside-norways-efforts-to-move-on-from-oil-and-gas. 
  5. ↑ Fish, M. Steven (2005-08-29) (in en). Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-44685-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=0_wLBAAAQBAJ&q=Fish,+M.+S.+(2005).+Democracy+derailed+in+Russia:+The+failure+of+open+politics.+Cambridge+University+Press.. 
  6. ↑ Ross, Michael Lewin (2013). The oil curse: how petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations (1. paperback printing ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15963-8. 
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Treisman, Daniel (2020). "Economic Development and Democracy: Predispositions and Triggers". Annual Review of Political Science 23: 241–257. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-043546. 
  8. ↑ Khoja, Tawfiq; Rawaf, Salman; Qidwai, Waris; Rawaf, David; Nanji, Kashmira; Hamad, Aisha (2017-08-21). "Health Care in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities" (in en). Cureus 9 (8): e1586. doi:10.7759/cureus.1586. ISSN 2168-8184. PMID 29062618. 
  9. ↑ De Jong, Martin; Hoppe, Thomas; Noori, Negar (2019-04-30). "City Branding, Sustainable Urban Development and the Rentier State. How Do Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Dubai Present Themselves in the Age of Post Oil and Global Warming?" (in en). Energies 12 (9): 1657. doi:10.3390/en12091657. ISSN 1996-1073. 
  10. ↑ Gaddy, Clifford G.; Ickes., Barry W. (2005). "Resource rents and the Russian economy". Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (8): 559–583. doi:10.2747/1538-7216.46.8.559. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.46.8.559. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Goldthau, Andreas; Westphal, Kirsten (2019). "Why the Global Energy Transition Does Not Mean the End of the Petrostate" (in en). Global Policy 10 (2): 279–283. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12649. ISSN 1758-5880. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12649. 
  12. ↑ Bradshaw, Michael; Van de Graaf, Thijs; Connolly, Richard (2019). "Preparing for the new oil order? Saudi Arabia and Russia" (in en). Energy Strategy Reviews 26: 100374. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100374. 
  13. ↑ Rutland, Peter (2015-01-02). "Petronation? Oil, gas, and national identity in Russia" (in en). Post-Soviet Affairs 31 (1): 66–89. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2014.952537. ISSN 1060-586X. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1060586X.2014.952537. 
  14. ↑ Kuteleva, Anna (2020-01-02). "Discursive Politics of Energy in EU–Russia Relations: Russia as an "Energy Superpower" and a "Raw-Material Appendage"" (in en). Problems of Post-Communism 67 (1): 78–92. doi:10.1080/10758216.2018.1520601. ISSN 1075-8216. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10758216.2018.1520601. 
  15. ↑ Maugeri, Leonardo (2006). The age of oil: the mythology, history, and future of the world's most controversial resource (1. publ ed.). Westport, Conn.: Praeger. ISBN 978-0-275-99008-4. 
  16. ↑ Hertog, Steffen (2011-04-27) (in en). Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-5753-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=YNM4vMi7FtcC. 
  17. ↑ Vitalis, Robert (2009-03-02) (in en). America's Kingdom: Mythmaking on the Saudi Oil Frontier. Verso Books. ISBN 978-1-84467-313-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=sulOEAAAQBAJ&pg=PR9. 



Retrieved from "https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Social:Petrostate&oldid=3311341"