Impulse vector: Difference between revisions
imported>LinXED over-write |
over-write |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Mathematical tool}} | {{Short description|Mathematical tool}} | ||
An '''impulse vector''', also known as '''Kang vector''', is a mathematical tool used to graphically design and analyze [[Input shaping|input shapers]] that can suppress residual [[Vibration|vibration]]. The impulse vector can be applied to both [[ | |||
An '''impulse vector''', also known as '''Kang vector''', is a mathematical tool used to graphically design and analyze [[Input shaping|input shapers]] that can suppress residual [[Vibration|vibration]]. The impulse vector can be applied to both [[Damping|undamped and underdamped]] systems, as well as to both positive and negative [[Dirac delta function|impulses]] in a unified manner. The impulse vector makes it easy to obtain impulse time and magnitude of the input shaper graphically.<ref name="impulseVector">{{cite journal |last1=Kang |first1=Chul-Goo |date=August 2019 |title=Impulse vectors for input shaping control: A mathematical tool to design and analyze input shapers |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jlzzKanKMiOIqKh7ZfoAWftpq77lHw0J/view?usp=drive_link |journal=IEEE Control Systems Magazine |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=40–55 |doi=10.1109/MCS.2019.2913610 |s2cid=198145461|url-access=subscription }}</ref> | |||
A vector concept for an input shaper was first introduced by W. Singhose<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Singhose |first1=W. |last2=Seering |first2=W. |last3=Singer |first3=N. |title=Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs |journal=Journal of Mechanical Design |date=1994 |volume=116 |issue=2 |pages=654–659 |doi=10.1115/1.2919428 }}</ref> for undamped systems with positive impulses. Building on this idea, C.-G. Kang<ref name="impulseVector" /> introduced the impulse vector (or Kang vector) to generalize Singhose's idea to undamped and underdamped systems with positive and negative impulses. | A vector concept for an input shaper was first introduced by W. Singhose<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Singhose |first1=W. |last2=Seering |first2=W. |last3=Singer |first3=N. |title=Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs |journal=Journal of Mechanical Design |date=1994 |volume=116 |issue=2 |pages=654–659 |doi=10.1115/1.2919428 }}</ref> for undamped systems with positive impulses. Building on this idea, C.-G. Kang<ref name="impulseVector" /> introduced the impulse vector (or Kang vector) to generalize Singhose's idea to undamped and underdamped systems with positive and negative impulses. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
where <math>A_i</math> implies the magnitude of an impulse function, <math>t_i</math> implies the time location of the impulse function, and <math>\omega_d</math> implies damped natural frequency <math>\omega_n \sqrt{1-\zeta^2}</math>. For a positive impulse function with <math>A_i > 0</math>, the initial point of the impulse vector is located at the origin of the polar coordinate system, while for a negative impulse function with <math>A_i < 0</math>, the terminal point of the impulse vector is located at the origin.<ref name="impulseVector" /> □ | where <math>A_i</math> implies the magnitude of an impulse function, <math>t_i</math> implies the time location of the impulse function, and <math>\omega_d</math> implies damped natural frequency <math>\omega_n \sqrt{1-\zeta^2}</math>. For a positive impulse function with <math>A_i > 0</math>, the initial point of the impulse vector is located at the origin of the polar coordinate system, while for a negative impulse function with <math>A_i < 0</math>, the terminal point of the impulse vector is located at the origin.<ref name="impulseVector" /> □ | ||
In this definition, the magnitude <math>I_i</math> is the product of <math>A_i</math> and a scaling factor for damping during time interval <math>t_i</math>, which represents the magnitude <math>A_i</math> before being damped; the angle <math>\theta_i</math> is the product of the impulse time and damped natural frequency. <math>\delta(t-t_i)</math> represents the [[Dirac delta function]] with impulse time at <math>t=t_i</math>. | In this definition, the magnitude <math>I_i</math> is the product of <math>A_i</math> and a scaling factor for damping during time interval <math>t_i</math>, which represents the magnitude <math>A_i</math> before being damped; the angle <math>\theta_i</math> is the product of the impulse time and damped natural frequency. <math>\delta(t-t_i)</math> represents the [[Dirac delta function]] with impulse time at <math>t=t_i</math>. | ||
Note that an impulse function is a purely mathematical quantity, while the impulse vector includes a physical quantity (that is, <math>\omega_n</math> and <math>\zeta</math> of a second-order system) as well as a mathematical impulse function. Representing more than two impulse vectors in the same polar coordinate system makes an ''impulse vector diagram''. The impulse vector diagram is a graphical representation of an impulse sequence. | Note that an impulse function is a purely mathematical quantity, while the impulse vector includes a [[Physics:Physical quantity|physical quantity]] (that is, <math>\omega_n</math> and <math>\zeta</math> of a second-order system) as well as a mathematical impulse function. Representing more than two impulse vectors in the same polar coordinate system makes an ''impulse vector diagram''. The impulse vector diagram is a graphical representation of an impulse sequence. | ||
[[File:CGKang_fig2.jpg|thumb|450px|Two impulse vectors and their corresponding impulse responses for a second-order system. (a) Two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_{1}, \mathbf{I}_{2}</math> with the same magnitude and 180 deg angle difference, with one pointing to the origin and the other pointing to the outside, are regarded as the same vector for vector addition and subtraction. (b) Two impulse responses corresponding to two impulse vectors are exactly same after the final impulse time <math>t_2</math>]] | [[File:CGKang_fig2.jpg|thumb|450px|Two impulse vectors and their corresponding impulse responses for a second-order system. (a) Two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_{1}, \mathbf{I}_{2}</math> with the same magnitude and 180 deg angle difference, with one pointing to the origin and the other pointing to the outside, are regarded as the same vector for vector addition and subtraction. (b) Two impulse responses corresponding to two impulse vectors are exactly same after the final impulse time <math>t_2</math>]] | ||
Consider two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> in the figure on the right-hand side, in which <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> is an impulse vector with magnitude <math>I_1 (>0)</math> and angle <math>\theta_1</math> corresponding to a positive impulse with <math>A_1 > 0</math>, and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> is an impulse vector with magnitude <math>I_2 = -I_1</math> and angle <math>\theta_2 = \pi + \theta_1</math> corresponding to a negative impulse with <math>A_2 < 0</math>. Since the two time-responses corresponding to <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> are exactly same after the final impulse time <math>t_2</math> as shown in the figure, the two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> can be regarded as the same [[Vector (mathematics and physics)|vector]] for vector addition and subtraction. Impulse vectors satisfy the [[Commutative property|commutative]] and [[Associative property|associative]] laws, as well as the [[Distributive property|distributive]] law for scalar multiplication. | Consider two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> in the figure on the right-hand side, in which <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> is an impulse vector with magnitude <math>I_1 (>0)</math> and angle <math>\theta_1</math> corresponding to a positive impulse with <math>A_1 > 0</math>, and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> is an impulse vector with magnitude <math>I_2 = -I_1</math> and angle <math>\theta_2 = \pi + \theta_1</math> corresponding to a negative impulse with <math>A_2 < 0</math>. Since the two time-responses corresponding to <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> are exactly same after the final impulse time <math>t_2</math> as shown in the figure, the two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> can be regarded as the same [[Vector (mathematics and physics)|vector]] for vector addition and subtraction. Impulse vectors satisfy the [[Commutative property|commutative]] and [[Associative property|associative]] laws, as well as the [[Distributive property|distributive]] law for [[Scalar multiplication|scalar multiplication]]. | ||
The magnitude of the impulse vector determines the magnitude of the impulse, and the angle of the impulse vector determines the time location of the impulse. One rotation, <math>2 \pi</math> angle, on an impulse vector diagram corresponds to one (damped) [[Periodic function|period]] of the corresponding impulse response. | The magnitude of the impulse vector determines the magnitude of the impulse, and the angle of the impulse vector determines the time location of the impulse. One rotation, <math>2 \pi</math> angle, on an impulse vector diagram corresponds to one (damped) [[Periodic function|period]] of the corresponding impulse response. | ||
If it is an undamped system (<math>\zeta = 0</math>), the magnitude and angle of the impulse vector become <math>I_i = A_i</math> and <math>\theta_i = \omega_n t_i</math>. | If it is an undamped system (<math>\zeta = 0</math>), the magnitude and angle of the impulse vector become <math>I_i = A_i</math> and <math>\theta_i = \omega_n t_i</math>. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Properties == | == Properties == | ||
=== Property 1: Resultant of two impulse vectors. === | === Property 1: Resultant of two impulse vectors. === | ||
[[File:CGKang_fig3.jpg|thumb|500px|(a) Two representations <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}, \mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> of the resultant of two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_{1}, \mathbf{I}_{2}</math>, and (b) the corresponding impulse responses. ]] | [[File:CGKang_fig3.jpg|thumb|500px|(a) Two representations <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}, \mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> of the resultant of two impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_{1}, \mathbf{I}_{2}</math>, and (b) the corresponding impulse responses.]] | ||
The [[Impulse response|impulse response]] of a second-order system corresponding to the resultant of two impulse vectors is same as the time response of the system with a two-impulse input corresponding to two impulse vectors after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □ | The [[Impulse response|impulse response]] of a second-order system corresponding to the resultant of two impulse vectors is same as the time response of the system with a two-impulse input corresponding to two impulse vectors after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □ | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
If the resultant of impulse vectors is zero, the time response of a second-order system for the input of the impulse sequence corresponding to the impulse vectors becomes zero also after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □ | If the resultant of impulse vectors is zero, the time response of a second-order system for the input of the impulse sequence corresponding to the impulse vectors becomes zero also after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □ | ||
Consider an underdamped second-order system with the [[Transfer function|transfer function]] <math>4 \pi^2 / (s^2 + 0.4 \pi s + 4 \pi^2 )</math>. This system has <math>\omega_n = 2 \pi</math> and <math>\zeta = 0.1</math>. For given impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> as shown in the figure, the resultant can be represented in two ways, <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math>, in which <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math> corresponds to a negative impulse with <math>A_{R1} = I_{R1} / e^{\zeta \omega_n t_{R1}}</math> and <math>t_{R1} = \theta_{R1} / \omega_d</math>, and <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> corresponds to a positive impulse with <math>A_{R2} = I_{R2} / e^{\zeta \omega_n t_{R2}}</math> and <math>t_{R2} = \theta_{R2} / \omega_d</math>. | |||
Consider an underdamped second-order system with the [[Transfer function|transfer function]] <math>4 \pi^2 / (s^2 + 0.4 \pi s + 4 \pi^2 )</math>. This system has <math>\omega_n = 2 \pi</math> and <math>\zeta = 0.1</math>. For given impulse vectors <math>\mathbf{I}_1</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_2</math> as shown in the figure, the resultant can be represented in two ways, <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math> and <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math>, in which <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math> corresponds to a negative impulse with <math>A_{R1} = I_{R1} / e^{\zeta \omega_n t_{R1}}</math> and <math>t_{R1} = \theta_{R1} / \omega_d</math>, and <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> corresponds to a positive impulse with <math>A_{R2} = I_{R2} / e^{\zeta \omega_n t_{R2}}</math> and <math>t_{R2} = \theta_{R2} / \omega_d</math>. | |||
The resultants <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math>, <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> can be found as follows. | The resultants <math>\mathbf{I}_{R1}</math>, <math>\mathbf{I}_{R2}</math> can be found as follows. | ||
| Line 125: | Line 124: | ||
::<math>\theta_1 = 0, \ \ \theta_2 = \pi , \ \ \theta_3 = 2 \pi , \ \ \theta_4 = 3 \pi</math>. | ::<math>\theta_1 = 0, \ \ \theta_2 = \pi , \ \ \theta_3 = 2 \pi , \ \ \theta_4 = 3 \pi</math>. | ||
Therefore, <math>t_1 = 0, \ \ t_2 = \pi / \omega_d , \ \ t_3 = 2 \pi / \omega_d , \ \ t_4 = 3 \pi / \omega_d</math>. | Therefore, <math>t_1 = 0, \ \ t_2 = \pi / \omega_d , \ \ t_3 = 2 \pi / \omega_d , \ \ t_4 = 3 \pi / \omega_d</math>. | ||
Also, from the impulse vector diagram, | Also, from the impulse vector diagram, | ||
| Line 226: | Line 225: | ||
The NMe shaper has faster [[Rise time|rise time]] than the ZVD shaper, but it is more sensitive to modeling error than the ZVD shaper. Note that the NMe shaper is the same with the UM shaper<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Singhose |first1=W. E. |last2=Seering |first2=W. P. |last3=Singer |first3=N. C. |title=Time-optimal negative input shapers |journal=Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control |date=1997 |volume=119 |issue=2 |pages=198–205 |doi=10.1115/1.2801233 }}</ref> if the system is undamped (<math>\zeta = 0</math>). | The NMe shaper has faster [[Rise time|rise time]] than the ZVD shaper, but it is more sensitive to modeling error than the ZVD shaper. Note that the NMe shaper is the same with the UM shaper<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Singhose |first1=W. E. |last2=Seering |first2=W. P. |last3=Singer |first3=N. C. |title=Time-optimal negative input shapers |journal=Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control |date=1997 |volume=119 |issue=2 |pages=198–205 |doi=10.1115/1.2801233 }}</ref> if the system is undamped (<math>\zeta = 0</math>). | ||
Figure (a) in the right side shows a typical block diagram of an input-shaping control system, and figure (b) shows residual vibration suppressions in unit-step responses by ZV, ZVD, ETM4 and NMe shapers. | Figure (a) in the right side shows a typical [[Block diagram|block diagram]] of an input-shaping control system, and figure (b) shows residual vibration suppressions in unit-step responses by ZV, ZVD, ETM4 and NMe shapers. | ||
Refer to the reference<ref name="impulseVector" /> for sensitivity curves of the above input shapers, which represent the [[Robust control|robustness]] to modeling errors in <math>\omega_n</math> and <math>\zeta</math>. | Refer to the reference<ref name="impulseVector" /> for sensitivity curves of the above input shapers, which represent the [[Robust control|robustness]] to modeling errors in <math>\omega_n</math> and <math>\zeta</math>. | ||
| Line 236: | Line 234: | ||
[[Category:Dynamics (mechanics)]] | [[Category:Dynamics (mechanics)]] | ||
[[Category:Control theory]] | [[Category:Control theory]] | ||
[[Category:Mechanical vibrations]] | [[Category:Mechanical vibrations]] | ||
{{Sourceattribution|Impulse vector}} | {{Sourceattribution|Impulse vector}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:45, 12 May 2026
An impulse vector, also known as Kang vector, is a mathematical tool used to graphically design and analyze input shapers that can suppress residual vibration. The impulse vector can be applied to both undamped and underdamped systems, as well as to both positive and negative impulses in a unified manner. The impulse vector makes it easy to obtain impulse time and magnitude of the input shaper graphically.[1]
A vector concept for an input shaper was first introduced by W. Singhose[2] for undamped systems with positive impulses. Building on this idea, C.-G. Kang[1] introduced the impulse vector (or Kang vector) to generalize Singhose's idea to undamped and underdamped systems with positive and negative impulses.
Definition

For a vibratory second-order system with undamped natural frequency and damping ratio , the magnitude and angle of an impulse vector (or Kang vector) corresponding to an impulse function , is defined in a 2-dimensional polar coordinate system as
where implies the magnitude of an impulse function, implies the time location of the impulse function, and implies damped natural frequency . For a positive impulse function with , the initial point of the impulse vector is located at the origin of the polar coordinate system, while for a negative impulse function with , the terminal point of the impulse vector is located at the origin.[1] □
In this definition, the magnitude is the product of and a scaling factor for damping during time interval , which represents the magnitude before being damped; the angle is the product of the impulse time and damped natural frequency. represents the Dirac delta function with impulse time at . Note that an impulse function is a purely mathematical quantity, while the impulse vector includes a physical quantity (that is, and of a second-order system) as well as a mathematical impulse function. Representing more than two impulse vectors in the same polar coordinate system makes an impulse vector diagram. The impulse vector diagram is a graphical representation of an impulse sequence.

Consider two impulse vectors and in the figure on the right-hand side, in which is an impulse vector with magnitude and angle corresponding to a positive impulse with , and is an impulse vector with magnitude and angle corresponding to a negative impulse with . Since the two time-responses corresponding to and are exactly same after the final impulse time as shown in the figure, the two impulse vectors and can be regarded as the same vector for vector addition and subtraction. Impulse vectors satisfy the commutative and associative laws, as well as the distributive law for scalar multiplication.
The magnitude of the impulse vector determines the magnitude of the impulse, and the angle of the impulse vector determines the time location of the impulse. One rotation, angle, on an impulse vector diagram corresponds to one (damped) period of the corresponding impulse response.
If it is an undamped system (), the magnitude and angle of the impulse vector become and .
Properties
Property 1: Resultant of two impulse vectors.

The impulse response of a second-order system corresponding to the resultant of two impulse vectors is same as the time response of the system with a two-impulse input corresponding to two impulse vectors after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □
Property 2: Zero resultant of impulse vectors.

If the resultant of impulse vectors is zero, the time response of a second-order system for the input of the impulse sequence corresponding to the impulse vectors becomes zero also after the final impulse time regardless of whether the system is undamped or underdamped. □
Consider an underdamped second-order system with the transfer function . This system has and . For given impulse vectors and as shown in the figure, the resultant can be represented in two ways, and , in which corresponds to a negative impulse with and , and corresponds to a positive impulse with and .
The resultants , can be found as follows.
- ,
Note that . The impulse responses and corresponding to and are exactly same with after each impulse time location as shown in green lines of the figure (b).
Now, place an impulse vector on the impulse vector diagram to cancel the resultant as shown in the figure. The impulse vector is given by
- .
When the impulse sequence corresponding to three impulse vectors and is applied to a second-order system as an input, the resulting time response causes no residual vibration after the final impulse time as shown in the red line of the bottom figure (b). Of course, another canceling vector can exist, which is the impulse vector with the same magnitude as but with an opposite arrow direction. However, this canceling vector has a longer impulse time that can be as much as a half period compared to .
Applications: Design of input shapers using impulse vectors

ZVDn shaper
Using impulse vectors, we can redesign[1] known input shapers [3] such as zero vibration (ZV), zero vibration and derivative (ZVD), and ZVDn shapers. The ZV shaper is composed of two impulse vectors, in which the first impulse vector is located at 0°, and the second impulse vector with the same magnitude is located at 180° for . Then from the impulse vector diagram of the ZV shaper on the right-hand side,
- .
Therefore, .
Since (normalization constraint) must be hold, and ,
- .
Therefoere, .
Thus, the ZV shaper is given by
- .
The ZVD shaper is composed of three impulse vectors, in which the first impulse vector is located at 0 rad, the second vector at rad, and the third vector at rad, and the magnitude ratio is . Then . From the impulse vector diagram,
- .
Therefore, .
Also from the impulse vector diagram,
- .
Since must be hold,
- .
Therefore, .
Thus, the ZVD shaper is given by
- .
The ZVD2 shaper is composed of four impulse vectors, in which the first impulse vector is located at 0 rad, the second vector at rad, the third vector at rad, and the fourth vector at rad, and the magnitude ratio is . Then . From the impulse vector diagram,
- .
Therefore, .
Also, from the impulse vector diagram,
- .
Since must be hold,
- .
Therefore, .
Thus, the ZVD2 shaper is given by
- .
Similarly, the ZVD3 shaper with five impulse vectors can be obtained, in which the first vector is located at 0 rad, the second vector at rad, third vector at rad, the fourth vector at rad, and the fifth vector at rad, and the magnitude ratio is . In general, for the ZVDn shaper, i-th impulse vector is located at rad, and the magnitude ratio is where implies a mathematical combination.
ETM shaper

Now, consider equal shaping-time and magnitudes (ETM) shapers,[1] with the same magnitude of impulse vectors and with the same angle between impulse vectors. The ETMn shaper satisfies the conditions
- .
Thus, the resultant of the impulse vectors of the ETMn shaper becomes always zero for all . One merit of the ETMn shaper is that, unlike the ZVDn or extra insensitive (EI) shapers,[4] the shaping time is always one (damped) period of the time response even if n increases. The ETM4 shaper with four impulse vectors is obtained from the above conditions together with impulse vector definitions as
- .
- .
The ETM5 shaper with five impulse vectors is obtained similarly as
- .
- .
In the same way, the ETMn shaper with can be obtained easily. In general, ETM shapers are less sensitive to modeling errors than ZVDn shapers in a large positive error range. Note that the ZVD shaper is an ETM3 shaper with .
NMe shaper

Moreover, impulse vectors can be applied to design input shapers with negative impulses. Consider a negative equal-magnitude (NMe) shaper,[1] in which the magnitudes of three impulse vectors are , and the angles are . Then the resultant of three impulse vectors becomes zero, and thus the residual vibration is suppressed. Impulse time of the NMe shaper are obtained as , and impulse magnitudes are obtained easily by solving the simultaneous equations
- .

The resulting NMe shaper is
- .
- .
The NMe shaper has faster rise time than the ZVD shaper, but it is more sensitive to modeling error than the ZVD shaper. Note that the NMe shaper is the same with the UM shaper[5] if the system is undamped ().
Figure (a) in the right side shows a typical block diagram of an input-shaping control system, and figure (b) shows residual vibration suppressions in unit-step responses by ZV, ZVD, ETM4 and NMe shapers.
Refer to the reference[1] for sensitivity curves of the above input shapers, which represent the robustness to modeling errors in and .
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Kang, Chul-Goo (August 2019). "Impulse vectors for input shaping control: A mathematical tool to design and analyze input shapers". IEEE Control Systems Magazine 39 (4): 40–55. doi:10.1109/MCS.2019.2913610. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jlzzKanKMiOIqKh7ZfoAWftpq77lHw0J/view?usp=drive_link.
- ↑ Singhose, W.; Seering, W.; Singer, N. (1994). "Residual vibration reduction using vector diagrams to generate shaped inputs". Journal of Mechanical Design 116 (2): 654–659. doi:10.1115/1.2919428.
- ↑ Singhose, W. (2009). "Command shaping for flexible systems: A review of the first 50 years". International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 10 (4): 153–168. doi:10.1007/s12541-009-0084-2.
- ↑ Singhose, W.; Derezinski, S.; Singer, N. (1996). "Extra-insensitive input shapers for controlling flexible spacecraft". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 19 (2): 385–391. doi:10.2514/3.21630. Bibcode: 1996JGCD...19..385S.
- ↑ Singhose, W. E.; Seering, W. P.; Singer, N. C. (1997). "Time-optimal negative input shapers". Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 119 (2): 198–205. doi:10.1115/1.2801233.
