Biology:Dictyochales

From HandWiki
Short description: Order of single-celled organisms

Silicoflagellates
Temporal range: 115–0 Ma
Dictyocha speculum.jpg
Dictyocha speculum
Scientific classification e
Domain: Eukaryota
Clade: Diaphoretickes
Clade: SAR
Clade: Stramenopiles
Phylum: Gyrista
Subphylum: Ochrophytina
Class: Dictyochophyceae
Order: Dictyochales
Haeckel, 1894
Family: Dictyochaceae
Lemmermann, 1901
Genera
Synonyms[1]
  • Silicoflagellata Borgert, 1890
  • Dictyochida Borgert, 1891

The silicoflagellates (order Dictyochales) are a small group of unicellular photosynthetic protists, or algae, belonging to the supergroup of eukaryotes known as Stramenopiles. They behave as plankton and are present in oceanic waters. They are well-known from harmful algal blooms that cause high mortality of fish. Additionally, they compose a rich fossil record represented by their silica skeletons.

Morphology

Dictyocha fibula

The silicoflagellates are unicellular protists, composed of cells with one emergent flagellum and a siliceous skeleton constructed from a network of hollow rods outside of the cytoplasm. The morphology of the skeleton can vary greatly, from a simple ring, an ellipse or triangle, to a more complex and complete arrangement of rods. For example, in Dictyocha fibula (pictured) the skeleton rods are arranged in a series of peripheral polygons surrounding a central hexagon.[2] These skeletons form a small component of marine sediments, and are well-known microfossils dating as far back as the early Cretaceous.[3]

The silicoflagellates are considered algae due to being photosynthetic. Their chloroplasts are usually present inside the numerous cytoplasmic processes that extend from the central mass of the cytoplasm, where the cell nucleus is located. There is a possibility that silicoflagellate chloroplasts are derived from haptophyte algae through tertiary endosymbiosis.[2]

Ecology

Silicoflagellates are photosynthetic microscopic algae present in the upper part of the marine water column, as plankton. They are adapted to both warm and cold waters. Similarly to diatoms, silicoflagellates are most productive where high levels of silica and nutrients are present in near-surface waters. They are known to cause harmful algal blooms, or red tides, in many parts of Europe. Blooms of silicoflagellates cause fish mortality because their silica skeletons obstruct and abrade fish gills, leading to asphyxiation and subsequent death. Additionally, some silicoflagellates are thought to produce ichthyotoxins, i.e. substances toxic to fish, although their effect is debated. Apart from physical damage to fish, the depletion of dissolved oxygen in water due to their cellular respiration during bloom growth has also caused fish mortality in fisheries and aquaculture.[4]

Systematics

Taxonomy

In biological classification, silicoflagellates compose the family Dictyochaceae (in botanical nomenclature) or Dictyochidae (in zoological nomenclature), contained within the order Dictyochales or Silicoflagellata.[1][2] They were previously classified as Chrysophyceae (golden algae).[1] Through morphological and molecular similarities, this group was eventually transferred to the Dictyochophyceae, which contains three additional orders, Pedinellales, Florenciellales and Rhizochromulinales.[5] After decades of phylogenetic analyses, silicoflagellates and the rest of Dictyochophyceae are accepted as a class of the phylum Ochrophyta, within the eukaryotic supergroup Stramenopiles.[6]

Genera

There are four living genera: Dictyocha, Octactis, Stephanocha (earlier known as Distephanus,[7] homonymous with the flowering plant Distephanus)[8] and Vicicitus, with 11 recognised living species. Dictyocha was previously the only member of the order, until Vicicitus was created for a species previously assigned to the raphidophyte Chattonella but later proven to be a Dictyochophyceae through phylogenetic analyses.[9][10]

  • Dictyocha Ehrenberg, 1837 — 4 spp.[11]
  • Octactis J. Schiller, 1925 — 2 spp.[10]
  • Stephanocha R.W.Jordan & McCartney, 2015 (=Distephanus Stöhr, 1880 nom. illeg.)[8] — 4 spp.
  • Vicicitus F.H.Chang, 2012 — 1 sp.[9]

There are also several extinct genera, but their classification is difficult, since skeletons may show diverse forms within each living species.[12][3]

  • Arctyocha Bukry, 1985 — 3 spp.
  • Corbisema Hanna, 1928 — 5 spp.
  • Cornua Schulz, 1928 — 6 spp.[12][3]
  • Gleserocha McCartney, Witkowski & Harwood, 2014 — 3 spp.[3]
  • Lyramula Hanna, 1928 — 2 spp.
  • Schulzyocha McCartney, Witkowski & Harwood, 2011 — 5 spp.[12]
  • Umpiocha McCartney, Witkowski & Harwood, 2011 — 2 spp.[12]
  • Vallacerta Hanna, 1928 — 5 spp.
  • Variramus McCartney, Wise, Harwood & Gersonde, 1990 ex McCartney, Witkowski & Harwood 2011 — 2 spp.[12]

Evolution

Proposed relationships among Cenozoic silicoflagellates

Cornua

62.0 Ma

Pseudonaviculopsis

Corbisema archangelskiana group

62.4 Ma
61.5 Ma
59.9 Ma

Corbisema tracantha group

Naviculopsis

37.8 Ma
37.1 Ma

Distephanopsis

18.4 Ma

Caryocha

13.0 Ma

Paramesocena

2.0 Ma?

Octactis

Stephanocha

Dictyocha

48.0 Ma

four-sided star-of-David double skeletons

Corbisema apiculata group

55.5 Ma 

Bachmannocena

Proposed evolutionary history for Cenozoic silicoflagellate genera based on their skeletal morphology, with estimated divergence ages in millions of years ago (Ma). The 4-sided fossils with star-of-David-shaped double skeletons presumably belong to the genus including Corbisema apiculata, while the 3-sided fossils currently placed in Corbisema are proposed to belong to multiple different genera not yet formally named.[13]

The fossil record of silicoflagellates extends back to early Albian times, in the Early Cretaceous, around 115 million years ago. However, data on Late Cretaceous and Paleocene silicoflagellate evolution is sparse, and they are best known from the Eocene to Recent era.[3] Silicoflagellate skeletons from the Cretaceous are markedly different from Cenozoic ones: before the Santonian (around 85 million years ago) they presented branched, non-ringed shapes.[13] During the Cenozoic, silicoflagellates show an evolutionary trend towards more complicated apical and basal structures, resulting in a design that resembles a hemisphere. As a consequence, after mitosis, the pair of daughter cell skeletons resembles a near-sphere.[13]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Moestrup, Øjvind; O'Kelly, Charles J. (2000). "Class Silicoflagellata Lemmermann, 1901". An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. II (2nd ed.). Lawrence, Kansas: Society of Protozoologists. pp. 775–782. https://protistologists.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/17SILICOFLAGELLATA.pdf. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lee, R.E. (2008). "14. Heterokontophyta: Dictyochophyceae". Phycology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 359–364. ISBN 978-1-139-46987-6. https://books.google.com/books?id=gfoIAFHgusgC&pg=PA359. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 McCartney, Kevin; Witkowski, Jakub; Hardwood, David M. (2014). "New insights into skeletal morphology of the oldest known silicoflagellates: Variramus, Cornua and Gleserocha gen. nov.". Rvue de micropaléontologie 57: 75–91. doi:10.1016/j.revmic.2014.05.001. 
  4. Ajuzie, Cyril C.; Houvenaghel, Guy T. (2015). "A first record of extant silicoflagellates in coastal waters of Nigeria". Nature and Science 13 (3): 74–79. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cyril-Ajuzie/publication/274192281_A_first_record_of_extant_silicoflagellates_in_coastal_waters_of_Nigeria/links/5517e9230cf2f7d80a3c1761/A-first-record-of-extant-silicoflagellates-in-coastal-waters-of-Nigeria.pdf. 
  5. Edvardsen, Bente; Eikrem, Wenche; Shalchian-Tabrizi, Kamran; Riisberg, Ingvild; Johnsen, Geir; Naustvoll, Lars; Throndsen, Jahn (2007). "Verrucophora farcimen gen. et sp. nov. (Dictyochophyceae, Heterokonta)—a bloom-forming ichthyotoxic flagellate from the Skagerrak, Norway". Journal of Phycology (Phycological Society of America) 43: 1054–1070. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00390.x. 
  6. Adl, Sina M.; Bass, David; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Schoch, Conrad L.; Smirnov, Alexey; Agatha, Sabine; Berney, Cedric et al. (2019). "Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology (Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the International Society of Protistologists) 66 (1): 4–119. doi:10.1111/jeu.12691. PMID 30257078. 
  7. Malinverno, Elisa (2010). "Extant morphotypes of Distephanus speculum (Silicoflagellata) from the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean: Morphology, morphometry and biogeography". Marine Micropaleontology 77: 154–174. doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2010.09.002. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 Jordan, Richard; McCartney, Kevin (2015). "Stephanocha nom. nov., a replacement name for the illegitimate silicoflagellate genus Distephanus (Dictyochophyceae)". Phytotaxa 201 (3). doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.201.3.1. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 Chang, F. Hoe; McVeagh, Margaret; Gall, Mark; Smith, Peter (2012). "Chattonella globosa is a member of Dictyochophyceae: reassignment to Vicicitus gen. nov., based on molecular phylogeny, pigment composition, morphology and life history". Phycologia 51 (4): 403–420. doi:10.2216/10-104.1. 
  10. 10.0 10.1 Chang, Fook Hoe; Sutherland, Judy; Bradford-Grieve, Janet (2017). "Taxonomic revision of Dictyochales (Dictyochophyceae) based on morphological, ultrastructural, biochemical and molecular data". Phycological Research 65: 235–247. doi:10.1111/pre.12181. 
  11. "Planktonic Silicoflagellates (Dictyochophyceae) from the Mexican Pacific Ocean". Botanica Marina 44 (5): 417–423. 2001. doi:10.1515/BOT.2001.050. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 McCartney, Kevin; Witkowski, Jakub; Harwood, David M. (2011). "Unusual assemblages of Late Cretaceous silicoflagellates from the Canadian Archipelago". Revue de micropaléontologie 54 (1): 31–58. doi:10.1016/j.revmic.2010.08.002. 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 McCartney, Kevin; Witkowski, Jakub; Jordan, Richard W.; Abe, Kenta; Jauszkiewicz, Adrianna; Wróbel, Rafał; Bąk, Małgorzata; Soeding, Emanuel (2022). "Silicoflagellate evolution through the Cenozoic". Marine Micropaleontology 172 (102108). doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2022.102108. 


Wikidata ☰ {{{from}}} entry