Physics:Quantum triviality

From HandWiki
Short description: Possible outcome of renormalization in physics

[original research?]

It is well-known, that the physical vacuum is not the empty space due to permanent creation and annihilation of virtual particles. As an usual continuous media, the physical vacuum possesses the ability of charge screening, which makes the effective charge being a function of the length (or momentum) scale. Quantum triviality is referred to a possible situation in quantum field theories, when the effective charge tends to zero in the limit of large length scales. In this case, the theory is said to be "trivial" or non-interacting.[1][2]

Quantum triviality and the renormalization group

The first evidence of possible triviality of quantum field theories was obtained in the context of quantum electrodynamics by Lev Landau, Alexei Abrikosov, and Isaak Khalatnikov[3][4][5] who found the following relation between the observable charge gobs and the "bare" charge g0:

gobs=g01+β2g0lnΛ/m,

 

 

 

 

(1)

where m is the mass of the particle, and Λ is the momentum cut-off. If g0 is finite, then gobs tends to zero in the limit of infinite cut-off Λ.

In fact, the proper interpretation of Eq.(1) consists in its inversion, so that g0 (related to the length scale Λ1 ) is chosen to give a correct value of gobs:

g0=gobs1β2gobslnΛ/m(2)

The growth of g0 with Λ invalidates Eqs.(1, 2) in the region g01 (since they were obtained for g01) and existence of the “Landau pole" in Eq.(2) has no physical sense. The actual behavior of the charge g(μ) as a function of the momentum scale μ is determined by the Gell-Mann–Low equation

dgdlnμ=β(g)=β2g2+β3g3+(3)

which leads to Eqs.(1,2) if it is integrated under conditions g(μ)=gobs for μ=m and g(μ)=g0 for μ=Λ, when only the term with β2 is retained in the right hand side. The general behavior of g(μ) depends on the appearance of the function β(g). According to classification by Bogoliubov and Shirkov,[6] there are three qualitatively different situations:

(a) if β(g) has a zero at the finite value g*, then growth of g is saturated, i.e. g(μ)g* for μ;

(b) if β(g) has no non-trivial zeroes and behaves as β(g)gα with α1 for large g, then the growth of g(μ) continues to infinity;

(c) if β(g)gα with α>1 for large g, then g(μ) is divergent at finite value μ0 and the real Landau pole arises: the theory is internally inconsistent due to indeterminacy of g(μ) for μ>μ0.

The latter case corresponds to the quantum triviality in full theory (beyond its perturbation context), as can be seen by a reductio ad absurdum. Indeed, if gobs is finite, the theory is internally inconsistent. The only way to avoid it, is to tend μ0 to infinity, which is possible only for gobs0.

Relation to Wilson triviality

Formula (1) is interpreted differently in the theory of critical phenomena. In this case, Λ and g0 have a direct physical sense, being related to the lattice spacing and the coefficient in the effective Landau Hamiltonian. The trivial theory with gobs=0 is obtained in the limit m0, which corresponds to the critical point. Such triviality has a physical sense and corresponds to absence of interaction between large-scale fluctuations of the order parameter. The fundamental question arises, if such triviality holds for arbitrary (and not only small) values of g0?

This question was investigated by Kenneth G. Wilson using the real-space renormalization group,[7] which was developed from the qualitative scheme suggested by Leo P. Kadanoff,[8] and strong evidence for the positive answer was obtained. Subsequent numerical investigations of the lattice field theory confirmed Wilson’s conclusion.

“Wilson triviality” signifies only that β-function is non-alternating and does not possess non-trivial zeroes: it excludes only the case (a) in the Bogoliubov and Shirkov classification. The “true” quantum triviality is the more strong property, corresponding to the case (c). If “Wilson triviality” is confirmed by extensive numerical investigations and can be considered as firmly established, the evidence of “true triviality” is scarce and allows different interpretation.

Contemporary results for the beta function

The beta function β(g) was recently studied by different methods:

(1) by summation the usual perturbation series in powers of g, using the Lipatov asymptotics [9] for the high-order terms;[10]

(2) by summation the high temperature expansions, adjusted to reproduce the small g behavior;[11]

(3) establishing the analytical strong coupling asymptotics of β(g) using the complex-valued bare charge g0;[12]

(4) establishing the same asymptotics using the real bare charge g0 in the scheme without complex parameters.[13]

All results are mutually consistent and correspond to the positive β-function with the strong coupling behavior β(g)=βg. It signifies that the φ4 theory is in agreement with Wilson triviality, but does not possess the true quantum triviality.

Analogously, the positive β-function with the linear strong coupling asymptotics is established for Quantum Electrodynamics .[14] .[15]

Consequences for the Higgs sector

The "Higgs sector" of the Standard Model is analogous to the φ4 theory. If one suggests the true quantum triviality of this theory, he will be able to establish the upper bound for a mass of the Higgs boson [16] .[17] It follows from the condition that the position of the Landau pole should be shifted to extremely large momenta, where unification with gravitation is expected. This triviality bound played a positive role in motivation of experiments for searching the Higgs boson. At present, when the Higgs boson is discovered, the triviality bound is not actual. In fact, this bound is invalid, since (according to the previous section) the Higgs sector is non-trivial. Correspondingly, the Standard Model is free from internal inconsistencies.

See also

References

  1. Zinn-Justin, Jean (2007). Phase Transitions and Renormalization Group. Oxford University Press. p. 323. ISBN 978-0-19-922719-8. 
  2. Huang, Kerson (2010). Quantum Field Theory: From Operators to Path Integrals. Wiley. pp. 255–256. ISBN 978-3-527-40846-7. 
  3. "On the Elimination of Infinities in Quantum Electrodynamics". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 497. 1954. 
  4. L. D. Landau; A. A. Abrikosov; I. M. Khalatnikov (1954). "Asymptotic Expression for the Green's Function of the Electron in Quantum Electrodynamics". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 773. 
  5. L. D. Landau; A. A. Abrikosov; I. M. Khalatnikov (1954). "Asymptotic Expression for the Green's Function of the Photon in Quantum Electrodynamics". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 95: 1177. 
  6. N. N. Bogoliubov, D. V. Shirkov (1980). Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471042235. 
  7. K. G. Wilson (1975). "The Renormalization Group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem". Reviews of Modern Physics 47: 4. 
  8. Kadanoff, L. P. (1966). "Scaling laws for Ising models near Tc". Physics Physique Fizika 2 (6): 263. doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.2.263. Bibcode1966PhyNY...2..263K. 
  9. L. N. Lipatov (1977). "Divergence of the Perturbation- theory Series and the quasi-classical theory". Sov. Phys. JETP 45: 216. 
  10. I. M. Suslov (2001). "Summing Divergent Perturbative Series in the Strong Coupling Limit. Gell-Mann-Low Function of the φ4 Theory". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 93: 1. doi:10.1134/1.1391515. 
  11. I. M. Suslov (2011). "Renormalization Group Functions of the φ4 Theory from High Temperature Expansions". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 112 (2): 274–287. doi:10.1134/S1063776110061184. Bibcode2011JETP..112..274S. 
  12. I. M. Suslov (2008). "Renormalization Group Functions of the φ4 Theory in the Strong Coupling Limit: Analytical Results". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 107 (3): 413–429. doi:10.1134/S1063776108090094. Bibcode2008JETP..107..413S. 
  13. I. M. Suslov (2010). "Asymptotic Behavior of the β Function in the φ4 Theory: A Scheme Without Complex Parameters". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 111 (3): 450. doi:10.1134/S1063776110090153. Bibcode2010JETP..111..450S. 
  14. I. M. Suslov (2001). "Gell-Mann – Low Function in QED". Letters to Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 74 (4): 191–195. doi:10.1134/1.1413543. Bibcode2001JETPL..74..191S. 
  15. I. M. Suslov (2009). "Exact Asymptotic Form for the β Function in Quantum Electrodynamics". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 108 (6): 980–984. doi:10.1134/S1063776109060089. Bibcode2009JETP..108..980S. 
  16. D. J. E. Callaway (1988). "Triviality Pursuit: Can Elementary Scalar Particles Exist?". Physics Reports 167 (5): 241–320. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90008-7. Bibcode1988PhR...167..241C. 
  17. Siefert, Johannes; Wolff, Ulli (2014). "Triviality of φ44 theory in a finite volume scheme adapted to the broken phase". Physics Letters B 733: 11–14. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.04.013. https://scoap3-prod-backend.s3.cern.ch/media/files/1940/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.04.013_a.pdf.