Biology:Environmental epigenetics

From HandWiki
Short description: Influence the environment on gene expression

Environmental epigenetics is a branch of epigenetics that studies the effects of external environmental factors on the gene expression of a developing embryo.[1] These factors do not alter the genetic code, but genes affected may be passed down from parent to offspring through epigenetic modifications.[2]

During development, exposure to certain environmental factors can influence epigenetic modifications, which can be harmful to offspring and increase the risk of developmental disorders or disease. Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone modification, alter how genes are expressed through turning on or off specific genes, ultimately affecting the embryo's phenotype.[1]

These environmental factors are referred to as triggers and can involve anything that influences normal gene expression without changing the DNA sequence itself.[2] Some of the most common environmental triggers leading to epigenetic change include diet, temperature,[3] lifestyle choices, stress,[2] exposure to chemicals,[4] and exposure to industrial pollutants. These triggers can cause low birth weight, neurological disorders, cancers, autoimmune diseases, and many other malformations.[1]

Anyone with a Genome is Predisposed to Epigenetic Effects

Epigenetic Mechanism demonstrating how DNA methylation can turn on or off genes.

But, who's most at risk?

Environmental exposures primarily affect embryos and children,[4] but exposure can occur throughout your lifetime, and the effects can be lifelong and passed on.[5]

Due to the complexity of fertilization, it is not completely known how the germline mechanism works throughout generations, but epigenetic reprogramming is well known.[6] Epigenetic reprogramming occurs to ensure totipotency and reduce the number of negative gene modifications and mutations.[7] Although this reprogramming occurs in the germ line cells, some modifications will be passed on to the 3rd generation.[4]

A common example of this phenomenon is a grandparent's chemical exposure to the insecticide DDT and materials, like plastic, containing bisphenol A, increasing a grandchild's risk of experiencing early puberty, obesity, and fertility issues.[8] Once a child is born, their genome can be modified by toxins and stress exposure can cause offspring epigenome to rearrange, resulting in disease later in life [9]

Examples of Triggers

Nutrients

Offspring can experience phenotypic changes depending on their access to nutrients. When nutrients are limited during pregnancy, the offspring's phenotypic expression can be disrupted. Nutrient intake is also important during lactation for the purpose of transferring nutrients to the offspring.[10]

Stress during pregnancy

Pregnancy is a significant life event that brings many hormonal changes. Stress during pregnancy can have adverse effects on both humans and animals. These stressors can be emotional or physical and have an impact not only on the mother but on the offspring as well. Understanding the causes and effects of stressors during pregnancy is important for managing the well-being of both mother and offspring.[11]

Exposure to maternal stressors can increase the likelihood of either overexpressing or suppressing DNA expression. When high levels of depression or stress are experienced in animals, it can result in smaller litter sizes and lower birth rates.[12] This is believed to be due to decreased hormone production.[13] Without adequate hormone production, ovulation may be affected, leading to fewer eggs and reduced potential offspring. Hormones also regulate the nutrients available to the offspring and assist in building the immune system. Reduced hormone levels can lead to miscarriages, underdevelopment, and weak offspring.[14]

Oxidative stress in offspring can come from environmental factors or actions. Drinking and smoking are some of the leading causes of birth defects in humans. Drinking during pregnancy can have a significant effect on an unborn child. Brain abnormalities and stunted growth are only two of the numerous impacts of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.[15] Smoking during pregnancy is another major oxidative stressor, causing changes in growth genes, and has been linked to premature, undersized babies that may also have cognitive issues throughout life.[16][17] Smoking is not the only cause of oxidative stress through inhalation; air pollution can also alter gene methylation, potentially increasing the offspring's risk of early-onset vascular disease.[18]

Extreme stress during pregnancy can cause changes in the baby's stress response gene (NR3C1), which regulates cortisol levels in the body. These changes can cause sensitivity to stress later on in life.[19] This can lead to anxiety, depression, and attention deficits in both children and adults.[20] Early stress can also impact brain development, leading to long-lasting effects on mental health and behavior.[21]

There are many clinically proven ways to manage stress during pregnancy. Meditation, yoga, and breathing exercises have been proven to lower stress hormone levels and can decrease prenatal depression and anxiety. When the expectant mother experiences less stress, it also reduces stress for the baby, leading to better health outcomes for both mother and child.[22][23]

Cold weather affects the likelihood of a butterfly finding a mate and reproducing, as well as their coloring. These insects are dependent on their coloring to survive and reproduce.

Temperature

Changes in temperature can have varied effects on an organism. DNA methylation can be impacted by temperature when the temperature deviates from its normal value, preventing regular processes from taking place. Temperature can be considered a stressor in environmental epigenetics since it has the potential to change how offspring respond and react to their environment.[24] Monarch butterflies are an example of how temperature can impact the survival and fitness of an organism.[25] If exposed to stressors such as varying temperatures, these butterflies may express coloring that deviates from their normal color.

Lifestyle choices

Epigenetic marks can result from a number of exposures and choices made by an individual in their lifetime. Exposure to environmental pollutants, psychological stress, dietary choices or restrictions, working habits, and consumption of drugs or alcohol all influence the epigenetics of an individual and what may be passed down to future offspring.[26] Such exposures can affect important processes of epigenetics such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, influencing the risk for noncommunicable diseases such as obesity.

Physical Activity

Physical activity plays a pivotal role in shaping gene expression through key epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA activity. Regular exercise induces specific changes in DNA methylation patterns, particularly in genes related to metabolism, inflammation, and muscle adaptation, thereby regulating critical physiological pathways without altering the genetic code itself.[11] For instance, both acute and long-term physical activity remodels promoter methylation in human skeletal muscle, improving glucose uptake, insulin sensitivity, and mitochondrial function.[27]

Moreover, exercise promotes beneficial histone modifications, such as increased histone acetylation, which relaxes chromatin structure and facilitates the transcription of genes involved in muscle growth, endurance, and energy metabolism. Additionally, physical activity influences non-coding RNAs like microRNAs, modulating post-transcriptional gene regulation related to muscle repair, cardiovascular function, and immune response.[28]

Exposure

Exposure to certain materials or chemicals can cause an epigenetic reaction. The epigenetic causing substances cause issues like altered DNA methylation, CpG islands, chromatin, along with other transcription factors.[29] Environmental epigenetics aims to relate such environmental triggers or substances to phenotypic variation.[30] Numerous studies have demonstrated how exposure to environmental pollutants, such as heavy metals, pesticides, and air pollutants, can induce epigenetic changes in various organisms.[31] For example, research has shown that exposure to pollutants like biphenol A (BPA) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can lead to DNA methylation changes and histone modifications in plants, animals, and humans.[32]

Epigentic mechanisms play a role in the adaptation of species of changing environmental conditions, including climate change.[33] Studies have shown that organisms can exhibit phenotypic plasticity through epigenetic modifications in response to environmental stressors such as temperature fluctuation, drought, and habitat loss.[34]

Environmental epigenetics has revealed the potential for transgenerational effects, where environmental exposures experienced by one generation can influence the phenotypes and health outcomes of subsequent generations through epigenetic inheritance mechanisms.[35] Studies in various organisms, including plants, insects, and mammals, have shown transgenerational epigenetic effects resulting from parental exposure to stressors such as toxins, dietary changes, and environmental contaminants.[36] Epigenetic modifications can influence gene expression and phenotypic traits in organisms across different trophic levels, with implications for ecosystem stability.[37]

Lemon sharks

A real-world example of environmental effects on DNA can be seen in lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) in the Bahamas. After a dredging event, where machinery scrapes mud and debris from the ocean floor, these sharks were exposed to toxic metals like manganese and other pollutants. Scientists found that this pollution caused changes in the shark's DNA Methylation, a process that helps control gene activity. Essentially, the sharks' genes started behaving differently than normal, likely due to the stress of dredging and the toxins in their habitat. This case shows how human activities, like dredging, don't just harm the environment, but they can also trigger hidden changes in animals' DNA, potentially affecting their health and survival.[38]

Plants

Plants require certain metals in small amounts for healthy growth, but excessive amounts can become toxic. While plants naturally absorb beneficial metals from soil, they can't distinguish these from harmful metals like mercury, so they take up both. When metal concentrations get too high, they damage plants in two main ways. First, they cause direct harm through oxidative stress, which creates destructive chemical reactions that damage plant cells. Second, they cause indirect harm by occupying spaces where plants normally absorb nutrients, blocking essential elements from entering the plant. The amount of mercury a plant absorbs depends on various factors including soil acidity and the specific plant species, making this a complex environmental issue.[39]

Many types of heavy metals are toxic to plants, such as lead. Typically, land plants absorb lead(Pb) from the soil, most retaining it in their roots with some evidence of foliage uptakes and potential distribution to other plant parts. Calcium and phosphorus can reduce the uptake of lead, a common and toxic soil element that impacts the plant, growth structure, and photosynthesis of the plant. Lead, in particular, inhibits the process by which a plant grows from a seed into a seedling, known as seed germination in various species, by interfering with crucial enzymes.[40] Studies have shown that lead acetate reduces protease and amylase activity in rice endosperm considerably. This interferes with early seeding growth across plant species such as soybean, rice, tomato, barley, maize, and some legumes.

Furthermore, lead delays root and steam elongation and leaf expansion, with the extent of root elongation inhibition varying based on the lead concentration, the medium's ionic composition, and pH.[41] Soil levels that have high levels of lead can also cause irregular root thickening, cell wall modifications in peas, growth reduction in sugar beets, oxidative stress due to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, biomass, and protein content in maize, along with diminished lead count and area, plant height in Portia trees, and enzyme activity affecting CO2 fixation in oats.[42]

Manganese (Mn), is crucial for plants and involves in photosynthesis and other physiological processes. Deficiency commonly affects sandy, organic, or tropical soils with a high pH above six and heavily weathered tropical soils. Mn can move easily from roots to shoots, though it is not efficiently redistributed from leaves to other parts of the plant. The signs of Mn toxicity are necrotic brown spots on leaves, petioles, and steams that start on the lower leaves and move upward, leading to death.[43][44] When damage to young leaves and stems, coupled with chlorosis and browning, called a "crinkle leaf." In some species, toxicity can begin with chlorosis in older leaves, advancing to younger ones, and can inhibit chlorophyll synthesis by interfering with iron-related processes.[45] Mn toxicity is more present in soils with a pH level lower than six. In the broad bean plant, Mn affects shoot and root length[46] The spearmint plant, lowers chlorophyll and carotenoid levels and increases root Mn accumulation.[47] Pea plant, lowers chlorophyll a and b, growth rate, and photosynthesis.[48] In the tomato plant, it slows growth and decreases chlorophyll concentration.[49][50]

Humans

Humans have displayed evidence of epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation, differentiation in expression, and histone modification due to environmental exposures. Carcinogen development in humans has been studied in correlation to environmental inducements such as chemical and physical exposures and their transformative abilities on epigenetics. Chemical and physical environmental factors are contributors to epigenetic statuses amongst humans.[30]

Firstly, a study was performed on drinking water populations in China involving three generations: the F1 generation consisting of grandparents exposed to arsenic in adulthood, the F2 generation including the parents exposed to arsenic in utero and early childhood, and the F3 generation which were the grandchildren exposed to arsenic from germ cells.[51] This area in China was historically known for its dangerously high levels of arsenic, therefore, there was opportunity to examine the timeline As exposures across the three generations. The study was conducted to discover the linkage between the timeline effects of As exposure and DNA methylations. The population and environment for which the study was conducted were reportedly not exposed to other environmental exposures besides arsenic.[51]

The results concluded from this experiment were that 744 CpG sites[52] had been differentially methylated. The 744 sites were found across all three generations in the group exposed to arsenic. The concluding argument based on the results of this study is that the DNA methylation changes were more prevalent in those that developed arsenic-induced diseases.[51]

Exposures to environmental factors during human lifetimes and their potential effect on phenotypes is a highly question topic involving epigenetics and disease development.[30] In the case of humans, "unhealthy" phenotypes have been identified to carry such evidence that environmental epigenetics could be a leading cause in gene regulation, disease development, cell development and differentiation, aging, and carcinogenic effect.[30] Although the way that environmental factors and the human genome work together is not completely understood, their influence has been identified and is continuing to drive explanations for human genome modifications and their outcomes. Driving evidence for adverse effects implemented by extrinsic factors from the environment, comes from studies done on nutrition and exposures to toxins.[30]

Besides arsenic exposures, other metals have been identified to cause such hypermethylations. Concentrations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn metals were identified in fishermen's blood and resulted in an increase in the expression of the IGF2 gene.[53] The IGF2 gene is responsible for making the insulin-like growth factor 2.[54] The insulin-like growth factor is involved in growth and can result in disorders where cell growth and overgrowth are abnormal.[55] Such disorders include breast and lung cancers and Silver–Russell and Beckwith–Wiedemann syndromes [55][56] The significance of IGF2 gene expression is found in its relationships to human health. There is remaining uncertainty between the long-term environmental exposures and epigenetic changes, but conducted research has provided that heavy metal exposures cause DNA methylation changes.[53]

Exposures to certain triggers such as alcohol or drugs can disrupt the normal expression of the offspring's phenotype. Antipsychotic drugs can lead to abnormal or stunted development during the fetal or embryonic stages.[57]

Multigenerational epigenetic inheritance

Organisms respond to the habitat around them in many different ways, one way is by changing its gene expression to one that is most suitable for their surroundings. More often than not, this has a direct correlation to phenotypic plasticity. Phenotypic plasticity is when a species develops new physical features in response to the environment they're in. Passing down epigenetics that are in relation to mitotic cell divisions allows for the belief of a possibility that this is also passed down from parents to offspring. Parents could be responsible for the development of new phenotypes in these cases.[58]

Epigenetic inheritance

Epigenetic inheritance refers to passing down or transferring epigenetic information between the parent and offspring. Some believe that these occurrences can be passed down for many generations. For example, the language a given species utilizes develops a specific phenotype that will be passed down from generation to generation.[58]

Cultural inheritance

Cultural inheritance is a behavioral factor that is passed down from generation to generation, similar to inheritance. For example, in rats, mothers that lick and groom their pups pass down a specific behavior to their offspring causing them to do the same to the subsequent generation. Epigenetic inheritance is involved in this, but they are separate things that work together.[58]

Interplay between Epigenetic and Cultural inheritance

The interaction between epigenetic and cultural inheritance demonstrates how environmental factors can shape both biological and behavioral traits across generations. Epigenetic inheritance involves molecular mechanisms (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications) that regulate gene expression without altering the DNA sequence, while cultural inheritance consists of learned behaviors transmitted through social interactions. These processes can reinforce each other, leading to persistent phenotypic changes in offspring.

For example, in humans, parental trauma or nutritional deficits can induce epigenetic modifications that affect stress responses or metabolic functions in subsequent generations. These biological changes may then influence parenting behaviors, such as caregiving styles, which are further propagated through cultural transmission.[59] Similarly, in animal models, maternal care behaviors (e.g., grooming in rats) have been linked to epigenetic alterations in offspring, affecting their stress reactivity and behavior as adults.[60]

This relationship suggests that epigenetic and cultural inheritance are deeply intertwined, forming an integrated system of multigenerational adaptation. However, distinguishing between biologically inherited traits and culturally learned behaviors remains a challenge. Future research should explore how these mechanisms interact across different species and environments to better understand their evolutionary significance.

Mechanisms influencing epigenetics

DNA replication

DNA Replication

DNA replication is a highly conserved process involving the copying of genetic information from parent one generation to the next. Within this complex process, chromatin disassembles and reassembles in a precise and regulated manner in order to compact large amounts of genetic material into the nucleus, while also maintaining the integrity of epigenetic information carried by histone proteins bound to DNA in the process of cell division. Half of the histones present during replication are from chromatin found in the parent DNA and thus carry the parent's epigenetic information.[61] These epigenetic marks play a critical role in determining chromatin structure and thus gene expression in the newly synthesized DNA. The other half of the histones present in replication are newly synthesized.

DNA methylation

Epigenetic mechanisms-DNA methylation and acetylation

A major formative mechanism of epigenetic modification is DNA methylation. DNA methylation is the process of adding a methyl group to a cytosine base in the DNA strand, via covalent bond. This process is carried out by specific enzymes.[62] These methyl additions can be reversed in a process known as demethylation. The presence or absence of methyl groups can attract proteins involved in gene repression, or inhibit the binding of certain transcription factors, thus preventing methylated genes from being transcribed, ultimately affecting phenotypic expression.[63]

Acetylation

Acetylation is a reaction that introduces an acetyl group into an organic chemical compound, typically by substituting an acetyl group for a hydrogen atom. Deacetylation is the removal of an acetyl group from an organic chemical compound. Histone acetylation and deacetylation affect the three-dimensional structure of chromatin. A more relaxed chromatin structure leads to greater rates of genetic transcription, whereas a tighter structure inhibits transcription.

Transcriptional regulation

Regulation of transcription in mammals

Transcriptional regulation is a complex process involving the binding of transcriptional machinery to regulatory proteins—specifically chromatin remodeling or modifying proteins-directly onto a specific target. This may sometimes be facilitated by the contribution of accessory complexes that function primarily to repress and activate transcription in a cell. Transcriptional regulation additionally focuses on the epigenetic regulation of a target locus, as the epigenetic status of the locus determines either the facilitation of or prohibition of transcription. Epigenetic regulation is necessary for the precise deployment of transcriptional programs.[64]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Perera, Frederica; Herbstman, Julie (2011-04-01). "Prenatal environmental exposures, epigenetics, and disease". Reproductive Toxicology. Prenatal Programming and Toxicity II (PPTOX II): Role of Environmental Stressors in the Developmental Origins of Disease 31 (3): 363–373. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.12.055. ISSN 0890-6238. PMID 21256208. Bibcode2011RepTx..31..363P. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Bollati, V.; Baccarelli, A. (July 2010). "Environmental epigenetics" (in en). Heredity 105 (1): 105–112. doi:10.1038/hdy.2010.2. ISSN 1365-2540. PMID 20179736. Bibcode2010Hered.105..105B. 
  3. McCaw, Beth A; Stevenson, Tyler J; Lancaster, Lesley T (2020-12-16). "Epigenetic Responses to Temperature and Climate". Integrative and Comparative Biology 60 (6): 1469–1480. doi:10.1093/icb/icaa049. ISSN 1540-7063. PMID 32470117. https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/60/6/1469/5848649?login=false. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Surani, M. Azim (November 2001). "Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance". Nature 414 (6859): 122–128. doi:10.1038/35102186. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11689958. Bibcode2001Natur.414..122S. 
  5. Heindel, Jerrold J.; Vandenberg, Laura N. (April 2015). "Developmental origins of health and disease: a paradigm for understanding disease cause and prevention" (in en). Current Opinion in Pediatrics 27 (2): 248–253. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000191. ISSN 1040-8703. PMID 25635586. 
  6. Grossniklaus, Ueli; Kelly, William G.; Kelly, Bill; Ferguson-Smith, Anne C.; Pembrey, Marcus; Lindquist, Susan (March 2013). "Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: how important is it?". Nature Reviews. Genetics 14 (3): 228–235. doi:10.1038/nrg3435. ISSN 1471-0064. PMID 23416892. 
  7. Pereira, Beatriz; Correia, Francisca P.; Alves, Inês A.; Costa, Margarida; Gameiro, Mariana; Martins, Ana P.; Saraiva, Jorge A. (March 2024). "Epigenetic reprogramming as a key to reverse ageing and increase longevity" (in en). Ageing Research Reviews 95. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102204. PMID 38272265. 
  8. Cirillo, Piera M.; La Merrill, Michele A.; Krigbaum, Nickilou Y.; Cohn, Barbara A. (2021-08-01). "Grandmaternal Perinatal Serum DDT in Relation to Granddaughter Early Menarche and Adult Obesity: Three Generations in the Child Health and Development Studies Cohort" (in en). Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 30 (8): 1480–1488. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1456. ISSN 1055-9965. PMID 33853850. 
  9. de Magalhães-Barbosa, M. C., Prata-Barbosa, A., & da Cunha, A. J. L. A. (2022). Toxic stress, epigenetics and child development. Jornal de Pediatria, 98, S13–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2021.09.007
  10. "Epigenetics and chemical safety assessment". Mutation Research 705 (2): 83–95. October 2010. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.04.003. PMID 20399890. Bibcode2010MRRMR.705...83L. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 Coussons-Read, Mary E (June 2013). "Effects of prenatal stress on pregnancy and human development: mechanisms and pathways" (in en). Obstetric Medicine 6 (2): 52–57. doi:10.1177/1753495x12473751. ISSN 1753-495X. PMID 27757157. 
  12. Nowak, Alexandra L.; Anderson, Cindy M.; Mackos, Amy R.; Neiman, Emily; Gillespie, Shannon L. (April 2020). "Stress During Pregnancy and Epigenetic Modifications to Offspring DNA: A Systematic Review of Associations and Implications for Preterm Birth" (in en). Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 34 (2): 134–145. doi:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000471. ISSN 0893-2190. PMID 32332443. 
  13. "Lifestyle, pregnancy and epigenetic effects". Epigenomics 7 (1): 85–102. February 1, 2015. doi:10.2217/epi.14.71. PMID 25687469. 
  14. Bataa, Munkhtuya; Abdelmessih, Erini; Hanna, Fahad (2024-04-02). "Exploring Progesterone Deficiency in First-Trimester Miscarriage and the Impact of Hormone Therapy on Foetal Development: A Scoping Review" (in en). Children 11 (4): 422. doi:10.3390/children11040422. ISSN 2227-9067. PMID 38671639. 
  15. Hellemans, Kim G.C.; Sliwowska, Joanna H.; Verma, Pamela; Weinberg, Joanne (May 2010). "Prenatal alcohol exposure: Fetal programming and later life vulnerability to stress, depression and anxiety disorders" (in en). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34 (6): 791–807. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.06.004. PMID 19545588. 
  16. Abraham, Miriam; Alramadhan, Salem; Iniguez, Carmen; Duijts, Liesbeth; Jaddoe, Vincent W. V.; Den Dekker, Herman T.; Crozier, Sarah; Godfrey, Keith M. et al. (2017-02-23). Niaura, Raymond. ed. "A systematic review of maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal measurements with meta-analysis" (in en). PLOS ONE 12 (2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170946. ISSN 1932-6203. PMID 28231292. Bibcode2017PLoSO..1270946A. 
  17. Hussain, Tarique; Murtaza, Ghulam; Metwally, Elsayed; Kalhoro, Dildar Hussain; Kalhoro, Muhammad Saleem; Rahu, Baban Ali; Sahito, Raja Ghazanfar Ali; Yin, Yulong et al. (2021-09-27). Jin, Mingliang. ed. "The Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Balance in Pregnancy" (in en). Mediators of Inflammation 2021: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2021/9962860. ISSN 1466-1861. PMID 34616234. 
  18. Ortega Avila, J. G.; Echeverri, I.; de Plata, C. A.; Castillo, A. (2015-01-01). "Impact of oxidative stress during pregnancy on fetal epigenetic patterns and early origin of vascular diseases" (in en). Nutrition Reviews 73 (1): 12–21. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuu001. ISSN 0029-6643. PMID 26024054. https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nutrit/nuu001. 
  19. Palma-Gudiel, H; Córdova-Palomera, A; Eixarch, E; Deuschle, M; Fañanás, L (2015-10-03). "Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy alters the epigenetic signature of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in their offspring: a meta-analysis" (in en). Epigenetics 10 (10): 893–902. doi:10.1080/15592294.2015.1088630. ISSN 1559-2294. PMID 26327302. 
  20. Palma-Gudiel, Helena; Córdova-Palomera, Aldo; Tornador, Cristian; Falcón, Carles; Bargalló, Núria; Deco, Gustavo; Fañanás, Lourdes (May 2018). "Increased methylation at an unexplored glucocorticoid responsive element within exon 1D of NR3C1 gene is related to anxious-depressive disorders and decreased hippocampal connectivity" (in en). European Neuropsychopharmacology 28 (5): 579–588. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.03.015. PMID 29650294. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924977X18300919. 
  21. McEwen, Bruce S. (September 2011). "Effects of stress on the developing brain". Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science 2011: 14. ISSN 1524-6205. PMID 23447783. 
  22. Babbar, Shilpa; Oyarzabal, Alejandro J.; Oyarzabal, Esteban A. (September 2021). "Meditation and Mindfulness in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Review of the Evidence" (in en). Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 64 (3): 661–682. doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000640. ISSN 0009-9201. PMID 34162788. https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000640. 
  23. Lin, I-Hui; Huang, Chueh-Yi; Chou, Shih-Hsiang; Shih, Chia-Lung (2022-04-28). "Efficacy of Prenatal Yoga in the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" (in en). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (9): 5368. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095368. ISSN 1660-4601. PMID 35564762. 
  24. "Epigenetic Responses to Temperature and Climate". Integrative and Comparative Biology 60 (6): 1469–1480. December 2020. doi:10.1093/icb/icaa049. PMID 32470117. 
  25. "Color-pattern evolution in response to environmental stress in butterflies". Frontiers in Genetics 3: 15. 2012. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00015. PMID 22363341. 
  26. "Obesity: epigenetic aspects". Biomolecular Concepts 7 (3): 145–155. June 2016. doi:10.1515/bmc-2016-0010. PMID 27327133. 
  27. Barrès, Romain; Yan, Jie; Egan, Brendan; Treebak, Jonas Thue; Rasmussen, Morten; Fritz, Tomas; Caidahl, Kenneth; Krook, Anna et al. (March 2012). "Acute Exercise Remodels Promoter Methylation in Human Skeletal Muscle" (in en). Cell Metabolism 15 (3): 405–411. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.001. PMID 22405075. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550413112000058. 
  28. Denham, Joshua; Marques, Francine Z.; O'Brien, Brendan J.; Charchar, Fadi J. (February 2014). "Exercise: Putting Action into Our Epigenome" (in en). Sports Medicine 44 (2): 189–209. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0114-1. ISSN 0112-1642. PMID 24163284. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-013-0114-1. 
  29. "Influence of environmental exposure on human epigenetic regulation". The Journal of Experimental Biology 218 (Pt 1): 71–79. January 2015. doi:10.1242/jeb.106971. PMID 25568453. Bibcode2015JExpB.218...71M. 
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 "The Impact of External Factors on the Epigenome: In Utero and over Lifetime". BioMed Research International 2016. 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/2568635. PMID 27294112. 
  31. "Environmental chemical exposures and human epigenetics". International Journal of Epidemiology 41 (1): 79–105. February 2012. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr154. PMID 22253299. 
  32. "Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals". Nature Genetics 33 (S3): 245–254. March 2003. doi:10.1038/ng1089. PMID 12610534. 
  33. "Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population". Science 320 (5877): 800–803. May 2008. doi:10.1126/science.1157174. PMID 18467590. Bibcode2008Sci...320..800C. 
  34. "Individual Variation of Body Weight In Plant and Animal Populations". Population Ecology of Individuals. (MPB-25). 25. Princeton University Press. 2020-03-31. pp. 46–64. doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbhx.6. 
  35. "Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution". Nature Reviews. Genetics 12 (7): 475–486. June 2011. doi:10.1038/nrg3028. PMID 21681209. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1497583. 
  36. "Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (Suppl 1): 1757–1764. January 2010. doi:10.1073/pnas.0906183107. PMID 20080672. Bibcode2010PNAS..107.1757F. 
  37. "DNA methylation mediates genetic variation for adaptive transgenerational plasticity". Proceedings. Biological Sciences 283 (1838). September 2016. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0988. PMID 27629032. 
  38. "Epigenetic responses in juvenile Lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) during a coastal dredging episode in Bimini, Bahamas". Ecological Indicators 127. August 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107793. Bibcode2021EcInd.12707793P. 
  39. Webber, J. (1981), "Trace Metals in Agriculture", Effect of Heavy Metal Pollution on Plants (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands): pp. 159–184, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8099-0_5, ISBN 978-94-009-8101-0 
  40. Sharma, Pallavi; Dubey, Rama Shanker (March 2005). "Lead toxicity in plants". Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 17 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1590/s1677-04202005000100004. ISSN 1677-0420. 
  41. "The uptake and toxicity of mercury and lead to spruce (picea abifs karst.seedlings". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 31 (1–2): 509–515. 1986. doi:10.1007/bf00630869. Bibcode1986WASP...31..509G. 
  42. Pourrut, Bertrand; Shahid, Muhammad; Dumat, Camille; Winterton, Peter; Pinelli, Eric (2011), Whitacre, David M., ed., "Lead Uptake, Toxicity, and Detoxification in Plants" (in en), Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 213 (New York, NY: Springer New York) 213: pp. 113–136, doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9860-6_4, ISBN 978-1-4419-9859-0, PMID 21541849, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-9860-6_4, retrieved 2025-04-22 
  43. "Effect of manganese excess on the soybean plant cultivated under various growth conditions". Journal of Plant Nutrition 17 (6): 991–1003. May 1994. doi:10.1080/01904169409364783. Bibcode1994JPlaN..17..991W. 
  44. "Mechanism of manganese toxicity and tolerance of plants: IV. Effects of silicon on alleviation of manganese toxicity of rice plants". Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 34 (1): 65–73. March 1988. doi:10.1080/00380768.1988.10415580. 
  45. "Iron chelate inducible iron/manganese toxicity in zonal geranium". Journal of Plant Nutrition 18 (9): 1917–1929. September 1995. doi:10.1080/01904169509365033. Bibcode1995JPlaN..18.1917B. 
  46. "Reduction of drought effect on peroxidase, catalase, chlorophyll content and yield of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) by proline and salicylic acid treatments". Advances in Environmental Biology. 2019. doi:10.22587/aeb.2018.12.12.5. 
  47. "Excess manganese effects on pigments of Mentha spicata at flowering stage". Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 51 (1): 101–107. February 2005. doi:10.1080/03650340400026602. Bibcode2005ArASS..51..101A. 
  48. "Effects of Succinate on Manganese Toxicity in Pea Plants". Journal of Plant Nutrition 28 (1): 47–62. January 2005. doi:10.1081/pln-200042161. Bibcode2005JPlaN..28...47D. 
  49. "Manganese nutrition effects on tomato growth, chlorophyll concentration, and superoxide dismutase activity". Journal of Plant Physiology 161 (2): 197–202. February 2004. doi:10.1078/0176-1617-00931. PMID 15022834. Bibcode2004JPPhy.161..197S. 
  50. "Effect of Heavy Metals on Plants: An Overview.". International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management 5 (3): 56–66. 2016. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27583.87204. 
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 "Multi-generational impacts of arsenic exposure on genome-wide DNA methylation and the implications for arsenic-induced skin lesions". Environment International 119: 250–263. October 2018. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.024. PMID 29982128. Bibcode2018EnInt.119..250G. 
  52. "Mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone modifications". Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 197: 51–92. 2023. doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2023.01.001. ISBN 978-0-443-18669-1. PMID 37019597. 
  53. 53.0 53.1 "Long-term environmental metal exposure is associated with hypomethylation of CpG sites in NFKB1 and other genes related to oncogenesis". Clinical Epigenetics 15 (1). August 2023. doi:10.1186/s13148-023-01536-3. PMID 37550793. 
  54. "IGF2 gene" (in en). MedlinePlus Genetics. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/gene/igf2/. 
  55. 55.0 55.1 "Insulin-like growth factor 2 in development and disease: a mini-review". Gerontology 59 (3): 240–249. 2013. doi:10.1159/000343995. PMID 23257688. 
  56. "IGF2: Development, Genetic and Epigenetic Abnormalities". Cells 11 (12): 1886. June 2022. doi:10.3390/cells11121886. PMID 35741015. 
  57. "Epigenetics of psychoactive drugs". The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 64 (10): 1349–58. October 2012. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01475.x. PMID 22943166. 
  58. 58.0 58.1 58.2 "How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 376 (1826). June 2021. doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0111. PMID 33866814. 
  59. Yehuda, Rachel; Lehrner, Amy (October 2018). "Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: putative role of epigenetic mechanisms" (in en). World Psychiatry 17 (3): 243–257. doi:10.1002/wps.20568. ISSN 1723-8617. PMID 30192087. 
  60. Weaver, Ian C G; Cervoni, Nadia; Champagne, Frances A; D'Alessio, Ana C; Sharma, Shakti; Seckl, Jonathan R; Dymov, Sergiy; Szyf, Moshe et al. (August 2004). "Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior" (in en). Nature Neuroscience 7 (8): 847–854. doi:10.1038/nn1276. ISSN 1097-6256. PMID 15220929. https://www.nature.com/articles/nn1276. 
  61. "How is epigenetic information maintained through DNA replication?". Epigenetics & Chromatin 6 (1). October 2013. doi:10.1186/1756-8935-6-32. PMID 24225278. 
  62. "Environmental epigenetics and asthma: current concepts and call for studies". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 177 (6): 567–573. March 2008. doi:10.1164/rccm.200710-1511pp. PMID 18187692. 
  63. "DNA methylation and its basic function". Neuropsychopharmacology 38 (1): 23–38. January 2013. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.112. PMID 22781841. 
  64. "Concise Review: Geminin-A Tale of Two Tails: DNA Replication and Transcriptional/Epigenetic Regulation in Stem Cells". Stem Cells 35 (2): 299–310. February 2017. doi:10.1002/stem.2529. PMID 27859962.